Is this a typo in Section 1.8.1 Mathematics for Computer Science?
$begingroup$
Am I completely mistake or is it suppose to say $n^2$ is a multiple of 2 and therefore $n$ must be a multiple of 4?
This is from MIT's Mathematics for Computer Science
proof-explanation proof-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Am I completely mistake or is it suppose to say $n^2$ is a multiple of 2 and therefore $n$ must be a multiple of 4?
This is from MIT's Mathematics for Computer Science
proof-explanation proof-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Am I completely mistake or is it suppose to say $n^2$ is a multiple of 2 and therefore $n$ must be a multiple of 4?
This is from MIT's Mathematics for Computer Science
proof-explanation proof-theory
$endgroup$
Am I completely mistake or is it suppose to say $n^2$ is a multiple of 2 and therefore $n$ must be a multiple of 4?
This is from MIT's Mathematics for Computer Science
proof-explanation proof-theory
proof-explanation proof-theory
asked 4 hours ago
doctopusdoctopus
1413
1413
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, it is correct. The point is that $2d^2=n^2$ implies $n^2$ is even, and only even numbers square to give an even number, so $n$ much be even, so $n^2$ is then actually a multiple of $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No. $6^2$ is a multiple of $2$ but $6$ is not a multiple of $4$. If $n=2k$ then for sure $n^2=4k^2$. So, MIT is right.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3202666%2fis-this-a-typo-in-section-1-8-1-mathematics-for-computer-science%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, it is correct. The point is that $2d^2=n^2$ implies $n^2$ is even, and only even numbers square to give an even number, so $n$ much be even, so $n^2$ is then actually a multiple of $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it is correct. The point is that $2d^2=n^2$ implies $n^2$ is even, and only even numbers square to give an even number, so $n$ much be even, so $n^2$ is then actually a multiple of $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it is correct. The point is that $2d^2=n^2$ implies $n^2$ is even, and only even numbers square to give an even number, so $n$ much be even, so $n^2$ is then actually a multiple of $4$.
$endgroup$
No, it is correct. The point is that $2d^2=n^2$ implies $n^2$ is even, and only even numbers square to give an even number, so $n$ much be even, so $n^2$ is then actually a multiple of $4$.
answered 4 hours ago
John DoeJohn Doe
12.2k11341
12.2k11341
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No. $6^2$ is a multiple of $2$ but $6$ is not a multiple of $4$. If $n=2k$ then for sure $n^2=4k^2$. So, MIT is right.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No. $6^2$ is a multiple of $2$ but $6$ is not a multiple of $4$. If $n=2k$ then for sure $n^2=4k^2$. So, MIT is right.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No. $6^2$ is a multiple of $2$ but $6$ is not a multiple of $4$. If $n=2k$ then for sure $n^2=4k^2$. So, MIT is right.
$endgroup$
No. $6^2$ is a multiple of $2$ but $6$ is not a multiple of $4$. If $n=2k$ then for sure $n^2=4k^2$. So, MIT is right.
answered 4 hours ago
RandallRandall
10.8k11431
10.8k11431
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3202666%2fis-this-a-typo-in-section-1-8-1-mathematics-for-computer-science%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
3 hours ago