Why does apt-get install python3 with a trailing hyphen remove a lot of packages? [duplicate]
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
command-line apt
edited yesterday
Community♦
1
asked yesterday
Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1
471
New contributor
Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna command-line
Users with the command-line badge can single-handedly close command-line questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
23 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
command-line apt
edited yesterday
Community♦
1
asked yesterday
Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1
471
New contributor
Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna command-line
Users with the command-line badge can single-handedly close command-line questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
23 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand typesinstallanyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.
– Giacomo Alzetta
23 hours ago
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
command-line apt
edited yesterday
Community♦
1
asked yesterday
Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1
471
New contributor
Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
command-line apt
command-line apt
edited yesterday
Community♦
1
asked yesterday
Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1
471
New contributor
Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
Community♦
1
asked yesterday
Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1
471
New contributor
Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
Community♦
1
edited yesterday
Community♦
1
edited yesterday
Community♦
1
1
asked yesterday
Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1
471
New contributor
Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1
471
asked yesterday
Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1
471
471
New contributor
Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna command-line
Users with the command-line badge can single-handedly close command-line questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
23 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna command-line
Users with the command-line badge can single-handedly close command-line questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
23 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand typesinstallanyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.
– Giacomo Alzetta
23 hours ago
add a comment |
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand typesinstallanyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.
– Giacomo Alzetta
23 hours ago
8
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
2
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types
install anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.– Giacomo Alzetta
23 hours ago
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types
install anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.– Giacomo Alzetta
23 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man page. From man apt-get's install section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3 package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log.
1 If you have less as the man pager, you can go to the install section of man apt-get directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
answered yesterday
heemaylheemayl
68.1k11142215
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktopwill get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
23 hours ago
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
edited yesterday
N0rbert
25.2k853118
answered yesterday
vidarlovidarlo
10.7k52852
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man page. From man apt-get's install section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3 package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log.
1 If you have less as the man pager, you can go to the install section of man apt-get directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
answered yesterday
heemaylheemayl
68.1k11142215
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktopwill get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
23 hours ago
add a comment |
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man page. From man apt-get's install section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3 package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log.
1 If you have less as the man pager, you can go to the install section of man apt-get directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
answered yesterday
heemaylheemayl
68.1k11142215
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktopwill get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
23 hours ago
add a comment |
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man page. From man apt-get's install section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3 package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log.
1 If you have less as the man pager, you can go to the install section of man apt-get directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
answered yesterday
heemaylheemayl
68.1k11142215
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man page. From man apt-get's install section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3 package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log.
1 If you have less as the man pager, you can go to the install section of man apt-get directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
answered yesterday
heemaylheemayl
68.1k11142215
edited 23 hours ago
answered yesterday
heemaylheemayl
68.1k11142215
answered yesterday
heemaylheemayl
68.1k11142215
answered yesterday
heemaylheemayl
68.1k11142215
68.1k11142215
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktopwill get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
23 hours ago
add a comment |
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktopwill get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
23 hours ago
6
6
It might be worth mentioning that
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).– Henning Makholm
yesterday
It might be worth mentioning that
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
23 hours ago
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
23 hours ago
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
edited yesterday
N0rbert
25.2k853118
answered yesterday
vidarlovidarlo
10.7k52852
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
edited yesterday
N0rbert
25.2k853118
answered yesterday
vidarlovidarlo
10.7k52852
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
edited yesterday
N0rbert
25.2k853118
answered yesterday
vidarlovidarlo
10.7k52852
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
edited yesterday
N0rbert
25.2k853118
answered yesterday
vidarlovidarlo
10.7k52852
edited yesterday
N0rbert
25.2k853118
edited yesterday
N0rbert
25.2k853118
edited yesterday
N0rbert
25.2k853118
25.2k853118
answered yesterday
vidarlovidarlo
10.7k52852
answered yesterday
vidarlovidarlo
10.7k52852
answered yesterday
vidarlovidarlo
10.7k52852
10.7k52852
add a comment |
add a comment |
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types
installanyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.– Giacomo Alzetta
23 hours ago