Time series decomposition
$begingroup$
For me, the original data looks to have like a decreasing or constant trend but stl() is giving a different trend altogether. Can someone here please explain why?
The decomposition plot is as follows:
time-series
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 8 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For me, the original data looks to have like a decreasing or constant trend but stl() is giving a different trend altogether. Can someone here please explain why?
The decomposition plot is as follows:
time-series
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 8 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For me, the original data looks to have like a decreasing or constant trend but stl() is giving a different trend altogether. Can someone here please explain why?
The decomposition plot is as follows:
time-series
$endgroup$
For me, the original data looks to have like a decreasing or constant trend but stl() is giving a different trend altogether. Can someone here please explain why?
The decomposition plot is as follows:
time-series
time-series
edited Jan 9 at 16:05
Mark.F
766218
766218
asked Jan 8 at 11:08
KunalKunal
61
61
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 8 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 8 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To my eye, the second half of 2018 is substantially higher than the prior two years, so the trend that stl() is giving seems not unreasonable.
Trying to fit a time series model to only three years of data is going to require you to take a pretty strong hand guiding the model; I wouldn't expect a turn-key solution to give satisfactory results.
One obvious problem with the decomposition from stl() is that the seasonal figure is wildly overfit. I would try using the Fourier series approach to fitting the seasonal figure that Rob Hyndman describes in this blog post. I have applied that technique in exactly your situation and gotten decent results.
The closest to a turn-key solution is probably going to Facebook's prophet library. But with only three years of data, I still suspect you'll overfit the seasonal component if you call it with the defaults.
If you post your actual data and describe your goals more completely, folks might be able to help more.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43665%2ftime-series-decomposition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To my eye, the second half of 2018 is substantially higher than the prior two years, so the trend that stl() is giving seems not unreasonable.
Trying to fit a time series model to only three years of data is going to require you to take a pretty strong hand guiding the model; I wouldn't expect a turn-key solution to give satisfactory results.
One obvious problem with the decomposition from stl() is that the seasonal figure is wildly overfit. I would try using the Fourier series approach to fitting the seasonal figure that Rob Hyndman describes in this blog post. I have applied that technique in exactly your situation and gotten decent results.
The closest to a turn-key solution is probably going to Facebook's prophet library. But with only three years of data, I still suspect you'll overfit the seasonal component if you call it with the defaults.
If you post your actual data and describe your goals more completely, folks might be able to help more.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To my eye, the second half of 2018 is substantially higher than the prior two years, so the trend that stl() is giving seems not unreasonable.
Trying to fit a time series model to only three years of data is going to require you to take a pretty strong hand guiding the model; I wouldn't expect a turn-key solution to give satisfactory results.
One obvious problem with the decomposition from stl() is that the seasonal figure is wildly overfit. I would try using the Fourier series approach to fitting the seasonal figure that Rob Hyndman describes in this blog post. I have applied that technique in exactly your situation and gotten decent results.
The closest to a turn-key solution is probably going to Facebook's prophet library. But with only three years of data, I still suspect you'll overfit the seasonal component if you call it with the defaults.
If you post your actual data and describe your goals more completely, folks might be able to help more.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To my eye, the second half of 2018 is substantially higher than the prior two years, so the trend that stl() is giving seems not unreasonable.
Trying to fit a time series model to only three years of data is going to require you to take a pretty strong hand guiding the model; I wouldn't expect a turn-key solution to give satisfactory results.
One obvious problem with the decomposition from stl() is that the seasonal figure is wildly overfit. I would try using the Fourier series approach to fitting the seasonal figure that Rob Hyndman describes in this blog post. I have applied that technique in exactly your situation and gotten decent results.
The closest to a turn-key solution is probably going to Facebook's prophet library. But with only three years of data, I still suspect you'll overfit the seasonal component if you call it with the defaults.
If you post your actual data and describe your goals more completely, folks might be able to help more.
$endgroup$
To my eye, the second half of 2018 is substantially higher than the prior two years, so the trend that stl() is giving seems not unreasonable.
Trying to fit a time series model to only three years of data is going to require you to take a pretty strong hand guiding the model; I wouldn't expect a turn-key solution to give satisfactory results.
One obvious problem with the decomposition from stl() is that the seasonal figure is wildly overfit. I would try using the Fourier series approach to fitting the seasonal figure that Rob Hyndman describes in this blog post. I have applied that technique in exactly your situation and gotten decent results.
The closest to a turn-key solution is probably going to Facebook's prophet library. But with only three years of data, I still suspect you'll overfit the seasonal component if you call it with the defaults.
If you post your actual data and describe your goals more completely, folks might be able to help more.
answered Jan 8 at 16:19
John RauserJohn Rauser
914
914
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43665%2ftime-series-decomposition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown