Does Blowfly Infestation create a loop with Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons?












2















Does Blowfly Infestation create a loop with Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons?



The card text is as follows



'Whenever a creature is put into a graveyard from play, if it had a -1/-1 counter on it, put a -1/-1 counter on target creature.'



When a token dies it goes to the graveyard and then disappears, so it looks like you keep generating a token and killing it. Or does the generation of the creature allow you to cast in between.










share|improve this question





























    2















    Does Blowfly Infestation create a loop with Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons?



    The card text is as follows



    'Whenever a creature is put into a graveyard from play, if it had a -1/-1 counter on it, put a -1/-1 counter on target creature.'



    When a token dies it goes to the graveyard and then disappears, so it looks like you keep generating a token and killing it. Or does the generation of the creature allow you to cast in between.










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      Does Blowfly Infestation create a loop with Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons?



      The card text is as follows



      'Whenever a creature is put into a graveyard from play, if it had a -1/-1 counter on it, put a -1/-1 counter on target creature.'



      When a token dies it goes to the graveyard and then disappears, so it looks like you keep generating a token and killing it. Or does the generation of the creature allow you to cast in between.










      share|improve this question
















      Does Blowfly Infestation create a loop with Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons?



      The card text is as follows



      'Whenever a creature is put into a graveyard from play, if it had a -1/-1 counter on it, put a -1/-1 counter on target creature.'



      When a token dies it goes to the graveyard and then disappears, so it looks like you keep generating a token and killing it. Or does the generation of the creature allow you to cast in between.







      magic-the-gathering






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 6 hours ago









      Glorfindel

      3,15111031




      3,15111031










      asked 6 hours ago









      BillBill

      3397




      3397






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          If there is a creature with 1 toughness on the battlefield when a creature with a -1/-1 counter dies, you can create an arbitrarily large number of enter the battlefield triggers as @gendolkari explains.



          This is an optional infinite loop and so the game won't end in a draw because you can always choose to end it by giving Haptatra the a -1/-1 counter from blowfly infestation. If Haptara has more that 1 toughness, the loop will end because a creature does not die. If Haptara has 1 toughness, the loop will end because her ability is no longer active.




          421.2. If the loop contains one or more optional actions and one player controls them all, that player chooses a number. The loop is treated as repeating that many times or until another player intervenes, whichever comes first.







          share|improve this answer
























          • 421.2 is a good find... but what rule stops you from doing the same action again to restart the loop after it has repeated “that many” times?

            – GendoIkari
            4 hours ago






          • 3





            @GendoIkari Honestly, that feels like it'd almost fall under slowplay rules. There's not a whole lot of difference between doing it X times then Y times vs doing it X+Y times. This assumes no responses and similar boardstate, mind you.

            – Veskah
            3 hours ago











          • @veskah. Good point. So the important thing here is that you cannot get a draw due to an infinite loop this way; right?

            – GendoIkari
            3 hours ago











          • @GendoIkari In this case, you also need the ability to start the loop again as the two cards in question don't have the ability to start the loop on their own (besides as a result of combat). Let's say you have Fevered Convulsions and infinite mana, you can create a meta-loop involving continually restarting the basic loop. In this case, rule 421.2 kicks in again, you pick some number of times to resolve the meta-loop and the game moves on.

            – Zags
            3 hours ago











          • @Zags you could start the loop again simply by choosing the same targets for hose abilities again (the point where the loop ends is the point where you choose targets; to not start the loop again you’d need to choose different targets).

            – GendoIkari
            3 hours ago



















          2














          This works if you start with more than one 1/1 creature.



          The order of events:



          When you add your first -1/-1 counter on a 1/1 creature (creature A), this triggers Hapatra’s ability.[1] When state-based actions are checked; the creature dies; which also triggers Blowfly. SBAs keep getting checked until nothing new triggers.[2] At that time, you have 2 triggered abilities to put on the stack, and you can choose the order.



          No matter which order you choose, you have to choose Blowfly’s target at this time. Hapatra will not have resolved yet, so the 1/1 token won’t exist yet to target. You will have to target something else. Only after that will both abilities resolve and give you your token.



          If you had a second 1/1 token (creature B) to start with, then you could target that. If you do, and you have Hapatra resolve first, then Hapatra will create another 1/1 token (creature C), followed by Blowfly adding a -1/-1 token to creature B. This then repeats the entire cycle; everything is the same now except you have creatures B and C, with B dying, instead of creatures A and B, with A dying.



