Interface as functions in Kotlin
I am working on an android library that contains some views. Naturally these views can emit events.
I have an interface called (just for the purpose of this question) Listener
. If I wrote the library in Java things would look like this:
public interface Listener {
void onEvent();
}
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// Some more functions and implementation details
public void setListener(Listener l) { ... }
}
When using this view in a Kotlin activity I can use the setListener
like this:
someViewInstance.setListener {
// implementation
}
I want to write my library in Kotlin, but it might be used in Java code as well, so I want to provide and interface for the listener just like a regular view (like above) but have the option for Kotlin code to use the function implementation:
interface Listener {
fun onEvent()
}
when I try to use setListener
like above in my Kotlin test activity I get a compilation error saying that the function expects type Listener
but got () -> Unit
.
Is there a way to enable this kind of implementation in Kotlin without having to create a new function for this?
I thought about having just one function that receives () -> Unit
but then it look weird in the Java code (Function1
etc.).
Thanks!
android kotlin
add a comment |
I am working on an android library that contains some views. Naturally these views can emit events.
I have an interface called (just for the purpose of this question) Listener
. If I wrote the library in Java things would look like this:
public interface Listener {
void onEvent();
}
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// Some more functions and implementation details
public void setListener(Listener l) { ... }
}
When using this view in a Kotlin activity I can use the setListener
like this:
someViewInstance.setListener {
// implementation
}
I want to write my library in Kotlin, but it might be used in Java code as well, so I want to provide and interface for the listener just like a regular view (like above) but have the option for Kotlin code to use the function implementation:
interface Listener {
fun onEvent()
}
when I try to use setListener
like above in my Kotlin test activity I get a compilation error saying that the function expects type Listener
but got () -> Unit
.
Is there a way to enable this kind of implementation in Kotlin without having to create a new function for this?
I thought about having just one function that receives () -> Unit
but then it look weird in the Java code (Function1
etc.).
Thanks!
android kotlin
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
13 hours ago
add a comment |
I am working on an android library that contains some views. Naturally these views can emit events.
I have an interface called (just for the purpose of this question) Listener
. If I wrote the library in Java things would look like this:
public interface Listener {
void onEvent();
}
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// Some more functions and implementation details
public void setListener(Listener l) { ... }
}
When using this view in a Kotlin activity I can use the setListener
like this:
someViewInstance.setListener {
// implementation
}
I want to write my library in Kotlin, but it might be used in Java code as well, so I want to provide and interface for the listener just like a regular view (like above) but have the option for Kotlin code to use the function implementation:
interface Listener {
fun onEvent()
}
when I try to use setListener
like above in my Kotlin test activity I get a compilation error saying that the function expects type Listener
but got () -> Unit
.
Is there a way to enable this kind of implementation in Kotlin without having to create a new function for this?
I thought about having just one function that receives () -> Unit
but then it look weird in the Java code (Function1
etc.).
Thanks!
android kotlin
I am working on an android library that contains some views. Naturally these views can emit events.
I have an interface called (just for the purpose of this question) Listener
. If I wrote the library in Java things would look like this:
public interface Listener {
void onEvent();
}
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// Some more functions and implementation details
public void setListener(Listener l) { ... }
}
When using this view in a Kotlin activity I can use the setListener
like this:
someViewInstance.setListener {
// implementation
}
I want to write my library in Kotlin, but it might be used in Java code as well, so I want to provide and interface for the listener just like a regular view (like above) but have the option for Kotlin code to use the function implementation:
interface Listener {
fun onEvent()
}
when I try to use setListener
like above in my Kotlin test activity I get a compilation error saying that the function expects type Listener
but got () -> Unit
.
Is there a way to enable this kind of implementation in Kotlin without having to create a new function for this?
I thought about having just one function that receives () -> Unit
but then it look weird in the Java code (Function1
etc.).
