What Star Trek episode has a ship twisted by a wormhole?
I have watched almost all episodes of all Star Trek TV series, but I am unable to recall this scene:
In the image, I can clearly see a Warp Nacelle which is twisted/warped by a wormhole or something.
star-trek episode-identification
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
asked Nov 5 '14 at 14:43
S SS S
56k93428835
|
show 5 more comments
I have watched almost all episodes of all Star Trek TV series, but I am unable to recall this scene:
In the image, I can clearly see a Warp Nacelle which is twisted/warped by a wormhole or something.
star-trek episode-identification
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
asked Nov 5 '14 at 14:43
S SS S
56k93428835
2
Where did you find the image?
– Wikis
Nov 5 '14 at 14:45
27
That looks more like fan art than a screenshot from an episode.
– Thien
Nov 5 '14 at 14:46
8
It does look like fanart/someone took an image of that ship and distorted it themselves in a Photoshop type program. Look at the top left part of the picture- there's a clear seam/line in the sky and clouds, probably the top of the original undistorted image.
– Trish Ling
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
1
@Richard You need to use the warp tool...
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:00
3
@kapep - Hehe. Warp speed, Mr Kapep.
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:01
|
show 5 more comments
I have watched almost all episodes of all Star Trek TV series, but I am unable to recall this scene:
In the image, I can clearly see a Warp Nacelle which is twisted/warped by a wormhole or something.
star-trek episode-identification
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
asked Nov 5 '14 at 14:43
S SS S
56k93428835
I have watched almost all episodes of all Star Trek TV series, but I am unable to recall this scene:
In the image, I can clearly see a Warp Nacelle which is twisted/warped by a wormhole or something.
star-trek episode-identification
star-trek episode-identification
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
asked Nov 5 '14 at 14:43
S SS S
56k93428835
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
asked Nov 5 '14 at 14:43
S SS S
56k93428835
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
17.8k492127
asked Nov 5 '14 at 14:43
S SS S
56k93428835
asked Nov 5 '14 at 14:43
S SS S
56k93428835
asked Nov 5 '14 at 14:43
S SS S
56k93428835
56k93428835
2
Where did you find the image?
– Wikis
Nov 5 '14 at 14:45
27
That looks more like fan art than a screenshot from an episode.
– Thien
Nov 5 '14 at 14:46
8
It does look like fanart/someone took an image of that ship and distorted it themselves in a Photoshop type program. Look at the top left part of the picture- there's a clear seam/line in the sky and clouds, probably the top of the original undistorted image.
– Trish Ling
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
1
@Richard You need to use the warp tool...
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:00
3
@kapep - Hehe. Warp speed, Mr Kapep.
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:01
|
show 5 more comments
2
Where did you find the image?
– Wikis
Nov 5 '14 at 14:45
27
That looks more like fan art than a screenshot from an episode.
– Thien
Nov 5 '14 at 14:46
8
It does look like fanart/someone took an image of that ship and distorted it themselves in a Photoshop type program. Look at the top left part of the picture- there's a clear seam/line in the sky and clouds, probably the top of the original undistorted image.
– Trish Ling
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
1
@Richard You need to use the warp tool...
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:00
3
@kapep - Hehe. Warp speed, Mr Kapep.
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:01
2
2
Where did you find the image?
– Wikis
Nov 5 '14 at 14:45
Where did you find the image?
– Wikis
Nov 5 '14 at 14:45
27
27
That looks more like fan art than a screenshot from an episode.
– Thien
Nov 5 '14 at 14:46
That looks more like fan art than a screenshot from an episode.
– Thien
Nov 5 '14 at 14:46
8
8
It does look like fanart/someone took an image of that ship and distorted it themselves in a Photoshop type program. Look at the top left part of the picture- there's a clear seam/line in the sky and clouds, probably the top of the original undistorted image.
– Trish Ling
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
It does look like fanart/someone took an image of that ship and distorted it themselves in a Photoshop type program. Look at the top left part of the picture- there's a clear seam/line in the sky and clouds, probably the top of the original undistorted image.
– Trish Ling
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
1
1
@Richard You need to use the warp tool...
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:00
@Richard You need to use the warp tool...
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:00
3
3
@kapep - Hehe. Warp speed, Mr Kapep.
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:01
@kapep - Hehe. Warp speed, Mr Kapep.
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:01
|
show 5 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
I've located the original image. This ship is a concept art of the USS Archer, designed by senior Star Trek illustrator Rick Sternbach and hand-drawn by Yoshi Vu for the Star Trek Renegades fan series.
As such, this image is not a canon production. It appears that the original image has been distorted by another (unnamed) fan.
Major hat tip to @kapep for untwisting it.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 23:56
ValorumValorum
403k10629353159
And there's another pic here of the same ship; facebook.com/STRtheSeries/photos/…
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:03
I didn't know it was upside down :D I've just used the photoshop polar coordinates filter in case anyone wonders.
– kapex
Nov 6 '14 at 0:06
4
@kapep - You did great work here. It's only because I'm a colossal trek nerd that I immediately thought "well, that's inverted".
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:09
That is one fine-looking ship.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 6 '14 at 18:17
For the record, the background is a stock image.
– Valorum
May 15 '17 at 0:12
add a comment |
This is not from any canon production. As has been discovered by other Experts, this is fan art - Art created by someone who was a designer for the series, but for a non-canon project. The rest of the post will remain in tact for historical reasons.
It should be noted that while the image is of a Sovereign class ship, it is not a particularly good one. There are errors. But the intersection of the primary and secondary hulls eliminate Intrepid class as a possibility for this ship. This is obviously fan art.
Another factor that prevents this from being Voyager is the lack of the Aeroshuttle on the underside of the primary hull, lack of the impulse engines on the nacelle pylons, the shape and color of the main deflector, and the addition of Dominion War era escape pods in a loose formation on the hull (they were more tightly arranged on the intrepid).
A key factor in identifying this as fan art is the low quality of the color of the image, lack of film grain (which while the ship was digital, the movies were mastered to film, and have film grain, at least in every version I have seen of them, including blu-ray), general low polygon count, incorrect nacelles and Bussard collectors, and the amateurish warping of the image. While not definitive by any means, the aspect ratio is not even close to the ones used in any of the films - the image has, at least in that respect, definitely been doctored.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 14:47
Tritium21Tritium21
3,68722343
2
Are you sure about the Sovereign-class? Looks like Intrepid-class (USS Voyager) to me. Still, I agree that it is most likely fanart.
– Layna
Nov 5 '14 at 15:05
4
The intersection of the primary and secondary hulls are all wrong. It is smooth in the intrepid, and staggered (as shown) in the sovereign.
– Tritium21
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
3
The front of the nacelle doesn't match Enterprise E. I would add that this is obviously fan art.
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
4
BTW, reverse image search didn't find it. But Google does think it looks like the Manet of a cow. oilpainting-frame.com/upload1/file-admin/images/new8/…
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
2
Here is the untwisted images: i.imgur.com/cNhi0Yf.png Still no reverse image search result though.
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:16
|
show 3 more comments
As many of the other answers have already pointed out, the image posted is a fan art image.
However, at the title of the question I immediately thought of the Star Trek: Voyager episode "Twisted", in which an unknown energy field distorts the ship, and I thought I would mention it here in case anyone else was thinking of it or may find it useful.
I cannot find an image of the ship distorted from the outside, but here's a schematic of what the ship "looked like" to the people on board:
And the bar Sandrines, looking a little less than stellar:
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
answered Nov 6 '14 at 7:06
Laura WentworthLaura Wentworth
513
5
It should be noted that the Sandrines picture is the only example of its kind throughout the episode. The rest of the episode consists of utterly un-distorted rooms whose doors are just magically connected to different rooms than usual.
– O. R. Mapper
Nov 6 '14 at 8:53
add a comment |
I can confirm it is fan art as both the radial fade that is the focal point of the background and the twist effect that is on the ship are both distinct features of the graphical editor Paint.NET - a professional wouldn't have left them so obviously recognizable.
Additionally, I believe the ship image is from a Sketchup Model.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 17:21
PrinsigPrinsig
1392
Why on the Earth would ship image from Sketchup Model?