          Note that you can always break the loop at any time by targeting a creature with more than 1 toughness with Blowfly's trigger. But if you do not choose to do so (and no one has any other responses that end the loop), the game will end in a draw.[3]




          [1]603.2. Whenever a game event or game state matches a triggered ability’s trigger event, that ability automatically triggers. The ability doesn’t do anything at this point.



          [2]704.3. Whenever a player would get priority (see rule 116, “Timing and Priority”), the game checks for any of the listed conditions for state-based actions, then performs all applicable state-based actions simultaneously as a single event. If any state-based actions are performed as a result of a check, the check is repeated



          [3]720.4. If a loop contains only mandatory actions, the game is a draw.







          share|improve this answer


























          • I'm unclear if the player can actually choose to force a draw or not... does 720.3 apply here? It doesn't very clearly define what a "fragmented loop" is; but the example seems to imply that it only deals with multiple players making a choice. In this case, there is only one player involved. But 104.4b also says "Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw."

            – GendoIkari
            5 hours ago











          • If anything, the rule that applies here is 720.2a. You are suggesting a shortcut that consists of a sequence of game choices (Blowfly Infestation target choices), and such a sequence has to have an end if possible. If every possible sequence of choices was infinite, then 720.4 would apply.

            – murgatroid99
            3 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "147"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44833%2fdoes-blowfly-infestation-create-a-loop-with-hapatra-vizier-of-poisons%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6














          If there is a creature with 1 toughness on the battlefield when a creature with a -1/-1 counter dies, you can create an arbitrarily large number of enter the battlefield triggers as @gendolkari explains.



          This is an optional infinite loop and so the game won't end in a draw because you can always choose to end it by giving Haptatra the a -1/-1 counter from blowfly infestation. If Haptara has more that 1 toughness, the loop will end because a creature does not die. If Haptara has 1 toughness, the loop will end because her ability is no longer active.




          421.2. If the loop contains one or more optional actions and one player controls them all, that player chooses a number. The loop is treated as repeating that many times or until another player intervenes, whichever comes first.







          share|improve this answer
























          • 421.2 is a good find... but what rule stops you from doing the same action again to restart the loop after it has repeated “that many” times?

            – GendoIkari
            4 hours ago






          • 3





            @GendoIkari Honestly, that feels like it'd almost fall under slowplay rules. There's not a whole lot of difference between doing it X times then Y times vs doing it X+Y times. This assumes no responses and similar boardstate, mind you.

            – Veskah
            3 hours ago











          • @veskah. Good point. So the important thing here is that you cannot get a draw due to an infinite loop this way; right?

            – GendoIkari
            3 hours ago











          • @GendoIkari In this case, you also need the ability to start the loop again as the two cards in question don't have the ability to start the loop on their own (besides as a result of combat). Let's say you have Fevered Convulsions and infinite mana, you can create a meta-loop involving continually restarting the basic loop. In this case, rule 421.2 kicks in again, you pick some number of times to resolve the meta-loop and the game moves on.

            – Zags
            3 hours ago











          • @Zags you could start the loop again simply by choosing the same targets for hose abilities again (the point where the loop ends is the point where you choose targets; to not start the loop again you’d need to choose different targets).

            – GendoIkari
            3 hours ago
















          6














          If there is a creature with 1 toughness on the battlefield when a creature with a -1/-1 counter dies, you can create an arbitrarily large number of enter the battlefield triggers as @gendolkari explains.



          This is an optional infinite loop and so the game won't end in a draw because you can always choose to end it by giving Haptatra the a -1/-1 counter from blowfly infestation. If Haptara has more that 1 toughness, the loop will end because a creature does not die. If Haptara has 1 toughness, the loop will end because her ability is no longer active.




          421.2. If the loop contains one or more optional actions and one player controls them all, that player chooses a number. The loop is treated as repeating that many times or until another player intervenes, whichever comes first.







          share|improve this answer
























          • 421.2 is a good find... but what rule stops you from doing the same action again to restart the loop after it has repeated “that many” times?

            – GendoIkari
            4 hours ago






          • 3





            @GendoIkari Honestly, that feels like it'd almost fall under slowplay rules. There's not a whole lot of difference between doing it X times then Y times vs doing it X+Y times. This assumes no responses and similar boardstate, mind you.

