Adapting the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) for integers to polynomials












2












$begingroup$


I did a few examples using the CRT to solve congruences where everything was in terms of integers. I'm trying to use the same technique for polynomials over $mathbb{Q}$, but I'm getting stuck.




Here's an example with integers:



$begin{cases}x equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , 5) \
x equiv 2 , (mathrm{mod} , 7) \
x equiv 3 , (mathrm{mod} , 9) \
x equiv 4 , (mathrm{mod} , 11).
end{cases}$



Since all the moduli are pairwise relatively prime, we can use the CRT. Here's some notation I'm using:



$bullet , M$ denotes the product of the moduli (in this case, $M = 5 cdot7 cdot 9 cdot 11$)



$bullet , m_i $ denotes the modulus in the $i^{mathrm{th}}$ congruence



$bullet , M_i$ denotes $dfrac{M}{m_i}$



$bullet , y_i$ denotes the inverse of $M_i$ (mod $m_i$), i.e. $y_i$ satisfies $y_i M_i equiv 1$ (mod $m_i$).



Then $x = displaystyle sum_{i = 1}^n a_iM_iy_i$, and this solution is unique (mod $M$).




Now I want to apply the same technique to the following:



$begin{cases}
f(x) equiv 1 , (mathrm{ mod } , x^2 + 1) \
f(x) equiv x , (mathrm{mod} , x^4),
end{cases}$



where $f(x) in mathbb{Q}(x)$. Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime, we should be able to use the CRT. Using the notation above, I have the following:



$M = (x^4)(x^2 + 1)$



$M_1 = x^4$



$M_2 = x^2 + 1$



Here's where I run into a problem. I need to find $y_1, y_2$ such that



$begin{cases}
y_1 (x^4) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^2 + 1) \
y_2 (x^2+1) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^4).
end{cases}$



But how does one find $y_1, y_2$?






abstract-algebra ring-theory chinese-remainder-theorem







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
    $endgroup$
    – kccu
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Junglemath
    4 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$


I did a few examples using the CRT to solve congruences where everything was in terms of integers. I'm trying to use the same technique for polynomials over $mathbb{Q}$, but I'm getting stuck.




Here's an example with integers:



$begin{cases}x equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , 5) \
x equiv 2 , (mathrm{mod} , 7) \
x equiv 3 , (mathrm{mod} , 9) \
x equiv 4 , (mathrm{mod} , 11).
end{cases}$



Since all the moduli are pairwise relatively prime, we can use the CRT. Here's some notation I'm using:



$bullet , M$ denotes the product of the moduli (in this case, $M = 5 cdot7 cdot 9 cdot 11$)



$bullet , m_i $ denotes the modulus in the $i^{mathrm{th}}$ congruence



$bullet , M_i$ denotes $dfrac{M}{m_i}$



$bullet , y_i$ denotes the inverse of $M_i$ (mod $m_i$), i.e. $y_i$ satisfies $y_i M_i equiv 1$ (mod $m_i$).



Then $x = displaystyle sum_{i = 1}^n a_iM_iy_i$, and this solution is unique (mod $M$).




Now I want to apply the same technique to the following:



$begin{cases}
f(x) equiv 1 , (mathrm{ mod } , x^2 + 1) \
f(x) equiv x , (mathrm{mod} , x^4),
end{cases}$



where $f(x) in mathbb{Q}(x)$. Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime, we should be able to use the CRT. Using the notation above, I have the following:



$M = (x^4)(x^2 + 1)$



$M_1 = x^4$



$M_2 = x^2 + 1$



Here's where I run into a problem. I need to find $y_1, y_2$ such that



$begin{cases}
y_1 (x^4) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^2 + 1) \
y_2 (x^2+1) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^4).
end{cases}$



But how does one find $y_1, y_2$?






abstract-algebra ring-theory chinese-remainder-theorem







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
    $endgroup$
    – kccu
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Junglemath
    4 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I did a few examples using the CRT to solve congruences where everything was in terms of integers. I'm trying to use the same technique for polynomials over $mathbb{Q}$, but I'm getting stuck.