– S S
Nov 5 '14 at 18:46
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f72027%2fwhat-star-trek-episode-has-a-ship-twisted-by-a-wormhole%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I've located the original image. This ship is a concept art of the USS Archer, designed by senior Star Trek illustrator Rick Sternbach and hand-drawn by Yoshi Vu for the Star Trek Renegades fan series.
As such, this image is not a canon production. It appears that the original image has been distorted by another (unnamed) fan.
Major hat tip to @kapep for untwisting it.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 23:56
ValorumValorum
403k10629353159
And there's another pic here of the same ship; facebook.com/STRtheSeries/photos/…
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:03
I didn't know it was upside down :D I've just used the photoshop polar coordinates filter in case anyone wonders.
– kapex
Nov 6 '14 at 0:06
4
@kapep - You did great work here. It's only because I'm a colossal trek nerd that I immediately thought "well, that's inverted".
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:09
That is one fine-looking ship.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 6 '14 at 18:17
For the record, the background is a stock image.
– Valorum
May 15 '17 at 0:12
add a comment |
I've located the original image. This ship is a concept art of the USS Archer, designed by senior Star Trek illustrator Rick Sternbach and hand-drawn by Yoshi Vu for the Star Trek Renegades fan series.
As such, this image is not a canon production. It appears that the original image has been distorted by another (unnamed) fan.
Major hat tip to @kapep for untwisting it.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 23:56
ValorumValorum
403k10629353159
And there's another pic here of the same ship; facebook.com/STRtheSeries/photos/…
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:03
I didn't know it was upside down :D I've just used the photoshop polar coordinates filter in case anyone wonders.
– kapex
Nov 6 '14 at 0:06
4
@kapep - You did great work here. It's only because I'm a colossal trek nerd that I immediately thought "well, that's inverted".
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:09
That is one fine-looking ship.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 6 '14 at 18:17
For the record, the background is a stock image.
– Valorum
May 15 '17 at 0:12
add a comment |
I've located the original image. This ship is a concept art of the USS Archer, designed by senior Star Trek illustrator Rick Sternbach and hand-drawn by Yoshi Vu for the Star Trek Renegades fan series.
As such, this image is not a canon production. It appears that the original image has been distorted by another (unnamed) fan.
Major hat tip to @kapep for untwisting it.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 23:56
ValorumValorum
403k10629353159
I've located the original image. This ship is a concept art of the USS Archer, designed by senior Star Trek illustrator Rick Sternbach and hand-drawn by Yoshi Vu for the Star Trek Renegades fan series.
As such, this image is not a canon production. It appears that the original image has been distorted by another (unnamed) fan.
Major hat tip to @kapep for untwisting it.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 23:56
ValorumValorum
403k10629353159
edited 16 hours ago
answered Nov 5 '14 at 23:56
ValorumValorum
403k10629353159
answered Nov 5 '14 at 23:56
ValorumValorum
403k10629353159
answered Nov 5 '14 at 23:56
ValorumValorum
403k10629353159
403k10629353159
And there's another pic here of the same ship; facebook.com/STRtheSeries/photos/…
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:03
I didn't know it was upside down :D I've just used the photoshop polar coordinates filter in case anyone wonders.
– kapex
Nov 6 '14 at 0:06
4
@kapep - You did great work here. It's only because I'm a colossal trek nerd that I immediately thought "well, that's inverted".
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:09
That is one fine-looking ship.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 6 '14 at 18:17
For the record, the background is a stock image.
– Valorum
May 15 '17 at 0:12
add a comment |
And there's another pic here of the same ship; facebook.com/STRtheSeries/photos/…
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:03
I didn't know it was upside down :D I've just used the photoshop polar coordinates filter in case anyone wonders.
– kapex
Nov 6 '14 at 0:06
4
@kapep - You did great work here. It's only because I'm a colossal trek nerd that I immediately thought "well, that's inverted".
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:09
That is one fine-looking ship.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 6 '14 at 18:17
For the record, the background is a stock image.
– Valorum
May 15 '17 at 0:12
And there's another pic here of the same ship; facebook.com/STRtheSeries/photos/…
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:03
And there's another pic here of the same ship; facebook.com/STRtheSeries/photos/…
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:03
I didn't know it was upside down :D I've just used the photoshop polar coordinates filter in case anyone wonders.
