Is a debit card dangerous for an account with low balance and no overdraft protection?
I have a checking account that I keep very little money in. I use a debit card as a credit card at shops, and at the ATM. I have turned off overdraft protection on the checking account.
I've heard that using a debit card is dangerous. Given my situation, is it still dangerous? No overdraft and a low balance? I've also talked to my bank (USAA) and they've indicated there is fraud protection on my card, if it should be stolen and used to make purchases.
debit-card checking-account overdraft
|
show 1 more comment
I have a checking account that I keep very little money in. I use a debit card as a credit card at shops, and at the ATM. I have turned off overdraft protection on the checking account.
I've heard that using a debit card is dangerous. Given my situation, is it still dangerous? No overdraft and a low balance? I've also talked to my bank (USAA) and they've indicated there is fraud protection on my card, if it should be stolen and used to make purchases.
debit-card checking-account overdraft
7
"I use a debit card as a credit card..." - huh? I think you're missing the term "credit card", as by definition a credit card extends a line of credit to you so you can spend more than you (may) have. Can you clarify what you mean? Where did you hear a debit card may be dangerous? An account with a debit card that has $10 in it can, generally, not be used to debit $1000 from it (you likely get declined). Whereas a credit card can have up to the credit limit spent, regardless of how much you actually have in any account, which is arguably more "dangerous"
– BruceWayne
18 hours ago
2
Do you mean the type of debit card that looks like a credit card (Visa/Mastercard, 16 digits, CVV code), or a Maestro/Cirrus "ATM card" that cannot be used for card-not-present payments? Both may be called debit cards but they're very different products.
– gerrit
14 hours ago
2
@BruceWayne A debit card is used to pay directly from your account while a credit card is a loan you pay off later. Yes, a credit card extends your spending limits, but a debit card can do that as well if the account can go in the red (e.g. no "overdraft protection"). The only real difference is when the money leaves your account, not wether it extends your spending limit. I assume what OP means by "use a debit card as a credit card" is that they simply pay with the card like you would with a credit card, which is common in my country but I guess is not common everywhere.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
@BruceWayne in the Untied States, if a card user reports a fraudulent transaction, most credit card and debit card processors will hold the card user to $0 liability out of good business practice. But if it becomes contentious, the law is written to limit liability to the card user to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. That is $450 more danger, to me.
– user662852
6 hours ago
3
@BruceWayne OP probably means running the charge as "credit" (i.e. don't enter PIN) instead of debit.
– Kenneth K.
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
I have a checking account that I keep very little money in. I use a debit card as a credit card at shops, and at the ATM. I have turned off overdraft protection on the checking account.
I've heard that using a debit card is dangerous. Given my situation, is it still dangerous? No overdraft and a low balance? I've also talked to my bank (USAA) and they've indicated there is fraud protection on my card, if it should be stolen and used to make purchases.
debit-card checking-account overdraft
I have a checking account that I keep very little money in. I use a debit card as a credit card at shops, and at the ATM. I have turned off overdraft protection on the checking account.
I've heard that using a debit card is dangerous. Given my situation, is it still dangerous? No overdraft and a low balance? I've also talked to my bank (USAA) and they've indicated there is fraud protection on my card, if it should be stolen and used to make purchases.
debit-card checking-account overdraft
debit-card checking-account overdraft
edited 34 mins ago
200_success
853515
853515
asked 21 hours ago
horse hairhorse hair
1,84021831
1,84021831
7
"I use a debit card as a credit card..." - huh? I think you're missing the term "credit card", as by definition a credit card extends a line of credit to you so you can spend more than you (may) have. Can you clarify what you mean? Where did you hear a debit card may be dangerous? An account with a debit card that has $10 in it can, generally, not be used to debit $1000 from it (you likely get declined). Whereas a credit card can have up to the credit limit spent, regardless of how much you actually have in any account, which is arguably more "dangerous"
– BruceWayne
18 hours ago
2
Do you mean the type of debit card that looks like a credit card (Visa/Mastercard, 16 digits, CVV code), or a Maestro/Cirrus "ATM card" that cannot be used for card-not-present payments? Both may be called debit cards but they're very different products.
– gerrit
14 hours ago
2
@BruceWayne A debit card is used to pay directly from your account while a credit card is a loan you pay off later. Yes, a credit card extends your spending limits, but a debit card can do that as well if the account can go in the red (e.g. no "overdraft protection"). The only real difference is when the money leaves your account, not wether it extends your spending limit. I assume what OP means by "use a debit card as a credit card" is that they simply pay with the card like you would with a credit card, which is common in my country but I guess is not common everywhere.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
@BruceWayne in the Untied States, if a card user reports a fraudulent transaction, most credit card and debit card processors will hold the card user to $0 liability out of good business practice. But if it becomes contentious, the law is written to limit liability to the card user to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. That is $450 more danger, to me.
– user662852
6 hours ago
3
@BruceWayne OP probably means running the charge as "credit" (i.e. don't enter PIN) instead of debit.
– Kenneth K.