Here's an example with integers:



$begin{cases}x equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , 5) \
x equiv 2 , (mathrm{mod} , 7) \
x equiv 3 , (mathrm{mod} , 9) \
x equiv 4 , (mathrm{mod} , 11).
end{cases}$



Since all the moduli are pairwise relatively prime, we can use the CRT. Here's some notation I'm using:



$bullet , M$ denotes the product of the moduli (in this case, $M = 5 cdot7 cdot 9 cdot 11$)



$bullet , m_i $ denotes the modulus in the $i^{mathrm{th}}$ congruence



$bullet , M_i$ denotes $dfrac{M}{m_i}$



$bullet , y_i$ denotes the inverse of $M_i$ (mod $m_i$), i.e. $y_i$ satisfies $y_i M_i equiv 1$ (mod $m_i$).



Then $x = displaystyle sum_{i = 1}^n a_iM_iy_i$, and this solution is unique (mod $M$).




Now I want to apply the same technique to the following:



$begin{cases}
f(x) equiv 1 , (mathrm{ mod } , x^2 + 1) \
f(x) equiv x , (mathrm{mod} , x^4),
end{cases}$



where $f(x) in mathbb{Q}(x)$. Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime, we should be able to use the CRT. Using the notation above, I have the following:



$M = (x^4)(x^2 + 1)$



$M_1 = x^4$



$M_2 = x^2 + 1$



Here's where I run into a problem. I need to find $y_1, y_2$ such that



$begin{cases}
y_1 (x^4) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^2 + 1) \
y_2 (x^2+1) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^4).
end{cases}$



But how does one find $y_1, y_2$?






abstract-algebra ring-theory chinese-remainder-theorem







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I did a few examples using the CRT to solve congruences where everything was in terms of integers. I'm trying to use the same technique for polynomials over $mathbb{Q}$, but I'm getting stuck.




Here's an example with integers:



$begin{cases}x equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , 5) \
x equiv 2 , (mathrm{mod} , 7) \
x equiv 3 , (mathrm{mod} , 9) \
x equiv 4 , (mathrm{mod} , 11).
end{cases}$



Since all the moduli are pairwise relatively prime, we can use the CRT. Here's some notation I'm using:



$bullet , M$ denotes the product of the moduli (in this case, $M = 5 cdot7 cdot 9 cdot 11$)



$bullet , m_i $ denotes the modulus in the $i^{mathrm{th}}$ congruence



$bullet , M_i$ denotes $dfrac{M}{m_i}$



$bullet , y_i$ denotes the inverse of $M_i$ (mod $m_i$), i.e. $y_i$ satisfies $y_i M_i equiv 1$ (mod $m_i$).



Then $x = displaystyle sum_{i = 1}^n a_iM_iy_i$, and this solution is unique (mod $M$).




Now I want to apply the same technique to the following:



$begin{cases}
f(x) equiv 1 , (mathrm{ mod } , x^2 + 1) \
f(x) equiv x , (mathrm{mod} , x^4),
end{cases}$



where $f(x) in mathbb{Q}(x)$. Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime, we should be able to use the CRT. Using the notation above, I have the following:



$M = (x^4)(x^2 + 1)$



$M_1 = x^4$



$M_2 = x^2 + 1$



Here's where I run into a problem. I need to find $y_1, y_2$ such that



$begin{cases}
y_1 (x^4) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^2 + 1) \
y_2 (x^2+1) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^4).
end{cases}$



But how does one find $y_1, y_2$?






abstract-algebra ring-theory chinese-remainder-theorem




abstract-algebra ring-theory chinese-remainder-theorem






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









JunglemathJunglemath

6016




6016








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
    $endgroup$
    – kccu
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Junglemath
    4 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
    $endgroup$
    – kccu
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Junglemath
    4 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
"Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
$endgroup$
– kccu
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
"Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
$endgroup$
– kccu
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