– kapex
Nov 6 '14 at 0:06
I didn't know it was upside down :D I've just used the photoshop polar coordinates filter in case anyone wonders.
– kapex
Nov 6 '14 at 0:06
4
4
@kapep - You did great work here. It's only because I'm a colossal trek nerd that I immediately thought "well, that's inverted".
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:09
@kapep - You did great work here. It's only because I'm a colossal trek nerd that I immediately thought "well, that's inverted".
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:09
That is one fine-looking ship.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 6 '14 at 18:17
That is one fine-looking ship.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 6 '14 at 18:17
For the record, the background is a stock image.
– Valorum
May 15 '17 at 0:12
For the record, the background is a stock image.
– Valorum
May 15 '17 at 0:12
add a comment |
This is not from any canon production. As has been discovered by other Experts, this is fan art - Art created by someone who was a designer for the series, but for a non-canon project. The rest of the post will remain in tact for historical reasons.
It should be noted that while the image is of a Sovereign class ship, it is not a particularly good one. There are errors. But the intersection of the primary and secondary hulls eliminate Intrepid class as a possibility for this ship. This is obviously fan art.
Another factor that prevents this from being Voyager is the lack of the Aeroshuttle on the underside of the primary hull, lack of the impulse engines on the nacelle pylons, the shape and color of the main deflector, and the addition of Dominion War era escape pods in a loose formation on the hull (they were more tightly arranged on the intrepid).
A key factor in identifying this as fan art is the low quality of the color of the image, lack of film grain (which while the ship was digital, the movies were mastered to film, and have film grain, at least in every version I have seen of them, including blu-ray), general low polygon count, incorrect nacelles and Bussard collectors, and the amateurish warping of the image. While not definitive by any means, the aspect ratio is not even close to the ones used in any of the films - the image has, at least in that respect, definitely been doctored.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 14:47
Tritium21Tritium21
3,68722343
2
Are you sure about the Sovereign-class? Looks like Intrepid-class (USS Voyager) to me. Still, I agree that it is most likely fanart.
– Layna
Nov 5 '14 at 15:05
4
The intersection of the primary and secondary hulls are all wrong. It is smooth in the intrepid, and staggered (as shown) in the sovereign.
– Tritium21
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
3
The front of the nacelle doesn't match Enterprise E. I would add that this is obviously fan art.
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
4
BTW, reverse image search didn't find it. But Google does think it looks like the Manet of a cow. oilpainting-frame.com/upload1/file-admin/images/new8/…
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
2
Here is the untwisted images: i.imgur.com/cNhi0Yf.png Still no reverse image search result though.
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:16
|
show 3 more comments
This is not from any canon production. As has been discovered by other Experts, this is fan art - Art created by someone who was a designer for the series, but for a non-canon project. The rest of the post will remain in tact for historical reasons.
It should be noted that while the image is of a Sovereign class ship, it is not a particularly good one. There are errors. But the intersection of the primary and secondary hulls eliminate Intrepid class as a possibility for this ship. This is obviously fan art.
Another factor that prevents this from being Voyager is the lack of the Aeroshuttle on the underside of the primary hull, lack of the impulse engines on the nacelle pylons, the shape and color of the main deflector, and the addition of Dominion War era escape pods in a loose formation on the hull (they were more tightly arranged on the intrepid).
A key factor in identifying this as fan art is the low quality of the color of the image, lack of film grain (which while the ship was digital, the movies were mastered to film, and have film grain, at least in every version I have seen of them, including blu-ray), general low polygon count, incorrect nacelles and Bussard collectors, and the amateurish warping of the image. While not definitive by any means, the aspect ratio is not even close to the ones used in any of the films - the image has, at least in that respect, definitely been doctored.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 14:47
Tritium21Tritium21
3,68722343
2
Are you sure about the Sovereign-class? Looks like Intrepid-class (USS Voyager) to me. Still, I agree that it is most likely fanart.
– Layna
Nov 5 '14 at 15:05
4
The intersection of the primary and secondary hulls are all wrong. It is smooth in the intrepid, and staggered (as shown) in the sovereign.
– Tritium21
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
3
The front of the nacelle doesn't match Enterprise E. I would add that this is obviously fan art.