            – Veskah
            3 hours ago











          • @veskah. Good point. So the important thing here is that you cannot get a draw due to an infinite loop this way; right?

            – GendoIkari
            3 hours ago











          • @GendoIkari In this case, you also need the ability to start the loop again as the two cards in question don't have the ability to start the loop on their own (besides as a result of combat). Let's say you have Fevered Convulsions and infinite mana, you can create a meta-loop involving continually restarting the basic loop. In this case, rule 421.2 kicks in again, you pick some number of times to resolve the meta-loop and the game moves on.

            – Zags
            3 hours ago











          • @Zags you could start the loop again simply by choosing the same targets for hose abilities again (the point where the loop ends is the point where you choose targets; to not start the loop again you’d need to choose different targets).

            – GendoIkari
            3 hours ago














          6












          6








          6







          If there is a creature with 1 toughness on the battlefield when a creature with a -1/-1 counter dies, you can create an arbitrarily large number of enter the battlefield triggers as @gendolkari explains.



          This is an optional infinite loop and so the game won't end in a draw because you can always choose to end it by giving Haptatra the a -1/-1 counter from blowfly infestation. If Haptara has more that 1 toughness, the loop will end because a creature does not die. If Haptara has 1 toughness, the loop will end because her ability is no longer active.




          421.2. If the loop contains one or more optional actions and one player controls them all, that player chooses a number. The loop is treated as repeating that many times or until another player intervenes, whichever comes first.







          share|improve this answer













          If there is a creature with 1 toughness on the battlefield when a creature with a -1/-1 counter dies, you can create an arbitrarily large number of enter the battlefield triggers as @gendolkari explains.



          This is an optional infinite loop and so the game won't end in a draw because you can always choose to end it by giving Haptatra the a -1/-1 counter from blowfly infestation. If Haptara has more that 1 toughness, the loop will end because a creature does not die. If Haptara has 1 toughness, the loop will end because her ability is no longer active.




          421.2. If the loop contains one or more optional actions and one player controls them all, that player chooses a number. The loop is treated as repeating that many times or until another player intervenes, whichever comes first.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          ZagsZags

          4,97921454




          4,97921454













          • 421.2 is a good find... but what rule stops you from doing the same action again to restart the loop after it has repeated “that many” times?

            – GendoIkari
            4 hours ago






          • 3





            @GendoIkari Honestly, that feels like it'd almost fall under slowplay rules. There's not a whole lot of difference between doing it X times then Y times vs doing it X+Y times. This assumes no responses and similar boardstate, mind you.

            – Veskah
            3 hours ago











          • @veskah. Good point. So the important thing here is that you cannot get a draw due to an infinite loop this way; right?

            – GendoIkari
            3 hours ago











          • @GendoIkari In this case, you also need the ability to start the loop again as the two cards in question don't have the ability to start the loop on their own (besides as a result of combat). Let's say you have Fevered Convulsions and infinite mana, you can create a meta-loop involving continually restarting the basic loop. In this case, rule 421.2 kicks in again, you pick some number of times to resolve the meta-loop and the game moves on.

            – Zags
            3 hours ago











          • @Zags you could start the loop again simply by choosing the same targets for hose abilities again (the point where the loop ends is the point where you choose targets; to not start the loop again you’d need to choose different targets).

            – GendoIkari
            3 hours ago



















          • 421.2 is a good find... but what rule stops you from doing the same action again to restart the loop after it has repeated “that many” times?

            – GendoIkari
            4 hours ago






          • 3





            @GendoIkari Honestly, that feels like it'd almost fall under slowplay rules. There's not a whole lot of difference between doing it X times then Y times vs doing it X+Y times. This assumes no responses and similar boardstate, mind you.

            – Veskah
            3 hours ago











          • @veskah. Good point. So the important thing here is that you cannot get a draw due to an infinite loop this way; right?

            – GendoIkari
            3 hours ago











          • @GendoIkari In this case, you also need the ability to start the loop again as the two cards in question don't have the ability to start the loop on their own (besides as a result of combat). Let's say you have Fevered Convulsions and infinite mana, you can create a meta-loop involving continually restarting the basic loop. In this case, rule 421.2 kicks in again, you pick some number of times to resolve the meta-loop and the game moves on.

