How long ago was the yo-yo first used as a weapon?
How long ago was the yo-yo first used as a weapon?
weapons
add a comment |
How long ago was the yo-yo first used as a weapon?
weapons
1
What has your research on this shown you? For example: was it ever used as a weapon?
– LangLangC
46 mins ago
1
Why would anyone use a yo-yo as a weapon? Were stones in such a short supply that you have to retrieve it after each throw? And what kind of target is where you want to throw stones at it multiple times from a distance of a meter or two at most?
– vsz
13 mins ago
add a comment |
How long ago was the yo-yo first used as a weapon?
weapons
How long ago was the yo-yo first used as a weapon?
weapons
weapons
edited 17 mins ago
Mark C. Wallace♦
23.4k972111
23.4k972111
asked 11 hours ago
Abraham RayAbraham Ray
2129
2129
1
What has your research on this shown you? For example: was it ever used as a weapon?
– LangLangC
46 mins ago
1
Why would anyone use a yo-yo as a weapon? Were stones in such a short supply that you have to retrieve it after each throw? And what kind of target is where you want to throw stones at it multiple times from a distance of a meter or two at most?
– vsz
13 mins ago
add a comment |
1
What has your research on this shown you? For example: was it ever used as a weapon?
– LangLangC
46 mins ago
1
Why would anyone use a yo-yo as a weapon? Were stones in such a short supply that you have to retrieve it after each throw? And what kind of target is where you want to throw stones at it multiple times from a distance of a meter or two at most?
– vsz
13 mins ago
1
1
What has your research on this shown you? For example: was it ever used as a weapon?
– LangLangC
46 mins ago
What has your research on this shown you? For example: was it ever used as a weapon?
– LangLangC
46 mins ago
1
1
Why would anyone use a yo-yo as a weapon? Were stones in such a short supply that you have to retrieve it after each throw? And what kind of target is where you want to throw stones at it multiple times from a distance of a meter or two at most?
– vsz
13 mins ago
Why would anyone use a yo-yo as a weapon? Were stones in such a short supply that you have to retrieve it after each throw? And what kind of target is where you want to throw stones at it multiple times from a distance of a meter or two at most?
– vsz
13 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
History of the Yo-yo Origins
The origin of the yo-yo is still under argument, but documentaries that have been made show that it came from Greece. It is rumored that it was used as a weapon for hunting game or other land animals. Although physics may prove the use of the yo-yo as a hunting tool to be ineffective, the concept of being able to retry a missed throw of an object was still an amazing feat. But people still have, to this day, believed it to be a weapon. The yo-yos was actually first made by the Duncan yo-yo demonstrators in the 1930s and the yo-yo today is now considered a weapon due to the Duncan brothers making up the rumor of it being a weapon, this was done as a marketing strategy. Since the time of the Duncan brothers' making of the rumor, people have tried to use it as a weapon but in all cases it has failed. The rumor still stands today and many people still believe but it in fact isn't more than a child's toy.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
6
You seem to be quoting text from a site called yoyo.fandom.com, which provides no source materials and no references for any of the claims it makes. Is this really such a trustworthy site?
– terdon
4 hours ago
6
@terdon: When a fandom site disclaims something (the "yo-yo as weapon" being no more than a marketing gag), that's much more believable than if they were claiming something (the yo-yo being a weapon).
– DevSolar
3 hours ago
3
@SolarMike no, I don't but I'm not the one presenting this as an answer :) It may well be true, for all I know. I'm just saying that the source doesn't seem particularly credible and phrases like "documentaries [...] show" and the fact that the quote seems to both claim an Ancient Greek origin and that yo-yos were created in the 30s, combined with the complete lack of any references to back any of the claims up, make the quote feel suspect. It just seems like the musing of some random internet person.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
@DevSolar and it may well be true. I just don't see any reason to take this particular source as authoritative.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
I second terdon's scepticism: "fandom", formerly known as "wikia", is a set of wiki sites some of which have just a handful of enthusiastic users and no editorial rigour at all. They may be useful as starting points in searching for more evidence, but they should not be trusted as an authoritative source in their own right, and more than you should trust "iloveyoyos.blogspot.com", or a post on Facebook headed "did you know?"
