How can I prove that $(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_n)(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_n})geq n^2$ [duplicate]












3












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Proof that $left(sum^n_{k=1}x_kright)left(sum^n_{k=1}y_kright)geq n^2$

    7 answers




I've been struggling for several hours, trying to prove this horrible inequality:
$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_n)left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_n}right)geq n^2$.



Where each $a_i$'s are positive and $n$ is a natural number.



First I tried the usual "mathematical induction" method, but it made no avail, since I could not show it would be true if $n=k+1$.



Suppose the inequality holds true when $n=k$, i.e.,



$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_k)left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}right)geq n^2$.



This is true if and only if



$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_k+a_{k+1})left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}+frac{1}{a_{k+1}}right) -a_{k+1}left(frac{1}{a_1}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}right)-frac{1}{a_{k+1}}(a_1+dotsb+a_k)-frac{a_{k+1}}{a_{k+1}} geq n^2$.



And I got stuck here.



The question looks like I have to use AM-GM inequality at some point, but I do not have a clue. Any small hints and clues will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Arnaud D., qwr, Martin R, Asaf Karagila 7 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • $begingroup$
    Conditions on $a_i$?
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    whoa, I forgot the most important info there. They are all positive, and n is a natural number.
    $endgroup$
    – Ko Byeongmin
    12 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Try Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?
    $endgroup$
    – Sik Feng Cheong
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Now I get it, I learn something new every day!! Thanks a lot :D
    $endgroup$
    – Ko Byeongmin
    12 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Proof that $left(sum^n_{k=1}x_kright)left(sum^n_{k=1}y_kright)geq n^2$

    7 answers




I've been struggling for several hours, trying to prove this horrible inequality:
$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_n)left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_n}right)geq n^2$.



Where each $a_i$'s are positive and $n$ is a natural number.



First I tried the usual "mathematical induction" method, but it made no avail, since I could not show it would be true if $n=k+1$.



Suppose the inequality holds true when $n=k$, i.e.,



$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_k)left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}right)geq n^2$.



This is true if and only if



$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_k+a_{k+1})left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}+frac{1}{a_{k+1}}right) -a_{k+1}left(frac{1}{a_1}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}right)-frac{1}{a_{k+1}}(a_1+dotsb+a_k)-frac{a_{k+1}}{a_{k+1}} geq n^2$.



And I got stuck here.



The question looks like I have to use AM-GM inequality at some point, but I do not have a clue. Any small hints and clues will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Arnaud D., qwr, Martin R, Asaf Karagila 7 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • $begingroup$
    Conditions on $a_i$?
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    whoa, I forgot the most important info there. They are all positive, and n is a natural number.
    $endgroup$
    – Ko Byeongmin
    12 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Try Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?
    $endgroup$
    – Sik Feng Cheong
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Now I get it, I learn something new every day!! Thanks a lot :D
    $endgroup$
    – Ko Byeongmin
    12 hours ago














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Proof that $left(sum^n_{k=1}x_kright)left(sum^n_{k=1}y_kright)geq n^2$

    7 answers




I've been struggling for several hours, trying to prove this horrible inequality:
$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_n)left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_n}right)geq n^2$.



Where each $a_i$'s are positive and $n$ is a natural number.



First I tried the usual "mathematical induction" method, but it made no avail, since I could not show it would be true if $n=k+1$.



Suppose the inequality holds true when $n=k$, i.e.,



$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_k)left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}right)geq n^2$.



This is true if and only if



$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_k+a_{k+1})left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}+frac{1}{a_{k+1}}right) -a_{k+1}left(frac{1}{a_1}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}right)-frac{1}{a_{k+1}}(a_1+dotsb+a_k)-frac{a_{k+1}}{a_{k+1}} geq n^2$.



And I got stuck here.



The question looks like I have to use AM-GM inequality at some point, but I do not have a clue. Any small hints and clues will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Proof that $left(sum^n_{k=1}x_kright)left(sum^n_{k=1}y_kright)geq n^2$

    7 answers




I've been struggling for several hours, trying to prove this horrible inequality:
$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_n)left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_n}right)geq n^2$.



Where each $a_i$'s are positive and $n$ is a natural number.



First I tried the usual "mathematical induction" method, but it made no avail, since I could not show it would be true if $n=k+1$.



Suppose the inequality holds true when $n=k$, i.e.,



$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_k)left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}right)geq n^2$.



This is true if and only if



$(a_1+a_2+dotsb+a_k+a_{k+1})left(frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}+frac{1}{a_{k+1}}right) -a_{k+1}left(frac{1}{a_1}+dotsb+frac{1}{a_k}right)-frac{1}{a_{k+1}}(a_1+dotsb+a_k)-frac{a_{k+1}}{a_{k+1}} geq n^2$.



And I got stuck here.



The question looks like I have to use AM-GM inequality at some point, but I do not have a clue. Any small hints and clues will be appreciated.





This question already has an answer here:




  • Proof that $left(sum^n_{k=1}x_kright)left(sum^n_{k=1}y_kright)geq n^2$

    7 answers








analysis inequality






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Asaf Karagila

306k33438769




306k33438769










asked 12 hours ago









Ko ByeongminKo Byeongmin

1546




1546




marked as duplicate by Arnaud D., qwr, Martin R, Asaf Karagila 7 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Arnaud D., qwr, Martin R, Asaf Karagila 7 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • $begingroup$
    Conditions on $a_i$?
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    whoa, I forgot the most important info there. They are all positive, and n is a natural number.
    $endgroup$
    – Ko Byeongmin
    12 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Try Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?
    $endgroup$
    – Sik Feng Cheong
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Now I get it, I learn something new every day!! Thanks a lot :D
    $endgroup$
    – Ko Byeongmin
    12 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Conditions on $a_i$?
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    whoa, I forgot the most important info there. They are all positive, and n is a natural number.
    $endgroup$
    – Ko Byeongmin
    12 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Try Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?
    $endgroup$
    – Sik Feng Cheong
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Now I get it, I learn something new every day!! Thanks a lot :D
    $endgroup$
    – Ko Byeongmin
    12 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Conditions on $a_i$?
$endgroup$
– Parcly Taxel
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Conditions on $a_i$?
$endgroup$
– Parcly Taxel
12 hours ago












$begingroup$
whoa, I forgot the most important info there. They are all positive, and n is a natural number.
$endgroup$
– Ko Byeongmin
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
whoa, I forgot the most important info there. They are all positive, and n is a natural number.
$endgroup$
– Ko Byeongmin
12 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
Try Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?
$endgroup$
– Sik Feng Cheong
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Try Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?
$endgroup$
– Sik Feng Cheong
12 hours ago












$begingroup$
Now I get it, I learn something new every day!! Thanks a lot :D
$endgroup$
– Ko Byeongmin
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Now I get it, I learn something new every day!! Thanks a lot :D
$endgroup$
– Ko Byeongmin
12 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

Hint: AM-GM implies
$$
a_1+a_2+cdots +a_nge nsqrt[n]{a_1a_2cdots a_n}
$$
and $$
frac1{a_1}+frac1{a_2}+cdots +frac1{a_n}ge frac{n}{sqrt[n]{a_1a_2cdots a_n}}.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That's a really strong hint, it looks like an answer
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You may be right.. It makes the remaining step look so trivial, so it can be justly regarded as an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    10 hours ago



















9












$begingroup$

It is AM-HM inequality
$$frac{a_1+a_2+a_3+...+a_n}{n}geq frac{n}{frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+frac{1}{a_3}+...+frac{1}{a_n}}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Here is the proof by induction
    that you wanted.



    I added a more exact
    version of
    the identity used
    in the proof
    at the end.



    Let
    $s_n
    =u_nv_n
    $

    where
    $u_n=sum_{k=1}^n a_k,
    v_n= sum_{k=1}^n dfrac1{a_k}
    $
    .
    Then,
    assuming
    $s_n ge n^2$,



    $begin{array}\
    s_{n+1}
    &=u_{n+1}v_{n+1}\
    &=(u_n+a_{n+1}) (v_n+dfrac1{a_{n+1}})\
    &=u_nv_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
    &=s_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
    &ge n^2+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
    end{array}
    $



    So it is sufficient
    to show that
    $u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+v_na_{n+1}
    ge 2n
    $
    .



    By simple algebra,
    if $a, b ge 0$ then
    $a+b
    ge 2sqrt{ab}
    $
    .
    (Rewrite as
    $(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2ge 0$
    or,
    as an identity,
    $a+b
    =2ab+(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2$
    .)