            – Zags
            3 hours ago











          • @Zags you could start the loop again simply by choosing the same targets for hose abilities again (the point where the loop ends is the point where you choose targets; to not start the loop again you’d need to choose different targets).

            – GendoIkari
            3 hours ago

















          421.2 is a good find... but what rule stops you from doing the same action again to restart the loop after it has repeated “that many” times?

          – GendoIkari
          4 hours ago





          421.2 is a good find... but what rule stops you from doing the same action again to restart the loop after it has repeated “that many” times?

          – GendoIkari
          4 hours ago




          3




          3





          @GendoIkari Honestly, that feels like it'd almost fall under slowplay rules. There's not a whole lot of difference between doing it X times then Y times vs doing it X+Y times. This assumes no responses and similar boardstate, mind you.

          – Veskah
          3 hours ago





          @GendoIkari Honestly, that feels like it'd almost fall under slowplay rules. There's not a whole lot of difference between doing it X times then Y times vs doing it X+Y times. This assumes no responses and similar boardstate, mind you.

          – Veskah
          3 hours ago













          @veskah. Good point. So the important thing here is that you cannot get a draw due to an infinite loop this way; right?

          – GendoIkari
          3 hours ago





          @veskah. Good point. So the important thing here is that you cannot get a draw due to an infinite loop this way; right?

          – GendoIkari
          3 hours ago













          @GendoIkari In this case, you also need the ability to start the loop again as the two cards in question don't have the ability to start the loop on their own (besides as a result of combat). Let's say you have Fevered Convulsions and infinite mana, you can create a meta-loop involving continually restarting the basic loop. In this case, rule 421.2 kicks in again, you pick some number of times to resolve the meta-loop and the game moves on.

          – Zags
          3 hours ago





          @GendoIkari In this case, you also need the ability to start the loop again as the two cards in question don't have the ability to start the loop on their own (besides as a result of combat). Let's say you have Fevered Convulsions and infinite mana, you can create a meta-loop involving continually restarting the basic loop. In this case, rule 421.2 kicks in again, you pick some number of times to resolve the meta-loop and the game moves on.

          – Zags
          3 hours ago













          @Zags you could start the loop again simply by choosing the same targets for hose abilities again (the point where the loop ends is the point where you choose targets; to not start the loop again you’d need to choose different targets).

          – GendoIkari
          3 hours ago





          @Zags you could start the loop again simply by choosing the same targets for hose abilities again (the point where the loop ends is the point where you choose targets; to not start the loop again you’d need to choose different targets).

          – GendoIkari
          3 hours ago











          2














          This works if you start with more than one 1/1 creature.



          The order of events:



          When you add your first -1/-1 counter on a 1/1 creature (creature A), this triggers Hapatra’s ability.[1] When state-based actions are checked; the creature dies; which also triggers Blowfly. SBAs keep getting checked until nothing new triggers.[2] At that time, you have 2 triggered abilities to put on the stack, and you can choose the order.



          No matter which order you choose, you have to choose Blowfly’s target at this time. Hapatra will not have resolved yet, so the 1/1 token won’t exist yet to target. You will have to target something else. Only after that will both abilities resolve and give you your token.



          If you had a second 1/1 token (creature B) to start with, then you could target that. If you do, and you have Hapatra resolve first, then Hapatra will create another 1/1 token (creature C), followed by Blowfly adding a -1/-1 token to creature B. This then repeats the entire cycle; everything is the same now except you have creatures B and C, with B dying, instead of creatures A and B, with A dying.



          Note that you can always break the loop at any time by targeting a creature with more than 1 toughness with Blowfly's trigger. But if you do not choose to do so (and no one has any other responses that end the loop), the game will end in a draw.[3]




          [1]603.2. Whenever a game event or game state matches a triggered ability’s trigger event, that ability automatically triggers. The ability doesn’t do anything at this point.



          [2]704.3. Whenever a player would get priority (see rule 116, “Timing and Priority”), the game checks for any of the listed conditions for state-based actions, then performs all applicable state-based actions simultaneously as a single event. If any state-based actions are performed as a result of a check, the check is repeated



          [3]720.4. If a loop contains only mandatory actions, the game is a draw.







          share|improve this answer


























          • I'm unclear if the player can actually choose to force a draw or not... does 720.3 apply here? It doesn't very clearly define what a "fragmented loop" is; but the example seems to imply that it only deals with multiple players making a choice. In this case, there is only one player involved. But 104.4b also says "Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw."