– IMSoP
46 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50781%2fhow-long-ago-was-the-yo-yo-first-used-as-a-weapon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
History of the Yo-yo Origins
The origin of the yo-yo is still under argument, but documentaries that have been made show that it came from Greece. It is rumored that it was used as a weapon for hunting game or other land animals. Although physics may prove the use of the yo-yo as a hunting tool to be ineffective, the concept of being able to retry a missed throw of an object was still an amazing feat. But people still have, to this day, believed it to be a weapon. The yo-yos was actually first made by the Duncan yo-yo demonstrators in the 1930s and the yo-yo today is now considered a weapon due to the Duncan brothers making up the rumor of it being a weapon, this was done as a marketing strategy. Since the time of the Duncan brothers' making of the rumor, people have tried to use it as a weapon but in all cases it has failed. The rumor still stands today and many people still believe but it in fact isn't more than a child's toy.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
6
You seem to be quoting text from a site called yoyo.fandom.com, which provides no source materials and no references for any of the claims it makes. Is this really such a trustworthy site?
– terdon
4 hours ago
6
@terdon: When a fandom site disclaims something (the "yo-yo as weapon" being no more than a marketing gag), that's much more believable than if they were claiming something (the yo-yo being a weapon).
– DevSolar
3 hours ago
3
@SolarMike no, I don't but I'm not the one presenting this as an answer :) It may well be true, for all I know. I'm just saying that the source doesn't seem particularly credible and phrases like "documentaries [...] show" and the fact that the quote seems to both claim an Ancient Greek origin and that yo-yos were created in the 30s, combined with the complete lack of any references to back any of the claims up, make the quote feel suspect. It just seems like the musing of some random internet person.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
@DevSolar and it may well be true. I just don't see any reason to take this particular source as authoritative.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
I second terdon's scepticism: "fandom", formerly known as "wikia", is a set of wiki sites some of which have just a handful of enthusiastic users and no editorial rigour at all. They may be useful as starting points in searching for more evidence, but they should not be trusted as an authoritative source in their own right, and more than you should trust "iloveyoyos.blogspot.com", or a post on Facebook headed "did you know?"
– IMSoP
46 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
History of the Yo-yo Origins
The origin of the yo-yo is still under argument, but documentaries that have been made show that it came from Greece. It is rumored that it was used as a weapon for hunting game or other land animals. Although physics may prove the use of the yo-yo as a hunting tool to be ineffective, the concept of being able to retry a missed throw of an object was still an amazing feat. But people still have, to this day, believed it to be a weapon. The yo-yos was actually first made by the Duncan yo-yo demonstrators in the 1930s and the yo-yo today is now considered a weapon due to the Duncan brothers making up the rumor of it being a weapon, this was done as a marketing strategy. Since the time of the Duncan brothers' making of the rumor, people have tried to use it as a weapon but in all cases it has failed. The rumor still stands today and many people still believe but it in fact isn't more than a child's toy.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
6
You seem to be quoting text from a site called yoyo.fandom.com, which provides no source materials and no references for any of the claims it makes. Is this really such a trustworthy site?
– terdon
4 hours ago
6
@terdon: When a fandom site disclaims something (the "yo-yo as weapon" being no more than a marketing gag), that's much more believable than if they were claiming something (the yo-yo being a weapon).
– DevSolar
3 hours ago
3
@SolarMike no, I don't but I'm not the one presenting this as an answer :) It may well be true, for all I know. I'm just saying that the source doesn't seem particularly credible and phrases like "documentaries [...] show" and the fact that the quote seems to both claim an Ancient Greek origin and that yo-yos were created in the 30s, combined with the complete lack of any references to back any of the claims up, make the quote feel suspect. It just seems like the musing of some random internet person.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
@DevSolar and it may well be true. I just don't see any reason to take this particular source as authoritative.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
I second terdon's scepticism: "fandom", formerly known as "wikia", is a set of wiki sites some of which have just a handful of enthusiastic users and no editorial rigour at all. They may be useful as starting points in searching for more evidence, but they should not be trusted as an authoritative source in their own right, and more than you should trust "iloveyoyos.blogspot.com", or a post on Facebook headed "did you know?"
– IMSoP
46 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
History of the Yo-yo Origins
The origin of the yo-yo is still under argument, but documentaries that have been made show that it came from Greece. It is rumored that it was used as a weapon for hunting game or other land animals. Although physics may prove the use of the yo-yo as a hunting tool to be ineffective, the concept of being able to retry a missed throw of an object was still an amazing feat. But people still have, to this day, believed it to be a weapon. The yo-yos was actually first made by the Duncan yo-yo demonstrators in the 1930s and the yo-yo today is now considered a weapon due to the Duncan brothers making up the rumor of it being a weapon, this was done as a marketing strategy. Since the time of the Duncan brothers' making of the rumor, people have tried to use it as a weapon but in all cases it has failed. The rumor still stands today and many people still believe but it in fact isn't more than a child's toy.
History of the Yo-yo Origins
The origin of the yo-yo is still under argument, but documentaries that have been made show that it came from Greece. It is rumored that it was used as a weapon for hunting game or other land animals. Although physics may prove the use of the yo-yo as a hunting tool to be ineffective, the concept of being able to retry a missed throw of an object was still an amazing feat. But people still have, to this day, believed it to be a weapon. The yo-yos was actually first made by the Duncan yo-yo demonstrators in the 1930s and the yo-yo today is now considered a weapon due to the Duncan brothers making up the rumor of it being a weapon, this was done as a marketing strategy. Since the time of the Duncan brothers' making of the rumor, people have tried to use it as a weapon but in all cases it has failed. The rumor still stands today and many people still believe but it in fact isn't more than a child's toy.
answered 11 hours ago
pnutspnuts
640114
640114
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
6
You seem to be quoting text from a site called yoyo.fandom.com, which provides no source materials and no references for any of the claims it makes. Is this really such a trustworthy site?
– terdon
4 hours ago
6
@terdon: When a fandom site disclaims something (the "yo-yo as weapon" being no more than a marketing gag), that's much more believable than if they were claiming something (the yo-yo being a weapon).
– DevSolar
3 hours ago
3
@SolarMike no, I don't but I'm not the one presenting this as an answer :) It may well be true, for all I know. I'm just saying that the source doesn't seem particularly credible and phrases like "documentaries [...] show" and the fact that the quote seems to both claim an Ancient Greek origin and that yo-yos were created in the 30s, combined with the complete lack of any references to back any of the claims up, make the quote feel suspect. It just seems like the musing of some random internet person.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
@DevSolar and it may well be true. I just don't see any reason to take this particular source as authoritative.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
I second terdon's scepticism: "fandom", formerly known as "wikia", is a set of wiki sites some of which have just a handful of enthusiastic users and no editorial rigour at all. They may be useful as starting points in searching for more evidence, but they should not be trusted as an authoritative source in their own right, and more than you should trust "iloveyoyos.blogspot.com", or a post on Facebook headed "did you know?"
– IMSoP
46 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
6
You seem to be quoting text from a site called yoyo.fandom.com, which provides no source materials and no references for any of the claims it makes. Is this really such a trustworthy site?
– terdon
4 hours ago
6
@terdon: When a fandom site disclaims something (the "yo-yo as weapon" being no more than a marketing gag), that's much more believable than if they were claiming something (the yo-yo being a weapon).
– DevSolar
3 hours ago
3
@SolarMike no, I don't but I'm not the one presenting this as an answer :) It may well be true, for all I know. I'm just saying that the source doesn't seem particularly credible and phrases like "documentaries [...] show" and the fact that the quote seems to both claim an Ancient Greek origin and that yo-yos were created in the 30s, combined with the complete lack of any references to back any of the claims up, make the quote feel suspect. It just seems like the musing of some random internet person.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
@DevSolar and it may well be true. I just don't see any reason to take this particular source as authoritative.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
I second terdon's scepticism: "fandom", formerly known as "wikia", is a set of wiki sites some of which have just a handful of enthusiastic users and no editorial rigour at all. They may be useful as starting points in searching for more evidence, but they should not be trusted as an authoritative source in their own right, and more than you should trust "iloveyoyos.blogspot.com", or a post on Facebook headed "did you know?"
– IMSoP
46 mins ago
6
6
You seem to be quoting text from a site called yoyo.fandom.com, which provides no source materials and no references for any of the claims it makes. Is this really such a trustworthy site?
– terdon
4 hours ago
You seem to be quoting text from a site called yoyo.fandom.com, which provides no source materials and no references for any of the claims it makes. Is this really such a trustworthy site?
– terdon
4 hours ago
6
6
@terdon: When a fandom site disclaims something (the "yo-yo as weapon" being no more than a marketing gag), that's much more believable than if they were claiming something (the yo-yo being a weapon).
– DevSolar
3 hours ago
@terdon: When a fandom site disclaims something (the "yo-yo as weapon" being no more than a marketing gag), that's much more believable than if they were claiming something (the yo-yo being a weapon).
– DevSolar
3 hours ago
3
3
@SolarMike no, I don't but I'm not the one presenting this as an answer :) It may well be true, for all I know. I'm just saying that the source doesn't seem particularly credible and phrases like "documentaries [...] show" and the fact that the quote seems to both claim an Ancient Greek origin and that yo-yos were created in the 30s, combined with the complete lack of any references to back any of the claims up, make the quote feel suspect. It just seems like the musing of some random internet person.
– terdon
1 hour ago
@SolarMike no, I don't but I'm not the one presenting this as an answer :) It may well be true, for all I know. I'm just saying that the source doesn't seem particularly credible and phrases like "documentaries [...] show" and the fact that the quote seems to both claim an Ancient Greek origin and that yo-yos were created in the 30s, combined with the complete lack of any references to back any of the claims up, make the quote feel suspect. It just seems like the musing of some random internet person.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
2
@DevSolar and it may well be true. I just don't see any reason to take this particular source as authoritative.
– terdon
1 hour ago
@DevSolar and it may well be true. I just don't see any reason to take this particular source as authoritative.
– terdon
1 hour ago
2
2
I second terdon's scepticism: "fandom", formerly known as "wikia", is a set of wiki sites some of which have just a handful of enthusiastic users and no editorial rigour at all. They may be useful as starting points in searching for more evidence, but they should not be trusted as an authoritative source in their own right, and more than you should trust "iloveyoyos.blogspot.com", or a post on Facebook headed "did you know?"
– IMSoP
46 mins ago
I second terdon's scepticism: "fandom", formerly known as "wikia", is a set of wiki sites some of which have just a handful of enthusiastic users and no editorial rigour at all. They may be useful as starting points in searching for more evidence, but they should not be trusted as an authoritative source in their own right, and more than you should trust "iloveyoyos.blogspot.com", or a post on Facebook headed "did you know?"
– IMSoP
46 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50781%2fhow-long-ago-was-the-yo-yo-first-used-as-a-weapon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
What has your research on this shown you? For example: was it ever used as a weapon?
– LangLangC
46 mins ago
1
Why would anyone use a yo-yo as a weapon? Were stones in such a short supply that you have to retrieve it after each throw? And what kind of target is where you want to throw stones at it multiple times from a distance of a meter or two at most?
– vsz
13 mins ago