How to charge percentage of transaction cost?
Example:
uint public createPostCost = 0.0003 ether;
function createPost(bytes32 _post)
public payable {
require(msg.value >= createPostCost);
Post memory newPost;
newPost.post = _post;
}
Within a discussion forum dapp, the current implementation charges users a set fee per post created. I would like the charge to be dynamic, say 10% of the gas cost of the transaction. Is this possible to implement in the contract? Or is this something for front-end web3 to handle?
solidity web3js contract-development gas gas-limit
add a comment |
Example:
uint public createPostCost = 0.0003 ether;
function createPost(bytes32 _post)
public payable {
require(msg.value >= createPostCost);
Post memory newPost;
newPost.post = _post;
}
Within a discussion forum dapp, the current implementation charges users a set fee per post created. I would like the charge to be dynamic, say 10% of the gas cost of the transaction. Is this possible to implement in the contract? Or is this something for front-end web3 to handle?
solidity web3js contract-development gas gas-limit
add a comment |
Example:
uint public createPostCost = 0.0003 ether;
function createPost(bytes32 _post)
public payable {
require(msg.value >= createPostCost);
Post memory newPost;
newPost.post = _post;
}
Within a discussion forum dapp, the current implementation charges users a set fee per post created. I would like the charge to be dynamic, say 10% of the gas cost of the transaction. Is this possible to implement in the contract? Or is this something for front-end web3 to handle?
solidity web3js contract-development gas gas-limit
Example:
uint public createPostCost = 0.0003 ether;
function createPost(bytes32 _post)
public payable {
require(msg.value >= createPostCost);
Post memory newPost;
newPost.post = _post;
}
Within a discussion forum dapp, the current implementation charges users a set fee per post created. I would like the charge to be dynamic, say 10% of the gas cost of the transaction. Is this possible to implement in the contract? Or is this something for front-end web3 to handle?
solidity web3js contract-development gas gas-limit
solidity web3js contract-development gas gas-limit
edited 3 hours ago
shane
2,4524832
2,4524832
asked 3 hours ago
Jaren LJaren L
335
335
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes, you can let the charge be a function of the gas of the transaction. You would do something like this:
uint256 charge = gasleft() / 10;
This is sensitive and you should know that gasleft()
returns the amount of gas available at that point in the execution. Therefore, if you call gasleft()
at the beginning of a function, the number will be higher than at the end of the function.
Additionally, someone may send a lot of unnecessary gas, so they could end up paying a lot.
My opinion is that it is best to handle this on the front-end.
Edit
If you are trying to take into account the gasPrice
, you can use tx.gasprice
. See here for more information.
2
Psst,msg.gas
has been removed and replaced bygasleft
as per solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/…
– Lauri Peltonen
3 hours ago
Ahh yes. Thank you.
– shane
3 hours ago
Ah that makes sense. If I made a require to check the msg.value >= 10% of tx.gasprice, would that work? Would there be discrepancies between generating the web3 function call price + value and the contract value?
– Jaren L
27 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "642"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fethereum.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f69960%2fhow-to-charge-percentage-of-transaction-cost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, you can let the charge be a function of the gas of the transaction. You would do something like this:
uint256 charge = gasleft() / 10;
This is sensitive and you should know that gasleft()
returns the amount of gas available at that point in the execution. Therefore, if you call gasleft()
at the beginning of a function, the number will be higher than at the end of the function.
Additionally, someone may send a lot of unnecessary gas, so they could end up paying a lot.
My opinion is that it is best to handle this on the front-end.
Edit
If you are trying to take into account the gasPrice
, you can use tx.gasprice
. See here for more information.
2
Psst,msg.gas
has been removed and replaced bygasleft
as per solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/…
– Lauri Peltonen
3 hours ago
Ahh yes. Thank you.
– shane
3 hours ago
Ah that makes sense. If I made a require to check the msg.value >= 10% of tx.gasprice, would that work? Would there be discrepancies between generating the web3 function call price + value and the contract value?
