How much time does it take for a broken magnet to recover its poles?












1












$begingroup$


I understand that when you cut a magnet you end up with 2 magnets but I wonder how much time does it take to the magnetic domains to rearange and form the new pole. I know the answer may vary depending on the size of the magnet, the material, and some other variable so I'm searching for an answer as general as possible and how the variables may affect the answer.






electromagnetism







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I understand that when you cut a magnet you end up with 2 magnets but I wonder how much time does it take to the magnetic domains to rearange and form the new pole. I know the answer may vary depending on the size of the magnet, the material, and some other variable so I'm searching for an answer as general as possible and how the variables may affect the answer.






    electromagnetism







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I understand that when you cut a magnet you end up with 2 magnets but I wonder how much time does it take to the magnetic domains to rearange and form the new pole. I know the answer may vary depending on the size of the magnet, the material, and some other variable so I'm searching for an answer as general as possible and how the variables may affect the answer.






      electromagnetism







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I understand that when you cut a magnet you end up with 2 magnets but I wonder how much time does it take to the magnetic domains to rearange and form the new pole. I know the answer may vary depending on the size of the magnet, the material, and some other variable so I'm searching for an answer as general as possible and how the variables may affect the answer.






      electromagnetism




      electromagnetism






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      Diego Rodríguez CidDiego Rodríguez Cid

      214




      214






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          It takes zero time because no domains need to rearrange when a permanent magnet breaks in two. The spins in each half are still aligned and still produce a magnetic field.



          The idea that magnets have “poles” is a misconception. There are no magnetic poles in nature, or at least none that we have found. (And physicists have looked hard for them.) This is the meaning of one of Maxwell’s equations,



          $$nablacdotmathbf{B}=0.$$



          The magnetic field lines of a magnet are loops than run through the interior of the magnet and then loop back around outside. The so-called “poles” are just where the field lines happen to emerge from the interior to the exterior, or return back inside. When you break a magnet, the field lines simply come out and go in in two new places, so that each half has its own loops and its own “poles”.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Or, to use using the nomenclature "poles" for the places dense field emerges from the interior to the exterior, the field was running through the body of the magnet all along, so anywhere you break it both of the new ends will be places where dense field emerges...
            $endgroup$
            – dmckee♦
            4 hours ago



















          0












          $begingroup$

          I believe you seem to be worried about the effect of the physical disturbances on the domain arrangement caused by the cutting process. If my assumption is right, then to return both derivatives to their former glory (being much of half of the strength of the original), I'll recommend keeping them in a relatively stronger magnetic field, making sure they are aligned for a decent amount of time. This will repair the fallout domains that has been supposedly disoriented by the cutting process.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "151"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f464256%2fhow-much-time-does-it-take-for-a-broken-magnet-to-recover-its-poles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            It takes zero time because no domains need to rearrange when a permanent magnet breaks in two. The spins in each half are still aligned and still produce a magnetic field.



            The idea that magnets have “poles” is a misconception. There are no magnetic poles in nature, or at least none that we have found. (And physicists have looked hard for them.) This is the meaning of one of Maxwell’s equations,



            $$nablacdotmathbf{B}=0.$$



            The magnetic field lines of a magnet are loops than run through the interior of the magnet and then loop back around outside. The so-called “poles” are just where the field lines happen to emerge from the interior to the exterior, or return back inside. When you break a magnet, the field lines simply come out and go in in two new places, so that each half has its own loops and its own “poles”.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Or, to use using the nomenclature "poles" for the places dense field emerges from the interior to the exterior, the field was running through the body of the magnet all along, so anywhere you break it both of the new ends will be places where dense field emerges...
              $endgroup$
              – dmckee♦
              4 hours ago
















            3












            $begingroup$

            It takes zero time because no domains need to rearrange when a permanent magnet breaks in two. The spins in each half are still aligned and still produce a magnetic field.



            The idea that magnets have “poles” is a misconception. There are no magnetic poles in nature, or at least none that we have found. (And physicists have looked hard for them.) This is the meaning of one of Maxwell’s equations,



            $$nablacdotmathbf{B}=0.$$



            The magnetic field lines of a magnet are loops than run through the interior of the magnet and then loop back around outside. The so-called “poles” are just where the field lines happen to emerge from the interior to the exterior, or return back inside. When you break a magnet, the field lines simply come out and go in in two new places, so that each half has its own loops and its own “poles”.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Or, to use using the nomenclature "poles" for the places dense field emerges from the interior to the exterior, the field was running through the body of the magnet all along, so anywhere you break it both of the new ends will be places where dense field emerges...
              $endgroup$
              – dmckee♦
              4 hours ago














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            It takes zero time because no domains need to rearrange when a permanent magnet breaks in two. The spins in each half are still aligned and still produce a magnetic field.