    Therefore



    $begin{array}\
    u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+v_na_{n+1}
    &ge sqrt{(u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}})(v_na_{n+1})}\
    &= sqrt{u_nv_n}\
    &=2sqrt{s_n}\
    &ge 2sqrt{n^2}
    qquadtext{by the induction hypothesis}\
    &=2n\
    end{array}
    $



    and we are done.



    I find it interesting that
    $s_n ge n^2$
    is used twice in the
    induction step.



    Note that,
    if we use the identity above,
    $a+b
    =2ab+(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2$
    ,
    we get this:



    $begin{array}\
    s_{n+1}
    &=s_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
    &=s_n+2sqrt{u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}a_{n+1}v_n}+1+(sqrt{u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}}-sqrt{a_{n+1}v_n})^2\
    &=s_n+2sqrt{s_n}+1+dfrac1{sqrt{a_{n+1}}}(sqrt{u_n}-a_{n+1}sqrt{v_n})^2\
    &=(sqrt{s_n}+1)^2+dfrac1{sqrt{a_{n+1}}}(sqrt{u_n}-a_{n+1}sqrt{v_n})^2\
    &ge(sqrt{s_n}+1)^2\
    end{array}
    $



    with equality
    if and only if
    $a_{n+1}
    =sqrt{dfrac{u_n}{v_n}}
    =sqrt{dfrac{sum_{k=1}^n a_k}{sum_{k=1}^n dfrac1{a_k}}}
    $
    .






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This is wonderful! I love it that you’ve done it without using any “machineries” like the AM-GM inequality. I hope one day I become skillful as you are! Have a great day :)
      $endgroup$
      – Ko Byeongmin
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you. This makes my day.
      $endgroup$
      – marty cohen
      2 hours ago


















    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    12












    $begingroup$

    Hint: AM-GM implies
    $$
    a_1+a_2+cdots +a_nge nsqrt[n]{a_1a_2cdots a_n}
    $$
    and $$
    frac1{a_1}+frac1{a_2}+cdots +frac1{a_n}ge frac{n}{sqrt[n]{a_1a_2cdots a_n}}.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      That's a really strong hint, it looks like an answer
      $endgroup$
      – enedil
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You may be right.. It makes the remaining step look so trivial, so it can be justly regarded as an answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Song
      10 hours ago
















    12












    $begingroup$

    Hint: AM-GM implies
    $$
    a_1+a_2+cdots +a_nge nsqrt[n]{a_1a_2cdots a_n}
    $$
    and $$
    frac1{a_1}+frac1{a_2}+cdots +frac1{a_n}ge frac{n}{sqrt[n]{a_1a_2cdots a_n}}.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      That's a really strong hint, it looks like an answer
      $endgroup$
      – enedil
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You may be right.. It makes the remaining step look so trivial, so it can be justly regarded as an answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Song
      10 hours ago














    12












    12








    12





    $begingroup$

    Hint: AM-GM implies
    $$
    a_1+a_2+cdots +a_nge nsqrt[n]{a_1a_2cdots a_n}
    $$
    and $$
    frac1{a_1}+frac1{a_2}+cdots +frac1{a_n}ge frac{n}{sqrt[n]{a_1a_2cdots a_n}}.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Hint: AM-GM implies
    $$
    a_1+a_2+cdots +a_nge nsqrt[n]{a_1a_2cdots a_n}
    $$
    and $$
    frac1{a_1}+frac1{a_2}+cdots +frac1{a_n}ge frac{n}{sqrt[n]{a_1a_2cdots a_n}}.
    $$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 12 hours ago









    SongSong

    17.2k21246




    17.2k21246












    • $begingroup$
      That's a really strong hint, it looks like an answer
      $endgroup$
      – enedil
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You may be right.. It makes the remaining step look so trivial, so it can be justly regarded as an answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Song
      10 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      That's a really strong hint, it looks like an answer
      $endgroup$
      – enedil
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You may be right.. It makes the remaining step look so trivial, so it can be justly regarded as an answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Song
      10 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    That's a really strong hint, it looks like an answer
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    That's a really strong hint, it looks like an answer
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    10 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    You may be right.. It makes the remaining step look so trivial, so it can be justly regarded as an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You may be right.. It makes the remaining step look so trivial, so it can be justly regarded as an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    10 hours ago











