Would the Life Transference spell be unbalanced if it ignored resistance and immunity?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I want to create a Abjuration wizard (PHB, p. 115-116) that uses the Life Transference spell (XGtE, p. 160) and the Arcane Ward feature to heal people, but I've heard people saying Life Transference is bad due to how it interacts with resistance (half the damage taken = half the healing).
That is pretty relevant for me, because of the Spell Resistance feature that Abjuration wizards get at 14th level.
What if Life Transference worked like the Overchannel feature from the School of Evocation wizard (PHB, p. 118): necrotic damage that ignores resistance and immunity?
I believe that would be very thematically appropriate considering the fact that it is a self-sacrifice spell. I know that this is all up to the DM, but I want to know: Would that be unbalanced? Could that somehow be exploited?
dnd-5e spells balance wizard house-rules
edited 3 hours ago
V2Blast
27.5k597167
asked 4 hours ago
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
261
New contributor
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I want to create a Abjuration wizard (PHB, p. 115-116) that uses the Life Transference spell (XGtE, p. 160) and the Arcane Ward feature to heal people, but I've heard people saying Life Transference is bad due to how it interacts with resistance (half the damage taken = half the healing).
That is pretty relevant for me, because of the Spell Resistance feature that Abjuration wizards get at 14th level.
What if Life Transference worked like the Overchannel feature from the School of Evocation wizard (PHB, p. 118): necrotic damage that ignores resistance and immunity?
I believe that would be very thematically appropriate considering the fact that it is a self-sacrifice spell. I know that this is all up to the DM, but I want to know: Would that be unbalanced? Could that somehow be exploited?
dnd-5e spells balance wizard house-rules
edited 3 hours ago
V2Blast
27.5k597167
asked 4 hours ago
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
261
New contributor
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Just to clarify: what you're proposing is allowing the spell to fully ignore the spellcaster's possible Necrotic Resistance, meaning the spell would deal full damage to the spellcaster even if they have resistance, and therefore heal the normal amount to their target? Or are you proposing allowing the healing to be equal to 4x the damage in the scenario where the spellcaster has resistance?
$endgroup$
– Xirema
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
The first option, just ignore necrotic resistance fully and always heal the normal amount. I believe it is only appropriate considering it is a self sacrifice.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Could you clarify something? I'm not sure how Arcane Ward is involved in this process. How are you using it to heal people?
$endgroup$
– Gandalfmeansme
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Arcane Ward takes the damage instead of me, it's basically similar to having temporary hit points. That way I can basically trasform the hit points of the ward (say the ward takes 10 damage) into double the amount of hit points to someone else (in this case 20) without taking any damage myself.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I want to create a Abjuration wizard (PHB, p. 115-116) that uses the Life Transference spell (XGtE, p. 160) and the Arcane Ward feature to heal people, but I've heard people saying Life Transference is bad due to how it interacts with resistance (half the damage taken = half the healing).
That is pretty relevant for me, because of the Spell Resistance feature that Abjuration wizards get at 14th level.
What if Life Transference worked like the Overchannel feature from the School of Evocation wizard (PHB, p. 118): necrotic damage that ignores resistance and immunity?
I believe that would be very thematically appropriate considering the fact that it is a self-sacrifice spell. I know that this is all up to the DM, but I want to know: Would that be unbalanced? Could that somehow be exploited?
dnd-5e spells balance wizard house-rules
edited 3 hours ago
V2Blast
27.5k597167
asked 4 hours ago
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
261
New contributor
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I want to create a Abjuration wizard (PHB, p. 115-116) that uses the Life Transference spell (XGtE, p. 160) and the Arcane Ward feature to heal people, but I've heard people saying Life Transference is bad due to how it interacts with resistance (half the damage taken = half the healing).
That is pretty relevant for me, because of the Spell Resistance feature that Abjuration wizards get at 14th level.
What if Life Transference worked like the Overchannel feature from the School of Evocation wizard (PHB, p. 118): necrotic damage that ignores resistance and immunity?