Thanks!
android kotlin
android kotlin
asked 14 hours ago
Dor MesicaDor Mesica
311316
311316
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
13 hours ago
add a comment |
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
13 hours ago
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
13 hours ago
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
13 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can define your interface as suggested and also add an extension that allows the usage of a lambda which is more idimatic for Kotlin code.
class SomeView {
fun setListener(l: Listener) {}
}
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) = setListener(object : Listener {
override fun onEvent() = l()
})
In Java, you would still be able to pass the Listener
implementation.
add a comment |
This is called SAM-conversions,
Just like Java 8, Kotlin supports SAM conversions. This means that Kotlin function literals can be automatically converted into implementations of Java interfaces with a single non-default method, as long as the parameter types of the interface method match the parameter types of the Kotlin function.
But
Note that SAM conversions only work for interfaces, not for abstract classes, even if those also have just a single abstract method.
Also note that this feature works only for Java interop; since Kotlin has proper function types, automatic conversion of functions into implementations of Kotlin interfaces is unnecessary and therefore unsupported.
So, you can't write a simple Kotlin code to simulate this call.
In Java, if you write a
public interface Listener {
void onEvent(); // SAM: Single Abstract Method. Only 1 is allowed
}
And you have a
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// skip the constructors
public void setListener(Listener listener) {
// do something
}
}
Then you can do such a fancy call in Kotlin, thanks to SAM-conversion:
SomeView(this).setListener {} // asking a parameter with type () -> Unit for setListener
// Then parenthesis of function call can be omitted
// setListener function can also accept a parameter with type Listener
// by object : Listener {}
But if you convert that Java file into Kotlin, the code will report an error, due to the reason mentioned above. You have to implement a SomeView.setListener(() -> Unit)
function by yourself, for example
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) {
listener = object : Listener{
override fun onEvent() {
l()
}
}
}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55116769%2finterface-as-functions-in-kotlin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can define your interface as suggested and also add an extension that allows the usage of a lambda which is more idimatic for Kotlin code.
class SomeView {
fun setListener(l: Listener) {}
}
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) = setListener(object : Listener {
override fun onEvent() = l()
})
In Java, you would still be able to pass the Listener
implementation.
add a comment |
You can define your interface as suggested and also add an extension that allows the usage of a lambda which is more idimatic for Kotlin code.
class SomeView {
fun setListener(l: Listener) {}
}
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) = setListener(object : Listener {
override fun onEvent() = l()
})
In Java, you would still be able to pass the Listener
implementation.
add a comment |
You can define your interface as suggested and also add an extension that allows the usage of a lambda which is more idimatic for Kotlin code.
class SomeView {
fun setListener(l: Listener) {}
}
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) = setListener(object : Listener {
override fun onEvent() = l()
})
In Java, you would still be able to pass the Listener
implementation.
You can define your interface as suggested and also add an extension that allows the usage of a lambda which is more idimatic for Kotlin code.
class SomeView {
fun setListener(l: Listener) {}
}
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) = setListener(object : Listener {
override fun onEvent() = l()
})
In Java, you would still be able to pass the Listener
implementation.
answered 13 hours ago
s1m0nw1s1m0nw1
28.7k652110
28.7k652110
add a comment |
add a comment |
This is called SAM-conversions,
Just like Java 8, Kotlin supports SAM conversions. This means that Kotlin function literals can be automatically converted into implementations of Java interfaces with a single non-default method, as long as the parameter types of the interface method match the parameter types of the Kotlin function.
But
Note that SAM conversions only work for interfaces, not for abstract classes, even if those also have just a single abstract method.
Also note that this feature works only for Java interop; since Kotlin has proper function types, automatic conversion of functions into implementations of Kotlin interfaces is unnecessary and therefore unsupported.
So, you can't write a simple Kotlin code to simulate this call.
In Java, if you write a
public interface Listener {
void onEvent(); // SAM: Single Abstract Method. Only 1 is allowed
}
And you have a
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// skip the constructors
public void setListener(Listener listener) {
// do something
}
}
Then you can do such a fancy call in Kotlin, thanks to SAM-conversion:
SomeView(this).setListener {} // asking a parameter with type () -> Unit for setListener
// Then parenthesis of function call can be omitted
// setListener function can also accept a parameter with type Listener
// by object : Listener {}
But if you convert that Java file into Kotlin, the code will report an error, due to the reason mentioned above. You have to implement a SomeView.setListener(() -> Unit)
function by yourself, for example
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) {
listener = object : Listener{
override fun onEvent() {
l()
}
}
}
add a comment |
This is called SAM-conversions,
Just like Java 8, Kotlin supports SAM conversions. This means that Kotlin function literals can be automatically converted into implementations of Java interfaces with a single non-default method, as long as the parameter types of the interface method match the parameter types of the Kotlin function.