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
4
BTW, reverse image search didn't find it. But Google does think it looks like the Manet of a cow. oilpainting-frame.com/upload1/file-admin/images/new8/…
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
2
Here is the untwisted images: i.imgur.com/cNhi0Yf.png Still no reverse image search result though.
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:16
|
show 3 more comments
This is not from any canon production. As has been discovered by other Experts, this is fan art - Art created by someone who was a designer for the series, but for a non-canon project. The rest of the post will remain in tact for historical reasons.
It should be noted that while the image is of a Sovereign class ship, it is not a particularly good one. There are errors. But the intersection of the primary and secondary hulls eliminate Intrepid class as a possibility for this ship. This is obviously fan art.
Another factor that prevents this from being Voyager is the lack of the Aeroshuttle on the underside of the primary hull, lack of the impulse engines on the nacelle pylons, the shape and color of the main deflector, and the addition of Dominion War era escape pods in a loose formation on the hull (they were more tightly arranged on the intrepid).
A key factor in identifying this as fan art is the low quality of the color of the image, lack of film grain (which while the ship was digital, the movies were mastered to film, and have film grain, at least in every version I have seen of them, including blu-ray), general low polygon count, incorrect nacelles and Bussard collectors, and the amateurish warping of the image. While not definitive by any means, the aspect ratio is not even close to the ones used in any of the films - the image has, at least in that respect, definitely been doctored.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 14:47
Tritium21Tritium21
3,68722343
This is not from any canon production. As has been discovered by other Experts, this is fan art - Art created by someone who was a designer for the series, but for a non-canon project. The rest of the post will remain in tact for historical reasons.
It should be noted that while the image is of a Sovereign class ship, it is not a particularly good one. There are errors. But the intersection of the primary and secondary hulls eliminate Intrepid class as a possibility for this ship. This is obviously fan art.
Another factor that prevents this from being Voyager is the lack of the Aeroshuttle on the underside of the primary hull, lack of the impulse engines on the nacelle pylons, the shape and color of the main deflector, and the addition of Dominion War era escape pods in a loose formation on the hull (they were more tightly arranged on the intrepid).
A key factor in identifying this as fan art is the low quality of the color of the image, lack of film grain (which while the ship was digital, the movies were mastered to film, and have film grain, at least in every version I have seen of them, including blu-ray), general low polygon count, incorrect nacelles and Bussard collectors, and the amateurish warping of the image. While not definitive by any means, the aspect ratio is not even close to the ones used in any of the films - the image has, at least in that respect, definitely been doctored.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 14:47
Tritium21Tritium21
3,68722343
edited Nov 6 '14 at 2:27
answered Nov 5 '14 at 14:47
Tritium21Tritium21
3,68722343
answered Nov 5 '14 at 14:47
Tritium21Tritium21
3,68722343
answered Nov 5 '14 at 14:47
Tritium21Tritium21
3,68722343
3,68722343
2
Are you sure about the Sovereign-class? Looks like Intrepid-class (USS Voyager) to me. Still, I agree that it is most likely fanart.
– Layna
Nov 5 '14 at 15:05
4
The intersection of the primary and secondary hulls are all wrong. It is smooth in the intrepid, and staggered (as shown) in the sovereign.
– Tritium21
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
3
The front of the nacelle doesn't match Enterprise E. I would add that this is obviously fan art.
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
4
BTW, reverse image search didn't find it. But Google does think it looks like the Manet of a cow. oilpainting-frame.com/upload1/file-admin/images/new8/…
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
2
Here is the untwisted images: i.imgur.com/cNhi0Yf.png Still no reverse image search result though.
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:16
|
show 3 more comments
2
Are you sure about the Sovereign-class? Looks like Intrepid-class (USS Voyager) to me. Still, I agree that it is most likely fanart.
– Layna
Nov 5 '14 at 15:05
4
The intersection of the primary and secondary hulls are all wrong. It is smooth in the intrepid, and staggered (as shown) in the sovereign.
– Tritium21
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
3
The front of the nacelle doesn't match Enterprise E. I would add that this is obviously fan art.
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
4
BTW, reverse image search didn't find it. But Google does think it looks like the Manet of a cow. oilpainting-frame.com/upload1/file-admin/images/new8/…
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
2
Here is the untwisted images: i.imgur.com/cNhi0Yf.png Still no reverse image search result though.
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:16
2
2
Are you sure about the Sovereign-class? Looks like Intrepid-class (USS Voyager) to me. Still, I agree that it is most likely fanart.
– Layna
Nov 5 '14 at 15:05
Are you sure about the Sovereign-class? Looks like Intrepid-class (USS Voyager) to me. Still, I agree that it is most likely fanart.
– Layna
Nov 5 '14 at 15:05
4
4
The intersection of the primary and secondary hulls are all wrong. It is smooth in the intrepid, and staggered (as shown) in the sovereign.
– Tritium21
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
The intersection of the primary and secondary hulls are all wrong. It is smooth in the intrepid, and staggered (as shown) in the sovereign.
– Tritium21
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
3
3
The front of the nacelle doesn't match Enterprise E. I would add that this is obviously fan art.
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
The front of the nacelle doesn't match Enterprise E. I would add that this is obviously fan art.
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
4
4
BTW, reverse image search didn't find it. But Google does think it looks like the Manet of a cow. oilpainting-frame.com/upload1/file-admin/images/new8/…
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
BTW, reverse image search didn't find it. But Google does think it looks like the Manet of a cow. oilpainting-frame.com/upload1/file-admin/images/new8/…
– ThePopMachine
Nov 5 '14 at 15:10
2
2
Here is the untwisted images: i.imgur.com/cNhi0Yf.png Still no reverse image search result though.
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:16
Here is the untwisted images: i.imgur.com/cNhi0Yf.png Still no reverse image search result though.
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:16
|
show 3 more comments
As many of the other answers have already pointed out, the image posted is a fan art image.
However, at the title of the question I immediately thought of the Star Trek: Voyager episode "Twisted", in which an unknown energy field distorts the ship, and I thought I would mention it here in case anyone else was thinking of it or may find it useful.
I cannot find an image of the ship distorted from the outside, but here's a schematic of what the ship "looked like" to the people on board:
And the bar Sandrines, looking a little less than stellar:
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
answered Nov 6 '14 at 7:06
Laura WentworthLaura Wentworth
513
5
It should be noted that the Sandrines picture is the only example of its kind throughout the episode. The rest of the episode consists of utterly un-distorted rooms whose doors are just magically connected to different rooms than usual.
– O. R. Mapper
Nov 6 '14 at 8:53
add a comment |
As many of the other answers have already pointed out, the image posted is a fan art image.
However, at the title of the question I immediately thought of the Star Trek: Voyager episode "Twisted", in which an unknown energy field distorts the ship, and I thought I would mention it here in case anyone else was thinking of it or may find it useful.
I cannot find an image of the ship distorted from the outside, but here's a schematic of what the ship "looked like" to the people on board:
And the bar Sandrines, looking a little less than stellar:
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
answered Nov 6 '14 at 7:06
Laura WentworthLaura Wentworth
513
5
It should be noted that the Sandrines picture is the only example of its kind throughout the episode. The rest of the episode consists of utterly un-distorted rooms whose doors are just magically connected to different rooms than usual.
– O. R. Mapper
Nov 6 '14 at 8:53
add a comment |
As many of the other answers have already pointed out, the image posted is a fan art image.
However, at the title of the question I immediately thought of the Star Trek: Voyager episode "Twisted", in which an unknown energy field distorts the ship, and I thought I would mention it here in case anyone else was thinking of it or may find it useful.
I cannot find an image of the ship distorted from the outside, but here's a schematic of what the ship "looked like" to the people on board:
And the bar Sandrines, looking a little less than stellar:
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
answered Nov 6 '14 at 7:06
Laura WentworthLaura Wentworth
513
As many of the other answers have already pointed out, the image posted is a fan art image.
However, at the title of the question I immediately thought of the Star Trek: Voyager episode "Twisted", in which an unknown energy field distorts the ship, and I thought I would mention it here in case anyone else was thinking of it or may find it useful.