    9












    $begingroup$

    It is AM-HM inequality
    $$frac{a_1+a_2+a_3+...+a_n}{n}geq frac{n}{frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+frac{1}{a_3}+...+frac{1}{a_n}}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      9












      $begingroup$

      It is AM-HM inequality
      $$frac{a_1+a_2+a_3+...+a_n}{n}geq frac{n}{frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+frac{1}{a_3}+...+frac{1}{a_n}}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        9












        9








        9





        $begingroup$

        It is AM-HM inequality
        $$frac{a_1+a_2+a_3+...+a_n}{n}geq frac{n}{frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+frac{1}{a_3}+...+frac{1}{a_n}}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It is AM-HM inequality
        $$frac{a_1+a_2+a_3+...+a_n}{n}geq frac{n}{frac{1}{a_1}+frac{1}{a_2}+frac{1}{a_3}+...+frac{1}{a_n}}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 12 hours ago









        Dr. Sonnhard GraubnerDr. Sonnhard Graubner

        77.7k42866




        77.7k42866























            2












            $begingroup$

            Here is the proof by induction
            that you wanted.



            I added a more exact
            version of
            the identity used
            in the proof
            at the end.



            Let
            $s_n
            =u_nv_n
            $

            where
            $u_n=sum_{k=1}^n a_k,
            v_n= sum_{k=1}^n dfrac1{a_k}
            $
            .
            Then,
            assuming
            $s_n ge n^2$,



            $begin{array}\
            s_{n+1}
            &=u_{n+1}v_{n+1}\
            &=(u_n+a_{n+1}) (v_n+dfrac1{a_{n+1}})\
            &=u_nv_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &=s_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &ge n^2+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            end{array}
            $



            So it is sufficient
            to show that
            $u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+v_na_{n+1}
            ge 2n
            $
            .



            By simple algebra,
            if $a, b ge 0$ then
            $a+b
            ge 2sqrt{ab}
            $
            .
            (Rewrite as
            $(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2ge 0$
            or,
            as an identity,
            $a+b
            =2ab+(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2$
            .)



            Therefore



            $begin{array}\
            u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+v_na_{n+1}
            &ge sqrt{(u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}})(v_na_{n+1})}\
            &= sqrt{u_nv_n}\
            &=2sqrt{s_n}\
            &ge 2sqrt{n^2}
            qquadtext{by the induction hypothesis}\
            &=2n\
            end{array}
            $



            and we are done.



            I find it interesting that
            $s_n ge n^2$
            is used twice in the
            induction step.



            Note that,
            if we use the identity above,
            $a+b
            =2ab+(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2$
            ,
            we get this:



            $begin{array}\
            s_{n+1}
            &=s_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &=s_n+2sqrt{u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}a_{n+1}v_n}+1+(sqrt{u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}}-sqrt{a_{n+1}v_n})^2\
            &=s_n+2sqrt{s_n}+1+dfrac1{sqrt{a_{n+1}}}(sqrt{u_n}-a_{n+1}sqrt{v_n})^2\
            &=(sqrt{s_n}+1)^2+dfrac1{sqrt{a_{n+1}}}(sqrt{u_n}-a_{n+1}sqrt{v_n})^2\
            &ge(sqrt{s_n}+1)^2\
            end{array}
            $



            with equality
            if and only if
            $a_{n+1}
            =sqrt{dfrac{u_n}{v_n}}
            =sqrt{dfrac{sum_{k=1}^n a_k}{sum_{k=1}^n dfrac1{a_k}}}
            $
            .






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This is wonderful! I love it that you’ve done it without using any “machineries” like the AM-GM inequality. I hope one day I become skillful as you are! Have a great day :)
              $endgroup$
              – Ko Byeongmin
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. This makes my day.
              $endgroup$
              – marty cohen
              2 hours ago
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Here is the proof by induction
            that you wanted.



            I added a more exact
            version of
            the identity used
            in the proof
            at the end.



            Let
            $s_n
            =u_nv_n
            $

            where
            $u_n=sum_{k=1}^n a_k,
            v_n= sum_{k=1}^n dfrac1{a_k}
            $
            .
            Then,
            assuming
            $s_n ge n^2$,



            $begin{array}\
            s_{n+1}
            &=u_{n+1}v_{n+1}\
            &=(u_n+a_{n+1}) (v_n+dfrac1{a_{n+1}})\
            &=u_nv_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &=s_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &ge n^2+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            end{array}
            $



            So it is sufficient
            to show that
            $u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+v_na_{n+1}
            ge 2n
            $
            .