But
Note that SAM conversions only work for interfaces, not for abstract classes, even if those also have just a single abstract method.
Also note that this feature works only for Java interop; since Kotlin has proper function types, automatic conversion of functions into implementations of Kotlin interfaces is unnecessary and therefore unsupported.
So, you can't write a simple Kotlin code to simulate this call.
In Java, if you write a
public interface Listener {
void onEvent(); // SAM: Single Abstract Method. Only 1 is allowed
}
And you have a
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// skip the constructors
public void setListener(Listener listener) {
// do something
}
}
Then you can do such a fancy call in Kotlin, thanks to SAM-conversion:
SomeView(this).setListener {} // asking a parameter with type () -> Unit for setListener
// Then parenthesis of function call can be omitted
// setListener function can also accept a parameter with type Listener
// by object : Listener {}
But if you convert that Java file into Kotlin, the code will report an error, due to the reason mentioned above. You have to implement a SomeView.setListener(() -> Unit)
function by yourself, for example
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) {
listener = object : Listener{
override fun onEvent() {
l()
}
}
}
add a comment |
This is called SAM-conversions,
Just like Java 8, Kotlin supports SAM conversions. This means that Kotlin function literals can be automatically converted into implementations of Java interfaces with a single non-default method, as long as the parameter types of the interface method match the parameter types of the Kotlin function.
But
Note that SAM conversions only work for interfaces, not for abstract classes, even if those also have just a single abstract method.
Also note that this feature works only for Java interop; since Kotlin has proper function types, automatic conversion of functions into implementations of Kotlin interfaces is unnecessary and therefore unsupported.
So, you can't write a simple Kotlin code to simulate this call.
In Java, if you write a
public interface Listener {
void onEvent(); // SAM: Single Abstract Method. Only 1 is allowed
}
And you have a
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// skip the constructors
public void setListener(Listener listener) {
// do something
}
}
Then you can do such a fancy call in Kotlin, thanks to SAM-conversion:
SomeView(this).setListener {} // asking a parameter with type () -> Unit for setListener
// Then parenthesis of function call can be omitted
// setListener function can also accept a parameter with type Listener
// by object : Listener {}
But if you convert that Java file into Kotlin, the code will report an error, due to the reason mentioned above. You have to implement a SomeView.setListener(() -> Unit)
function by yourself, for example
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) {
listener = object : Listener{
override fun onEvent() {
l()
}
}
}
This is called SAM-conversions,
Just like Java 8, Kotlin supports SAM conversions. This means that Kotlin function literals can be automatically converted into implementations of Java interfaces with a single non-default method, as long as the parameter types of the interface method match the parameter types of the Kotlin function.
But
Note that SAM conversions only work for interfaces, not for abstract classes, even if those also have just a single abstract method.
Also note that this feature works only for Java interop; since Kotlin has proper function types, automatic conversion of functions into implementations of Kotlin interfaces is unnecessary and therefore unsupported.
So, you can't write a simple Kotlin code to simulate this call.
In Java, if you write a
public interface Listener {
void onEvent(); // SAM: Single Abstract Method. Only 1 is allowed
}
And you have a
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// skip the constructors
public void setListener(Listener listener) {
// do something
}
}
Then you can do such a fancy call in Kotlin, thanks to SAM-conversion:
SomeView(this).setListener {} // asking a parameter with type () -> Unit for setListener
// Then parenthesis of function call can be omitted
// setListener function can also accept a parameter with type Listener
// by object : Listener {}
But if you convert that Java file into Kotlin, the code will report an error, due to the reason mentioned above. You have to implement a SomeView.setListener(() -> Unit)
function by yourself, for example
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) {
listener = object : Listener{
override fun onEvent() {
l()
}
}
}
edited 13 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
Geno ChenGeno Chen
2,6506925
2,6506925
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55116769%2finterface-as-functions-in-kotlin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
13 hours ago