SWAP test inputs












2












$begingroup$


I'm using the SWAP test circuit for implementing a qubit registers comparison
enter image description here



From the documentation I could find I've understood it can be applied to input qubits |$alpharangle$ and |$betarangle$ of the same size.



Is that really a constraint? Or it can be also applied to general cases of qubits of different size?






quantum-gate circuit-construction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I think your question is similar to mine, and I found the answer over here Inner product of quantum states.
    $endgroup$
    – Aman
    8 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$


I'm using the SWAP test circuit for implementing a qubit registers comparison
enter image description here



From the documentation I could find I've understood it can be applied to input qubits |$alpharangle$ and |$betarangle$ of the same size.



Is that really a constraint? Or it can be also applied to general cases of qubits of different size?






quantum-gate circuit-construction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I think your question is similar to mine, and I found the answer over here Inner product of quantum states.
    $endgroup$
    – Aman
    8 hours ago
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


I'm using the SWAP test circuit for implementing a qubit registers comparison
enter image description here



From the documentation I could find I've understood it can be applied to input qubits |$alpharangle$ and |$betarangle$ of the same size.



Is that really a constraint? Or it can be also applied to general cases of qubits of different size?






quantum-gate circuit-construction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm using the SWAP test circuit for implementing a qubit registers comparison
enter image description here



From the documentation I could find I've understood it can be applied to input qubits |$alpharangle$ and |$betarangle$ of the same size.



Is that really a constraint? Or it can be also applied to general cases of qubits of different size?






quantum-gate circuit-construction




quantum-gate circuit-construction






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









Blue♦

6,12831354




6,12831354










asked 9 hours ago









Gianni CasonatoGianni Casonato

455




455












  • $begingroup$
    I think your question is similar to mine, and I found the answer over here Inner product of quantum states.
    $endgroup$
    – Aman
    8 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    I think your question is similar to mine, and I found the answer over here Inner product of quantum states.
    $endgroup$
    – Aman
    8 hours ago


















$begingroup$
I think your question is similar to mine, and I found the answer over here Inner product of quantum states.
$endgroup$
– Aman
8 hours ago






$begingroup$
I think your question is similar to mine, and I found the answer over here Inner product of quantum states.
$endgroup$
– Aman
8 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Qubits can be only with a size of 2, which means a dimensionality of 2.



For $|alpha rangle,|betarangle$ here, for the SWAP gate to make sense, they must be of the same dimensionality (in the operating Hilbert space), then only there is a meaningful correspondence for the SWAP to work.



In case if it happens that they are not (suppose one qubit and other qtrit), then the extra degrees of freedom of the qtrit would not take part in the algorithm governed by the Hamiltonian which mimics the SWAP gate.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    4












    $begingroup$

    Yes they should be the same size. Otherwise, if you use it for getting the inner product between them, it would not make sense they aren't.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      or even more simply, the SWAP operation does not make sense if they have different sizes
      $endgroup$
      – glS
      6 hours ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "694"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5434%2fswap-test-inputs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Qubits can be only with a size of 2, which means a dimensionality of 2.



    For $|alpha rangle,|betarangle$ here, for the SWAP gate to make sense, they must be of the same dimensionality (in the operating Hilbert space), then only there is a meaningful correspondence for the SWAP to work.



    In case if it happens that they are not (suppose one qubit and other qtrit), then the extra degrees of freedom of the qtrit would not take part in the algorithm governed by the Hamiltonian which mimics the SWAP gate.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Qubits can be only with a size of 2, which means a dimensionality of 2.



      For $|alpha rangle,|betarangle$ here, for the SWAP gate to make sense, they must be of the same dimensionality (in the operating Hilbert space), then only there is a meaningful correspondence for the SWAP to work.



      In case if it happens that they are not (suppose one qubit and other qtrit), then the extra degrees of freedom of the qtrit would not take part in the algorithm governed by the Hamiltonian which mimics the SWAP gate.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Qubits can be only with a size of 2, which means a dimensionality of 2.



        For $|alpha rangle,|betarangle$ here, for the SWAP gate to make sense, they must be of the same dimensionality (in the operating Hilbert space), then only there is a meaningful correspondence for the SWAP to work.



        In case if it happens that they are not (suppose one qubit and other qtrit), then the extra degrees of freedom of the qtrit would not take part in the algorithm governed by the Hamiltonian which mimics the SWAP gate.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Qubits can be only with a size of 2, which means a dimensionality of 2.



        For $|alpha rangle,|betarangle$ here, for the SWAP gate to make sense, they must be of the same dimensionality (in the operating Hilbert space), then only there is a meaningful correspondence for the SWAP to work.



        In case if it happens that they are not (suppose one qubit and other qtrit), then the extra degrees of freedom of the qtrit would not take part in the algorithm governed by the Hamiltonian which mimics the SWAP gate.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        Siddhānt SinghSiddhānt Singh

        853115




        853115

























            4












            $begingroup$

            Yes they should be the same size. Otherwise, if you use it for getting the inner product between them, it would not make sense they aren't.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              or even more simply, the SWAP operation does not make sense if they have different sizes
              $endgroup$
              – glS
              6 hours ago
















            4












            $begingroup$

            Yes they should be the same size. Otherwise, if you use it for getting the inner product between them, it would not make sense they aren't.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              or even more simply, the SWAP operation does not make sense if they have different sizes
              $endgroup$
              – glS
              6 hours ago














            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Yes they should be the same size. Otherwise, if you use it for getting the inner product between them, it would not make sense they aren't.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Yes they should be the same size. Otherwise, if you use it for getting the inner product between them, it would not make sense they aren't.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 8 hours ago









            cnadacnada

            2,340213




            2,340213








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              or even more simply, the SWAP operation does not make sense if they have different sizes
              $endgroup$
              – glS
              6 hours ago














            • 2




              $begingroup$
              or even more simply, the SWAP operation does not make sense if they have different sizes
              $endgroup$
              – glS
              6 hours ago








            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            or even more simply, the SWAP operation does not make sense if they have different sizes
            $endgroup$
            – glS
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            or even more simply, the SWAP operation does not make sense if they have different sizes
            $endgroup$
            – glS
            6 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5434%2fswap-test-inputs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to label and detect the document text images

            Image
            1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C
            Read more

            Vallis Paradisi

            Image
            Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para
            Read more

            Tabula Rosettana

            Image
            Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a
            Read more