To find $y_1$ and $y_2$ consider solving the problem
$$y_1x^4+y_2(x^2+1)=1.$$
This is not always easy to solve, but in this case a solution comes to mind. Note that by difference of squares
$$(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=x^4-1,$$
hence
$$x^4+[(-1)(x^2-1)](x^2+1)=1.$$
This tells us that we can choose
$$y_1=1,$$
$$y_2=(1-x^2).$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
    $endgroup$
    – Junglemath
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paolo
    4 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    4 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    4 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    3 hours ago





















1












$begingroup$

Bu applying $ abbmod ac, =, a(bbmod c) $ [Mod Distributive Law] $ $ it is a bit simpler:



$ f-x,bmod, {x^{large 4}(x^{large 2}!+!1)}, =, x^{large 4}underbrace{{left[dfrac{color{#c00}f-x}{color{#0a0}{x^{large 4}}}bmod {x^{large 2}!+!1}right]}}_{large color{#0a0}{x^{Large 4}} equiv 1 {rm by} x^{Large 2} equiv -1 } =, x^{large 4}[1-x], $ by $,color{#c00}fequiv 1pmod{!x^{large 2}!+!1}$



Remark $ $ Here are further examples done using MDL (an operational form of CRT).



You can find further details here on transforming the Bezout equation into a CRT solution (the method sketched in Melody's answer).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196235%2fadapting-the-chinese-remainder-theorem-crt-for-integers-to-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    To find $y_1$ and $y_2$ consider solving the problem
    $$y_1x^4+y_2(x^2+1)=1.$$
    This is not always easy to solve, but in this case a solution comes to mind. Note that by difference of squares
    $$(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=x^4-1,$$
    hence
    $$x^4+[(-1)(x^2-1)](x^2+1)=1.$$
    This tells us that we can choose
    $$y_1=1,$$
    $$y_2=(1-x^2).$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
      $endgroup$
      – Junglemath
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
      $endgroup$
      – Paolo
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
      $endgroup$
      – Melody
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
      $endgroup$
      – Melody
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Bill Dubuque
      3 hours ago


















    3












    $begingroup$

    To find $y_1$ and $y_2$ consider solving the problem
    $$y_1x^4+y_2(x^2+1)=1.$$
    This is not always easy to solve, but in this case a solution comes to mind. Note that by difference of squares
    $$(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=x^4-1,$$
    hence
    $$x^4+[(-1)(x^2-1)](x^2+1)=1.$$
    This tells us that we can choose
    $$y_1=1,$$
    $$y_2=(1-x^2).$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
      $endgroup$
      – Junglemath
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
      $endgroup$
      – Paolo
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
      $endgroup$
      – Melody
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
      $endgroup$
      – Melody
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Bill Dubuque
      3 hours ago
















    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    To find $y_1$ and $y_2$ consider solving the problem
    $$y_1x^4+y_2(x^2+1)=1.$$
    This is not always easy to solve, but in this case a solution comes to mind. Note that by difference of squares
    $$(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=x^4-1,$$
    hence
    $$x^4+[(-1)(x^2-1)](x^2+1)=1.$$
    This tells us that we can choose
    $$y_1=1,$$
    $$y_2=(1-x^2).$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    To find $y_1$ and $y_2$ consider solving the problem
    $$y_1x^4+y_2(x^2+1)=1.$$
    This is not always easy to solve, but in this case a solution comes to mind. Note that by difference of squares
    $$(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=x^4-1,$$
    hence
    $$x^4+[(-1)(x^2-1)](x^2+1)=1.$$
    This tells us that we can choose
    $$y_1=1,$$
    $$y_2=(1-x^2).$$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 4 hours ago

























    answered 5 hours ago









    MelodyMelody

    1,42212




    1,42212












    • $begingroup$
      Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
      $endgroup$
      – Junglemath
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
      $endgroup$
      – Paolo
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
      $endgroup$
      – Melody
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
      $endgroup$
      – Melody
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Bill Dubuque
      3 hours ago




















    • $begingroup$
      Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
      $endgroup$
      – Junglemath
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
      $endgroup$
      – Paolo
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
      $endgroup$
      – Melody
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
      $endgroup$
      – Melody
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Bill Dubuque
      3 hours ago


















