Aligning symbols underneath each other neatly
I'm trying to align the equal and greater than signs underneath each other but can't seem to get them aligned properly (see image attached). How can I align them correctly? I have included my lines of code below.
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebig[widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big] = EBigg[maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}Bigg}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg] \
geq maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),EBigg[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg]Bigg} \
= maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),Ebig[widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
geq maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),Ebig[V_{i+1}big(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}big)|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
= V_ibig(X_i^{j_1...j_i}big).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
equations vertical-alignment
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm trying to align the equal and greater than signs underneath each other but can't seem to get them aligned properly (see image attached). How can I align them correctly? I have included my lines of code below.
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebig[widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big] = EBigg[maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}Bigg}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg] \
geq maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),EBigg[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg]Bigg} \
= maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),Ebig[widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
geq maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),Ebig[V_{i+1}big(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}big)|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
= V_ibig(X_i^{j_1...j_i}big).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
equations vertical-alignment
New contributor
1
welcome to tex.se! please extend your code fragment to complete small document with your equation.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
3
Welcome to tex.sx. Since you're usingaligned
, you should place an&
just before the relation (=
orgeq
); that is the alignment point you are looking for. The user guide for theamsmath
package provides clear instructions for this and other math structures.
– barbara beeton
4 hours ago
If you're not interested in numbering the equation, usealign*
. Also, there'smax
instead ofmax
, together with, dots,
instead of...
.
– Werner
4 hours ago
Off-topic: all-blank lines are not legal syntax if theamsmath
package is loaded (which is the case here, since you're employing analigned
environment).
– Mico
3 hours ago
add a comment |
I'm trying to align the equal and greater than signs underneath each other but can't seem to get them aligned properly (see image attached). How can I align them correctly? I have included my lines of code below.
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebig[widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big] = EBigg[maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}Bigg}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg] \
geq maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),EBigg[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg]Bigg} \
= maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),Ebig[widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
geq maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),Ebig[V_{i+1}big(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}big)|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
= V_ibig(X_i^{j_1...j_i}big).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
equations vertical-alignment
New contributor
I'm trying to align the equal and greater than signs underneath each other but can't seem to get them aligned properly (see image attached). How can I align them correctly? I have included my lines of code below.
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebig[widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big] = EBigg[maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}Bigg}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg] \
geq maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),EBigg[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg]Bigg} \
= maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),Ebig[widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
geq maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),Ebig[V_{i+1}big(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}big)|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
= V_ibig(X_i^{j_1...j_i}big).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
equations vertical-alignment
equations vertical-alignment
New contributor
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
Phelype Oleinik
23.6k54586
23.6k54586
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
maths studentmaths student
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
1
welcome to tex.se! please extend your code fragment to complete small document with your equation.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
3
Welcome to tex.sx. Since you're usingaligned
, you should place an&
just before the relation (=
orgeq
); that is the alignment point you are looking for. The user guide for theamsmath
package provides clear instructions for this and other math structures.
– barbara beeton
4 hours ago
If you're not interested in numbering the equation, usealign*
. Also, there'smax
instead ofmax
, together with, dots,
instead of...
.
– Werner
4 hours ago
Off-topic: all-blank lines are not legal syntax if theamsmath
package is loaded (which is the case here, since you're employing analigned
environment).
– Mico
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
welcome to tex.se! please extend your code fragment to complete small document with your equation.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
3
Welcome to tex.sx. Since you're usingaligned
, you should place an&
just before the relation (=
orgeq
); that is the alignment point you are looking for. The user guide for theamsmath
package provides clear instructions for this and other math structures.
– barbara beeton
4 hours ago
If you're not interested in numbering the equation, usealign*
. Also, there'smax
instead ofmax
, together with, dots,
instead of...
.
– Werner
4 hours ago
Off-topic: all-blank lines are not legal syntax if theamsmath
package is loaded (which is the case here, since you're employing analigned
environment).
