Htydjtk

I am new to DMing. I am starting off with the Lost Mine of Phandelver adventure to get my feet wet.

One players in particular is playing a half-elf bard. They have watched a lot of Critical Role and are inspired by the stories that are created by those creative minds.

His approach to learning about the other characters is somewhat unorthodox. He will wait until they are chased down a mountain by a band of orcs and are hiding in the lowlands under cover of darkness to talk about his bedroll, and will go out of his way to ask the other characters what they think about his family crest that adorns the otherwise plain blue bedsheet that he keeps throughout his adventures. The other characters, recognizing the potential danger they are in, pay little mind to his antics, which actively frustrates the player of the half-elf bard, who feels as though it should evoke the other players to share their backstories.

It is somewhat irritating that he will forcibly ask the other players to provide an opinion on every little action his character takes, and he is a bit forceful about his way of getting the other characters to "open up". This makes for hilarious bits of dialog on occasion, and characterizes his half elf bard to an extent, but really slows the pacing of certain scenes down.

The other characters are role playing exceptionally in my opinion, despite all of us being new. As the DM, if I feel it's absolutely necessary that they give their opinion, I'll ask it of them. I feel it takes away from both my (as DM) and their (as players) agency that this one particular player continues to prod them for information, which I have vocalized.

The player on the other hand sees differently. He feels that there is only more story to be made if he knows more about the characters. He has even told me several times that it's my responsibility as a DM to prompt the characters to recount their lives to the other characters in the adventure. The other players, again, are role playing well, and I feel at the rate we are going everything will be revealed in time.

Aside from this bringing the scene to a grinding halt, which is irritating as a new DM, since I am only just getting familiar with the pacing of certain scenes to begin with, there is also an in-lore reason why the characters would not reveal this information. One of the other player characters is a Svirfneblin (deep gnome) Pact of the Tome Warlock. Deep Gnomes are known for keeping their private and business lives separate, and additionally live in secret societies in the Underdark. Beyond that, the Deep Gnome Warlock has a secret that she is keeping from the party, which is all the more reason for her to refuse outright to tell these newcomers her life's story.

If I were to describe the bulk of the party (if fact, everyone besides the half-elf bard) I would say that they keep to themselves and are wary of people who are asking too many questions.

The half-elf bard still wants to know more about these people he finds himself adventuring with, and continues to interrupt the pacing of various scenes by playing "temp DM" and coloring it like he's doing me a favor (he has never DM'd before either, he's just watched Critical Role). I've told him to stop, and while I could either put him on mute or kick him from the party, I feel as though I can at least improve his enjoyment for a couple of sessions and see if he improves his behaviour.

Is there any clean way out of this? The other players have rather obvious reasons why they aren't "opening up" and I would like to keep the story moving along. To be clear, I am fine with in character or out of character dialog between players. My question has specifically to do with one player interrupting the gameplay and spotlighting my other players for trivial background information (whole family tree, opinions on half elves, etc) and acting in the role of the DM.

Is there a clever way that I could throw him a bone? Maybe give him a lead to allow him to start asking questions about his party's life? A lot of the hooks I can think of at the moment relate to secret parts of the other characters' lore that they have a reason to be keeping secret. Can I come out clean from this without giving away the farm, so to speak? I want to empower my player characters to keep secrets from one another that allows us to build a strong narrative together, without burning one particular player out.

Have an out-of-game discussion with your players about expectations.

This is a common issue with TTRPGs, especially with newer groups: When people bring their own preconceptions and expectations, they often end up trying to play different games, which causes a clash of playstyles and a frustrated table dynamic.

It seems like your player has narrow preconceptions of D&D based entirely on a very specific DM and a very specific playstyle, and not from their own experience. In reality, there are many fun ways to run a D&D game, and very few of them involve mimicking Mercer et al.

You need to establish expectations with your players. Explain to your players that you are not Matt Mercer, nor are you any of their previous DMs (if any). You have your own way of running a game, and that's fine, you just need to communicate your style to them.

When having this out-of-game discussion, here are some example questions for you and your players:

• 
  Lost Mine of Phandelver is heavy on combat and danger. How much should the session focus on roleplay and inter-character dialogue?


• Is the DM going to stick to the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign content, or will they deviate to explore PC backstories and sideplots?


• D&D typically assumes the PCs have trust and party cohesion. How do you balance a PC's secrets with their willingness to trust other PCs?


• What tone does the group want (grimdark, heroic, goofy, etc.) and how should they approach alignment and morality?


• What forms of meta-gaming are acceptable or unacceptable?


• You're a relatively new DM. What counts as acceptable suggestions from the players, versus unwanted backseat DMing?

For more questions, you may want to check out the same page tool for establishing expectations. The tool itself is a bit simplistic, but it may give you some inspiration of what topics you want to discuss.

One common method for discussing expectations is to organize a Session zero. Typically this conversation occurs before the campaign, but your current issues at the table suggest you should have this discussion ASAP.

That being said, it's still encouraged to make some accommodations for your players. If the bard wants an opportunity to discuss backstories, that's fine, just give them an indication of when. For example, maybe throw in some slow-paced scenes (such as during short or long rests) when the player characters can have these sort of personal story dialogues.

It's a funny thing, isn't it, how things we ought to do and probably wouldn't think twice about become an issue when someone demands they happen? In this case, most GMs and many players want to share information and details to enhance game play, camaraderie, etc. And there are many questions pertaining to "My Guys" who are excessively uncommunicative loners.

And yet, I see the problem this presents: It is awkward. Here are three specific things I think your potentially troublesome player is doing that make things awkward, and they are all at the meta (player behavior) level rather than the in-game (character behavior) level:

1. 
   

   He is effectively telling the other players how to play their characters:

   
   
   

   
   

   The other characters, recognizing the potential danger they are in,
   pay little mind to his antics, which actively frustrates the player of
   the half-elf bard, who feels as though it should evoke the other
   players to share their backstories.

   
   

   
   


2. 
   

   He is effectively telling you how to GM:

   
   
   

   
   

   He has even told me several times that it's my responsibility as a DM
   to prompt the characters to recount their lives to the other
   characters in the adventure.

   
   

   
   


3. 
   

   He is, as you have pointed out yourself, usurping your role as the GM:

   
   
   

   
   

   The half-elf bard still wants to know more about these people he finds
   himself adventuring with, and continues to interrupt the pacing of
   various scenes by playing "temp DM" and coloring it like he's doing me
   a favor

   
   

   
   

All of these are intensely annoying and disruptive to a game, even when the player is pushing in a direction you might want to go, unless he has your permission or solicitation to do so. (It is pretty clear that he is not actually pushing in a direction you want to go.)

Couple this with the basic structure of your game, which has built in a bunch of characters with hidden pasts that they have reason to keep hidden and that you are reluctant to reveal ahead of their time. This may or may not be a wise decision or campaign structure, but that is not your question. Your question is whether you can satisfy the "cagey loners" and the "everybody's best friend" at the same time.

It seems to me the answer is no: These are in direct opposition to each other, a zero sum game. Someone is going to "win" this struggle, and someone is going to "lose."

My inclination would be to tell the player bluntly to let the other players play their characters, let you make the GM-ing decisions, and maybe stop irritating everyone in the process.