            The idea that magnets have “poles” is a misconception. There are no magnetic poles in nature, or at least none that we have found. (And physicists have looked hard for them.) This is the meaning of one of Maxwell’s equations,



            $$nablacdotmathbf{B}=0.$$



            The magnetic field lines of a magnet are loops than run through the interior of the magnet and then loop back around outside. The so-called “poles” are just where the field lines happen to emerge from the interior to the exterior, or return back inside. When you break a magnet, the field lines simply come out and go in in two new places, so that each half has its own loops and its own “poles”.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            It takes zero time because no domains need to rearrange when a permanent magnet breaks in two. The spins in each half are still aligned and still produce a magnetic field.



            The idea that magnets have “poles” is a misconception. There are no magnetic poles in nature, or at least none that we have found. (And physicists have looked hard for them.) This is the meaning of one of Maxwell’s equations,



            $$nablacdotmathbf{B}=0.$$



            The magnetic field lines of a magnet are loops than run through the interior of the magnet and then loop back around outside. The so-called “poles” are just where the field lines happen to emerge from the interior to the exterior, or return back inside. When you break a magnet, the field lines simply come out and go in in two new places, so that each half has its own loops and its own “poles”.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 4 hours ago

























            answered 4 hours ago









            G. SmithG. Smith

            8,59111426




            8,59111426












            • $begingroup$
              Or, to use using the nomenclature "poles" for the places dense field emerges from the interior to the exterior, the field was running through the body of the magnet all along, so anywhere you break it both of the new ends will be places where dense field emerges...
              $endgroup$
              – dmckee♦
              4 hours ago


















            • $begingroup$
              Or, to use using the nomenclature "poles" for the places dense field emerges from the interior to the exterior, the field was running through the body of the magnet all along, so anywhere you break it both of the new ends will be places where dense field emerges...
              $endgroup$
              – dmckee♦
              4 hours ago
















            $begingroup$
            Or, to use using the nomenclature "poles" for the places dense field emerges from the interior to the exterior, the field was running through the body of the magnet all along, so anywhere you break it both of the new ends will be places where dense field emerges...
            $endgroup$
            – dmckee♦
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Or, to use using the nomenclature "poles" for the places dense field emerges from the interior to the exterior, the field was running through the body of the magnet all along, so anywhere you break it both of the new ends will be places where dense field emerges...
            $endgroup$
            – dmckee♦
            4 hours ago











            0












            $begingroup$

            I believe you seem to be worried about the effect of the physical disturbances on the domain arrangement caused by the cutting process. If my assumption is right, then to return both derivatives to their former glory (being much of half of the strength of the original), I'll recommend keeping them in a relatively stronger magnetic field, making sure they are aligned for a decent amount of time. This will repair the fallout domains that has been supposedly disoriented by the cutting process.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              I believe you seem to be worried about the effect of the physical disturbances on the domain arrangement caused by the cutting process. If my assumption is right, then to return both derivatives to their former glory (being much of half of the strength of the original), I'll recommend keeping them in a relatively stronger magnetic field, making sure they are aligned for a decent amount of time. This will repair the fallout domains that has been supposedly disoriented by the cutting process.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                I believe you seem to be worried about the effect of the physical disturbances on the domain arrangement caused by the cutting process. If my assumption is right, then to return both derivatives to their former glory (being much of half of the strength of the original), I'll recommend keeping them in a relatively stronger magnetic field, making sure they are aligned for a decent amount of time. This will repair the fallout domains that has been supposedly disoriented by the cutting process.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I believe you seem to be worried about the effect of the physical disturbances on the domain arrangement caused by the cutting process. If my assumption is right, then to return both derivatives to their former glory (being much of half of the strength of the original), I'll recommend keeping them in a relatively stronger magnetic field, making sure they are aligned for a decent amount of time. This will repair the fallout domains that has been supposedly disoriented by the cutting process.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 4 hours ago









                TechDroidTechDroid

                1317




                1317






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f464256%2fhow-much-time-does-it-take-for-a-broken-magnet-to-recover-its-poles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to label and detect the document text images

                    Image
                    1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
                    Read more

                    Vallis Paradisi

                    Image
                    Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
                    Read more

                    Tabula Rosettana

                    Image
                    Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
                    Read more