I cannot find an image of the ship distorted from the outside, but here's a schematic of what the ship "looked like" to the people on board:
And the bar Sandrines, looking a little less than stellar:
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
answered Nov 6 '14 at 7:06
Laura WentworthLaura Wentworth
513
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
edited 16 hours ago
Jenayah
17.8k492127
17.8k492127
answered Nov 6 '14 at 7:06
Laura WentworthLaura Wentworth
513
answered Nov 6 '14 at 7:06
Laura WentworthLaura Wentworth
513
answered Nov 6 '14 at 7:06
Laura WentworthLaura Wentworth
513
513
5
It should be noted that the Sandrines picture is the only example of its kind throughout the episode. The rest of the episode consists of utterly un-distorted rooms whose doors are just magically connected to different rooms than usual.
– O. R. Mapper
Nov 6 '14 at 8:53
add a comment |
5
It should be noted that the Sandrines picture is the only example of its kind throughout the episode. The rest of the episode consists of utterly un-distorted rooms whose doors are just magically connected to different rooms than usual.
– O. R. Mapper
Nov 6 '14 at 8:53
5
5
It should be noted that the Sandrines picture is the only example of its kind throughout the episode. The rest of the episode consists of utterly un-distorted rooms whose doors are just magically connected to different rooms than usual.
– O. R. Mapper
Nov 6 '14 at 8:53
It should be noted that the Sandrines picture is the only example of its kind throughout the episode. The rest of the episode consists of utterly un-distorted rooms whose doors are just magically connected to different rooms than usual.
– O. R. Mapper
Nov 6 '14 at 8:53
add a comment |
I can confirm it is fan art as both the radial fade that is the focal point of the background and the twist effect that is on the ship are both distinct features of the graphical editor Paint.NET - a professional wouldn't have left them so obviously recognizable.
Additionally, I believe the ship image is from a Sketchup Model.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 17:21
PrinsigPrinsig
1392
Why on the Earth would ship image from Sketchup Model?
– S S
Nov 5 '14 at 18:46
add a comment |
I can confirm it is fan art as both the radial fade that is the focal point of the background and the twist effect that is on the ship are both distinct features of the graphical editor Paint.NET - a professional wouldn't have left them so obviously recognizable.
Additionally, I believe the ship image is from a Sketchup Model.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 17:21
PrinsigPrinsig
1392
Why on the Earth would ship image from Sketchup Model?
– S S
Nov 5 '14 at 18:46
add a comment |
I can confirm it is fan art as both the radial fade that is the focal point of the background and the twist effect that is on the ship are both distinct features of the graphical editor Paint.NET - a professional wouldn't have left them so obviously recognizable.
Additionally, I believe the ship image is from a Sketchup Model.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 17:21
PrinsigPrinsig
1392
I can confirm it is fan art as both the radial fade that is the focal point of the background and the twist effect that is on the ship are both distinct features of the graphical editor Paint.NET - a professional wouldn't have left them so obviously recognizable.
Additionally, I believe the ship image is from a Sketchup Model.
answered Nov 5 '14 at 17:21
PrinsigPrinsig
1392
answered Nov 5 '14 at 17:21
PrinsigPrinsig
1392
answered Nov 5 '14 at 17:21
PrinsigPrinsig
1392
answered Nov 5 '14 at 17:21
PrinsigPrinsig
1392
1392
Why on the Earth would ship image from Sketchup Model?
– S S
Nov 5 '14 at 18:46
add a comment |
Why on the Earth would ship image from Sketchup Model?
– S S
Nov 5 '14 at 18:46
Why on the Earth would ship image from Sketchup Model?
– S S
Nov 5 '14 at 18:46
Why on the Earth would ship image from Sketchup Model?
– S S
Nov 5 '14 at 18:46
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f72027%2fwhat-star-trek-episode-has-a-ship-twisted-by-a-wormhole%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Where did you find the image?
– Wikis
Nov 5 '14 at 14:45
27
That looks more like fan art than a screenshot from an episode.
– Thien
Nov 5 '14 at 14:46
8
It does look like fanart/someone took an image of that ship and distorted it themselves in a Photoshop type program. Look at the top left part of the picture- there's a clear seam/line in the sky and clouds, probably the top of the original undistorted image.
– Trish Ling
Nov 5 '14 at 15:06
1
@Richard You need to use the warp tool...
– kapex
Nov 5 '14 at 23:00
3
@kapep - Hehe. Warp speed, Mr Kapep.
– Valorum
Nov 6 '14 at 0:01