            – GendoIkari
            5 hours ago











          • If anything, the rule that applies here is 720.2a. You are suggesting a shortcut that consists of a sequence of game choices (Blowfly Infestation target choices), and such a sequence has to have an end if possible. If every possible sequence of choices was infinite, then 720.4 would apply.

            – murgatroid99
            3 hours ago
















          2














          This works if you start with more than one 1/1 creature.



          The order of events:



          When you add your first -1/-1 counter on a 1/1 creature (creature A), this triggers Hapatra’s ability.[1] When state-based actions are checked; the creature dies; which also triggers Blowfly. SBAs keep getting checked until nothing new triggers.[2] At that time, you have 2 triggered abilities to put on the stack, and you can choose the order.



          No matter which order you choose, you have to choose Blowfly’s target at this time. Hapatra will not have resolved yet, so the 1/1 token won’t exist yet to target. You will have to target something else. Only after that will both abilities resolve and give you your token.



          If you had a second 1/1 token (creature B) to start with, then you could target that. If you do, and you have Hapatra resolve first, then Hapatra will create another 1/1 token (creature C), followed by Blowfly adding a -1/-1 token to creature B. This then repeats the entire cycle; everything is the same now except you have creatures B and C, with B dying, instead of creatures A and B, with A dying.



          Note that you can always break the loop at any time by targeting a creature with more than 1 toughness with Blowfly's trigger. But if you do not choose to do so (and no one has any other responses that end the loop), the game will end in a draw.[3]




          [1]603.2. Whenever a game event or game state matches a triggered ability’s trigger event, that ability automatically triggers. The ability doesn’t do anything at this point.



          [2]704.3. Whenever a player would get priority (see rule 116, “Timing and Priority”), the game checks for any of the listed conditions for state-based actions, then performs all applicable state-based actions simultaneously as a single event. If any state-based actions are performed as a result of a check, the check is repeated



          [3]720.4. If a loop contains only mandatory actions, the game is a draw.







          share|improve this answer


























          • I'm unclear if the player can actually choose to force a draw or not... does 720.3 apply here? It doesn't very clearly define what a "fragmented loop" is; but the example seems to imply that it only deals with multiple players making a choice. In this case, there is only one player involved. But 104.4b also says "Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw."

            – GendoIkari
            5 hours ago











          • If anything, the rule that applies here is 720.2a. You are suggesting a shortcut that consists of a sequence of game choices (Blowfly Infestation target choices), and such a sequence has to have an end if possible. If every possible sequence of choices was infinite, then 720.4 would apply.

            – murgatroid99
            3 hours ago














          2












          2








          2







          This works if you start with more than one 1/1 creature.



          The order of events:



          When you add your first -1/-1 counter on a 1/1 creature (creature A), this triggers Hapatra’s ability.[1] When state-based actions are checked; the creature dies; which also triggers Blowfly. SBAs keep getting checked until nothing new triggers.[2] At that time, you have 2 triggered abilities to put on the stack, and you can choose the order.



          No matter which order you choose, you have to choose Blowfly’s target at this time. Hapatra will not have resolved yet, so the 1/1 token won’t exist yet to target. You will have to target something else. Only after that will both abilities resolve and give you your token.



          If you had a second 1/1 token (creature B) to start with, then you could target that. If you do, and you have Hapatra resolve first, then Hapatra will create another 1/1 token (creature C), followed by Blowfly adding a -1/-1 token to creature B. This then repeats the entire cycle; everything is the same now except you have creatures B and C, with B dying, instead of creatures A and B, with A dying.



          Note that you can always break the loop at any time by targeting a creature with more than 1 toughness with Blowfly's trigger. But if you do not choose to do so (and no one has any other responses that end the loop), the game will end in a draw.[3]




          [1]603.2. Whenever a game event or game state matches a triggered ability’s trigger event, that ability automatically triggers. The ability doesn’t do anything at this point.



          [2]704.3. Whenever a player would get priority (see rule 116, “Timing and Priority”), the game checks for any of the listed conditions for state-based actions, then performs all applicable state-based actions simultaneously as a single event. If any state-based actions are performed as a result of a check, the check is repeated



          [3]720.4. If a loop contains only mandatory actions, the game is a draw.







          share|improve this answer















          This works if you start with more than one 1/1 creature.