            By simple algebra,
            if $a, b ge 0$ then
            $a+b
            ge 2sqrt{ab}
            $
            .
            (Rewrite as
            $(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2ge 0$
            or,
            as an identity,
            $a+b
            =2ab+(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2$
            .)



            Therefore



            $begin{array}\
            u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+v_na_{n+1}
            &ge sqrt{(u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}})(v_na_{n+1})}\
            &= sqrt{u_nv_n}\
            &=2sqrt{s_n}\
            &ge 2sqrt{n^2}
            qquadtext{by the induction hypothesis}\
            &=2n\
            end{array}
            $



            and we are done.



            I find it interesting that
            $s_n ge n^2$
            is used twice in the
            induction step.



            Note that,
            if we use the identity above,
            $a+b
            =2ab+(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2$
            ,
            we get this:



            $begin{array}\
            s_{n+1}
            &=s_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &=s_n+2sqrt{u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}a_{n+1}v_n}+1+(sqrt{u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}}-sqrt{a_{n+1}v_n})^2\
            &=s_n+2sqrt{s_n}+1+dfrac1{sqrt{a_{n+1}}}(sqrt{u_n}-a_{n+1}sqrt{v_n})^2\
            &=(sqrt{s_n}+1)^2+dfrac1{sqrt{a_{n+1}}}(sqrt{u_n}-a_{n+1}sqrt{v_n})^2\
            &ge(sqrt{s_n}+1)^2\
            end{array}
            $



            with equality
            if and only if
            $a_{n+1}
            =sqrt{dfrac{u_n}{v_n}}
            =sqrt{dfrac{sum_{k=1}^n a_k}{sum_{k=1}^n dfrac1{a_k}}}
            $
            .






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This is wonderful! I love it that you’ve done it without using any “machineries” like the AM-GM inequality. I hope one day I become skillful as you are! Have a great day :)
              $endgroup$
              – Ko Byeongmin
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. This makes my day.
              $endgroup$
              – marty cohen
              2 hours ago














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Here is the proof by induction
            that you wanted.



            I added a more exact
            version of
            the identity used
            in the proof
            at the end.



            Let
            $s_n
            =u_nv_n
            $

            where
            $u_n=sum_{k=1}^n a_k,
            v_n= sum_{k=1}^n dfrac1{a_k}
            $
            .
            Then,
            assuming
            $s_n ge n^2$,



            $begin{array}\
            s_{n+1}
            &=u_{n+1}v_{n+1}\
            &=(u_n+a_{n+1}) (v_n+dfrac1{a_{n+1}})\
            &=u_nv_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &=s_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &ge n^2+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            end{array}
            $



            So it is sufficient
            to show that
            $u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+v_na_{n+1}
            ge 2n
            $
            .



            By simple algebra,
            if $a, b ge 0$ then
            $a+b
            ge 2sqrt{ab}
            $
            .
            (Rewrite as
            $(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2ge 0$
            or,
            as an identity,
            $a+b
            =2ab+(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2$
            .)



            Therefore



            $begin{array}\
            u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+v_na_{n+1}
            &ge sqrt{(u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}})(v_na_{n+1})}\
            &= sqrt{u_nv_n}\
            &=2sqrt{s_n}\
            &ge 2sqrt{n^2}
            qquadtext{by the induction hypothesis}\
            &=2n\
            end{array}
            $



            and we are done.



            I find it interesting that
            $s_n ge n^2$
            is used twice in the
            induction step.



            Note that,
            if we use the identity above,
            $a+b
            =2ab+(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2$
            ,
            we get this:



            $begin{array}\
            s_{n+1}
            &=s_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &=s_n+2sqrt{u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}a_{n+1}v_n}+1+(sqrt{u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}}-sqrt{a_{n+1}v_n})^2\
            &=s_n+2sqrt{s_n}+1+dfrac1{sqrt{a_{n+1}}}(sqrt{u_n}-a_{n+1}sqrt{v_n})^2\
            &=(sqrt{s_n}+1)^2+dfrac1{sqrt{a_{n+1}}}(sqrt{u_n}-a_{n+1}sqrt{v_n})^2\
            &ge(sqrt{s_n}+1)^2\
            end{array}
            $



            with equality
            if and only if
            $a_{n+1}
            =sqrt{dfrac{u_n}{v_n}}
            =sqrt{dfrac{sum_{k=1}^n a_k}{sum_{k=1}^n dfrac1{a_k}}}
            $
            .






