can entangled photons produce an interference pattern?
$begingroup$
Suppose you have a laser that emits entangled photons in opposite directions towards a double-slit screen setup as shown below.
The photons are entangled such that if a photon on the left travels through slit A, then its entangled photon goes through slit D. If we do not record any which path information on either side, would we get an interference or clump pattern recorded on the screens beyond the double-slits?
quantum-mechanics quantum-entanglement double-slit-experiment interference coherence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose you have a laser that emits entangled photons in opposite directions towards a double-slit screen setup as shown below.
The photons are entangled such that if a photon on the left travels through slit A, then its entangled photon goes through slit D. If we do not record any which path information on either side, would we get an interference or clump pattern recorded on the screens beyond the double-slits?
quantum-mechanics quantum-entanglement double-slit-experiment interference coherence
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Which degree of freedom is entangled?
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
The degree of freedom that is entangled is path.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
A photon is a wave. It doesn't have a path.
$endgroup$
– safesphere
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose you have a laser that emits entangled photons in opposite directions towards a double-slit screen setup as shown below.
The photons are entangled such that if a photon on the left travels through slit A, then its entangled photon goes through slit D. If we do not record any which path information on either side, would we get an interference or clump pattern recorded on the screens beyond the double-slits?
quantum-mechanics quantum-entanglement double-slit-experiment interference coherence
$endgroup$
Suppose you have a laser that emits entangled photons in opposite directions towards a double-slit screen setup as shown below.
The photons are entangled such that if a photon on the left travels through slit A, then its entangled photon goes through slit D. If we do not record any which path information on either side, would we get an interference or clump pattern recorded on the screens beyond the double-slits?
quantum-mechanics quantum-entanglement double-slit-experiment interference coherence
quantum-mechanics quantum-entanglement double-slit-experiment interference coherence
edited 11 hours ago
Norbert Schuch
8,76722438
8,76722438
asked 12 hours ago
kishdudekishdude
171
171
$begingroup$
Which degree of freedom is entangled?
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
The degree of freedom that is entangled is path.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
A photon is a wave. It doesn't have a path.
$endgroup$
– safesphere
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Which degree of freedom is entangled?
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
The degree of freedom that is entangled is path.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
A photon is a wave. It doesn't have a path.
$endgroup$
– safesphere
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Which degree of freedom is entangled?
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Which degree of freedom is entangled?
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
The degree of freedom that is entangled is path.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
The degree of freedom that is entangled is path.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
A photon is a wave. It doesn't have a path.
$endgroup$
– safesphere
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
A photon is a wave. It doesn't have a path.
$endgroup$
– safesphere
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can infer what happens by looking at one of the screens only (say, the left one). In that case, instead of entangled photons, you can as well just look at the left photons. If some of their degrees of freedom (DoF) are entangled with the right photons, it means that the left photons don't have a well-defined value for that DoF (i.e. it is in a mixed state). So the question is whether you still see an interference pattern if some degree of freedom has some randomness.
First, note that every photon just interferes with itself. Thus, the distribution of each individual photon on the screen will follow an interference pattern.
Now if the entangled DoF is the polarization, each photon will follow the same interference pattern, and you will see an interference pattern.
On the other hand, if the entangled DoF is the frequency, the spacing of the pattern will be different for each photon, and thus, you will see the average of interference patterns over the spread of the frequency. For a large enough spread, this will destroy the interference pattern (the spacing is proportional to the wavelength). If you want to know how this changes with the spreading of the frequency, this is a nice exercise problem!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If the DoF is polarization can we still expect that for every photon going through slit A that its entangled pair has to through slit D?
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude It doesn't matter. If these are really screens, then you will see an averaged pattern over many photons, so in the end you can treat the two screens completely independently. It only becomes different once you try to correlate the measurements on the two screens.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So en essence what you are saying is that you will see an interference pattern on both screens since this is what would happen if we take each side independently.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude ... unless the photons are frequency-entangled, with a too big frequency spread. Though even then, I'd guess it still looks different from a single peak distribution.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455287%2fcan-entangled-photons-produce-an-interference-pattern%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can infer what happens by looking at one of the screens only (say, the left one). In that case, instead of entangled photons, you can as well just look at the left photons. If some of their degrees of freedom (DoF) are entangled with the right photons, it means that the left photons don't have a well-defined value for that DoF (i.e. it is in a mixed state). So the question is whether you still see an interference pattern if some degree of freedom has some randomness.
First, note that every photon just interferes with itself. Thus, the distribution of each individual photon on the screen will follow an interference pattern.
Now if the entangled DoF is the polarization, each photon will follow the same interference pattern, and you will see an interference pattern.
On the other hand, if the entangled DoF is the frequency, the spacing of the pattern will be different for each photon, and thus, you will see the average of interference patterns over the spread of the frequency. For a large enough spread, this will destroy the interference pattern (the spacing is proportional to the wavelength). If you want to know how this changes with the spreading of the frequency, this is a nice exercise problem!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If the DoF is polarization can we still expect that for every photon going through slit A that its entangled pair has to through slit D?
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude It doesn't matter. If these are really screens, then you will see an averaged pattern over many photons, so in the end you can treat the two screens completely independently. It only becomes different once you try to correlate the measurements on the two screens.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So en essence what you are saying is that you will see an interference pattern on both screens since this is what would happen if we take each side independently.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude ... unless the photons are frequency-entangled, with a too big frequency spread. Though even then, I'd guess it still looks different from a single peak distribution.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can infer what happens by looking at one of the screens only (say, the left one). In that case, instead of entangled photons, you can as well just look at the left photons. If some of their degrees of freedom (DoF) are entangled with the right photons, it means that the left photons don't have a well-defined value for that DoF (i.e. it is in a mixed state). So the question is whether you still see an interference pattern if some degree of freedom has some randomness.
First, note that every photon just interferes with itself. Thus, the distribution of each individual photon on the screen will follow an interference pattern.
Now if the entangled DoF is the polarization, each photon will follow the same interference pattern, and you will see an interference pattern.
On the other hand, if the entangled DoF is the frequency, the spacing of the pattern will be different for each photon, and thus, you will see the average of interference patterns over the spread of the frequency. For a large enough spread, this will destroy the interference pattern (the spacing is proportional to the wavelength). If you want to know how this changes with the spreading of the frequency, this is a nice exercise problem!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If the DoF is polarization can we still expect that for every photon going through slit A that its entangled pair has to through slit D?
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude It doesn't matter. If these are really screens, then you will see an averaged pattern over many photons, so in the end you can treat the two screens completely independently. It only becomes different once you try to correlate the measurements on the two screens.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So en essence what you are saying is that you will see an interference pattern on both screens since this is what would happen if we take each side independently.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude ... unless the photons are frequency-entangled, with a too big frequency spread. Though even then, I'd guess it still looks different from a single peak distribution.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can infer what happens by looking at one of the screens only (say, the left one). In that case, instead of entangled photons, you can as well just look at the left photons. If some of their degrees of freedom (DoF) are entangled with the right photons, it means that the left photons don't have a well-defined value for that DoF (i.e. it is in a mixed state). So the question is whether you still see an interference pattern if some degree of freedom has some randomness.
First, note that every photon just interferes with itself. Thus, the distribution of each individual photon on the screen will follow an interference pattern.
Now if the entangled DoF is the polarization, each photon will follow the same interference pattern, and you will see an interference pattern.
On the other hand, if the entangled DoF is the frequency, the spacing of the pattern will be different for each photon, and thus, you will see the average of interference patterns over the spread of the frequency. For a large enough spread, this will destroy the interference pattern (the spacing is proportional to the wavelength). If you want to know how this changes with the spreading of the frequency, this is a nice exercise problem!
$endgroup$
You can infer what happens by looking at one of the screens only (say, the left one). In that case, instead of entangled photons, you can as well just look at the left photons. If some of their degrees of freedom (DoF) are entangled with the right photons, it means that the left photons don't have a well-defined value for that DoF (i.e. it is in a mixed state). So the question is whether you still see an interference pattern if some degree of freedom has some randomness.
First, note that every photon just interferes with itself. Thus, the distribution of each individual photon on the screen will follow an interference pattern.
Now if the entangled DoF is the polarization, each photon will follow the same interference pattern, and you will see an interference pattern.
On the other hand, if the entangled DoF is the frequency, the spacing of the pattern will be different for each photon, and thus, you will see the average of interference patterns over the spread of the frequency. For a large enough spread, this will destroy the interference pattern (the spacing is proportional to the wavelength). If you want to know how this changes with the spreading of the frequency, this is a nice exercise problem!
answered 11 hours ago
Norbert SchuchNorbert Schuch
8,76722438
8,76722438
$begingroup$
If the DoF is polarization can we still expect that for every photon going through slit A that its entangled pair has to through slit D?
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude It doesn't matter. If these are really screens, then you will see an averaged pattern over many photons, so in the end you can treat the two screens completely independently. It only becomes different once you try to correlate the measurements on the two screens.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So en essence what you are saying is that you will see an interference pattern on both screens since this is what would happen if we take each side independently.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude ... unless the photons are frequency-entangled, with a too big frequency spread. Though even then, I'd guess it still looks different from a single peak distribution.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the DoF is polarization can we still expect that for every photon going through slit A that its entangled pair has to through slit D?
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude It doesn't matter. If these are really screens, then you will see an averaged pattern over many photons, so in the end you can treat the two screens completely independently. It only becomes different once you try to correlate the measurements on the two screens.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So en essence what you are saying is that you will see an interference pattern on both screens since this is what would happen if we take each side independently.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude ... unless the photons are frequency-entangled, with a too big frequency spread. Though even then, I'd guess it still looks different from a single peak distribution.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the DoF is polarization can we still expect that for every photon going through slit A that its entangled pair has to through slit D?
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the DoF is polarization can we still expect that for every photon going through slit A that its entangled pair has to through slit D?
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude It doesn't matter. If these are really screens, then you will see an averaged pattern over many photons, so in the end you can treat the two screens completely independently. It only becomes different once you try to correlate the measurements on the two screens.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude It doesn't matter. If these are really screens, then you will see an averaged pattern over many photons, so in the end you can treat the two screens completely independently. It only becomes different once you try to correlate the measurements on the two screens.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So en essence what you are saying is that you will see an interference pattern on both screens since this is what would happen if we take each side independently.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So en essence what you are saying is that you will see an interference pattern on both screens since this is what would happen if we take each side independently.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude ... unless the photons are frequency-entangled, with a too big frequency spread. Though even then, I'd guess it still looks different from a single peak distribution.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@kishdude ... unless the photons are frequency-entangled, with a too big frequency spread. Though even then, I'd guess it still looks different from a single peak distribution.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455287%2fcan-entangled-photons-produce-an-interference-pattern%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Which degree of freedom is entangled?
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
The degree of freedom that is entangled is path.
$endgroup$
– kishdude
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
A photon is a wave. It doesn't have a path.
$endgroup$
– safesphere
8 hours ago