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
7
"I use a debit card as a credit card..." - huh? I think you're missing the term "credit card", as by definition a credit card extends a line of credit to you so you can spend more than you (may) have. Can you clarify what you mean? Where did you hear a debit card may be dangerous? An account with a debit card that has $10 in it can, generally, not be used to debit $1000 from it (you likely get declined). Whereas a credit card can have up to the credit limit spent, regardless of how much you actually have in any account, which is arguably more "dangerous"
– BruceWayne
18 hours ago
2
Do you mean the type of debit card that looks like a credit card (Visa/Mastercard, 16 digits, CVV code), or a Maestro/Cirrus "ATM card" that cannot be used for card-not-present payments? Both may be called debit cards but they're very different products.
– gerrit
14 hours ago
2
@BruceWayne A debit card is used to pay directly from your account while a credit card is a loan you pay off later. Yes, a credit card extends your spending limits, but a debit card can do that as well if the account can go in the red (e.g. no "overdraft protection"). The only real difference is when the money leaves your account, not wether it extends your spending limit. I assume what OP means by "use a debit card as a credit card" is that they simply pay with the card like you would with a credit card, which is common in my country but I guess is not common everywhere.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
@BruceWayne in the Untied States, if a card user reports a fraudulent transaction, most credit card and debit card processors will hold the card user to $0 liability out of good business practice. But if it becomes contentious, the law is written to limit liability to the card user to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. That is $450 more danger, to me.
– user662852
6 hours ago
3
@BruceWayne OP probably means running the charge as "credit" (i.e. don't enter PIN) instead of debit.
– Kenneth K.
5 hours ago
7
7
"I use a debit card as a credit card..." - huh? I think you're missing the term "credit card", as by definition a credit card extends a line of credit to you so you can spend more than you (may) have. Can you clarify what you mean? Where did you hear a debit card may be dangerous? An account with a debit card that has $10 in it can, generally, not be used to debit $1000 from it (you likely get declined). Whereas a credit card can have up to the credit limit spent, regardless of how much you actually have in any account, which is arguably more "dangerous"
– BruceWayne
18 hours ago
"I use a debit card as a credit card..." - huh? I think you're missing the term "credit card", as by definition a credit card extends a line of credit to you so you can spend more than you (may) have. Can you clarify what you mean? Where did you hear a debit card may be dangerous? An account with a debit card that has $10 in it can, generally, not be used to debit $1000 from it (you likely get declined). Whereas a credit card can have up to the credit limit spent, regardless of how much you actually have in any account, which is arguably more "dangerous"
– BruceWayne
18 hours ago
2
2
Do you mean the type of debit card that looks like a credit card (Visa/Mastercard, 16 digits, CVV code), or a Maestro/Cirrus "ATM card" that cannot be used for card-not-present payments? Both may be called debit cards but they're very different products.
– gerrit
14 hours ago
Do you mean the type of debit card that looks like a credit card (Visa/Mastercard, 16 digits, CVV code), or a Maestro/Cirrus "ATM card" that cannot be used for card-not-present payments? Both may be called debit cards but they're very different products.
– gerrit
14 hours ago
2
2
@BruceWayne A debit card is used to pay directly from your account while a credit card is a loan you pay off later. Yes, a credit card extends your spending limits, but a debit card can do that as well if the account can go in the red (e.g. no "overdraft protection"). The only real difference is when the money leaves your account, not wether it extends your spending limit. I assume what OP means by "use a debit card as a credit card" is that they simply pay with the card like you would with a credit card, which is common in my country but I guess is not common everywhere.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
@BruceWayne A debit card is used to pay directly from your account while a credit card is a loan you pay off later. Yes, a credit card extends your spending limits, but a debit card can do that as well if the account can go in the red (e.g. no "overdraft protection"). The only real difference is when the money leaves your account, not wether it extends your spending limit. I assume what OP means by "use a debit card as a credit card" is that they simply pay with the card like you would with a credit card, which is common in my country but I guess is not common everywhere.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
@BruceWayne in the Untied States, if a card user reports a fraudulent transaction, most credit card and debit card processors will hold the card user to $0 liability out of good business practice. But if it becomes contentious, the law is written to limit liability to the card user to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. That is $450 more danger, to me.
– user662852
6 hours ago
@BruceWayne in the Untied States, if a card user reports a fraudulent transaction, most credit card and debit card processors will hold the card user to $0 liability out of good business practice. But if it becomes contentious, the law is written to limit liability to the card user to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. That is $450 more danger, to me.
– user662852
6 hours ago
3
3
@BruceWayne OP probably means running the charge as "credit" (i.e. don't enter PIN) instead of debit.
– Kenneth K.
5 hours ago
@BruceWayne OP probably means running the charge as "credit" (i.e. don't enter PIN) instead of debit.
– Kenneth K.
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
The "danger" of using a debit card is that what backs it is your real money. If there is a fraudulent transaction, the money that is used to settle the transaction is yours. Yes there is a dispute and fraud protection policy offered by your bank, and should you qualify for it you'll get your money back.
If you use a credit card and there's a fraudulent transaction, the money that settles that transaction belongs to the credit card issuer. Yes you're obligated to pay it (or dispute it as fraud,) but it's a debt you owe, not your money that's been used.
So is it dangerous to use the debit card in the situation you've outlined? You've mitigated the risk by keeping your exposure low, but it would still be lower by not using the debit card in the first place.
9
It'd be nice if you could elaborate on the difference between "your" money vs. money that's lent to you and that you have to pay back because I don't think it's obvious.
