Why is cutting the nerve cords in Starcraft 2 Legacy of the Void such a drastic turning point for protoss...
I've just finished watching the Starcraft 2 Legacy of the Void "movie", and I just don't understand the whole "oh no, if I cut off my nerve cords the Khala will die" thing. I might not know something or there's a discrepancy in facts. From what I know:
- the Khala is the natural psychic connection between all Protoss,
mediated by the nerve cords; - one can be closed off from the Khala by cutting off the nerve cords OR by kind of hating the other Protoss too much (okay, so it is not exactly clear to me, why the Tal'darim don't have the Khala, but the Aeon of Strife and the Tal'darim mentality point to something akin to this);
- the nerve ending is a biological part of the protoss body, thus cutting it off does not affect any offspring (also implying, that for the Nerazim, cutting it off is somewhat like a circumcision).
Now if the above are true, why is everybody acting as if this will surely and permanently change the Protoss? Okay, everybody cuts it off, or almost everybody, so Amon is weakened, but wouldn't the next generation have the nerve cord, thus the Khala? I mean okay, so it's kind of needed for the Protoss to leave the Khala, so western liberalism can be raised on a shield - real hard to talk about individualism with something like the Khala -, but I just don't get the in-universe logic of it.
starcraft
add a comment |
I've just finished watching the Starcraft 2 Legacy of the Void "movie", and I just don't understand the whole "oh no, if I cut off my nerve cords the Khala will die" thing. I might not know something or there's a discrepancy in facts. From what I know:
- the Khala is the natural psychic connection between all Protoss,
mediated by the nerve cords; - one can be closed off from the Khala by cutting off the nerve cords OR by kind of hating the other Protoss too much (okay, so it is not exactly clear to me, why the Tal'darim don't have the Khala, but the Aeon of Strife and the Tal'darim mentality point to something akin to this);
- the nerve ending is a biological part of the protoss body, thus cutting it off does not affect any offspring (also implying, that for the Nerazim, cutting it off is somewhat like a circumcision).
Now if the above are true, why is everybody acting as if this will surely and permanently change the Protoss? Okay, everybody cuts it off, or almost everybody, so Amon is weakened, but wouldn't the next generation have the nerve cord, thus the Khala? I mean okay, so it's kind of needed for the Protoss to leave the Khala, so western liberalism can be raised on a shield - real hard to talk about individualism with something like the Khala -, but I just don't get the in-universe logic of it.
starcraft
add a comment |
I've just finished watching the Starcraft 2 Legacy of the Void "movie", and I just don't understand the whole "oh no, if I cut off my nerve cords the Khala will die" thing. I might not know something or there's a discrepancy in facts. From what I know:
- the Khala is the natural psychic connection between all Protoss,
mediated by the nerve cords; - one can be closed off from the Khala by cutting off the nerve cords OR by kind of hating the other Protoss too much (okay, so it is not exactly clear to me, why the Tal'darim don't have the Khala, but the Aeon of Strife and the Tal'darim mentality point to something akin to this);
- the nerve ending is a biological part of the protoss body, thus cutting it off does not affect any offspring (also implying, that for the Nerazim, cutting it off is somewhat like a circumcision).
Now if the above are true, why is everybody acting as if this will surely and permanently change the Protoss? Okay, everybody cuts it off, or almost everybody, so Amon is weakened, but wouldn't the next generation have the nerve cord, thus the Khala? I mean okay, so it's kind of needed for the Protoss to leave the Khala, so western liberalism can be raised on a shield - real hard to talk about individualism with something like the Khala -, but I just don't get the in-universe logic of it.
starcraft
I've just finished watching the Starcraft 2 Legacy of the Void "movie", and I just don't understand the whole "oh no, if I cut off my nerve cords the Khala will die" thing. I might not know something or there's a discrepancy in facts. From what I know:
- the Khala is the natural psychic connection between all Protoss,
mediated by the nerve cords; - one can be closed off from the Khala by cutting off the nerve cords OR by kind of hating the other Protoss too much (okay, so it is not exactly clear to me, why the Tal'darim don't have the Khala, but the Aeon of Strife and the Tal'darim mentality point to something akin to this);
- the nerve ending is a biological part of the protoss body, thus cutting it off does not affect any offspring (also implying, that for the Nerazim, cutting it off is somewhat like a circumcision).
Now if the above are true, why is everybody acting as if this will surely and permanently change the Protoss? Okay, everybody cuts it off, or almost everybody, so Amon is weakened, but wouldn't the next generation have the nerve cord, thus the Khala? I mean okay, so it's kind of needed for the Protoss to leave the Khala, so western liberalism can be raised on a shield - real hard to talk about individualism with something like the Khala -, but I just don't get the in-universe logic of it.
starcraft
starcraft
edited yesterday
fbence
asked Dec 2 '15 at 22:26
fbencefbence
554511
554511
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Khala is not natural - it has been orchestrated by Xel'naga who manipulated early Protoss race into developing strong mental links and certain loss of individuality. While it brought peace and prosper to the race as a whole, it was also a trap made by Amon - when needed he could use it to mentally control whole race.:
Amon and the Xel'naga who followed him broke their rule of noninterference and came to Aiur. Seeing beings who had the potential for purity of form, they began to manipulate the natural psionic link they had developed to accelerate their potential. This would have the added bonus of allowing Amon and his Xel'naga to assert direct control of the protoss if needed.
So now, to survive they have to destroy something wonderful, something that has been influencing their culture for countless generations - you could compare it to humanity getting together and suddenly banning ALL forms of art and religion.
Will it change the race? Definitely - instead of being part of united being they will become more individual beings. Will the next generations have Khala? Yes, at birth, but if Protoss will decide to permanently remove it, my guess is that it will be severed at birth, akin to severing the umbilical cord.
1
The page starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Khala states they already shared a natural link and they will biologically still possess the capability. I don't see how they can actually loose it, especially, with Artanis uniting them in such a splendid way. It's there, unless they hate each other, or start mutilating their children. Does this imply they will do this? Also, Amon is dead, why bother now? We explicitly know that there are no Xel'naga left, except for Ms. Kerrigan that is.
– fbence
Dec 2 '15 at 23:00
Where do you take it from that Amon is alive? He surely died at the end of the game, the link you provided to Amon also states the same thing.
– fbence
Dec 3 '15 at 9:27
OK, sorry, I haven't played the game yet. Anyway: Khala was made by Amon, Amon is evil and was trying to use it to control them, so why would they still try to use it? Yes, it is built into their bodies, so they will have to remove it surgically - maybe there is someone else akin to Amon waiting for its chance? And That is not dead which can eternal lie....
– Yasskier
Dec 3 '15 at 18:40
add a comment |
My understanding is the Khala holds the ancestral memory of the entire Protoss culture, but only when there are people tapped into the Khala keeping it going, like the Preservers.
With every single Protoss having now cut their nerve cords the Khala no longer exists. When new generations are born, the Khala will be a blank slate. They will no longer have that wealth of ancestral memory to draw from.
Rohana and Artanis have a discussion about this, lamenting how they lose the certainty of knowledge about history, and instead having to rely on something more akin to our own historical revisionism.
2
Do you have sources for this?
– Mithrandir
Jan 26 '16 at 8:06
This is a plausible explanation. Although it could be, that the preservers are just the people trained to access what is already there.
– fbence
Jan 27 '16 at 9:40
add a comment |
If i remember correctly, Amon had established the psionic link of all protoss, but in leaving them that connection was lost. Then comes the Aeon of Strife and near its end Adun had reestablished the link that is now known as the Khala. However, different tribe didn't want to be connected with others as they wanted to keep their individuality. The Nerazim getting the brunt of this as they cut off their nerve cords and the Tal'darim I believe they just up and left and were considered exiled later.
The issue with the Khalai protoss isn't that they would die with their nerve cords cut.. as shown by the Nerazim.. however through their continued existence within the Khala, they have socially never been alone and never had to deal with pain or sorrow alone. This social function would mean that they could always rely on their past brethren and nearby citizens for support. The dysfunction of the Khala is a inability to work things on their own and a weak internal willpower... hence why it was so easy for Amon to usurp his will over the Khalai, first the network of connections to all Khalai and their weakness to internal control.