– Mico
3 hours ago
1
1
welcome to tex.se! please extend your code fragment to complete small document with your equation.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
welcome to tex.se! please extend your code fragment to complete small document with your equation.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
3
3
Welcome to tex.sx. Since you're using
aligned
, you should place an &
just before the relation (=
or geq
); that is the alignment point you are looking for. The user guide for the amsmath
package provides clear instructions for this and other math structures.– barbara beeton
4 hours ago
Welcome to tex.sx. Since you're using
aligned
, you should place an &
just before the relation (=
or geq
); that is the alignment point you are looking for. The user guide for the amsmath
package provides clear instructions for this and other math structures.– barbara beeton
4 hours ago
If you're not interested in numbering the equation, use
align*
. Also, there's max
instead of max
, together with , dots,
instead of ...
.– Werner
4 hours ago
If you're not interested in numbering the equation, use
align*
. Also, there's max
instead of max
, together with , dots,
instead of ...
.– Werner
4 hours ago
Off-topic: all-blank lines are not legal syntax if the
amsmath
package is loaded (which is the case here, since you're employing an aligned
environment).– Mico
3 hours ago
Off-topic: all-blank lines are not legal syntax if the
amsmath
package is loaded (which is the case here, since you're employing an aligned
environment).– Mico
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
In addition to providing &
alignments points in five places, you should also (a) write max
instead of max
and (b) use large |
symbols (by writing bigmvert
and biggmvert
). Do please replace all instances of ...
with dots
. I would also like to suggest that you use upright-E letters to denote the expectations operator. Do write bigl(
and bigr)
, etc rather than just big(
and big)
; that way, the spacing around the opening and closing "fence" symbols can be optimized by LaTeX. Last but not least, don't over-size the fence symbols; e.g., don't write Biggl[
when biggl[
does just as well -- or, arguably, even better!
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebigl[,widehat{V}_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr]
&= Ebiggl[maxbiggl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}biggr} biggmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}biggr] \
&ge maxbiggl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),Ebiggl[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}biggmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}biggr]biggr} \
&= maxbigl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),Ebigl[,widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}
bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr]bigr} \
&ge maxbigl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),
Ebigl[,V_{i+1}bigl(X_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_i1}bigr)
bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr] bigr} \
&= V_ibigl(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr),.
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
you forgot on ampersands ... and max
is probably operator max
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebig[widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]
& = EBigg[maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}Bigg}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg] \
& geq maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),EBigg[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg]Bigg} \
& = maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E
big[widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
& geq maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E
big[V_{i+1}big(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}big)|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
& = V_ibig(X_i^{j_1...j_i}big).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
Another solution with DeclarePairedDelimiter
and its variants, from mathtools
: this allows us to declare the E
and Set
command which can take an optional argument, chosen in big, Big, bigg, Bigg
, which implicitly adds a pair of bigl ... bigr
, &c., around the delimiters. Alternatively, there is a star version, which adds a pair of left ... right
. Furthermore, the vertical line is translated into a given
command, which adapts its size to the delimiters size. Note that in the first two lines, I used smaller delimiters, which I thought more convenient.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}%
usepackage{mathtools}
providecommandgiven{}
DeclarePairedDelimiterXPPE[1]{mathrm E}{}{%
renewcommandgiven{nonscript:delimsizevertnonscript:mathopen{}}
#1}
DeclarePairedDelimiterXSet[1]{}{%
renewcommandgiven{nonscript:delimsizevertnonscript:mathopen{}}
#1}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
E[big]{widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}} & = E[bigg]{maxSet[bigg]{{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}} \
& geq maxSet[bigg]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}), E[bigg]{frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& = maxSet[Big]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E[big]{widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& geq maxSet[Big]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E[big]{V_{i+1}bigl(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}bigr)given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& = V_ibigl(X_i^{j_1...j_i}bigr).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
maths student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477010%2faligning-symbols-underneath-each-other-neatly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In addition to providing &
alignments points in five places, you should also (a) write max
instead of max
and (b) use large |
symbols (by writing bigmvert
and biggmvert
). Do please replace all instances of ...
with dots
. I would also like to suggest that you use upright-E letters to denote the expectations operator. Do write bigl(
and bigr)
, etc rather than just big(
and big)
; that way, the spacing around the opening and closing "fence" symbols can be optimized by LaTeX. Last but not least, don't over-size the fence symbols; e.g., don't write Biggl[
when biggl[
does just as well -- or, arguably, even better!
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebigl[,widehat{V}_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr]
&= Ebiggl[maxbiggl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}biggr} biggmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}biggr] \
&ge maxbiggl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),Ebiggl[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}biggmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}biggr]biggr} \
&= maxbigl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),Ebigl[,widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}
bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr]bigr} \
&ge maxbigl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),
Ebigl[,V_{i+1}bigl(X_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_i1}bigr)
bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr] bigr} \
&= V_ibigl(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr),.
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
In addition to providing &
alignments points in five places, you should also (a) write max
instead of max
and (b) use large |
symbols (by writing bigmvert
and biggmvert
). Do please replace all instances of ...
with dots
. I would also like to suggest that you use upright-E letters to denote the expectations operator. Do write bigl(
and bigr)
, etc rather than just big(
and big)
; that way, the spacing around the opening and closing "fence" symbols can be optimized by LaTeX. Last but not least, don't over-size the fence symbols; e.g., don't write Biggl[
when biggl[
does just as well -- or, arguably, even better!
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebigl[,widehat{V}_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr]
&= Ebiggl[maxbiggl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}biggr} biggmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}biggr] \
&ge maxbiggl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),Ebiggl[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}biggmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}biggr]biggr} \
&= maxbigl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),Ebigl[,widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}
bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr]bigr} \
&ge maxbigl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),
Ebigl[,V_{i+1}bigl(X_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_i1}bigr)
bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr] bigr} \
&= V_ibigl(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr),.
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
In addition to providing &
alignments points in five places, you should also (a) write max
instead of max
and (b) use large |
symbols (by writing bigmvert
and biggmvert
). Do please replace all instances of ...
with dots
. I would also like to suggest that you use upright-E letters to denote the expectations operator. Do write bigl(
and bigr)
, etc rather than just big(
and big)
; that way, the spacing around the opening and closing "fence" symbols can be optimized by LaTeX. Last but not least, don't over-size the fence symbols; e.g., don't write Biggl[
when biggl[
does just as well -- or, arguably, even better!
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebigl[,widehat{V}_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr]
&= Ebiggl[maxbiggl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}biggr} biggmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}biggr] \
&ge maxbiggl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),Ebiggl[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}biggmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}biggr]biggr} \
&= maxbigl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),Ebigl[,widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}
bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr]bigr} \
&ge maxbigl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),
Ebigl[,V_{i+1}bigl(X_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_i1}bigr)
bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr] bigr} \
&= V_ibigl(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr),.
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
In addition to providing &
alignments points in five places, you should also (a) write max
instead of max
and (b) use large |
symbols (by writing bigmvert
and biggmvert
). Do please replace all instances of ...
with dots
. I would also like to suggest that you use upright-E letters to denote the expectations operator. Do write bigl(
and bigr)
, etc rather than just big(
and big)
; that way, the spacing around the opening and closing "fence" symbols can be optimized by LaTeX. Last but not least, don't over-size the fence symbols; e.g., don't write Biggl[
when biggl[
does just as well -- or, arguably, even better!
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebigl[,widehat{V}_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr]
&= Ebiggl[maxbiggl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}biggr} biggmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}biggr] \
&ge maxbiggl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),Ebiggl[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}biggmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}biggr]biggr} \
&= maxbigl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),Ebigl[,widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_ij}
bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr]bigr} \
&ge maxbigl{h_i(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}),
Ebigl[,V_{i+1}bigl(X_{i+1}^{j_1dots j_i1}bigr)
bigmvert X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr] bigr} \
&= V_ibigl(X_i^{j_1dots j_i}bigr),.
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
MicoMico
280k31384772
280k31384772
add a comment |
add a comment |
you forgot on ampersands ... and max
is probably operator max
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebig[widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]
& = EBigg[maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}Bigg}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg] \
& geq maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),EBigg[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg]Bigg} \
& = maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E
big[widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
& geq maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E
big[V_{i+1}big(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}big)|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
& = V_ibig(X_i^{j_1...j_i}big).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
you forgot on ampersands ... and max
is probably operator max
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebig[widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]
& = EBigg[maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}Bigg}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg] \
& geq maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),EBigg[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg]Bigg} \
& = maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E
big[widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
& geq maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E
big[V_{i+1}big(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}big)|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
& = V_ibig(X_i^{j_1...j_i}big).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
you forgot on ampersands ... and max
is probably operator max
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebig[widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]
& = EBigg[maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}Bigg}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg] \
& geq maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),EBigg[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg]Bigg} \
& = maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E
big[widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
& geq maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E
big[V_{i+1}big(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}big)|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
& = V_ibig(X_i^{j_1...j_i}big).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
you forgot on ampersands ... and max
is probably operator max
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
Ebig[widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]
& = EBigg[maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}Bigg}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg] \
& geq maxBigg{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),EBigg[frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b}
widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}Bigg]Bigg} \
& = maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E
big[widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
& geq maxBig{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E
big[V_{i+1}big(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}big)|X_i^{j_1...j_i}big]Big} \
& = V_ibig(X_i^{j_1...j_i}big).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
answered 4 hours ago
ZarkoZarko
126k867164
126k867164
add a comment |
add a comment |
Another solution with DeclarePairedDelimiter
and its variants, from mathtools
: this allows us to declare the E
and Set
command which can take an optional argument, chosen in big, Big, bigg, Bigg
, which implicitly adds a pair of bigl ... bigr
, &c., around the delimiters. Alternatively, there is a star version, which adds a pair of left ... right
. Furthermore, the vertical line is translated into a given
command, which adapts its size to the delimiters size. Note that in the first two lines, I used smaller delimiters, which I thought more convenient.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}%
usepackage{mathtools}
providecommandgiven{}
DeclarePairedDelimiterXPPE[1]{mathrm E}{}{%
renewcommandgiven{nonscript:delimsizevertnonscript:mathopen{}}
#1}
DeclarePairedDelimiterXSet[1]{}{%
renewcommandgiven{nonscript:delimsizevertnonscript:mathopen{}}
#1}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
E[big]{widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}} & = E[bigg]{maxSet[bigg]{{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}} \
& geq maxSet[bigg]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}), E[bigg]{frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& = maxSet[Big]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E[big]{widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& geq maxSet[Big]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E[big]{V_{i+1}bigl(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}bigr)given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& = V_ibigl(X_i^{j_1...j_i}bigr).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
Another solution with DeclarePairedDelimiter
and its variants, from mathtools
: this allows us to declare the E
and Set
command which can take an optional argument, chosen in big, Big, bigg, Bigg
, which implicitly adds a pair of bigl ... bigr
, &c., around the delimiters. Alternatively, there is a star version, which adds a pair of left ... right
. Furthermore, the vertical line is translated into a given
command, which adapts its size to the delimiters size. Note that in the first two lines, I used smaller delimiters, which I thought more convenient.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}%
usepackage{mathtools}
providecommandgiven{}
DeclarePairedDelimiterXPPE[1]{mathrm E}{}{%
renewcommandgiven{nonscript:delimsizevertnonscript:mathopen{}}
#1}
DeclarePairedDelimiterXSet[1]{}{%
renewcommandgiven{nonscript:delimsizevertnonscript:mathopen{}}
#1}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
E[big]{widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}} & = E[bigg]{maxSet[bigg]{{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}} \
& geq maxSet[bigg]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}), E[bigg]{frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& = maxSet[Big]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E[big]{widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& geq maxSet[Big]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E[big]{V_{i+1}bigl(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}bigr)given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& = V_ibigl(X_i^{j_1...j_i}bigr).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
Another solution with DeclarePairedDelimiter
and its variants, from mathtools
: this allows us to declare the E
and Set
command which can take an optional argument, chosen in big, Big, bigg, Bigg
, which implicitly adds a pair of bigl ... bigr
, &c., around the delimiters. Alternatively, there is a star version, which adds a pair of left ... right
. Furthermore, the vertical line is translated into a given
command, which adapts its size to the delimiters size. Note that in the first two lines, I used smaller delimiters, which I thought more convenient.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}%
usepackage{mathtools}
providecommandgiven{}
DeclarePairedDelimiterXPPE[1]{mathrm E}{}{%
renewcommandgiven{nonscript:delimsizevertnonscript:mathopen{}}
#1}
DeclarePairedDelimiterXSet[1]{}{%
renewcommandgiven{nonscript:delimsizevertnonscript:mathopen{}}
#1}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
E[big]{widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}} & = E[bigg]{maxSet[bigg]{{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}} \
& geq maxSet[bigg]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}), E[bigg]{frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& = maxSet[Big]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E[big]{widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& geq maxSet[Big]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E[big]{V_{i+1}bigl(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}bigr)given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& = V_ibigl(X_i^{j_1...j_i}bigr).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
Another solution with DeclarePairedDelimiter
and its variants, from mathtools
: this allows us to declare the E
and Set
command which can take an optional argument, chosen in big, Big, bigg, Bigg
, which implicitly adds a pair of bigl ... bigr
, &c., around the delimiters. Alternatively, there is a star version, which adds a pair of left ... right
. Furthermore, the vertical line is translated into a given
command, which adapts its size to the delimiters size. Note that in the first two lines, I used smaller delimiters, which I thought more convenient.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}%
usepackage{mathtools}
providecommandgiven{}
DeclarePairedDelimiterXPPE[1]{mathrm E}{}{%
renewcommandgiven{nonscript:delimsizevertnonscript:mathopen{}}
#1}
DeclarePairedDelimiterXSet[1]{}{%
renewcommandgiven{nonscript:delimsizevertnonscript:mathopen{}}
#1}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
E[big]{widehat{V}_i^{j_1...j_i}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}} & = E[bigg]{maxSet[bigg]{{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}} \
& geq maxSet[bigg]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}), E[bigg]{frac{1}{b}sum_{j=1}^{b} widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& = maxSet[Big]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E[big]{widehat{V}_{i+1}^{j_1...j_ij}given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& geq maxSet[Big]{h_i(X_i^{j_1...j_i}),E[big]{V_{i+1}bigl(X_{i+1}^{j_1...j_i1}bigr)given X_i^{j_1...j_i}}} \
& = V_ibigl(X_i^{j_1...j_i}bigr).
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
answered 3 hours ago
BernardBernard
171k775203
171k775203
add a comment |
add a comment |
maths student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
maths student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
maths student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
maths student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477010%2faligning-symbols-underneath-each-other-neatly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
welcome to tex.se! please extend your code fragment to complete small document with your equation.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
3
Welcome to tex.sx. Since you're using
aligned
, you should place an&
just before the relation (=
orgeq
); that is the alignment point you are looking for. The user guide for theamsmath
package provides clear instructions for this and other math structures.– barbara beeton
4 hours ago
If you're not interested in numbering the equation, use
align*
. Also, there'smax
instead ofmax
, together with, dots,
instead of...
.– Werner
4 hours ago
Off-topic: all-blank lines are not legal syntax if the
amsmath
package is loaded (which is the case here, since you're employing analigned
environment).– Mico
3 hours ago