How did the Caretaker not kill everyone on Voyager when pulling them into the Delta quadrant?












0















We know that ships in the Star Trek universe can travel very fast, but this is still generally limited by the technology of the time. Sometimes travel is accomplished by instantaneous travel using wormholes. Q teleporting, or slipstream travel.



The Caretaker used his array to pull Voyager across the universe. From the way it was depicted in the show, this was essentially a wave of energy that pushed Voyager across space - it didn't transport them immediately, place them into a corridor, or open any kind of 'shortcut' through another dimension.



Assuming that the wave simply accelerated the ship to way above warp-10, how was the entire crew (not to mention the ship itself) not liquefied by the forces? I would assume that the inertial dampeners and whatever other technology was in place could easily handle speeds that the ship was intended to travel at, but Voyager hit speeds exponentially higher than what it was capable of managing on its own. I can't imagine that safety technology of the day could simply mitigate any arbitrary amount of acceleration - surely it had upper limits just like any other tech of the time.










share|improve this question























  • Don't know that it was ever addressed but perhaps some sort of "on-demand" wormhole technology was employed. After ships in DS9 went to the Gamma Quadrant all the time without any of the negative effects of hyper-acceleration.

    – Emsley Wyatt
    56 mins ago
















0















We know that ships in the Star Trek universe can travel very fast, but this is still generally limited by the technology of the time. Sometimes travel is accomplished by instantaneous travel using wormholes. Q teleporting, or slipstream travel.



The Caretaker used his array to pull Voyager across the universe. From the way it was depicted in the show, this was essentially a wave of energy that pushed Voyager across space - it didn't transport them immediately, place them into a corridor, or open any kind of 'shortcut' through another dimension.



Assuming that the wave simply accelerated the ship to way above warp-10, how was the entire crew (not to mention the ship itself) not liquefied by the forces? I would assume that the inertial dampeners and whatever other technology was in place could easily handle speeds that the ship was intended to travel at, but Voyager hit speeds exponentially higher than what it was capable of managing on its own. I can't imagine that safety technology of the day could simply mitigate any arbitrary amount of acceleration - surely it had upper limits just like any other tech of the time.










share|improve this question























  • Don't know that it was ever addressed but perhaps some sort of "on-demand" wormhole technology was employed. After ships in DS9 went to the Gamma Quadrant all the time without any of the negative effects of hyper-acceleration.

    – Emsley Wyatt
    56 mins ago














0












0








0








We know that ships in the Star Trek universe can travel very fast, but this is still generally limited by the technology of the time. Sometimes travel is accomplished by instantaneous travel using wormholes. Q teleporting, or slipstream travel.



The Caretaker used his array to pull Voyager across the universe. From the way it was depicted in the show, this was essentially a wave of energy that pushed Voyager across space - it didn't transport them immediately, place them into a corridor, or open any kind of 'shortcut' through another dimension.



Assuming that the wave simply accelerated the ship to way above warp-10, how was the entire crew (not to mention the ship itself) not liquefied by the forces? I would assume that the inertial dampeners and whatever other technology was in place could easily handle speeds that the ship was intended to travel at, but Voyager hit speeds exponentially higher than what it was capable of managing on its own. I can't imagine that safety technology of the day could simply mitigate any arbitrary amount of acceleration - surely it had upper limits just like any other tech of the time.










share|improve this question














We know that ships in the Star Trek universe can travel very fast, but this is still generally limited by the technology of the time. Sometimes travel is accomplished by instantaneous travel using wormholes. Q teleporting, or slipstream travel.



The Caretaker used his array to pull Voyager across the universe. From the way it was depicted in the show, this was essentially a wave of energy that pushed Voyager across space - it didn't transport them immediately, place them into a corridor, or open any kind of 'shortcut' through another dimension.



Assuming that the wave simply accelerated the ship to way above warp-10, how was the entire crew (not to mention the ship itself) not liquefied by the forces? I would assume that the inertial dampeners and whatever other technology was in place could easily handle speeds that the ship was intended to travel at, but Voyager hit speeds exponentially higher than what it was capable of managing on its own. I can't imagine that safety technology of the day could simply mitigate any arbitrary amount of acceleration - surely it had upper limits just like any other tech of the time.







star-trek star-trek-voyager






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









Brian RBrian R

1454




1454













  • Don't know that it was ever addressed but perhaps some sort of "on-demand" wormhole technology was employed. After ships in DS9 went to the Gamma Quadrant all the time without any of the negative effects of hyper-acceleration.

    – Emsley Wyatt
    56 mins ago



















  • Don't know that it was ever addressed but perhaps some sort of "on-demand" wormhole technology was employed. After ships in DS9 went to the Gamma Quadrant all the time without any of the negative effects of hyper-acceleration.

    – Emsley Wyatt
    56 mins ago

















Don't know that it was ever addressed but perhaps some sort of "on-demand" wormhole technology was employed. After ships in DS9 went to the Gamma Quadrant all the time without any of the negative effects of hyper-acceleration.

– Emsley Wyatt
56 mins ago





Don't know that it was ever addressed but perhaps some sort of "on-demand" wormhole technology was employed. After ships in DS9 went to the Gamma Quadrant all the time without any of the negative effects of hyper-acceleration.

– Emsley Wyatt
56 mins ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205211%2fhow-did-the-caretaker-not-kill-everyone-on-voyager-when-pulling-them-into-the-de%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205211%2fhow-did-the-caretaker-not-kill-everyone-on-voyager-when-pulling-them-into-the-de%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to label and detect the document text images

Vallis Paradisi

Tabula Rosettana