Sixth grade math (number related) problem












1












$begingroup$


We have this statement (about rational numbers, btw):



If $m-n+p = p$ and $ m neq n neq 0$ then $ m = -n$



Is this true?

a) always

b) never

c) sometimes



The given answer is b) but:

1) this textbook often has some wrong answers and

2) this question got me really thinking...



According to the truth table of the implication if the premise is false, then the whole implication is true, no matter what the conclusion is.
In this case the premise is a conjunction of several facts, two of which are contradictory ($m = n $ and $m neq n$).
So the premise is false. And so I conclude the whole implication is true.

Then... what does that mean? I guess it means the correct answer is a).






logic education rational-numbers







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    We have this statement (about rational numbers, btw):



    If $m-n+p = p$ and $ m neq n neq 0$ then $ m = -n$



    Is this true?

    a) always

    b) never

    c) sometimes



    The given answer is b) but:

    1) this textbook often has some wrong answers and

    2) this question got me really thinking...



    According to the truth table of the implication if the premise is false, then the whole implication is true, no matter what the conclusion is.
    In this case the premise is a conjunction of several facts, two of which are contradictory ($m = n $ and $m neq n$).
    So the premise is false. And so I conclude the whole implication is true.

    Then... what does that mean? I guess it means the correct answer is a).






    logic education rational-numbers







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      We have this statement (about rational numbers, btw):



      If $m-n+p = p$ and $ m neq n neq 0$ then $ m = -n$



      Is this true?

      a) always

      b) never

      c) sometimes



      The given answer is b) but:

      1) this textbook often has some wrong answers and

      2) this question got me really thinking...



      According to the truth table of the implication if the premise is false, then the whole implication is true, no matter what the conclusion is.
      In this case the premise is a conjunction of several facts, two of which are contradictory ($m = n $ and $m neq n$).
      So the premise is false. And so I conclude the whole implication is true.

      Then... what does that mean? I guess it means the correct answer is a).






      logic education rational-numbers







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      We have this statement (about rational numbers, btw):



      If $m-n+p = p$ and $ m neq n neq 0$ then $ m = -n$



      Is this true?

      a) always

      b) never

      c) sometimes



      The given answer is b) but:

      1) this textbook often has some wrong answers and

      2) this question got me really thinking...



      According to the truth table of the implication if the premise is false, then the whole implication is true, no matter what the conclusion is.
      In this case the premise is a conjunction of several facts, two of which are contradictory ($m = n $ and $m neq n$).
      So the premise is false. And so I conclude the whole implication is true.

      Then... what does that mean? I guess it means the correct answer is a).






      logic education rational-numbers




      logic education rational-numbers






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      peter.petrovpeter.petrov

      5,422821




      5,422821






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          I believe this is a poorly worded math problem, sixth grade or otherwise. The statement



          $$m neq n neq 0$$



          is possibly meant to be something like



          $$m, n neq 0$$



          instead. This would be to ensure that $m = n$ and $m = -n$ can't both be true simultaneously as it only occurs when $m = n = 0$.



          This is only a guess, but it would mean the question would then be consistent with the textbook's provided answer.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            It's unclear what $m neq n neq 0$ means. But, suppose that instead the statement were:



            "If $m - n + p = p$ and $m neq n$ then $m = -n$."



            In this case, the statement would be true (vacuously true). I wouldn't describe the statement as "always true" ; the statement is simply "true".






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              "always" because it is never true that $(m-n+p=p) land(mneq n)$.
              $endgroup$
              – jordan_glen
              3 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              The phrase "always true" seems redundant. There is no need for the word "always". The statement I mentioned is simply "true".
              $endgroup$
              – littleO
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Could be "true for all values of $p$".
              $endgroup$
              – dbx
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              It is always true in the sense that $forall m, forall n, forall pBig((mneq n land m-n+p=p)to (m= -n)Big)$ is true. Don't be so patronizing in your tone, please. Be kind.
              $endgroup$
              – jordan_glen
              3 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              I didn't intend for my tone to sound patronizing, sorry if it did! However, I stand by my point that the word "always" is unnecessary. For example, one wouldn't describe Fermat's Last Theorem as being "always true", it's just a statement that is true.
              $endgroup$
              – littleO
              3 hours ago











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079912%2fsixth-grade-math-number-related-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            I believe this is a poorly worded math problem, sixth grade or otherwise. The statement



            $$m neq n neq 0$$



            is possibly meant to be something like



            $$m, n neq 0$$



            instead. This would be to ensure that $m = n$ and $m = -n$ can't both be true simultaneously as it only occurs when $m = n = 0$.



            This is only a guess, but it would mean the question would then be consistent with the textbook's provided answer.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              I believe this is a poorly worded math problem, sixth grade or otherwise. The statement



              $$m neq n neq 0$$



              is possibly meant to be something like



              $$m, n neq 0$$



              instead. This would be to ensure that $m = n$ and $m = -n$ can't both be true simultaneously as it only occurs when $m = n = 0$.



              This is only a guess, but it would mean the question would then be consistent with the textbook's provided answer.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                I believe this is a poorly worded math problem, sixth grade or otherwise. The statement



                $$m neq n neq 0$$



                is possibly meant to be something like



                $$m, n neq 0$$



                instead. This would be to ensure that $m = n$ and $m = -n$ can't both be true simultaneously as it only occurs when $m = n = 0$.



                This is only a guess, but it would mean the question would then be consistent with the textbook's provided answer.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                I believe this is a poorly worded math problem, sixth grade or otherwise. The statement



                $$m neq n neq 0$$



                is possibly meant to be something like



                $$m, n neq 0$$



                instead. This would be to ensure that $m = n$ and $m = -n$ can't both be true simultaneously as it only occurs when $m = n = 0$.



                This is only a guess, but it would mean the question would then be consistent with the textbook's provided answer.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 3 hours ago

























                answered 4 hours ago









                John OmielanJohn Omielan

                1,47629




                1,47629























                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    It's unclear what $m neq n neq 0$ means. But, suppose that instead the statement were:



                    "If $m - n + p = p$ and $m neq n$ then $m = -n$."



                    In this case, the statement would be true (vacuously true). I wouldn't describe the statement as "always true" ; the statement is simply "true".






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      "always" because it is never true that $(m-n+p=p) land(mneq n)$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jordan_glen
                      3 hours ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      The phrase "always true" seems redundant. There is no need for the word "always". The statement I mentioned is simply "true".
                      $endgroup$
                      – littleO
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Could be "true for all values of $p$".
                      $endgroup$
                      – dbx
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It is always true in the sense that $forall m, forall n, forall pBig((mneq n land m-n+p=p)to (m= -n)Big)$ is true. Don't be so patronizing in your tone, please. Be kind.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jordan_glen
                      3 hours ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      I didn't intend for my tone to sound patronizing, sorry if it did! However, I stand by my point that the word "always" is unnecessary. For example, one wouldn't describe Fermat's Last Theorem as being "always true", it's just a statement that is true.
                      $endgroup$
                      – littleO
                      3 hours ago
















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    It's unclear what $m neq n neq 0$ means. But, suppose that instead the statement were:



                    "If $m - n + p = p$ and $m neq n$ then $m = -n$."



                    In this case, the statement would be true (vacuously true). I wouldn't describe the statement as "always true" ; the statement is simply "true".






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      "always" because it is never true that $(m-n+p=p) land(mneq n)$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jordan_glen
                      3 hours ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      The phrase "always true" seems redundant. There is no need for the word "always". The statement I mentioned is simply "true".
                      $endgroup$
                      – littleO
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Could be "true for all values of $p$".
                      $endgroup$
                      – dbx
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It is always true in the sense that $forall m, forall n, forall pBig((mneq n land m-n+p=p)to (m= -n)Big)$ is true. Don't be so patronizing in your tone, please. Be kind.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jordan_glen
                      3 hours ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      I didn't intend for my tone to sound patronizing, sorry if it did! However, I stand by my point that the word "always" is unnecessary. For example, one wouldn't describe Fermat's Last Theorem as being "always true", it's just a statement that is true.
                      $endgroup$
                      – littleO
                      3 hours ago














                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    It's unclear what $m neq n neq 0$ means. But, suppose that instead the statement were:



                    "If $m - n + p = p$ and $m neq n$ then $m = -n$."



                    In this case, the statement would be true (vacuously true). I wouldn't describe the statement as "always true" ; the statement is simply "true".






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    It's unclear what $m neq n neq 0$ means. But, suppose that instead the statement were:



                    "If $m - n + p = p$ and $m neq n$ then $m = -n$."



                    In this case, the statement would be true (vacuously true). I wouldn't describe the statement as "always true" ; the statement is simply "true".







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 3 hours ago

























                    answered 3 hours ago









                    littleOlittleO

                    29.5k645109




                    29.5k645109












                    • $begingroup$
                      "always" because it is never true that $(m-n+p=p) land(mneq n)$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jordan_glen
                      3 hours ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      The phrase "always true" seems redundant. There is no need for the word "always". The statement I mentioned is simply "true".
                      $endgroup$
                      – littleO
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Could be "true for all values of $p$".
                      $endgroup$
                      – dbx
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It is always true in the sense that $forall m, forall n, forall pBig((mneq n land m-n+p=p)to (m= -n)Big)$ is true. Don't be so patronizing in your tone, please. Be kind.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jordan_glen
                      3 hours ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      I didn't intend for my tone to sound patronizing, sorry if it did! However, I stand by my point that the word "always" is unnecessary. For example, one wouldn't describe Fermat's Last Theorem as being "always true", it's just a statement that is true.
                      $endgroup$
                      – littleO
                      3 hours ago


















                    • $begingroup$
                      "always" because it is never true that $(m-n+p=p) land(mneq n)$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jordan_glen
                      3 hours ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      The phrase "always true" seems redundant. There is no need for the word "always". The statement I mentioned is simply "true".
                      $endgroup$
                      – littleO
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Could be "true for all values of $p$".
                      $endgroup$
                      – dbx
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It is always true in the sense that $forall m, forall n, forall pBig((mneq n land m-n+p=p)to (m= -n)Big)$ is true. Don't be so patronizing in your tone, please. Be kind.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jordan_glen
                      3 hours ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      I didn't intend for my tone to sound patronizing, sorry if it did! However, I stand by my point that the word "always" is unnecessary. For example, one wouldn't describe Fermat's Last Theorem as being "always true", it's just a statement that is true.
                      $endgroup$
                      – littleO
                      3 hours ago
















                    $begingroup$
                    "always" because it is never true that $(m-n+p=p) land(mneq n)$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jordan_glen
                    3 hours ago






                    $begingroup$
                    "always" because it is never true that $(m-n+p=p) land(mneq n)$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jordan_glen
                    3 hours ago














                    $begingroup$
                    The phrase "always true" seems redundant. There is no need for the word "always". The statement I mentioned is simply "true".
                    $endgroup$
                    – littleO
                    3 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    The phrase "always true" seems redundant. There is no need for the word "always". The statement I mentioned is simply "true".
                    $endgroup$
                    – littleO
                    3 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    Could be "true for all values of $p$".
                    $endgroup$
                    – dbx
                    3 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Could be "true for all values of $p$".
                    $endgroup$
                    – dbx
                    3 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    It is always true in the sense that $forall m, forall n, forall pBig((mneq n land m-n+p=p)to (m= -n)Big)$ is true. Don't be so patronizing in your tone, please. Be kind.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jordan_glen
                    3 hours ago






                    $begingroup$
                    It is always true in the sense that $forall m, forall n, forall pBig((mneq n land m-n+p=p)to (m= -n)Big)$ is true. Don't be so patronizing in your tone, please. Be kind.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jordan_glen
                    3 hours ago














                    $begingroup$
                    I didn't intend for my tone to sound patronizing, sorry if it did! However, I stand by my point that the word "always" is unnecessary. For example, one wouldn't describe Fermat's Last Theorem as being "always true", it's just a statement that is true.
                    $endgroup$
                    – littleO
                    3 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    I didn't intend for my tone to sound patronizing, sorry if it did! However, I stand by my point that the word "always" is unnecessary. For example, one wouldn't describe Fermat's Last Theorem as being "always true", it's just a statement that is true.
                    $endgroup$
                    – littleO
                    3 hours ago


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079912%2fsixth-grade-math-number-related-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to label and detect the document text images

                    Image
                    1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
                    Read more

                    Vallis Paradisi

                    Image
                    Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
                    Read more

                    Tabula Rosettana

                    Image
                    Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
                    Read more