I believe that would be very thematically appropriate considering the fact that it is a self-sacrifice spell. I know that this is all up to the DM, but I want to know: Would that be unbalanced? Could that somehow be exploited?
dnd-5e spells balance wizard house-rules
dnd-5e spells balance wizard house-rules
edited 3 hours ago
V2Blast
27.5k597167
asked 4 hours ago
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
261
New contributor
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 3 hours ago
V2Blast
27.5k597167
asked 4 hours ago
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
261
New contributor
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 3 hours ago
V2Blast
27.5k597167
edited 3 hours ago
V2Blast
27.5k597167
edited 3 hours ago
V2Blast
27.5k597167
27.5k597167
asked 4 hours ago
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
261
New contributor
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 hours ago
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
261
asked 4 hours ago
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
261
261
New contributor
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Just to clarify: what you're proposing is allowing the spell to fully ignore the spellcaster's possible Necrotic Resistance, meaning the spell would deal full damage to the spellcaster even if they have resistance, and therefore heal the normal amount to their target? Or are you proposing allowing the healing to be equal to 4x the damage in the scenario where the spellcaster has resistance?
$endgroup$
– Xirema
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
The first option, just ignore necrotic resistance fully and always heal the normal amount. I believe it is only appropriate considering it is a self sacrifice.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Could you clarify something? I'm not sure how Arcane Ward is involved in this process. How are you using it to heal people?
$endgroup$
– Gandalfmeansme
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Arcane Ward takes the damage instead of me, it's basically similar to having temporary hit points. That way I can basically trasform the hit points of the ward (say the ward takes 10 damage) into double the amount of hit points to someone else (in this case 20) without taking any damage myself.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Just to clarify: what you're proposing is allowing the spell to fully ignore the spellcaster's possible Necrotic Resistance, meaning the spell would deal full damage to the spellcaster even if they have resistance, and therefore heal the normal amount to their target? Or are you proposing allowing the healing to be equal to 4x the damage in the scenario where the spellcaster has resistance?
$endgroup$
– Xirema
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
The first option, just ignore necrotic resistance fully and always heal the normal amount. I believe it is only appropriate considering it is a self sacrifice.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Could you clarify something? I'm not sure how Arcane Ward is involved in this process. How are you using it to heal people?
$endgroup$
– Gandalfmeansme
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Arcane Ward takes the damage instead of me, it's basically similar to having temporary hit points. That way I can basically trasform the hit points of the ward (say the ward takes 10 damage) into double the amount of hit points to someone else (in this case 20) without taking any damage myself.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just to clarify: what you're proposing is allowing the spell to fully ignore the spellcaster's possible Necrotic Resistance, meaning the spell would deal full damage to the spellcaster even if they have resistance, and therefore heal the normal amount to their target? Or are you proposing allowing the healing to be equal to 4x the damage in the scenario where the spellcaster has resistance?
$endgroup$
– Xirema
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just to clarify: what you're proposing is allowing the spell to fully ignore the spellcaster's possible Necrotic Resistance, meaning the spell would deal full damage to the spellcaster even if they have resistance, and therefore heal the normal amount to their target? Or are you proposing allowing the healing to be equal to 4x the damage in the scenario where the spellcaster has resistance?
$endgroup$
– Xirema
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
The first option, just ignore necrotic resistance fully and always heal the normal amount. I believe it is only appropriate considering it is a self sacrifice.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The first option, just ignore necrotic resistance fully and always heal the normal amount. I believe it is only appropriate considering it is a self sacrifice.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Could you clarify something? I'm not sure how Arcane Ward is involved in this process. How are you using it to heal people?
$endgroup$
– Gandalfmeansme
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Could you clarify something? I'm not sure how Arcane Ward is involved in this process. How are you using it to heal people?