          The order of events:



          When you add your first -1/-1 counter on a 1/1 creature (creature A), this triggers Hapatra’s ability.[1] When state-based actions are checked; the creature dies; which also triggers Blowfly. SBAs keep getting checked until nothing new triggers.[2] At that time, you have 2 triggered abilities to put on the stack, and you can choose the order.



          No matter which order you choose, you have to choose Blowfly’s target at this time. Hapatra will not have resolved yet, so the 1/1 token won’t exist yet to target. You will have to target something else. Only after that will both abilities resolve and give you your token.



          If you had a second 1/1 token (creature B) to start with, then you could target that. If you do, and you have Hapatra resolve first, then Hapatra will create another 1/1 token (creature C), followed by Blowfly adding a -1/-1 token to creature B. This then repeats the entire cycle; everything is the same now except you have creatures B and C, with B dying, instead of creatures A and B, with A dying.



          Note that you can always break the loop at any time by targeting a creature with more than 1 toughness with Blowfly's trigger. But if you do not choose to do so (and no one has any other responses that end the loop), the game will end in a draw.[3]




          [1]603.2. Whenever a game event or game state matches a triggered ability’s trigger event, that ability automatically triggers. The ability doesn’t do anything at this point.



          [2]704.3. Whenever a player would get priority (see rule 116, “Timing and Priority”), the game checks for any of the listed conditions for state-based actions, then performs all applicable state-based actions simultaneously as a single event. If any state-based actions are performed as a result of a check, the check is repeated



          [3]720.4. If a loop contains only mandatory actions, the game is a draw.








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 26 mins ago









          DarkCygnus

          2,0731222




          2,0731222










          answered 5 hours ago









          GendoIkariGendoIkari

          42.6k389163




          42.6k389163













          • I'm unclear if the player can actually choose to force a draw or not... does 720.3 apply here? It doesn't very clearly define what a "fragmented loop" is; but the example seems to imply that it only deals with multiple players making a choice. In this case, there is only one player involved. But 104.4b also says "Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw."

            – GendoIkari
            5 hours ago











          • If anything, the rule that applies here is 720.2a. You are suggesting a shortcut that consists of a sequence of game choices (Blowfly Infestation target choices), and such a sequence has to have an end if possible. If every possible sequence of choices was infinite, then 720.4 would apply.

            – murgatroid99
            3 hours ago



















          • I'm unclear if the player can actually choose to force a draw or not... does 720.3 apply here? It doesn't very clearly define what a "fragmented loop" is; but the example seems to imply that it only deals with multiple players making a choice. In this case, there is only one player involved. But 104.4b also says "Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw."

            – GendoIkari
            5 hours ago











          • If anything, the rule that applies here is 720.2a. You are suggesting a shortcut that consists of a sequence of game choices (Blowfly Infestation target choices), and such a sequence has to have an end if possible. If every possible sequence of choices was infinite, then 720.4 would apply.

            – murgatroid99
            3 hours ago

















          I'm unclear if the player can actually choose to force a draw or not... does 720.3 apply here? It doesn't very clearly define what a "fragmented loop" is; but the example seems to imply that it only deals with multiple players making a choice. In this case, there is only one player involved. But 104.4b also says "Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw."

          – GendoIkari
          5 hours ago





          I'm unclear if the player can actually choose to force a draw or not... does 720.3 apply here? It doesn't very clearly define what a "fragmented loop" is; but the example seems to imply that it only deals with multiple players making a choice. In this case, there is only one player involved. But 104.4b also says "Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw."

          – GendoIkari
          5 hours ago













          If anything, the rule that applies here is 720.2a. You are suggesting a shortcut that consists of a sequence of game choices (Blowfly Infestation target choices), and such a sequence has to have an end if possible. If every possible sequence of choices was infinite, then 720.4 would apply.

          – murgatroid99
          3 hours ago





          If anything, the rule that applies here is 720.2a. You are suggesting a shortcut that consists of a sequence of game choices (Blowfly Infestation target choices), and such a sequence has to have an end if possible. If every possible sequence of choices was infinite, then 720.4 would apply.

          – murgatroid99
          3 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Board & Card Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44833%2fdoes-blowfly-infestation-create-a-loop-with-hapatra-vizier-of-poisons%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to label and detect the document text images

          Vallis Paradisi

          Tabula Rosettana