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Here is the proof by induction
            that you wanted.



            I added a more exact
            version of
            the identity used
            in the proof
            at the end.



            Let
            $s_n
            =u_nv_n
            $

            where
            $u_n=sum_{k=1}^n a_k,
            v_n= sum_{k=1}^n dfrac1{a_k}
            $
            .
            Then,
            assuming
            $s_n ge n^2$,



            $begin{array}\
            s_{n+1}
            &=u_{n+1}v_{n+1}\
            &=(u_n+a_{n+1}) (v_n+dfrac1{a_{n+1}})\
            &=u_nv_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &=s_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &ge n^2+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            end{array}
            $



            So it is sufficient
            to show that
            $u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+v_na_{n+1}
            ge 2n
            $
            .



            By simple algebra,
            if $a, b ge 0$ then
            $a+b
            ge 2sqrt{ab}
            $
            .
            (Rewrite as
            $(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2ge 0$
            or,
            as an identity,
            $a+b
            =2ab+(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2$
            .)



            Therefore



            $begin{array}\
            u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+v_na_{n+1}
            &ge sqrt{(u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}})(v_na_{n+1})}\
            &= sqrt{u_nv_n}\
            &=2sqrt{s_n}\
            &ge 2sqrt{n^2}
            qquadtext{by the induction hypothesis}\
            &=2n\
            end{array}
            $



            and we are done.



            I find it interesting that
            $s_n ge n^2$
            is used twice in the
            induction step.



            Note that,
            if we use the identity above,
            $a+b
            =2ab+(sqrt{a}-sqrt{b})^2$
            ,
            we get this:



            $begin{array}\
            s_{n+1}
            &=s_n+u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}+a_{n+1}v_n+1\
            &=s_n+2sqrt{u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}a_{n+1}v_n}+1+(sqrt{u_ndfrac1{a_{n+1}}}-sqrt{a_{n+1}v_n})^2\
            &=s_n+2sqrt{s_n}+1+dfrac1{sqrt{a_{n+1}}}(sqrt{u_n}-a_{n+1}sqrt{v_n})^2\
            &=(sqrt{s_n}+1)^2+dfrac1{sqrt{a_{n+1}}}(sqrt{u_n}-a_{n+1}sqrt{v_n})^2\
            &ge(sqrt{s_n}+1)^2\
            end{array}
            $



            with equality
            if and only if
            $a_{n+1}
            =sqrt{dfrac{u_n}{v_n}}
            =sqrt{dfrac{sum_{k=1}^n a_k}{sum_{k=1}^n dfrac1{a_k}}}
            $
            .







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago

























            answered 7 hours ago









            marty cohenmarty cohen

            74.3k549128




            74.3k549128








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This is wonderful! I love it that you’ve done it without using any “machineries” like the AM-GM inequality. I hope one day I become skillful as you are! Have a great day :)
              $endgroup$
              – Ko Byeongmin
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. This makes my day.
              $endgroup$
              – marty cohen
              2 hours ago














            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This is wonderful! I love it that you’ve done it without using any “machineries” like the AM-GM inequality. I hope one day I become skillful as you are! Have a great day :)
              $endgroup$
              – Ko Byeongmin
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. This makes my day.
              $endgroup$
              – marty cohen
              2 hours ago








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            This is wonderful! I love it that you’ve done it without using any “machineries” like the AM-GM inequality. I hope one day I become skillful as you are! Have a great day :)
            $endgroup$
            – Ko Byeongmin
            3 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            This is wonderful! I love it that you’ve done it without using any “machineries” like the AM-GM inequality. I hope one day I become skillful as you are! Have a great day :)
            $endgroup$
            – Ko Byeongmin
            3 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Thank you. This makes my day.
            $endgroup$
            – marty cohen
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Thank you. This makes my day.
            $endgroup$
            – marty cohen
            2 hours ago



            Popular posts from this blog

            How to label and detect the document text images

            Vallis Paradisi

            Tabula Rosettana