– Mehrdad
15 hours ago
7
I live in Europe (Belgium) where everything is done with debit cards, and I have never heard of fraudulent transactions with debit cards. What kind of fraude are we talking about here?
– Jungkook
14 hours ago
8
@Jungkook In UK, USA and elsewhere, debit cards are Visa/MasterCard, look like credit cards, can be used for card-not-present payments and with swipe&sign. In Netherlands, Germany, and elsewhere, debit cards are through Maestro and cannot be used for card-not-present payments. The N-American equivalent would be ATM Card (which can also be used at POS).
– gerrit
14 hours ago
1
@gerrit oooh ok I see, thanks for the clarification
– Jungkook
13 hours ago
1
@mehrdad you have the choice whether to pay back a credit card in full or spread it out per the interest terms. If it comes to it, you can declare bankruptcy and be released from credit debt. These are features not available to debit card use. As I noted in another comment, the laws in at least the United States limit card user liability to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. consumer.ftc.gov/articles/…
– user662852
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Todd has a great answer. Just building on that there is also the danger when you want to hire a car, stay in hotel etc. that you need to put down your real money. Instead what typically happens is the hire company does a transaction whereby it ensures you will have the funds to pay the damages if anything goes wrong, without you necessarily having enough cash to do so. This happened to me when I was travelling as I also don't have a credit card. Some hire car companies are very reluctant to lend you a car if you do not have a credit card.
1
Is that really "danger" or just an inconvenience?
– mastov
12 hours ago
@mastov It can be a lot more than just an inconvenience. On a debit card, a "credit hold" reserves a (potentially-large) chunk of your funds such that you cannot access them. After the merchant releases the hold, it can take up to a week before you can access those funds again. This can easily leave you vulnerable to overdrafts, bounced checks, late bills, etc.
– bta
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The dangers are:
- When (not if) your card gets used for fraudulent transactions, those funds will be gone from your account until you get it resolved, which might take awhile.
- When that happens, you'll want them to cancel that card and issue a new one. You'll be without access to any remaining funds in your account until that is resolved, which might take awhile. (Excepting in-person cash withdrawals or writing checks of course.)
Credit card people have it a bit easier. Funds don't disappear from their account, their amount of available credit just goes down. They still have access to funds in their account via a debit card, they just might not be able to use their credit card for additional funds beyond that. So it's likely to be resolved before it affects them, as long as they have funds in their account. That mitigates the danger for them.
I don't have a credit card. My solution is to carry a separate debit card for another account. If my primary gets compromised, I have my backup to last until it's resolved and vice-versa.
My credit union is actually very good about proactively detecting and blocking fraud, though it's gotten past them a couple times. In those cases it only took a few days to get my money back, but it could take much longer - would you be ok if your account was empty for a month while you waited? I can also get a new card on the first business day that I can get into a branch - can you get yours that quickly or do you have to wait a couple weeks for them to mail you one? Even if you can, if weekends and holidays and travel and weather intervene and make it take awhile before you can get in, would you be ok without your card?
Using a debit card isn't dangerous in itself, but you'll be in for a tough time if you're not prepared to deal without it for a bit. I recommend keeping a backup from a second account. That mitigates the danger.
New contributor
add a comment |
Many years ago, I used a Visa debit card for all purchases. Then there was a fraudulent charge on the card; luckily, my bank spotted it and refunded it immediately.
I asked them what I could do to protect myself in future: the bank said I should use a credit card instead, as that had much greater protection. (As other answers have pointed out, you have an opportunity to contest a charge on a credit card before you've paid it. Credit card companies have a greater incentive to resolve any problems, as it's their own money at stake! I believe there are other advantages, too.)
One other advantage to using a credit card is that you build up a credit score — especially if you pay it off in full every month (as I do). Had I not started using a credit card back then, I might have had much more trouble getting a mortgage.
New contributor
add a comment |
Federal law in the United States (as the OP mentions USAA) sets different requirements and limits on a user for reporting fraudulent use of a credit card versus a debit card. While as a matter of good customer service, a bank or card may hold you to $0 for the report of a fraudulent charge for either type of account, what they are required to do by federal law is different for each. In general the maximum liability a credit user has is $50. The maximum liability a debit card user can be unlimited.
From the Federal Trade Commission
Under the FCBA, your liability for unauthorized use of your credit card tops out at $50.
...
If someone uses your ATM or debit card before you report it lost or stolen, your liability depends on how quickly you report it:
...
More than 2 business days after you learn about the loss or theft, but less than 60 calendar days after your statement is sent to you, $500
More than 60 calendar days after your statement is sent to you. All the money taken from
your ATM/debit card acount, and possibly more; for example, money in accounts linked to your debit account.
add a comment |
protected by JoeTaxpayer♦ 57 mins ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The "danger" of using a debit card is that what backs it is your real money. If there is a fraudulent transaction, the money that is used to settle the transaction is yours. Yes there is a dispute and fraud protection policy offered by your bank, and should you qualify for it you'll get your money back.
If you use a credit card and there's a fraudulent transaction, the money that settles that transaction belongs to the credit card issuer. Yes you're obligated to pay it (or dispute it as fraud,) but it's a debt you owe, not your money that's been used.
So is it dangerous to use the debit card in the situation you've outlined? You've mitigated the risk by keeping your exposure low, but it would still be lower by not using the debit card in the first place.
9
It'd be nice if you could elaborate on the difference between "your" money vs. money that's lent to you and that you have to pay back because I don't think it's obvious.
– Mehrdad
15 hours ago
7
I live in Europe (Belgium) where everything is done with debit cards, and I have never heard of fraudulent transactions with debit cards. What kind of fraude are we talking about here?
– Jungkook
14 hours ago
8
@Jungkook In UK, USA and elsewhere, debit cards are Visa/MasterCard, look like credit cards, can be used for card-not-present payments and with swipe&sign. In Netherlands, Germany, and elsewhere, debit cards are through Maestro and cannot be used for card-not-present payments. The N-American equivalent would be ATM Card (which can also be used at POS).
– gerrit
14 hours ago
1
@gerrit oooh ok I see, thanks for the clarification
– Jungkook
13 hours ago
1
@mehrdad you have the choice whether to pay back a credit card in full or spread it out per the interest terms. If it comes to it, you can declare bankruptcy and be released from credit debt. These are features not available to debit card use. As I noted in another comment, the laws in at least the United States limit card user liability to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. consumer.ftc.gov/articles/…
– user662852
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
The "danger" of using a debit card is that what backs it is your real money. If there is a fraudulent transaction, the money that is used to settle the transaction is yours. Yes there is a dispute and fraud protection policy offered by your bank, and should you qualify for it you'll get your money back.
If you use a credit card and there's a fraudulent transaction, the money that settles that transaction belongs to the credit card issuer. Yes you're obligated to pay it (or dispute it as fraud,) but it's a debt you owe, not your money that's been used.
So is it dangerous to use the debit card in the situation you've outlined? You've mitigated the risk by keeping your exposure low, but it would still be lower by not using the debit card in the first place.
9
It'd be nice if you could elaborate on the difference between "your" money vs. money that's lent to you and that you have to pay back because I don't think it's obvious.
– Mehrdad
15 hours ago
7
I live in Europe (Belgium) where everything is done with debit cards, and I have never heard of fraudulent transactions with debit cards. What kind of fraude are we talking about here?
– Jungkook
14 hours ago
8
@Jungkook In UK, USA and elsewhere, debit cards are Visa/MasterCard, look like credit cards, can be used for card-not-present payments and with swipe&sign. In Netherlands, Germany, and elsewhere, debit cards are through Maestro and cannot be used for card-not-present payments. The N-American equivalent would be ATM Card (which can also be used at POS).
– gerrit
14 hours ago
1
@gerrit oooh ok I see, thanks for the clarification
– Jungkook
13 hours ago
1
@mehrdad you have the choice whether to pay back a credit card in full or spread it out per the interest terms. If it comes to it, you can declare bankruptcy and be released from credit debt. These are features not available to debit card use. As I noted in another comment, the laws in at least the United States limit card user liability to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. consumer.ftc.gov/articles/…
– user662852
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
The "danger" of using a debit card is that what backs it is your real money. If there is a fraudulent transaction, the money that is used to settle the transaction is yours. Yes there is a dispute and fraud protection policy offered by your bank, and should you qualify for it you'll get your money back.
If you use a credit card and there's a fraudulent transaction, the money that settles that transaction belongs to the credit card issuer. Yes you're obligated to pay it (or dispute it as fraud,) but it's a debt you owe, not your money that's been used.
So is it dangerous to use the debit card in the situation you've outlined? You've mitigated the risk by keeping your exposure low, but it would still be lower by not using the debit card in the first place.
The "danger" of using a debit card is that what backs it is your real money. If there is a fraudulent transaction, the money that is used to settle the transaction is yours. Yes there is a dispute and fraud protection policy offered by your bank, and should you qualify for it you'll get your money back.
If you use a credit card and there's a fraudulent transaction, the money that settles that transaction belongs to the credit card issuer. Yes you're obligated to pay it (or dispute it as fraud,) but it's a debt you owe, not your money that's been used.
So is it dangerous to use the debit card in the situation you've outlined? You've mitigated the risk by keeping your exposure low, but it would still be lower by not using the debit card in the first place.
answered 21 hours ago
ToddTodd
1,513612
1,513612
9
It'd be nice if you could elaborate on the difference between "your" money vs. money that's lent to you and that you have to pay back because I don't think it's obvious.
– Mehrdad
15 hours ago
7
I live in Europe (Belgium) where everything is done with debit cards, and I have never heard of fraudulent transactions with debit cards. What kind of fraude are we talking about here?
– Jungkook
14 hours ago
8
@Jungkook In UK, USA and elsewhere, debit cards are Visa/MasterCard, look like credit cards, can be used for card-not-present payments and with swipe&sign. In Netherlands, Germany, and elsewhere, debit cards are through Maestro and cannot be used for card-not-present payments. The N-American equivalent would be ATM Card (which can also be used at POS).
– gerrit
14 hours ago
1
@gerrit oooh ok I see, thanks for the clarification
– Jungkook
13 hours ago
1
@mehrdad you have the choice whether to pay back a credit card in full or spread it out per the interest terms. If it comes to it, you can declare bankruptcy and be released from credit debt. These are features not available to debit card use. As I noted in another comment, the laws in at least the United States limit card user liability to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. consumer.ftc.gov/articles/…
– user662852
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
9
It'd be nice if you could elaborate on the difference between "your" money vs. money that's lent to you and that you have to pay back because I don't think it's obvious.
– Mehrdad
15 hours ago
7
I live in Europe (Belgium) where everything is done with debit cards, and I have never heard of fraudulent transactions with debit cards. What kind of fraude are we talking about here?
– Jungkook
14 hours ago
8
@Jungkook In UK, USA and elsewhere, debit cards are Visa/MasterCard, look like credit cards, can be used for card-not-present payments and with swipe&sign. In Netherlands, Germany, and elsewhere, debit cards are through Maestro and cannot be used for card-not-present payments. The N-American equivalent would be ATM Card (which can also be used at POS).
– gerrit
14 hours ago
1
@gerrit oooh ok I see, thanks for the clarification
– Jungkook
13 hours ago
1
@mehrdad you have the choice whether to pay back a credit card in full or spread it out per the interest terms. If it comes to it, you can declare bankruptcy and be released from credit debt. These are features not available to debit card use. As I noted in another comment, the laws in at least the United States limit card user liability to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. consumer.ftc.gov/articles/…
– user662852
6 hours ago
9
9
It'd be nice if you could elaborate on the difference between "your" money vs. money that's lent to you and that you have to pay back because I don't think it's obvious.
– Mehrdad
15 hours ago
It'd be nice if you could elaborate on the difference between "your" money vs. money that's lent to you and that you have to pay back because I don't think it's obvious.
– Mehrdad
15 hours ago
7
7
I live in Europe (Belgium) where everything is done with debit cards, and I have never heard of fraudulent transactions with debit cards. What kind of fraude are we talking about here?
– Jungkook
14 hours ago
I live in Europe (Belgium) where everything is done with debit cards, and I have never heard of fraudulent transactions with debit cards. What kind of fraude are we talking about here?
– Jungkook
14 hours ago
8
8
@Jungkook In UK, USA and elsewhere, debit cards are Visa/MasterCard, look like credit cards, can be used for card-not-present payments and with swipe&sign. In Netherlands, Germany, and elsewhere, debit cards are through Maestro and cannot be used for card-not-present payments. The N-American equivalent would be ATM Card (which can also be used at POS).
– gerrit
14 hours ago
@Jungkook In UK, USA and elsewhere, debit cards are Visa/MasterCard, look like credit cards, can be used for card-not-present payments and with swipe&sign. In Netherlands, Germany, and elsewhere, debit cards are through Maestro and cannot be used for card-not-present payments. The N-American equivalent would be ATM Card (which can also be used at POS).
– gerrit
14 hours ago
1
1
@gerrit oooh ok I see, thanks for the clarification
– Jungkook
13 hours ago
@gerrit oooh ok I see, thanks for the clarification
– Jungkook
13 hours ago
1
1
@mehrdad you have the choice whether to pay back a credit card in full or spread it out per the interest terms. If it comes to it, you can declare bankruptcy and be released from credit debt. These are features not available to debit card use. As I noted in another comment, the laws in at least the United States limit card user liability to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. consumer.ftc.gov/articles/…
– user662852
6 hours ago
@mehrdad you have the choice whether to pay back a credit card in full or spread it out per the interest terms. If it comes to it, you can declare bankruptcy and be released from credit debt. These are features not available to debit card use. As I noted in another comment, the laws in at least the United States limit card user liability to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. consumer.ftc.gov/articles/…
– user662852
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Todd has a great answer. Just building on that there is also the danger when you want to hire a car, stay in hotel etc. that you need to put down your real money. Instead what typically happens is the hire company does a transaction whereby it ensures you will have the funds to pay the damages if anything goes wrong, without you necessarily having enough cash to do so. This happened to me when I was travelling as I also don't have a credit card. Some hire car companies are very reluctant to lend you a car if you do not have a credit card.
1
Is that really "danger" or just an inconvenience?
– mastov
12 hours ago
@mastov It can be a lot more than just an inconvenience. On a debit card, a "credit hold" reserves a (potentially-large) chunk of your funds such that you cannot access them. After the merchant releases the hold, it can take up to a week before you can access those funds again. This can easily leave you vulnerable to overdrafts, bounced checks, late bills, etc.
– bta
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Todd has a great answer. Just building on that there is also the danger when you want to hire a car, stay in hotel etc. that you need to put down your real money. Instead what typically happens is the hire company does a transaction whereby it ensures you will have the funds to pay the damages if anything goes wrong, without you necessarily having enough cash to do so. This happened to me when I was travelling as I also don't have a credit card. Some hire car companies are very reluctant to lend you a car if you do not have a credit card.
1
Is that really "danger" or just an inconvenience?
– mastov
12 hours ago
@mastov It can be a lot more than just an inconvenience. On a debit card, a "credit hold" reserves a (potentially-large) chunk of your funds such that you cannot access them. After the merchant releases the hold, it can take up to a week before you can access those funds again. This can easily leave you vulnerable to overdrafts, bounced checks, late bills, etc.
– bta
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Todd has a great answer. Just building on that there is also the danger when you want to hire a car, stay in hotel etc. that you need to put down your real money. Instead what typically happens is the hire company does a transaction whereby it ensures you will have the funds to pay the damages if anything goes wrong, without you necessarily having enough cash to do so. This happened to me when I was travelling as I also don't have a credit card. Some hire car companies are very reluctant to lend you a car if you do not have a credit card.
Todd has a great answer. Just building on that there is also the danger when you want to hire a car, stay in hotel etc. that you need to put down your real money. Instead what typically happens is the hire company does a transaction whereby it ensures you will have the funds to pay the damages if anything goes wrong, without you necessarily having enough cash to do so. This happened to me when I was travelling as I also don't have a credit card. Some hire car companies are very reluctant to lend you a car if you do not have a credit card.
answered 21 hours ago
user73552user73552
1512
1512
1
Is that really "danger" or just an inconvenience?
– mastov
12 hours ago
@mastov It can be a lot more than just an inconvenience. On a debit card, a "credit hold" reserves a (potentially-large) chunk of your funds such that you cannot access them. After the merchant releases the hold, it can take up to a week before you can access those funds again. This can easily leave you vulnerable to overdrafts, bounced checks, late bills, etc.
– bta
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
Is that really "danger" or just an inconvenience?
– mastov
12 hours ago
@mastov It can be a lot more than just an inconvenience. On a debit card, a "credit hold" reserves a (potentially-large) chunk of your funds such that you cannot access them. After the merchant releases the hold, it can take up to a week before you can access those funds again. This can easily leave you vulnerable to overdrafts, bounced checks, late bills, etc.
– bta
1 hour ago
1
1
Is that really "danger" or just an inconvenience?
– mastov
12 hours ago
Is that really "danger" or just an inconvenience?
– mastov
12 hours ago
@mastov It can be a lot more than just an inconvenience. On a debit card, a "credit hold" reserves a (potentially-large) chunk of your funds such that you cannot access them. After the merchant releases the hold, it can take up to a week before you can access those funds again. This can easily leave you vulnerable to overdrafts, bounced checks, late bills, etc.
– bta
1 hour ago
@mastov It can be a lot more than just an inconvenience. On a debit card, a "credit hold" reserves a (potentially-large) chunk of your funds such that you cannot access them. After the merchant releases the hold, it can take up to a week before you can access those funds again. This can easily leave you vulnerable to overdrafts, bounced checks, late bills, etc.
– bta
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The dangers are:
- When (not if) your card gets used for fraudulent transactions, those funds will be gone from your account until you get it resolved, which might take awhile.
- When that happens, you'll want them to cancel that card and issue a new one. You'll be without access to any remaining funds in your account until that is resolved, which might take awhile. (Excepting in-person cash withdrawals or writing checks of course.)
Credit card people have it a bit easier. Funds don't disappear from their account, their amount of available credit just goes down. They still have access to funds in their account via a debit card, they just might not be able to use their credit card for additional funds beyond that. So it's likely to be resolved before it affects them, as long as they have funds in their account. That mitigates the danger for them.
I don't have a credit card. My solution is to carry a separate debit card for another account. If my primary gets compromised, I have my backup to last until it's resolved and vice-versa.
My credit union is actually very good about proactively detecting and blocking fraud, though it's gotten past them a couple times. In those cases it only took a few days to get my money back, but it could take much longer - would you be ok if your account was empty for a month while you waited? I can also get a new card on the first business day that I can get into a branch - can you get yours that quickly or do you have to wait a couple weeks for them to mail you one? Even if you can, if weekends and holidays and travel and weather intervene and make it take awhile before you can get in, would you be ok without your card?
Using a debit card isn't dangerous in itself, but you'll be in for a tough time if you're not prepared to deal without it for a bit. I recommend keeping a backup from a second account. That mitigates the danger.
New contributor
add a comment |
The dangers are:
- When (not if) your card gets used for fraudulent transactions, those funds will be gone from your account until you get it resolved, which might take awhile.
- When that happens, you'll want them to cancel that card and issue a new one. You'll be without access to any remaining funds in your account until that is resolved, which might take awhile. (Excepting in-person cash withdrawals or writing checks of course.)
Credit card people have it a bit easier. Funds don't disappear from their account, their amount of available credit just goes down. They still have access to funds in their account via a debit card, they just might not be able to use their credit card for additional funds beyond that. So it's likely to be resolved before it affects them, as long as they have funds in their account. That mitigates the danger for them.
I don't have a credit card. My solution is to carry a separate debit card for another account. If my primary gets compromised, I have my backup to last until it's resolved and vice-versa.
My credit union is actually very good about proactively detecting and blocking fraud, though it's gotten past them a couple times. In those cases it only took a few days to get my money back, but it could take much longer - would you be ok if your account was empty for a month while you waited? I can also get a new card on the first business day that I can get into a branch - can you get yours that quickly or do you have to wait a couple weeks for them to mail you one? Even if you can, if weekends and holidays and travel and weather intervene and make it take awhile before you can get in, would you be ok without your card?
Using a debit card isn't dangerous in itself, but you'll be in for a tough time if you're not prepared to deal without it for a bit. I recommend keeping a backup from a second account. That mitigates the danger.
New contributor
add a comment |
The dangers are:
- When (not if) your card gets used for fraudulent transactions, those funds will be gone from your account until you get it resolved, which might take awhile.
- When that happens, you'll want them to cancel that card and issue a new one. You'll be without access to any remaining funds in your account until that is resolved, which might take awhile. (Excepting in-person cash withdrawals or writing checks of course.)
Credit card people have it a bit easier. Funds don't disappear from their account, their amount of available credit just goes down. They still have access to funds in their account via a debit card, they just might not be able to use their credit card for additional funds beyond that. So it's likely to be resolved before it affects them, as long as they have funds in their account. That mitigates the danger for them.
I don't have a credit card. My solution is to carry a separate debit card for another account. If my primary gets compromised, I have my backup to last until it's resolved and vice-versa.
My credit union is actually very good about proactively detecting and blocking fraud, though it's gotten past them a couple times. In those cases it only took a few days to get my money back, but it could take much longer - would you be ok if your account was empty for a month while you waited? I can also get a new card on the first business day that I can get into a branch - can you get yours that quickly or do you have to wait a couple weeks for them to mail you one? Even if you can, if weekends and holidays and travel and weather intervene and make it take awhile before you can get in, would you be ok without your card?
Using a debit card isn't dangerous in itself, but you'll be in for a tough time if you're not prepared to deal without it for a bit. I recommend keeping a backup from a second account. That mitigates the danger.
New contributor
The dangers are:
- When (not if) your card gets used for fraudulent transactions, those funds will be gone from your account until you get it resolved, which might take awhile.
- When that happens, you'll want them to cancel that card and issue a new one. You'll be without access to any remaining funds in your account until that is resolved, which might take awhile. (Excepting in-person cash withdrawals or writing checks of course.)
Credit card people have it a bit easier. Funds don't disappear from their account, their amount of available credit just goes down. They still have access to funds in their account via a debit card, they just might not be able to use their credit card for additional funds beyond that. So it's likely to be resolved before it affects them, as long as they have funds in their account. That mitigates the danger for them.
I don't have a credit card. My solution is to carry a separate debit card for another account. If my primary gets compromised, I have my backup to last until it's resolved and vice-versa.
My credit union is actually very good about proactively detecting and blocking fraud, though it's gotten past them a couple times. In those cases it only took a few days to get my money back, but it could take much longer - would you be ok if your account was empty for a month while you waited? I can also get a new card on the first business day that I can get into a branch - can you get yours that quickly or do you have to wait a couple weeks for them to mail you one? Even if you can, if weekends and holidays and travel and weather intervene and make it take awhile before you can get in, would you be ok without your card?
Using a debit card isn't dangerous in itself, but you'll be in for a tough time if you're not prepared to deal without it for a bit. I recommend keeping a backup from a second account. That mitigates the danger.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 14 hours ago
user82972user82972
411
411
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Many years ago, I used a Visa debit card for all purchases. Then there was a fraudulent charge on the card; luckily, my bank spotted it and refunded it immediately.
I asked them what I could do to protect myself in future: the bank said I should use a credit card instead, as that had much greater protection. (As other answers have pointed out, you have an opportunity to contest a charge on a credit card before you've paid it. Credit card companies have a greater incentive to resolve any problems, as it's their own money at stake! I believe there are other advantages, too.)
One other advantage to using a credit card is that you build up a credit score — especially if you pay it off in full every month (as I do). Had I not started using a credit card back then, I might have had much more trouble getting a mortgage.
New contributor
add a comment |
Many years ago, I used a Visa debit card for all purchases. Then there was a fraudulent charge on the card; luckily, my bank spotted it and refunded it immediately.
I asked them what I could do to protect myself in future: the bank said I should use a credit card instead, as that had much greater protection. (As other answers have pointed out, you have an opportunity to contest a charge on a credit card before you've paid it. Credit card companies have a greater incentive to resolve any problems, as it's their own money at stake! I believe there are other advantages, too.)
One other advantage to using a credit card is that you build up a credit score — especially if you pay it off in full every month (as I do). Had I not started using a credit card back then, I might have had much more trouble getting a mortgage.
New contributor
add a comment |
Many years ago, I used a Visa debit card for all purchases. Then there was a fraudulent charge on the card; luckily, my bank spotted it and refunded it immediately.
I asked them what I could do to protect myself in future: the bank said I should use a credit card instead, as that had much greater protection. (As other answers have pointed out, you have an opportunity to contest a charge on a credit card before you've paid it. Credit card companies have a greater incentive to resolve any problems, as it's their own money at stake! I believe there are other advantages, too.)
One other advantage to using a credit card is that you build up a credit score — especially if you pay it off in full every month (as I do). Had I not started using a credit card back then, I might have had much more trouble getting a mortgage.
New contributor
Many years ago, I used a Visa debit card for all purchases. Then there was a fraudulent charge on the card; luckily, my bank spotted it and refunded it immediately.
I asked them what I could do to protect myself in future: the bank said I should use a credit card instead, as that had much greater protection. (As other answers have pointed out, you have an opportunity to contest a charge on a credit card before you've paid it. Credit card companies have a greater incentive to resolve any problems, as it's their own money at stake! I believe there are other advantages, too.)
One other advantage to using a credit card is that you build up a credit score — especially if you pay it off in full every month (as I do). Had I not started using a credit card back then, I might have had much more trouble getting a mortgage.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 11 hours ago
giddsgidds
1411
1411
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Federal law in the United States (as the OP mentions USAA) sets different requirements and limits on a user for reporting fraudulent use of a credit card versus a debit card. While as a matter of good customer service, a bank or card may hold you to $0 for the report of a fraudulent charge for either type of account, what they are required to do by federal law is different for each. In general the maximum liability a credit user has is $50. The maximum liability a debit card user can be unlimited.
From the Federal Trade Commission
Under the FCBA, your liability for unauthorized use of your credit card tops out at $50.
...
If someone uses your ATM or debit card before you report it lost or stolen, your liability depends on how quickly you report it:
...
More than 2 business days after you learn about the loss or theft, but less than 60 calendar days after your statement is sent to you, $500
More than 60 calendar days after your statement is sent to you. All the money taken from
your ATM/debit card acount, and possibly more; for example, money in accounts linked to your debit account.
add a comment |
Federal law in the United States (as the OP mentions USAA) sets different requirements and limits on a user for reporting fraudulent use of a credit card versus a debit card. While as a matter of good customer service, a bank or card may hold you to $0 for the report of a fraudulent charge for either type of account, what they are required to do by federal law is different for each. In general the maximum liability a credit user has is $50. The maximum liability a debit card user can be unlimited.
From the Federal Trade Commission
Under the FCBA, your liability for unauthorized use of your credit card tops out at $50.
...
If someone uses your ATM or debit card before you report it lost or stolen, your liability depends on how quickly you report it:
...
More than 2 business days after you learn about the loss or theft, but less than 60 calendar days after your statement is sent to you, $500
More than 60 calendar days after your statement is sent to you. All the money taken from
your ATM/debit card acount, and possibly more; for example, money in accounts linked to your debit account.
add a comment |
Federal law in the United States (as the OP mentions USAA) sets different requirements and limits on a user for reporting fraudulent use of a credit card versus a debit card. While as a matter of good customer service, a bank or card may hold you to $0 for the report of a fraudulent charge for either type of account, what they are required to do by federal law is different for each. In general the maximum liability a credit user has is $50. The maximum liability a debit card user can be unlimited.
From the Federal Trade Commission
Under the FCBA, your liability for unauthorized use of your credit card tops out at $50.
...
If someone uses your ATM or debit card before you report it lost or stolen, your liability depends on how quickly you report it:
...
More than 2 business days after you learn about the loss or theft, but less than 60 calendar days after your statement is sent to you, $500
More than 60 calendar days after your statement is sent to you. All the money taken from
your ATM/debit card acount, and possibly more; for example, money in accounts linked to your debit account.
Federal law in the United States (as the OP mentions USAA) sets different requirements and limits on a user for reporting fraudulent use of a credit card versus a debit card. While as a matter of good customer service, a bank or card may hold you to $0 for the report of a fraudulent charge for either type of account, what they are required to do by federal law is different for each. In general the maximum liability a credit user has is $50. The maximum liability a debit card user can be unlimited.
From the Federal Trade Commission
Under the FCBA, your liability for unauthorized use of your credit card tops out at $50.
...
If someone uses your ATM or debit card before you report it lost or stolen, your liability depends on how quickly you report it:
...
More than 2 business days after you learn about the loss or theft, but less than 60 calendar days after your statement is sent to you, $500
More than 60 calendar days after your statement is sent to you. All the money taken from
your ATM/debit card acount, and possibly more; for example, money in accounts linked to your debit account.
answered 6 hours ago
user662852user662852
5,1091921
5,1091921
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by JoeTaxpayer♦ 57 mins ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
7
"I use a debit card as a credit card..." - huh? I think you're missing the term "credit card", as by definition a credit card extends a line of credit to you so you can spend more than you (may) have. Can you clarify what you mean? Where did you hear a debit card may be dangerous? An account with a debit card that has $10 in it can, generally, not be used to debit $1000 from it (you likely get declined). Whereas a credit card can have up to the credit limit spent, regardless of how much you actually have in any account, which is arguably more "dangerous"
– BruceWayne
18 hours ago
2
Do you mean the type of debit card that looks like a credit card (Visa/Mastercard, 16 digits, CVV code), or a Maestro/Cirrus "ATM card" that cannot be used for card-not-present payments? Both may be called debit cards but they're very different products.
– gerrit
14 hours ago
2
@BruceWayne A debit card is used to pay directly from your account while a credit card is a loan you pay off later. Yes, a credit card extends your spending limits, but a debit card can do that as well if the account can go in the red (e.g. no "overdraft protection"). The only real difference is when the money leaves your account, not wether it extends your spending limit. I assume what OP means by "use a debit card as a credit card" is that they simply pay with the card like you would with a credit card, which is common in my country but I guess is not common everywhere.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
@BruceWayne in the Untied States, if a card user reports a fraudulent transaction, most credit card and debit card processors will hold the card user to $0 liability out of good business practice. But if it becomes contentious, the law is written to limit liability to the card user to $50 for credit card fraud and $500 for debit card fraud. That is $450 more danger, to me.
– user662852
6 hours ago
3
@BruceWayne OP probably means running the charge as "credit" (i.e. don't enter PIN) instead of debit.
– Kenneth K.
5 hours ago