$endgroup$
– Gandalfmeansme
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Arcane Ward takes the damage instead of me, it's basically similar to having temporary hit points. That way I can basically trasform the hit points of the ward (say the ward takes 10 damage) into double the amount of hit points to someone else (in this case 20) without taking any damage myself.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Arcane Ward takes the damage instead of me, it's basically similar to having temporary hit points. That way I can basically trasform the hit points of the ward (say the ward takes 10 damage) into double the amount of hit points to someone else (in this case 20) without taking any damage myself.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is perfectly reasonable
Of course, it'll come down to what your DM says, since this is not Rules-as-Written. But Life Transference already has a quite substantial opportunity cost associated with it, and all this change does is revert to the mean, so to speak: instead of the feature being weaker for Abjuration Wizards, it's instead normal strength.
So if I were DM, I'd be perfectly fine allowing this. The few possible exploits are things that would be exploitable for non-abjuration wizards anyways, so I can't even think of what might constitute an exploit particular to this combo.
answered 3 hours ago
XiremaXirema
24.4k269144
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The OP specifically mentioned the exploit they intend to use - fuelling Life Transference with Arcane Ward.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would not be imbalanced.
The features like Spell Resistance and Inured to Undeath (both for wizards) are perfectly fine on all other characters, and life transference works as intended on most other characters.
The question, therefore, is "does having both Spell Resistance and life transference work as intended on a character with both make it overpowered", and I think the simple answer is no, because the combination of the two doesn't make the spell or the feature any more powerful, only removes the detriment to bring it back to level with all other characters.
answered 3 hours ago
Blake SteelBlake Steel
4,6591952
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145429%2fwould-the-life-transference-spell-be-unbalanced-if-it-ignored-resistance-and-imm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is perfectly reasonable
Of course, it'll come down to what your DM says, since this is not Rules-as-Written. But Life Transference already has a quite substantial opportunity cost associated with it, and all this change does is revert to the mean, so to speak: instead of the feature being weaker for Abjuration Wizards, it's instead normal strength.
So if I were DM, I'd be perfectly fine allowing this. The few possible exploits are things that would be exploitable for non-abjuration wizards anyways, so I can't even think of what might constitute an exploit particular to this combo.
answered 3 hours ago
XiremaXirema
24.4k269144
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The OP specifically mentioned the exploit they intend to use - fuelling Life Transference with Arcane Ward.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is perfectly reasonable
Of course, it'll come down to what your DM says, since this is not Rules-as-Written. But Life Transference already has a quite substantial opportunity cost associated with it, and all this change does is revert to the mean, so to speak: instead of the feature being weaker for Abjuration Wizards, it's instead normal strength.
So if I were DM, I'd be perfectly fine allowing this. The few possible exploits are things that would be exploitable for non-abjuration wizards anyways, so I can't even think of what might constitute an exploit particular to this combo.
answered 3 hours ago
XiremaXirema
24.4k269144
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The OP specifically mentioned the exploit they intend to use - fuelling Life Transference with Arcane Ward.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is perfectly reasonable
Of course, it'll come down to what your DM says, since this is not Rules-as-Written. But Life Transference already has a quite substantial opportunity cost associated with it, and all this change does is revert to the mean, so to speak: instead of the feature being weaker for Abjuration Wizards, it's instead normal strength.
So if I were DM, I'd be perfectly fine allowing this. The few possible exploits are things that would be exploitable for non-abjuration wizards anyways, so I can't even think of what might constitute an exploit particular to this combo.
answered 3 hours ago
XiremaXirema
24.4k269144
$endgroup$
This is perfectly reasonable
Of course, it'll come down to what your DM says, since this is not Rules-as-Written. But Life Transference already has a quite substantial opportunity cost associated with it, and all this change does is revert to the mean, so to speak: instead of the feature being weaker for Abjuration Wizards, it's instead normal strength.
So if I were DM, I'd be perfectly fine allowing this. The few possible exploits are things that would be exploitable for non-abjuration wizards anyways, so I can't even think of what might constitute an exploit particular to this combo.
answered 3 hours ago
XiremaXirema
24.4k269144
answered 3 hours ago
XiremaXirema
24.4k269144
answered 3 hours ago
XiremaXirema
24.4k269144
answered 3 hours ago
XiremaXirema
24.4k269144
24.4k269144
$begingroup$
The OP specifically mentioned the exploit they intend to use - fuelling Life Transference with Arcane Ward.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The OP specifically mentioned the exploit they intend to use - fuelling Life Transference with Arcane Ward.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The OP specifically mentioned the exploit they intend to use - fuelling Life Transference with Arcane Ward.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The OP specifically mentioned the exploit they intend to use - fuelling Life Transference with Arcane Ward.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would not be imbalanced.
The features like Spell Resistance and Inured to Undeath (both for wizards) are perfectly fine on all other characters, and life transference works as intended on most other characters.
The question, therefore, is "does having both Spell Resistance and life transference work as intended on a character with both make it overpowered", and I think the simple answer is no, because the combination of the two doesn't make the spell or the feature any more powerful, only removes the detriment to bring it back to level with all other characters.
answered 3 hours ago
Blake SteelBlake Steel
4,6591952
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would not be imbalanced.
The features like Spell Resistance and Inured to Undeath (both for wizards) are perfectly fine on all other characters, and life transference works as intended on most other characters.
The question, therefore, is "does having both Spell Resistance and life transference work as intended on a character with both make it overpowered", and I think the simple answer is no, because the combination of the two doesn't make the spell or the feature any more powerful, only removes the detriment to bring it back to level with all other characters.
answered 3 hours ago
Blake SteelBlake Steel
4,6591952
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would not be imbalanced.
The features like Spell Resistance and Inured to Undeath (both for wizards) are perfectly fine on all other characters, and life transference works as intended on most other characters.
The question, therefore, is "does having both Spell Resistance and life transference work as intended on a character with both make it overpowered", and I think the simple answer is no, because the combination of the two doesn't make the spell or the feature any more powerful, only removes the detriment to bring it back to level with all other characters.
answered 3 hours ago
Blake SteelBlake Steel
4,6591952
$endgroup$
This would not be imbalanced.
The features like Spell Resistance and Inured to Undeath (both for wizards) are perfectly fine on all other characters, and life transference works as intended on most other characters.
The question, therefore, is "does having both Spell Resistance and life transference work as intended on a character with both make it overpowered", and I think the simple answer is no, because the combination of the two doesn't make the spell or the feature any more powerful, only removes the detriment to bring it back to level with all other characters.
answered 3 hours ago
Blake SteelBlake Steel
4,6591952
answered 3 hours ago
Blake SteelBlake Steel
4,6591952
answered 3 hours ago
Blake SteelBlake Steel
4,6591952
answered 3 hours ago
Blake SteelBlake Steel
4,6591952
4,6591952
add a comment |
add a comment |
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145429%2fwould-the-life-transference-spell-be-unbalanced-if-it-ignored-resistance-and-imm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Just to clarify: what you're proposing is allowing the spell to fully ignore the spellcaster's possible Necrotic Resistance, meaning the spell would deal full damage to the spellcaster even if they have resistance, and therefore heal the normal amount to their target? Or are you proposing allowing the healing to be equal to 4x the damage in the scenario where the spellcaster has resistance?
$endgroup$
– Xirema
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
The first option, just ignore necrotic resistance fully and always heal the normal amount. I believe it is only appropriate considering it is a self sacrifice.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Could you clarify something? I'm not sure how Arcane Ward is involved in this process. How are you using it to heal people?
$endgroup$
– Gandalfmeansme
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Arcane Ward takes the damage instead of me, it's basically similar to having temporary hit points. That way I can basically trasform the hit points of the ward (say the ward takes 10 damage) into double the amount of hit points to someone else (in this case 20) without taking any damage myself.
$endgroup$
– Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
3 hours ago