    $begingroup$
    Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
    $endgroup$
    – Junglemath
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
    $endgroup$
    – Junglemath
    4 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paolo
    4 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paolo
    4 hours ago






    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    4 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    4 hours ago






    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    4 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    4 hours ago






    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    3 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    @Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    3 hours ago













    1












    $begingroup$

    Bu applying $ abbmod ac, =, a(bbmod c) $ [Mod Distributive Law] $ $ it is a bit simpler:



    $ f-x,bmod, {x^{large 4}(x^{large 2}!+!1)}, =, x^{large 4}underbrace{{left[dfrac{color{#c00}f-x}{color{#0a0}{x^{large 4}}}bmod {x^{large 2}!+!1}right]}}_{large color{#0a0}{x^{Large 4}} equiv 1 {rm by} x^{Large 2} equiv -1 } =, x^{large 4}[1-x], $ by $,color{#c00}fequiv 1pmod{!x^{large 2}!+!1}$



    Remark $ $ Here are further examples done using MDL (an operational form of CRT).



    You can find further details here on transforming the Bezout equation into a CRT solution (the method sketched in Melody's answer).






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Bu applying $ abbmod ac, =, a(bbmod c) $ [Mod Distributive Law] $ $ it is a bit simpler:



      $ f-x,bmod, {x^{large 4}(x^{large 2}!+!1)}, =, x^{large 4}underbrace{{left[dfrac{color{#c00}f-x}{color{#0a0}{x^{large 4}}}bmod {x^{large 2}!+!1}right]}}_{large color{#0a0}{x^{Large 4}} equiv 1 {rm by} x^{Large 2} equiv -1 } =, x^{large 4}[1-x], $ by $,color{#c00}fequiv 1pmod{!x^{large 2}!+!1}$



      Remark $ $ Here are further examples done using MDL (an operational form of CRT).



      You can find further details here on transforming the Bezout equation into a CRT solution (the method sketched in Melody's answer).






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Bu applying $ abbmod ac, =, a(bbmod c) $ [Mod Distributive Law] $ $ it is a bit simpler:



        $ f-x,bmod, {x^{large 4}(x^{large 2}!+!1)}, =, x^{large 4}underbrace{{left[dfrac{color{#c00}f-x}{color{#0a0}{x^{large 4}}}bmod {x^{large 2}!+!1}right]}}_{large color{#0a0}{x^{Large 4}} equiv 1 {rm by} x^{Large 2} equiv -1 } =, x^{large 4}[1-x], $ by $,color{#c00}fequiv 1pmod{!x^{large 2}!+!1}$



        Remark $ $ Here are further examples done using MDL (an operational form of CRT).



        You can find further details here on transforming the Bezout equation into a CRT solution (the method sketched in Melody's answer).






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Bu applying $ abbmod ac, =, a(bbmod c) $ [Mod Distributive Law] $ $ it is a bit simpler:



        $ f-x,bmod, {x^{large 4}(x^{large 2}!+!1)}, =, x^{large 4}underbrace{{left[dfrac{color{#c00}f-x}{color{#0a0}{x^{large 4}}}bmod {x^{large 2}!+!1}right]}}_{large color{#0a0}{x^{Large 4}} equiv 1 {rm by} x^{Large 2} equiv -1 } =, x^{large 4}[1-x], $ by $,color{#c00}fequiv 1pmod{!x^{large 2}!+!1}$



        Remark $ $ Here are further examples done using MDL (an operational form of CRT).



        You can find further details here on transforming the Bezout equation into a CRT solution (the method sketched in Melody's answer).







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 3 hours ago

























        answered 3 hours ago









        Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque

        214k29198660




        214k29198660






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196235%2fadapting-the-chinese-remainder-theorem-crt-for-integers-to-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to label and detect the document text images

            Image
            1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
            Read more

            Vallis Paradisi

            Image
            Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
            Read more

            Tabula Rosettana

            Image
            Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
            Read more