Now as for their biology, it is stated in the Starcraft Wiki(if you want to trust it) that when the nerve cords are cut and are not sealed by psi clamps/couplings taht psionic bleed off with at one point kill them.
2
Welcome to the site! Do you have a sources for this information? An answer is more likely to be accepted if it comes with citations to reliable sites. Even the Wiki would be better than nothing. Where you mention the Starcraft Wiki, I'd recommend adding a quotation from the wiki to explain this.
– kuhl
Jun 1 '16 at 20:40
I wish to amend a previous oversight, its was Khas that reestablished the psionic link of the Khala while it was Adun that made a way for the Nerazim to live and was instrumental in their exodus.
– Osival
Jun 4 '16 at 20:18
1
Please edit your post rather than adding corrections as another answer
– Jason Baker
Jun 4 '16 at 20:46
add a comment |
I got the impression that they intend to cut the nerve cords of all new protoss to prevent it from reforming because "khala bad, it makes protoss arrogant and (justifiably) certain of their superiority"
really felt like they were bashing the khala hardcore in SC2, i got the feeling it was new writers who hated what the old ones did in SC1 and wanted to change things.
Also, it really diluted the protoss' identity.
1
This seems to be more of an opinion than an answer. If you have a statement, please add a source to back it up.
– cst1992
May 13 '16 at 8:40
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109369%2fwhy-is-cutting-the-nerve-cords-in-starcraft-2-legacy-of-the-void-such-a-drastic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Khala is not natural - it has been orchestrated by Xel'naga who manipulated early Protoss race into developing strong mental links and certain loss of individuality. While it brought peace and prosper to the race as a whole, it was also a trap made by Amon - when needed he could use it to mentally control whole race.:
Amon and the Xel'naga who followed him broke their rule of noninterference and came to Aiur. Seeing beings who had the potential for purity of form, they began to manipulate the natural psionic link they had developed to accelerate their potential. This would have the added bonus of allowing Amon and his Xel'naga to assert direct control of the protoss if needed.
So now, to survive they have to destroy something wonderful, something that has been influencing their culture for countless generations - you could compare it to humanity getting together and suddenly banning ALL forms of art and religion.
Will it change the race? Definitely - instead of being part of united being they will become more individual beings. Will the next generations have Khala? Yes, at birth, but if Protoss will decide to permanently remove it, my guess is that it will be severed at birth, akin to severing the umbilical cord.
1
The page starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Khala states they already shared a natural link and they will biologically still possess the capability. I don't see how they can actually loose it, especially, with Artanis uniting them in such a splendid way. It's there, unless they hate each other, or start mutilating their children. Does this imply they will do this? Also, Amon is dead, why bother now? We explicitly know that there are no Xel'naga left, except for Ms. Kerrigan that is.
– fbence
Dec 2 '15 at 23:00
Where do you take it from that Amon is alive? He surely died at the end of the game, the link you provided to Amon also states the same thing.
– fbence
Dec 3 '15 at 9:27
OK, sorry, I haven't played the game yet. Anyway: Khala was made by Amon, Amon is evil and was trying to use it to control them, so why would they still try to use it? Yes, it is built into their bodies, so they will have to remove it surgically - maybe there is someone else akin to Amon waiting for its chance? And That is not dead which can eternal lie....
– Yasskier
Dec 3 '15 at 18:40
add a comment |
Khala is not natural - it has been orchestrated by Xel'naga who manipulated early Protoss race into developing strong mental links and certain loss of individuality. While it brought peace and prosper to the race as a whole, it was also a trap made by Amon - when needed he could use it to mentally control whole race.:
Amon and the Xel'naga who followed him broke their rule of noninterference and came to Aiur. Seeing beings who had the potential for purity of form, they began to manipulate the natural psionic link they had developed to accelerate their potential. This would have the added bonus of allowing Amon and his Xel'naga to assert direct control of the protoss if needed.
So now, to survive they have to destroy something wonderful, something that has been influencing their culture for countless generations - you could compare it to humanity getting together and suddenly banning ALL forms of art and religion.
Will it change the race? Definitely - instead of being part of united being they will become more individual beings. Will the next generations have Khala? Yes, at birth, but if Protoss will decide to permanently remove it, my guess is that it will be severed at birth, akin to severing the umbilical cord.
1
The page starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Khala states they already shared a natural link and they will biologically still possess the capability. I don't see how they can actually loose it, especially, with Artanis uniting them in such a splendid way. It's there, unless they hate each other, or start mutilating their children. Does this imply they will do this? Also, Amon is dead, why bother now? We explicitly know that there are no Xel'naga left, except for Ms. Kerrigan that is.
– fbence
Dec 2 '15 at 23:00
Where do you take it from that Amon is alive? He surely died at the end of the game, the link you provided to Amon also states the same thing.
– fbence
Dec 3 '15 at 9:27
OK, sorry, I haven't played the game yet. Anyway: Khala was made by Amon, Amon is evil and was trying to use it to control them, so why would they still try to use it? Yes, it is built into their bodies, so they will have to remove it surgically - maybe there is someone else akin to Amon waiting for its chance? And That is not dead which can eternal lie....
– Yasskier
Dec 3 '15 at 18:40
add a comment |
Khala is not natural - it has been orchestrated by Xel'naga who manipulated early Protoss race into developing strong mental links and certain loss of individuality. While it brought peace and prosper to the race as a whole, it was also a trap made by Amon - when needed he could use it to mentally control whole race.:
Amon and the Xel'naga who followed him broke their rule of noninterference and came to Aiur. Seeing beings who had the potential for purity of form, they began to manipulate the natural psionic link they had developed to accelerate their potential. This would have the added bonus of allowing Amon and his Xel'naga to assert direct control of the protoss if needed.
So now, to survive they have to destroy something wonderful, something that has been influencing their culture for countless generations - you could compare it to humanity getting together and suddenly banning ALL forms of art and religion.
Will it change the race? Definitely - instead of being part of united being they will become more individual beings. Will the next generations have Khala? Yes, at birth, but if Protoss will decide to permanently remove it, my guess is that it will be severed at birth, akin to severing the umbilical cord.
Khala is not natural - it has been orchestrated by Xel'naga who manipulated early Protoss race into developing strong mental links and certain loss of individuality. While it brought peace and prosper to the race as a whole, it was also a trap made by Amon - when needed he could use it to mentally control whole race.:
Amon and the Xel'naga who followed him broke their rule of noninterference and came to Aiur. Seeing beings who had the potential for purity of form, they began to manipulate the natural psionic link they had developed to accelerate their potential. This would have the added bonus of allowing Amon and his Xel'naga to assert direct control of the protoss if needed.
So now, to survive they have to destroy something wonderful, something that has been influencing their culture for countless generations - you could compare it to humanity getting together and suddenly banning ALL forms of art and religion.
Will it change the race? Definitely - instead of being part of united being they will become more individual beings. Will the next generations have Khala? Yes, at birth, but if Protoss will decide to permanently remove it, my guess is that it will be severed at birth, akin to severing the umbilical cord.
edited yesterday
Renan
1,5501823
1,5501823
answered Dec 2 '15 at 22:43
YasskierYasskier
16.5k458112
16.5k458112
1
The page starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Khala states they already shared a natural link and they will biologically still possess the capability. I don't see how they can actually loose it, especially, with Artanis uniting them in such a splendid way. It's there, unless they hate each other, or start mutilating their children. Does this imply they will do this? Also, Amon is dead, why bother now? We explicitly know that there are no Xel'naga left, except for Ms. Kerrigan that is.
– fbence
Dec 2 '15 at 23:00
Where do you take it from that Amon is alive? He surely died at the end of the game, the link you provided to Amon also states the same thing.
– fbence
Dec 3 '15 at 9:27
OK, sorry, I haven't played the game yet. Anyway: Khala was made by Amon, Amon is evil and was trying to use it to control them, so why would they still try to use it? Yes, it is built into their bodies, so they will have to remove it surgically - maybe there is someone else akin to Amon waiting for its chance? And That is not dead which can eternal lie....
– Yasskier
Dec 3 '15 at 18:40
add a comment |
1
The page starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Khala states they already shared a natural link and they will biologically still possess the capability. I don't see how they can actually loose it, especially, with Artanis uniting them in such a splendid way. It's there, unless they hate each other, or start mutilating their children. Does this imply they will do this? Also, Amon is dead, why bother now? We explicitly know that there are no Xel'naga left, except for Ms. Kerrigan that is.
– fbence
Dec 2 '15 at 23:00
Where do you take it from that Amon is alive? He surely died at the end of the game, the link you provided to Amon also states the same thing.
– fbence
Dec 3 '15 at 9:27
OK, sorry, I haven't played the game yet. Anyway: Khala was made by Amon, Amon is evil and was trying to use it to control them, so why would they still try to use it? Yes, it is built into their bodies, so they will have to remove it surgically - maybe there is someone else akin to Amon waiting for its chance? And That is not dead which can eternal lie....
– Yasskier
Dec 3 '15 at 18:40
1
1
The page starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Khala states they already shared a natural link and they will biologically still possess the capability. I don't see how they can actually loose it, especially, with Artanis uniting them in such a splendid way. It's there, unless they hate each other, or start mutilating their children. Does this imply they will do this? Also, Amon is dead, why bother now? We explicitly know that there are no Xel'naga left, except for Ms. Kerrigan that is.
– fbence
Dec 2 '15 at 23:00
The page starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Khala states they already shared a natural link and they will biologically still possess the capability. I don't see how they can actually loose it, especially, with Artanis uniting them in such a splendid way. It's there, unless they hate each other, or start mutilating their children. Does this imply they will do this? Also, Amon is dead, why bother now? We explicitly know that there are no Xel'naga left, except for Ms. Kerrigan that is.
– fbence
Dec 2 '15 at 23:00
Where do you take it from that Amon is alive? He surely died at the end of the game, the link you provided to Amon also states the same thing.
– fbence
Dec 3 '15 at 9:27
Where do you take it from that Amon is alive? He surely died at the end of the game, the link you provided to Amon also states the same thing.
– fbence
Dec 3 '15 at 9:27
OK, sorry, I haven't played the game yet. Anyway: Khala was made by Amon, Amon is evil and was trying to use it to control them, so why would they still try to use it? Yes, it is built into their bodies, so they will have to remove it surgically - maybe there is someone else akin to Amon waiting for its chance? And That is not dead which can eternal lie....
– Yasskier
Dec 3 '15 at 18:40
OK, sorry, I haven't played the game yet. Anyway: Khala was made by Amon, Amon is evil and was trying to use it to control them, so why would they still try to use it? Yes, it is built into their bodies, so they will have to remove it surgically - maybe there is someone else akin to Amon waiting for its chance? And That is not dead which can eternal lie....
– Yasskier
Dec 3 '15 at 18:40
add a comment |
My understanding is the Khala holds the ancestral memory of the entire Protoss culture, but only when there are people tapped into the Khala keeping it going, like the Preservers.
With every single Protoss having now cut their nerve cords the Khala no longer exists. When new generations are born, the Khala will be a blank slate. They will no longer have that wealth of ancestral memory to draw from.
Rohana and Artanis have a discussion about this, lamenting how they lose the certainty of knowledge about history, and instead having to rely on something more akin to our own historical revisionism.
2
Do you have sources for this?
– Mithrandir
Jan 26 '16 at 8:06
This is a plausible explanation. Although it could be, that the preservers are just the people trained to access what is already there.
– fbence
Jan 27 '16 at 9:40
add a comment |
My understanding is the Khala holds the ancestral memory of the entire Protoss culture, but only when there are people tapped into the Khala keeping it going, like the Preservers.
With every single Protoss having now cut their nerve cords the Khala no longer exists. When new generations are born, the Khala will be a blank slate. They will no longer have that wealth of ancestral memory to draw from.
Rohana and Artanis have a discussion about this, lamenting how they lose the certainty of knowledge about history, and instead having to rely on something more akin to our own historical revisionism.
2
Do you have sources for this?
– Mithrandir
Jan 26 '16 at 8:06
This is a plausible explanation. Although it could be, that the preservers are just the people trained to access what is already there.
– fbence
Jan 27 '16 at 9:40
add a comment |
My understanding is the Khala holds the ancestral memory of the entire Protoss culture, but only when there are people tapped into the Khala keeping it going, like the Preservers.
With every single Protoss having now cut their nerve cords the Khala no longer exists. When new generations are born, the Khala will be a blank slate. They will no longer have that wealth of ancestral memory to draw from.
Rohana and Artanis have a discussion about this, lamenting how they lose the certainty of knowledge about history, and instead having to rely on something more akin to our own historical revisionism.
My understanding is the Khala holds the ancestral memory of the entire Protoss culture, but only when there are people tapped into the Khala keeping it going, like the Preservers.
With every single Protoss having now cut their nerve cords the Khala no longer exists. When new generations are born, the Khala will be a blank slate. They will no longer have that wealth of ancestral memory to draw from.
Rohana and Artanis have a discussion about this, lamenting how they lose the certainty of knowledge about history, and instead having to rely on something more akin to our own historical revisionism.
answered Jan 26 '16 at 6:27
Oh_ManOh_Man
211
211
2
Do you have sources for this?
– Mithrandir
Jan 26 '16 at 8:06
This is a plausible explanation. Although it could be, that the preservers are just the people trained to access what is already there.
– fbence
Jan 27 '16 at 9:40
add a comment |
2
Do you have sources for this?
– Mithrandir
Jan 26 '16 at 8:06
This is a plausible explanation. Although it could be, that the preservers are just the people trained to access what is already there.
– fbence
Jan 27 '16 at 9:40
2
2
Do you have sources for this?
– Mithrandir
Jan 26 '16 at 8:06
Do you have sources for this?
– Mithrandir
Jan 26 '16 at 8:06
This is a plausible explanation. Although it could be, that the preservers are just the people trained to access what is already there.
– fbence
Jan 27 '16 at 9:40
This is a plausible explanation. Although it could be, that the preservers are just the people trained to access what is already there.
– fbence
Jan 27 '16 at 9:40
add a comment |
If i remember correctly, Amon had established the psionic link of all protoss, but in leaving them that connection was lost. Then comes the Aeon of Strife and near its end Adun had reestablished the link that is now known as the Khala. However, different tribe didn't want to be connected with others as they wanted to keep their individuality. The Nerazim getting the brunt of this as they cut off their nerve cords and the Tal'darim I believe they just up and left and were considered exiled later.
The issue with the Khalai protoss isn't that they would die with their nerve cords cut.. as shown by the Nerazim.. however through their continued existence within the Khala, they have socially never been alone and never had to deal with pain or sorrow alone. This social function would mean that they could always rely on their past brethren and nearby citizens for support. The dysfunction of the Khala is a inability to work things on their own and a weak internal willpower... hence why it was so easy for Amon to usurp his will over the Khalai, first the network of connections to all Khalai and their weakness to internal control.
Now as for their biology, it is stated in the Starcraft Wiki(if you want to trust it) that when the nerve cords are cut and are not sealed by psi clamps/couplings taht psionic bleed off with at one point kill them.
2
Welcome to the site! Do you have a sources for this information? An answer is more likely to be accepted if it comes with citations to reliable sites. Even the Wiki would be better than nothing. Where you mention the Starcraft Wiki, I'd recommend adding a quotation from the wiki to explain this.
– kuhl
Jun 1 '16 at 20:40
I wish to amend a previous oversight, its was Khas that reestablished the psionic link of the Khala while it was Adun that made a way for the Nerazim to live and was instrumental in their exodus.
– Osival
Jun 4 '16 at 20:18
1
Please edit your post rather than adding corrections as another answer
– Jason Baker
Jun 4 '16 at 20:46
add a comment |
If i remember correctly, Amon had established the psionic link of all protoss, but in leaving them that connection was lost. Then comes the Aeon of Strife and near its end Adun had reestablished the link that is now known as the Khala. However, different tribe didn't want to be connected with others as they wanted to keep their individuality. The Nerazim getting the brunt of this as they cut off their nerve cords and the Tal'darim I believe they just up and left and were considered exiled later.
The issue with the Khalai protoss isn't that they would die with their nerve cords cut.. as shown by the Nerazim.. however through their continued existence within the Khala, they have socially never been alone and never had to deal with pain or sorrow alone. This social function would mean that they could always rely on their past brethren and nearby citizens for support. The dysfunction of the Khala is a inability to work things on their own and a weak internal willpower... hence why it was so easy for Amon to usurp his will over the Khalai, first the network of connections to all Khalai and their weakness to internal control.
Now as for their biology, it is stated in the Starcraft Wiki(if you want to trust it) that when the nerve cords are cut and are not sealed by psi clamps/couplings taht psionic bleed off with at one point kill them.
2
Welcome to the site! Do you have a sources for this information? An answer is more likely to be accepted if it comes with citations to reliable sites. Even the Wiki would be better than nothing. Where you mention the Starcraft Wiki, I'd recommend adding a quotation from the wiki to explain this.
– kuhl
Jun 1 '16 at 20:40
I wish to amend a previous oversight, its was Khas that reestablished the psionic link of the Khala while it was Adun that made a way for the Nerazim to live and was instrumental in their exodus.
– Osival
Jun 4 '16 at 20:18
1
Please edit your post rather than adding corrections as another answer
– Jason Baker
Jun 4 '16 at 20:46
add a comment |
If i remember correctly, Amon had established the psionic link of all protoss, but in leaving them that connection was lost. Then comes the Aeon of Strife and near its end Adun had reestablished the link that is now known as the Khala. However, different tribe didn't want to be connected with others as they wanted to keep their individuality. The Nerazim getting the brunt of this as they cut off their nerve cords and the Tal'darim I believe they just up and left and were considered exiled later.
The issue with the Khalai protoss isn't that they would die with their nerve cords cut.. as shown by the Nerazim.. however through their continued existence within the Khala, they have socially never been alone and never had to deal with pain or sorrow alone. This social function would mean that they could always rely on their past brethren and nearby citizens for support. The dysfunction of the Khala is a inability to work things on their own and a weak internal willpower... hence why it was so easy for Amon to usurp his will over the Khalai, first the network of connections to all Khalai and their weakness to internal control.
Now as for their biology, it is stated in the Starcraft Wiki(if you want to trust it) that when the nerve cords are cut and are not sealed by psi clamps/couplings taht psionic bleed off with at one point kill them.
If i remember correctly, Amon had established the psionic link of all protoss, but in leaving them that connection was lost. Then comes the Aeon of Strife and near its end Adun had reestablished the link that is now known as the Khala. However, different tribe didn't want to be connected with others as they wanted to keep their individuality. The Nerazim getting the brunt of this as they cut off their nerve cords and the Tal'darim I believe they just up and left and were considered exiled later.
The issue with the Khalai protoss isn't that they would die with their nerve cords cut.. as shown by the Nerazim.. however through their continued existence within the Khala, they have socially never been alone and never had to deal with pain or sorrow alone. This social function would mean that they could always rely on their past brethren and nearby citizens for support. The dysfunction of the Khala is a inability to work things on their own and a weak internal willpower... hence why it was so easy for Amon to usurp his will over the Khalai, first the network of connections to all Khalai and their weakness to internal control.
Now as for their biology, it is stated in the Starcraft Wiki(if you want to trust it) that when the nerve cords are cut and are not sealed by psi clamps/couplings taht psionic bleed off with at one point kill them.
answered Jun 1 '16 at 20:23
OsivalOsival
111
111
2
Welcome to the site! Do you have a sources for this information? An answer is more likely to be accepted if it comes with citations to reliable sites. Even the Wiki would be better than nothing. Where you mention the Starcraft Wiki, I'd recommend adding a quotation from the wiki to explain this.
– kuhl
Jun 1 '16 at 20:40
I wish to amend a previous oversight, its was Khas that reestablished the psionic link of the Khala while it was Adun that made a way for the Nerazim to live and was instrumental in their exodus.
– Osival
Jun 4 '16 at 20:18
1
Please edit your post rather than adding corrections as another answer
– Jason Baker
Jun 4 '16 at 20:46
add a comment |
2
Welcome to the site! Do you have a sources for this information? An answer is more likely to be accepted if it comes with citations to reliable sites. Even the Wiki would be better than nothing. Where you mention the Starcraft Wiki, I'd recommend adding a quotation from the wiki to explain this.
– kuhl
Jun 1 '16 at 20:40
I wish to amend a previous oversight, its was Khas that reestablished the psionic link of the Khala while it was Adun that made a way for the Nerazim to live and was instrumental in their exodus.
– Osival
Jun 4 '16 at 20:18
1
Please edit your post rather than adding corrections as another answer
– Jason Baker
Jun 4 '16 at 20:46
2
2
Welcome to the site! Do you have a sources for this information? An answer is more likely to be accepted if it comes with citations to reliable sites. Even the Wiki would be better than nothing. Where you mention the Starcraft Wiki, I'd recommend adding a quotation from the wiki to explain this.
– kuhl
Jun 1 '16 at 20:40
Welcome to the site! Do you have a sources for this information? An answer is more likely to be accepted if it comes with citations to reliable sites. Even the Wiki would be better than nothing. Where you mention the Starcraft Wiki, I'd recommend adding a quotation from the wiki to explain this.
– kuhl
Jun 1 '16 at 20:40
I wish to amend a previous oversight, its was Khas that reestablished the psionic link of the Khala while it was Adun that made a way for the Nerazim to live and was instrumental in their exodus.
– Osival
Jun 4 '16 at 20:18
I wish to amend a previous oversight, its was Khas that reestablished the psionic link of the Khala while it was Adun that made a way for the Nerazim to live and was instrumental in their exodus.
– Osival
Jun 4 '16 at 20:18
1
1
Please edit your post rather than adding corrections as another answer
– Jason Baker
Jun 4 '16 at 20:46
Please edit your post rather than adding corrections as another answer
– Jason Baker
Jun 4 '16 at 20:46
add a comment |
I got the impression that they intend to cut the nerve cords of all new protoss to prevent it from reforming because "khala bad, it makes protoss arrogant and (justifiably) certain of their superiority"
really felt like they were bashing the khala hardcore in SC2, i got the feeling it was new writers who hated what the old ones did in SC1 and wanted to change things.
Also, it really diluted the protoss' identity.
1
This seems to be more of an opinion than an answer. If you have a statement, please add a source to back it up.
– cst1992
May 13 '16 at 8:40
add a comment |
I got the impression that they intend to cut the nerve cords of all new protoss to prevent it from reforming because "khala bad, it makes protoss arrogant and (justifiably) certain of their superiority"
really felt like they were bashing the khala hardcore in SC2, i got the feeling it was new writers who hated what the old ones did in SC1 and wanted to change things.
Also, it really diluted the protoss' identity.
1
This seems to be more of an opinion than an answer. If you have a statement, please add a source to back it up.
– cst1992
May 13 '16 at 8:40
add a comment |
I got the impression that they intend to cut the nerve cords of all new protoss to prevent it from reforming because "khala bad, it makes protoss arrogant and (justifiably) certain of their superiority"
really felt like they were bashing the khala hardcore in SC2, i got the feeling it was new writers who hated what the old ones did in SC1 and wanted to change things.
Also, it really diluted the protoss' identity.
I got the impression that they intend to cut the nerve cords of all new protoss to prevent it from reforming because "khala bad, it makes protoss arrogant and (justifiably) certain of their superiority"
really felt like they were bashing the khala hardcore in SC2, i got the feeling it was new writers who hated what the old ones did in SC1 and wanted to change things.
Also, it really diluted the protoss' identity.
answered May 13 '16 at 6:11
Vlad LongVlad Long
11
11
1
This seems to be more of an opinion than an answer. If you have a statement, please add a source to back it up.
– cst1992
May 13 '16 at 8:40
add a comment |
1
This seems to be more of an opinion than an answer. If you have a statement, please add a source to back it up.
– cst1992
May 13 '16 at 8:40
1
1
This seems to be more of an opinion than an answer. If you have a statement, please add a source to back it up.
– cst1992
May 13 '16 at 8:40
This seems to be more of an opinion than an answer. If you have a statement, please add a source to back it up.
– cst1992
May 13 '16 at 8:40
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109369%2fwhy-is-cutting-the-nerve-cords-in-starcraft-2-legacy-of-the-void-such-a-drastic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown