Why does Spock recommend this not be spoken of anymore?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















At the end of ST:DIS 2x14, Spock recommends that




all officers remaining with knowledge of these events must be ordered never to speak of Discovery, its spore drive, or her crew again




in order to prevent the experienced series of events from unfolding again.



This left me deeply confused.



I understand that the data




gathered from the Sphere




was instrumental in




Control gaining self-awareness




Thus, the plan was to send




the ship along with the data, which is magically locked to the ship, off into the far future where it is out of reach.




So, what in the world is Spock's recommendation supposed to achieve in-universe?




Given that various methods of time travel are known in the 23rd century, it is conceivable no-one should know the data is on Discovery. But about the rest - surely, Starfleet cannot just deny the existence of the Discovery's crew. And what does the spore drive have to do with it, anyway? As far as I remember, it played a significant role during several events of the Klingon war, which are definitely noted in Starfleet's historical records, but it was completely irrelevant to Control's rise.











share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.

    – starpilotsix
    2 hours ago











  • @starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…

    – Valorum
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned

    – NKCampbell
    1 hour ago




















1















At the end of ST:DIS 2x14, Spock recommends that




all officers remaining with knowledge of these events must be ordered never to speak of Discovery, its spore drive, or her crew again




in order to prevent the experienced series of events from unfolding again.



This left me deeply confused.



I understand that the data




gathered from the Sphere




was instrumental in




Control gaining self-awareness




Thus, the plan was to send




the ship along with the data, which is magically locked to the ship, off into the far future where it is out of reach.




So, what in the world is Spock's recommendation supposed to achieve in-universe?




Given that various methods of time travel are known in the 23rd century, it is conceivable no-one should know the data is on Discovery. But about the rest - surely, Starfleet cannot just deny the existence of the Discovery's crew. And what does the spore drive have to do with it, anyway? As far as I remember, it played a significant role during several events of the Klingon war, which are definitely noted in Starfleet's historical records, but it was completely irrelevant to Control's rise.











share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.

    – starpilotsix
    2 hours ago











  • @starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…

    – Valorum
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned

    – NKCampbell
    1 hour ago
















1












1








1








At the end of ST:DIS 2x14, Spock recommends that




all officers remaining with knowledge of these events must be ordered never to speak of Discovery, its spore drive, or her crew again




in order to prevent the experienced series of events from unfolding again.



This left me deeply confused.



I understand that the data




gathered from the Sphere




was instrumental in




Control gaining self-awareness




Thus, the plan was to send




the ship along with the data, which is magically locked to the ship, off into the far future where it is out of reach.




So, what in the world is Spock's recommendation supposed to achieve in-universe?




Given that various methods of time travel are known in the 23rd century, it is conceivable no-one should know the data is on Discovery. But about the rest - surely, Starfleet cannot just deny the existence of the Discovery's crew. And what does the spore drive have to do with it, anyway? As far as I remember, it played a significant role during several events of the Klingon war, which are definitely noted in Starfleet's historical records, but it was completely irrelevant to Control's rise.











share|improve this question
















At the end of ST:DIS 2x14, Spock recommends that




all officers remaining with knowledge of these events must be ordered never to speak of Discovery, its spore drive, or her crew again




in order to prevent the experienced series of events from unfolding again.



This left me deeply confused.



I understand that the data




gathered from the Sphere




was instrumental in




Control gaining self-awareness




Thus, the plan was to send




the ship along with the data, which is magically locked to the ship, off into the far future where it is out of reach.




So, what in the world is Spock's recommendation supposed to achieve in-universe?




Given that various methods of time travel are known in the 23rd century, it is conceivable no-one should know the data is on Discovery. But about the rest - surely, Starfleet cannot just deny the existence of the Discovery's crew. And what does the spore drive have to do with it, anyway? As far as I remember, it played a significant role during several events of the Klingon war, which are definitely noted in Starfleet's historical records, but it was completely irrelevant to Control's rise.








star-trek star-trek-discovery






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 mins ago









Machavity

25.7k577144




25.7k577144










asked 2 hours ago









O. R. MapperO. R. Mapper

1,69611020




1,69611020








  • 1





    Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.

    – starpilotsix
    2 hours ago











  • @starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…

    – Valorum
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned

    – NKCampbell
    1 hour ago
















  • 1





    Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.

    – starpilotsix
    2 hours ago











  • @starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…

    – Valorum
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned

    – NKCampbell
    1 hour ago










1




1





Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.

– starpilotsix
2 hours ago





Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.

– starpilotsix
2 hours ago













@starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…

– Valorum
2 hours ago





@starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…

– Valorum
2 hours ago




2




2





not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned

– NKCampbell
1 hour ago







not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned

– NKCampbell
1 hour ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Major spoilers ahead (impractical to wrap this all in spoilers)



It prevents people from asking deeper questions



There's no evidence it exploded (hence the intense questioning). We're not told everything they told Starfleet, but let's assume they omitted the Sphere data debacle. Starfleet knew about Control but would be puzzled why Control was so focused on Discovery. Maybe someone would boot Control back up to ask. By pretending that Discovery was lost, in the absence of other data, Starfleet would stop asking questions (we've seen this elsewhere when convenient lies are used to cover up things).



It stops the Section 31 time travel program



Only Ashe Tyler knows about it now (presumably, since Control purges Section 31) and he knows what's at stake if he chooses to pursue it. It's also safe to assume that this stops the Klingons from pursuing it as well, knowing that it could reawaken a monster. If they said "Oh, Burnham flew her Time Suit and Discovery to the 32nd Century", someone would say "Really? We need one of those" and then you're back in the same mess.






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209518%2fwhy-does-spock-recommend-this-not-be-spoken-of-anymore%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Major spoilers ahead (impractical to wrap this all in spoilers)



    It prevents people from asking deeper questions



    There's no evidence it exploded (hence the intense questioning). We're not told everything they told Starfleet, but let's assume they omitted the Sphere data debacle. Starfleet knew about Control but would be puzzled why Control was so focused on Discovery. Maybe someone would boot Control back up to ask. By pretending that Discovery was lost, in the absence of other data, Starfleet would stop asking questions (we've seen this elsewhere when convenient lies are used to cover up things).



    It stops the Section 31 time travel program



    Only Ashe Tyler knows about it now (presumably, since Control purges Section 31) and he knows what's at stake if he chooses to pursue it. It's also safe to assume that this stops the Klingons from pursuing it as well, knowing that it could reawaken a monster. If they said "Oh, Burnham flew her Time Suit and Discovery to the 32nd Century", someone would say "Really? We need one of those" and then you're back in the same mess.






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      Major spoilers ahead (impractical to wrap this all in spoilers)



      It prevents people from asking deeper questions



      There's no evidence it exploded (hence the intense questioning). We're not told everything they told Starfleet, but let's assume they omitted the Sphere data debacle. Starfleet knew about Control but would be puzzled why Control was so focused on Discovery. Maybe someone would boot Control back up to ask. By pretending that Discovery was lost, in the absence of other data, Starfleet would stop asking questions (we've seen this elsewhere when convenient lies are used to cover up things).



      It stops the Section 31 time travel program



      Only Ashe Tyler knows about it now (presumably, since Control purges Section 31) and he knows what's at stake if he chooses to pursue it. It's also safe to assume that this stops the Klingons from pursuing it as well, knowing that it could reawaken a monster. If they said "Oh, Burnham flew her Time Suit and Discovery to the 32nd Century", someone would say "Really? We need one of those" and then you're back in the same mess.






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        Major spoilers ahead (impractical to wrap this all in spoilers)



        It prevents people from asking deeper questions



        There's no evidence it exploded (hence the intense questioning). We're not told everything they told Starfleet, but let's assume they omitted the Sphere data debacle. Starfleet knew about Control but would be puzzled why Control was so focused on Discovery. Maybe someone would boot Control back up to ask. By pretending that Discovery was lost, in the absence of other data, Starfleet would stop asking questions (we've seen this elsewhere when convenient lies are used to cover up things).



        It stops the Section 31 time travel program



        Only Ashe Tyler knows about it now (presumably, since Control purges Section 31) and he knows what's at stake if he chooses to pursue it. It's also safe to assume that this stops the Klingons from pursuing it as well, knowing that it could reawaken a monster. If they said "Oh, Burnham flew her Time Suit and Discovery to the 32nd Century", someone would say "Really? We need one of those" and then you're back in the same mess.






        share|improve this answer













        Major spoilers ahead (impractical to wrap this all in spoilers)



        It prevents people from asking deeper questions



        There's no evidence it exploded (hence the intense questioning). We're not told everything they told Starfleet, but let's assume they omitted the Sphere data debacle. Starfleet knew about Control but would be puzzled why Control was so focused on Discovery. Maybe someone would boot Control back up to ask. By pretending that Discovery was lost, in the absence of other data, Starfleet would stop asking questions (we've seen this elsewhere when convenient lies are used to cover up things).



        It stops the Section 31 time travel program



        Only Ashe Tyler knows about it now (presumably, since Control purges Section 31) and he knows what's at stake if he chooses to pursue it. It's also safe to assume that this stops the Klingons from pursuing it as well, knowing that it could reawaken a monster. If they said "Oh, Burnham flew her Time Suit and Discovery to the 32nd Century", someone would say "Really? We need one of those" and then you're back in the same mess.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        MachavityMachavity

        25.7k577144




        25.7k577144






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209518%2fwhy-does-spock-recommend-this-not-be-spoken-of-anymore%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to label and detect the document text images

            Vallis Paradisi

            Tabula Rosettana