– Jaren L
27 mins ago
add a comment |
Yes, you can let the charge be a function of the gas of the transaction. You would do something like this:
uint256 charge = gasleft() / 10;
This is sensitive and you should know that gasleft()
returns the amount of gas available at that point in the execution. Therefore, if you call gasleft()
at the beginning of a function, the number will be higher than at the end of the function.
Additionally, someone may send a lot of unnecessary gas, so they could end up paying a lot.
My opinion is that it is best to handle this on the front-end.
Edit
If you are trying to take into account the gasPrice
, you can use tx.gasprice
. See here for more information.
2
Psst,msg.gas
has been removed and replaced bygasleft
as per solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/…
– Lauri Peltonen
3 hours ago
Ahh yes. Thank you.
– shane
3 hours ago
Ah that makes sense. If I made a require to check the msg.value >= 10% of tx.gasprice, would that work? Would there be discrepancies between generating the web3 function call price + value and the contract value?
– Jaren L
27 mins ago
add a comment |
Yes, you can let the charge be a function of the gas of the transaction. You would do something like this:
uint256 charge = gasleft() / 10;
This is sensitive and you should know that gasleft()
returns the amount of gas available at that point in the execution. Therefore, if you call gasleft()
at the beginning of a function, the number will be higher than at the end of the function.
Additionally, someone may send a lot of unnecessary gas, so they could end up paying a lot.
My opinion is that it is best to handle this on the front-end.
Edit
If you are trying to take into account the gasPrice
, you can use tx.gasprice
. See here for more information.
Yes, you can let the charge be a function of the gas of the transaction. You would do something like this:
uint256 charge = gasleft() / 10;
This is sensitive and you should know that gasleft()
returns the amount of gas available at that point in the execution. Therefore, if you call gasleft()
at the beginning of a function, the number will be higher than at the end of the function.
Additionally, someone may send a lot of unnecessary gas, so they could end up paying a lot.
My opinion is that it is best to handle this on the front-end.
Edit
If you are trying to take into account the gasPrice
, you can use tx.gasprice
. See here for more information.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
shaneshane
2,4524832
2,4524832
2
Psst,msg.gas
has been removed and replaced bygasleft
as per solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/…
– Lauri Peltonen
3 hours ago
Ahh yes. Thank you.
– shane
3 hours ago
Ah that makes sense. If I made a require to check the msg.value >= 10% of tx.gasprice, would that work? Would there be discrepancies between generating the web3 function call price + value and the contract value?
– Jaren L
27 mins ago
add a comment |
2
Psst,msg.gas
has been removed and replaced bygasleft
as per solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/…
– Lauri Peltonen
3 hours ago
Ahh yes. Thank you.
– shane
3 hours ago
Ah that makes sense. If I made a require to check the msg.value >= 10% of tx.gasprice, would that work? Would there be discrepancies between generating the web3 function call price + value and the contract value?
– Jaren L
27 mins ago
2
2
Psst,
msg.gas
has been removed and replaced by gasleft
as per solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/…– Lauri Peltonen
3 hours ago
Psst,
msg.gas
has been removed and replaced by gasleft
as per solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/…– Lauri Peltonen
3 hours ago
Ahh yes. Thank you.
– shane
3 hours ago
Ahh yes. Thank you.
– shane
3 hours ago
Ah that makes sense. If I made a require to check the msg.value >= 10% of tx.gasprice, would that work? Would there be discrepancies between generating the web3 function call price + value and the contract value?
– Jaren L
27 mins ago
Ah that makes sense. If I made a require to check the msg.value >= 10% of tx.gasprice, would that work? Would there be discrepancies between generating the web3 function call price + value and the contract value?
– Jaren L
27 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ethereum Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fethereum.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f69960%2fhow-to-charge-percentage-of-transaction-cost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown