Is Dumbledore using Legilimency when he gives Harry a “piercing look”?












25















At many points in the story, when Dumbledore asks Harry something, he gives him a piercing look. It makes me wonder if that is Dumbledore using Legilemency against him. Is he?










share|improve this question




















  • 16





    I can't remember anything in the books to suggest that. I thought it was the kind of "piercing look" I used to give my students when I wasn't sure they were telling the truth.

    – Matt Gutting
    Jul 29 '14 at 12:27






  • 1





    @MattGutting Harry admits that Dunbledore sees through him in a way even Mad eye's magical eye couldn't. Just my thought

    – Hashir Omer
    Jul 29 '14 at 12:29








  • 4





    @HashirOmer - yes. I felt the same way with some of my Muggle teachers.

    – DVK-on-Ahch-To
    Jul 30 '14 at 18:00
















25















At many points in the story, when Dumbledore asks Harry something, he gives him a piercing look. It makes me wonder if that is Dumbledore using Legilemency against him. Is he?










share|improve this question




















  • 16





    I can't remember anything in the books to suggest that. I thought it was the kind of "piercing look" I used to give my students when I wasn't sure they were telling the truth.

    – Matt Gutting
    Jul 29 '14 at 12:27






  • 1





    @MattGutting Harry admits that Dunbledore sees through him in a way even Mad eye's magical eye couldn't. Just my thought

    – Hashir Omer
    Jul 29 '14 at 12:29








  • 4





    @HashirOmer - yes. I felt the same way with some of my Muggle teachers.

    – DVK-on-Ahch-To
    Jul 30 '14 at 18:00














25












25








25


3






At many points in the story, when Dumbledore asks Harry something, he gives him a piercing look. It makes me wonder if that is Dumbledore using Legilemency against him. Is he?










share|improve this question
















At many points in the story, when Dumbledore asks Harry something, he gives him a piercing look. It makes me wonder if that is Dumbledore using Legilemency against him. Is he?







harry-potter albus-dumbledore






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 29 '14 at 18:19









SevenSidedDie

16710




16710










asked Jul 29 '14 at 12:23









Hashir OmerHashir Omer

82711423




82711423








  • 16





    I can't remember anything in the books to suggest that. I thought it was the kind of "piercing look" I used to give my students when I wasn't sure they were telling the truth.

    – Matt Gutting
    Jul 29 '14 at 12:27






  • 1





    @MattGutting Harry admits that Dunbledore sees through him in a way even Mad eye's magical eye couldn't. Just my thought

    – Hashir Omer
    Jul 29 '14 at 12:29








  • 4





    @HashirOmer - yes. I felt the same way with some of my Muggle teachers.

    – DVK-on-Ahch-To
    Jul 30 '14 at 18:00














  • 16





    I can't remember anything in the books to suggest that. I thought it was the kind of "piercing look" I used to give my students when I wasn't sure they were telling the truth.

    – Matt Gutting
    Jul 29 '14 at 12:27






  • 1





    @MattGutting Harry admits that Dunbledore sees through him in a way even Mad eye's magical eye couldn't. Just my thought

    – Hashir Omer
    Jul 29 '14 at 12:29








  • 4





    @HashirOmer - yes. I felt the same way with some of my Muggle teachers.

    – DVK-on-Ahch-To
    Jul 30 '14 at 18:00








16




16





I can't remember anything in the books to suggest that. I thought it was the kind of "piercing look" I used to give my students when I wasn't sure they were telling the truth.

– Matt Gutting
Jul 29 '14 at 12:27





I can't remember anything in the books to suggest that. I thought it was the kind of "piercing look" I used to give my students when I wasn't sure they were telling the truth.

– Matt Gutting
Jul 29 '14 at 12:27




1




1





@MattGutting Harry admits that Dunbledore sees through him in a way even Mad eye's magical eye couldn't. Just my thought

– Hashir Omer
Jul 29 '14 at 12:29







@MattGutting Harry admits that Dunbledore sees through him in a way even Mad eye's magical eye couldn't. Just my thought

– Hashir Omer
Jul 29 '14 at 12:29






4




4





@HashirOmer - yes. I felt the same way with some of my Muggle teachers.

– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jul 30 '14 at 18:00





@HashirOmer - yes. I felt the same way with some of my Muggle teachers.

– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jul 30 '14 at 18:00










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















42














He certainly seems to find some information when giving Harry these 'piercing looks', but he still doesn't know about Harry hearing the basilisk in the Chamber of Secrets, so I would say no; he's just extremely smart, so he makes some educated guesses as to what Harry is thinking.



I would also say that Dumbledore would feel it is rude to intrude on Harry's thoughts with legilimency, which is likely the reason he gives Harry plenty of opportunity to tell him his thoughts of his own accord. Harry's free will would factor greatly into Dumbledore's decisions.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Good point about the basilisk

    – Hashir Omer
    Jul 29 '14 at 12:56






  • 8





    Dumbledore's piercing looks typically are used when hes determining whether hes being lied to or not, Or if something is being withheld from him. legilimency is a very invasive spell as we find out when snape uses it against Harry so we know for sure hes not using it.

    – Himarm
    Jul 29 '14 at 13:22











  • @Himarm:Or maybe you just experience it in another way when you KNOW that someone reads your mind?!

    – teair
    Jul 29 '14 at 13:28













  • I seriously doubt that Dumbledore would use such a spell on Harry, he trusts people a little too fully remember, so I don't think he would have ever used it on too many people, certainly not people so close to him

    – ZenLogic
    Jul 29 '14 at 13:30






  • 1





    I dont think you could say Dumbledore trusts people to fully, he trusts people enough where it counts to get the job done. Other then his betrayal by grendelwald you see he never over extends his trust. Also Dumbledore will do practically anything to achieve his goals, and if he felt he needed to force Harry to talk... he would force Harry to talk.

    – Himarm
    Jul 29 '14 at 15:22





















6














I agree with this answer that Legilimency isn't imperceptible, that the 'victim' knows what information is being extracted and that the example with Snape and Harry proves this.



We do have one hint that Dumbledore used Legilimency on Harry, however. Since it's the only instance in canon that suggests this explicitly I thought I'd add an answer to the pile.




Boiling with anger at Snape, his desire to do something desperate and risky had increased tenfold in the last few minutes. This seemed to show on Harry's face, for Dumbledore moved away from the window, and looked more closely at Harry, a slight crease between his silver eyebrows.

"What has happened to you?"

"Nothing," lied Harry promptly.

"What has upset you?"

"I'm not upset."

"Harry, you were never a good Occlumens -"
(Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 25, The Seer Overheard).




Dumbledore's behaviour here is consistent with the use of Legilimency. He maintains eye contact and focuses intently on Harry. Ultimately, he's able to work out that Harry's lying to him.



Arguably, Dumbledore wouldn't have needed to use Legilimency to work out that Harry was lying to him. Harry was not in control of his emotions and was pretty easy to read once Dumbledore started observing him closely. Moreover, Dumbledore doesn't find out exactly what Harry is angry about, which he probably would have done if he were using Legilimency.



On balance, I don't think that Dumbledore was using Legilimency here. Nevertheless, Dumbledore brings up Harry not being good at Occlumency, which could indicate that he had used it. I don't think he did but it's possible to make an argument that he did based on Dumbledore's wording.






share|improve this answer

































    5














    I disagree. I absolutely think he was using legilimency. There’s a lot of evidence to support this, but the best example is when he asks Harry, notably in Chamber of Secrets, whether there is something he wishes to tell him. The reason Harry can tell when Snape is reading his mind is because Snape is using magic to force him to think of those images and thoughts. Dumbledore is much more subtle, as well as an exceptionally gifted wizard, so he simply asks Harry, who is very honest and open by nature (which is why he fails to learn occlumency with many lessons while Draco learns it almost immediately when taught by Narcissa) automatically thinks of the things he would tell Dumbledore if he weren’t afraid to, such as hearing the voice of the Basilisk. It also explains Dumbledore’s general tendency to know a lot more than he logically ought to. I originally assumed he was just making good guesses, and he jokes in one book that his guesses (not the word that’s used but I’m blanking right now) are usually correct. (Maybe the word is hunch. I digress) but I’ve also come to realize that when Dumbledore is amused with himself it’s on account of a private joke. Again I wish I had a quote for this but I don’t feel like digging for one.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 3





      Also, I meant to mention, the word Legilimens implies not specifically mind-reading, but knowing the truth. I suspect more complicated or “deep” Legilimency involves actually seeing memories and more subtle Legilimency can simply sense whether a person is being truthful or not. This also explains why Snape, a gifted Legilimens, seems to know whether students, specifically Harry, (again, particularly easy to “read” so to speak) have done something they shouldn’t have, regardless of whether he has evidence.

      – Mary
      Dec 27 '17 at 4:27











    • If you need to add to your answer or change something you can click the edit button below the post or in the link to the left to touch-up your answer.

      – Edlothiad
      Dec 27 '17 at 4:42



















    3














    No.



    Harry would know if legilimency was being used on him, as when Snape used legilimency on Harry (all emphasis added):




    “Liar,” said Snape. Harry’s throat went dry. He knew what Snape was going to do and he had never been able to prevent it. …



    The bathroom seemed to shimmer before his eyes; he struggled to block out all thought, but try as he might, the Half-Blood Prince's copy of Advanced Potion-Making swam hazily to the forefront of his mind.



    And then he was staring at Snape again, in the midst of this wrecked, soaked bathroom. He stared into Snape's black eyes, hoping against hope that Snape had not seen what he feared, but –




    Here, what Snape was trying to see "swam [...] to the forefront of his [Harry's] mind", so Harry was an observer as well as Snape.



    This did not happen when Dumbledore gave Harry a piercing look; I guess he was just looking sharply at Harry.



    Remember, Dumbledore was extremely smart and had a lot of information that Harry didn't. Chances are that he could guess anything he was a bit uncertain about simply by observing Harry closely and his reactions to what Dumbledore was saying.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 3





      That's far from conclusive; Dumbledore could be better than Snape and be able to perform it more subtly, or Dumbledore could be not going as deep (detecting just whether Harry was lying, rather than looking for specific details), etc.

      – Acccumulation
      Jan 4 '18 at 17:08



















    1














    I doubt it.



    If Dumbledore wouldn't use Legilimency on Slughorn to learn what he had told Riddle all those years ago, instead relying on Slughorn being honest, why would he read Harry's mind instead of just asking him? What ZenLogic said about Harry's free will is extremely important.



    You have to remember that Dumbledore had taught literally hundreds of students, so Dumbledore's "piercing look" would have been something he had used for decades. I believe it is simply reading the non-verbal cues of a child that is not yet in control of their emotions.






    share|improve this answer































      0














      YES.



      Then how did Dumbledore and Snape know Harry was there under the invisibility cloak? Dumbledore saw him and knew he was there in Hagrid's house. How could he not be like Queenie? Throughout all movies he suggests he knows what people are thinking before they say it, esp. Obvious with Leta Lestrange.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Danie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • Some more evidence might be a nice addition to that answer (you can edit it in). After all, it's not that hard to guess Harry is where trouble is, is it? :) And Dumbledore is very perceptive even without Legilimency.

        – Jenayah
        19 hours ago



















      -1














      My opinion is that if Albus Dumbledore as headmaster made it forbidden to use veritaserum (truth potion), Order of the Phoenix, then why would he allow the use of legilimency? (of course only when it was really needed, in Half Blood Prince).



      He trusted Harry well enough with all his secrets and more importantly, he once said that truth is a good and terrible thing.



      He also said that curiosity should be treated with caution and I believe he wouldn't break his own values.






      share|improve this answer

























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "186"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64315%2fis-dumbledore-using-legilimency-when-he-gives-harry-a-piercing-look%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes








        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        42














        He certainly seems to find some information when giving Harry these 'piercing looks', but he still doesn't know about Harry hearing the basilisk in the Chamber of Secrets, so I would say no; he's just extremely smart, so he makes some educated guesses as to what Harry is thinking.



        I would also say that Dumbledore would feel it is rude to intrude on Harry's thoughts with legilimency, which is likely the reason he gives Harry plenty of opportunity to tell him his thoughts of his own accord. Harry's free will would factor greatly into Dumbledore's decisions.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 2





          Good point about the basilisk

          – Hashir Omer
          Jul 29 '14 at 12:56






        • 8





          Dumbledore's piercing looks typically are used when hes determining whether hes being lied to or not, Or if something is being withheld from him. legilimency is a very invasive spell as we find out when snape uses it against Harry so we know for sure hes not using it.

          – Himarm
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:22











        • @Himarm:Or maybe you just experience it in another way when you KNOW that someone reads your mind?!

          – teair
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:28













        • I seriously doubt that Dumbledore would use such a spell on Harry, he trusts people a little too fully remember, so I don't think he would have ever used it on too many people, certainly not people so close to him

          – ZenLogic
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:30






        • 1





          I dont think you could say Dumbledore trusts people to fully, he trusts people enough where it counts to get the job done. Other then his betrayal by grendelwald you see he never over extends his trust. Also Dumbledore will do practically anything to achieve his goals, and if he felt he needed to force Harry to talk... he would force Harry to talk.

          – Himarm
          Jul 29 '14 at 15:22


















        42














        He certainly seems to find some information when giving Harry these 'piercing looks', but he still doesn't know about Harry hearing the basilisk in the Chamber of Secrets, so I would say no; he's just extremely smart, so he makes some educated guesses as to what Harry is thinking.



        I would also say that Dumbledore would feel it is rude to intrude on Harry's thoughts with legilimency, which is likely the reason he gives Harry plenty of opportunity to tell him his thoughts of his own accord. Harry's free will would factor greatly into Dumbledore's decisions.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 2





          Good point about the basilisk

          – Hashir Omer
          Jul 29 '14 at 12:56






        • 8





          Dumbledore's piercing looks typically are used when hes determining whether hes being lied to or not, Or if something is being withheld from him. legilimency is a very invasive spell as we find out when snape uses it against Harry so we know for sure hes not using it.

          – Himarm
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:22











        • @Himarm:Or maybe you just experience it in another way when you KNOW that someone reads your mind?!

          – teair
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:28













        • I seriously doubt that Dumbledore would use such a spell on Harry, he trusts people a little too fully remember, so I don't think he would have ever used it on too many people, certainly not people so close to him

          – ZenLogic
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:30






        • 1





          I dont think you could say Dumbledore trusts people to fully, he trusts people enough where it counts to get the job done. Other then his betrayal by grendelwald you see he never over extends his trust. Also Dumbledore will do practically anything to achieve his goals, and if he felt he needed to force Harry to talk... he would force Harry to talk.

          – Himarm
          Jul 29 '14 at 15:22
















        42












        42








        42







        He certainly seems to find some information when giving Harry these 'piercing looks', but he still doesn't know about Harry hearing the basilisk in the Chamber of Secrets, so I would say no; he's just extremely smart, so he makes some educated guesses as to what Harry is thinking.



        I would also say that Dumbledore would feel it is rude to intrude on Harry's thoughts with legilimency, which is likely the reason he gives Harry plenty of opportunity to tell him his thoughts of his own accord. Harry's free will would factor greatly into Dumbledore's decisions.






        share|improve this answer















        He certainly seems to find some information when giving Harry these 'piercing looks', but he still doesn't know about Harry hearing the basilisk in the Chamber of Secrets, so I would say no; he's just extremely smart, so he makes some educated guesses as to what Harry is thinking.



        I would also say that Dumbledore would feel it is rude to intrude on Harry's thoughts with legilimency, which is likely the reason he gives Harry plenty of opportunity to tell him his thoughts of his own accord. Harry's free will would factor greatly into Dumbledore's decisions.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 26 '16 at 19:45









        Thunderforge

        31k23145307




        31k23145307










        answered Jul 29 '14 at 12:54









        ZenLogicZenLogic

        3,65642032




        3,65642032








        • 2





          Good point about the basilisk

          – Hashir Omer
          Jul 29 '14 at 12:56






        • 8





          Dumbledore's piercing looks typically are used when hes determining whether hes being lied to or not, Or if something is being withheld from him. legilimency is a very invasive spell as we find out when snape uses it against Harry so we know for sure hes not using it.

          – Himarm
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:22











        • @Himarm:Or maybe you just experience it in another way when you KNOW that someone reads your mind?!

          – teair
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:28













        • I seriously doubt that Dumbledore would use such a spell on Harry, he trusts people a little too fully remember, so I don't think he would have ever used it on too many people, certainly not people so close to him

          – ZenLogic
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:30






        • 1





          I dont think you could say Dumbledore trusts people to fully, he trusts people enough where it counts to get the job done. Other then his betrayal by grendelwald you see he never over extends his trust. Also Dumbledore will do practically anything to achieve his goals, and if he felt he needed to force Harry to talk... he would force Harry to talk.

          – Himarm
          Jul 29 '14 at 15:22
















        • 2





          Good point about the basilisk

          – Hashir Omer
          Jul 29 '14 at 12:56






        • 8





          Dumbledore's piercing looks typically are used when hes determining whether hes being lied to or not, Or if something is being withheld from him. legilimency is a very invasive spell as we find out when snape uses it against Harry so we know for sure hes not using it.

          – Himarm
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:22











        • @Himarm:Or maybe you just experience it in another way when you KNOW that someone reads your mind?!

          – teair
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:28













        • I seriously doubt that Dumbledore would use such a spell on Harry, he trusts people a little too fully remember, so I don't think he would have ever used it on too many people, certainly not people so close to him

          – ZenLogic
          Jul 29 '14 at 13:30






        • 1





          I dont think you could say Dumbledore trusts people to fully, he trusts people enough where it counts to get the job done. Other then his betrayal by grendelwald you see he never over extends his trust. Also Dumbledore will do practically anything to achieve his goals, and if he felt he needed to force Harry to talk... he would force Harry to talk.

          – Himarm
          Jul 29 '14 at 15:22










        2




        2





        Good point about the basilisk

        – Hashir Omer
        Jul 29 '14 at 12:56





        Good point about the basilisk

        – Hashir Omer
        Jul 29 '14 at 12:56




        8




        8





        Dumbledore's piercing looks typically are used when hes determining whether hes being lied to or not, Or if something is being withheld from him. legilimency is a very invasive spell as we find out when snape uses it against Harry so we know for sure hes not using it.

        – Himarm
        Jul 29 '14 at 13:22





        Dumbledore's piercing looks typically are used when hes determining whether hes being lied to or not, Or if something is being withheld from him. legilimency is a very invasive spell as we find out when snape uses it against Harry so we know for sure hes not using it.

        – Himarm
        Jul 29 '14 at 13:22













        @Himarm:Or maybe you just experience it in another way when you KNOW that someone reads your mind?!

        – teair
        Jul 29 '14 at 13:28







        @Himarm:Or maybe you just experience it in another way when you KNOW that someone reads your mind?!

        – teair
        Jul 29 '14 at 13:28















        I seriously doubt that Dumbledore would use such a spell on Harry, he trusts people a little too fully remember, so I don't think he would have ever used it on too many people, certainly not people so close to him

        – ZenLogic
        Jul 29 '14 at 13:30





        I seriously doubt that Dumbledore would use such a spell on Harry, he trusts people a little too fully remember, so I don't think he would have ever used it on too many people, certainly not people so close to him

        – ZenLogic
        Jul 29 '14 at 13:30




        1




        1





        I dont think you could say Dumbledore trusts people to fully, he trusts people enough where it counts to get the job done. Other then his betrayal by grendelwald you see he never over extends his trust. Also Dumbledore will do practically anything to achieve his goals, and if he felt he needed to force Harry to talk... he would force Harry to talk.

        – Himarm
        Jul 29 '14 at 15:22







        I dont think you could say Dumbledore trusts people to fully, he trusts people enough where it counts to get the job done. Other then his betrayal by grendelwald you see he never over extends his trust. Also Dumbledore will do practically anything to achieve his goals, and if he felt he needed to force Harry to talk... he would force Harry to talk.

        – Himarm
        Jul 29 '14 at 15:22















        6














        I agree with this answer that Legilimency isn't imperceptible, that the 'victim' knows what information is being extracted and that the example with Snape and Harry proves this.



        We do have one hint that Dumbledore used Legilimency on Harry, however. Since it's the only instance in canon that suggests this explicitly I thought I'd add an answer to the pile.




        Boiling with anger at Snape, his desire to do something desperate and risky had increased tenfold in the last few minutes. This seemed to show on Harry's face, for Dumbledore moved away from the window, and looked more closely at Harry, a slight crease between his silver eyebrows.

        "What has happened to you?"

        "Nothing," lied Harry promptly.

        "What has upset you?"

        "I'm not upset."

        "Harry, you were never a good Occlumens -"
        (Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 25, The Seer Overheard).




        Dumbledore's behaviour here is consistent with the use of Legilimency. He maintains eye contact and focuses intently on Harry. Ultimately, he's able to work out that Harry's lying to him.



        Arguably, Dumbledore wouldn't have needed to use Legilimency to work out that Harry was lying to him. Harry was not in control of his emotions and was pretty easy to read once Dumbledore started observing him closely. Moreover, Dumbledore doesn't find out exactly what Harry is angry about, which he probably would have done if he were using Legilimency.



        On balance, I don't think that Dumbledore was using Legilimency here. Nevertheless, Dumbledore brings up Harry not being good at Occlumency, which could indicate that he had used it. I don't think he did but it's possible to make an argument that he did based on Dumbledore's wording.






        share|improve this answer






























          6














          I agree with this answer that Legilimency isn't imperceptible, that the 'victim' knows what information is being extracted and that the example with Snape and Harry proves this.



          We do have one hint that Dumbledore used Legilimency on Harry, however. Since it's the only instance in canon that suggests this explicitly I thought I'd add an answer to the pile.




          Boiling with anger at Snape, his desire to do something desperate and risky had increased tenfold in the last few minutes. This seemed to show on Harry's face, for Dumbledore moved away from the window, and looked more closely at Harry, a slight crease between his silver eyebrows.

          "What has happened to you?"

          "Nothing," lied Harry promptly.

          "What has upset you?"

          "I'm not upset."

          "Harry, you were never a good Occlumens -"
          (Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 25, The Seer Overheard).




          Dumbledore's behaviour here is consistent with the use of Legilimency. He maintains eye contact and focuses intently on Harry. Ultimately, he's able to work out that Harry's lying to him.



          Arguably, Dumbledore wouldn't have needed to use Legilimency to work out that Harry was lying to him. Harry was not in control of his emotions and was pretty easy to read once Dumbledore started observing him closely. Moreover, Dumbledore doesn't find out exactly what Harry is angry about, which he probably would have done if he were using Legilimency.



          On balance, I don't think that Dumbledore was using Legilimency here. Nevertheless, Dumbledore brings up Harry not being good at Occlumency, which could indicate that he had used it. I don't think he did but it's possible to make an argument that he did based on Dumbledore's wording.






          share|improve this answer




























            6












            6








            6







            I agree with this answer that Legilimency isn't imperceptible, that the 'victim' knows what information is being extracted and that the example with Snape and Harry proves this.



            We do have one hint that Dumbledore used Legilimency on Harry, however. Since it's the only instance in canon that suggests this explicitly I thought I'd add an answer to the pile.




            Boiling with anger at Snape, his desire to do something desperate and risky had increased tenfold in the last few minutes. This seemed to show on Harry's face, for Dumbledore moved away from the window, and looked more closely at Harry, a slight crease between his silver eyebrows.

            "What has happened to you?"

            "Nothing," lied Harry promptly.

            "What has upset you?"

            "I'm not upset."

            "Harry, you were never a good Occlumens -"
            (Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 25, The Seer Overheard).




            Dumbledore's behaviour here is consistent with the use of Legilimency. He maintains eye contact and focuses intently on Harry. Ultimately, he's able to work out that Harry's lying to him.



            Arguably, Dumbledore wouldn't have needed to use Legilimency to work out that Harry was lying to him. Harry was not in control of his emotions and was pretty easy to read once Dumbledore started observing him closely. Moreover, Dumbledore doesn't find out exactly what Harry is angry about, which he probably would have done if he were using Legilimency.



            On balance, I don't think that Dumbledore was using Legilimency here. Nevertheless, Dumbledore brings up Harry not being good at Occlumency, which could indicate that he had used it. I don't think he did but it's possible to make an argument that he did based on Dumbledore's wording.






            share|improve this answer















            I agree with this answer that Legilimency isn't imperceptible, that the 'victim' knows what information is being extracted and that the example with Snape and Harry proves this.



            We do have one hint that Dumbledore used Legilimency on Harry, however. Since it's the only instance in canon that suggests this explicitly I thought I'd add an answer to the pile.




            Boiling with anger at Snape, his desire to do something desperate and risky had increased tenfold in the last few minutes. This seemed to show on Harry's face, for Dumbledore moved away from the window, and looked more closely at Harry, a slight crease between his silver eyebrows.

            "What has happened to you?"

            "Nothing," lied Harry promptly.

            "What has upset you?"

            "I'm not upset."

            "Harry, you were never a good Occlumens -"
            (Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 25, The Seer Overheard).




            Dumbledore's behaviour here is consistent with the use of Legilimency. He maintains eye contact and focuses intently on Harry. Ultimately, he's able to work out that Harry's lying to him.



            Arguably, Dumbledore wouldn't have needed to use Legilimency to work out that Harry was lying to him. Harry was not in control of his emotions and was pretty easy to read once Dumbledore started observing him closely. Moreover, Dumbledore doesn't find out exactly what Harry is angry about, which he probably would have done if he were using Legilimency.



            On balance, I don't think that Dumbledore was using Legilimency here. Nevertheless, Dumbledore brings up Harry not being good at Occlumency, which could indicate that he had used it. I don't think he did but it's possible to make an argument that he did based on Dumbledore's wording.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 9 '18 at 22:36

























            answered Jan 9 '18 at 18:41









            The Dark LordThe Dark Lord

            40.9k22199323




            40.9k22199323























                5














                I disagree. I absolutely think he was using legilimency. There’s a lot of evidence to support this, but the best example is when he asks Harry, notably in Chamber of Secrets, whether there is something he wishes to tell him. The reason Harry can tell when Snape is reading his mind is because Snape is using magic to force him to think of those images and thoughts. Dumbledore is much more subtle, as well as an exceptionally gifted wizard, so he simply asks Harry, who is very honest and open by nature (which is why he fails to learn occlumency with many lessons while Draco learns it almost immediately when taught by Narcissa) automatically thinks of the things he would tell Dumbledore if he weren’t afraid to, such as hearing the voice of the Basilisk. It also explains Dumbledore’s general tendency to know a lot more than he logically ought to. I originally assumed he was just making good guesses, and he jokes in one book that his guesses (not the word that’s used but I’m blanking right now) are usually correct. (Maybe the word is hunch. I digress) but I’ve also come to realize that when Dumbledore is amused with himself it’s on account of a private joke. Again I wish I had a quote for this but I don’t feel like digging for one.






                share|improve this answer



















                • 3





                  Also, I meant to mention, the word Legilimens implies not specifically mind-reading, but knowing the truth. I suspect more complicated or “deep” Legilimency involves actually seeing memories and more subtle Legilimency can simply sense whether a person is being truthful or not. This also explains why Snape, a gifted Legilimens, seems to know whether students, specifically Harry, (again, particularly easy to “read” so to speak) have done something they shouldn’t have, regardless of whether he has evidence.

                  – Mary
                  Dec 27 '17 at 4:27











                • If you need to add to your answer or change something you can click the edit button below the post or in the link to the left to touch-up your answer.

                  – Edlothiad
                  Dec 27 '17 at 4:42
















                5














                I disagree. I absolutely think he was using legilimency. There’s a lot of evidence to support this, but the best example is when he asks Harry, notably in Chamber of Secrets, whether there is something he wishes to tell him. The reason Harry can tell when Snape is reading his mind is because Snape is using magic to force him to think of those images and thoughts. Dumbledore is much more subtle, as well as an exceptionally gifted wizard, so he simply asks Harry, who is very honest and open by nature (which is why he fails to learn occlumency with many lessons while Draco learns it almost immediately when taught by Narcissa) automatically thinks of the things he would tell Dumbledore if he weren’t afraid to, such as hearing the voice of the Basilisk. It also explains Dumbledore’s general tendency to know a lot more than he logically ought to. I originally assumed he was just making good guesses, and he jokes in one book that his guesses (not the word that’s used but I’m blanking right now) are usually correct. (Maybe the word is hunch. I digress) but I’ve also come to realize that when Dumbledore is amused with himself it’s on account of a private joke. Again I wish I had a quote for this but I don’t feel like digging for one.






                share|improve this answer



















                • 3





                  Also, I meant to mention, the word Legilimens implies not specifically mind-reading, but knowing the truth. I suspect more complicated or “deep” Legilimency involves actually seeing memories and more subtle Legilimency can simply sense whether a person is being truthful or not. This also explains why Snape, a gifted Legilimens, seems to know whether students, specifically Harry, (again, particularly easy to “read” so to speak) have done something they shouldn’t have, regardless of whether he has evidence.

                  – Mary
                  Dec 27 '17 at 4:27











                • If you need to add to your answer or change something you can click the edit button below the post or in the link to the left to touch-up your answer.

                  – Edlothiad
                  Dec 27 '17 at 4:42














                5












                5








                5







                I disagree. I absolutely think he was using legilimency. There’s a lot of evidence to support this, but the best example is when he asks Harry, notably in Chamber of Secrets, whether there is something he wishes to tell him. The reason Harry can tell when Snape is reading his mind is because Snape is using magic to force him to think of those images and thoughts. Dumbledore is much more subtle, as well as an exceptionally gifted wizard, so he simply asks Harry, who is very honest and open by nature (which is why he fails to learn occlumency with many lessons while Draco learns it almost immediately when taught by Narcissa) automatically thinks of the things he would tell Dumbledore if he weren’t afraid to, such as hearing the voice of the Basilisk. It also explains Dumbledore’s general tendency to know a lot more than he logically ought to. I originally assumed he was just making good guesses, and he jokes in one book that his guesses (not the word that’s used but I’m blanking right now) are usually correct. (Maybe the word is hunch. I digress) but I’ve also come to realize that when Dumbledore is amused with himself it’s on account of a private joke. Again I wish I had a quote for this but I don’t feel like digging for one.






                share|improve this answer













                I disagree. I absolutely think he was using legilimency. There’s a lot of evidence to support this, but the best example is when he asks Harry, notably in Chamber of Secrets, whether there is something he wishes to tell him. The reason Harry can tell when Snape is reading his mind is because Snape is using magic to force him to think of those images and thoughts. Dumbledore is much more subtle, as well as an exceptionally gifted wizard, so he simply asks Harry, who is very honest and open by nature (which is why he fails to learn occlumency with many lessons while Draco learns it almost immediately when taught by Narcissa) automatically thinks of the things he would tell Dumbledore if he weren’t afraid to, such as hearing the voice of the Basilisk. It also explains Dumbledore’s general tendency to know a lot more than he logically ought to. I originally assumed he was just making good guesses, and he jokes in one book that his guesses (not the word that’s used but I’m blanking right now) are usually correct. (Maybe the word is hunch. I digress) but I’ve also come to realize that when Dumbledore is amused with himself it’s on account of a private joke. Again I wish I had a quote for this but I don’t feel like digging for one.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Dec 27 '17 at 4:21









                MaryMary

                5911




                5911








                • 3





                  Also, I meant to mention, the word Legilimens implies not specifically mind-reading, but knowing the truth. I suspect more complicated or “deep” Legilimency involves actually seeing memories and more subtle Legilimency can simply sense whether a person is being truthful or not. This also explains why Snape, a gifted Legilimens, seems to know whether students, specifically Harry, (again, particularly easy to “read” so to speak) have done something they shouldn’t have, regardless of whether he has evidence.

                  – Mary
                  Dec 27 '17 at 4:27











                • If you need to add to your answer or change something you can click the edit button below the post or in the link to the left to touch-up your answer.

                  – Edlothiad
                  Dec 27 '17 at 4:42














                • 3





                  Also, I meant to mention, the word Legilimens implies not specifically mind-reading, but knowing the truth. I suspect more complicated or “deep” Legilimency involves actually seeing memories and more subtle Legilimency can simply sense whether a person is being truthful or not. This also explains why Snape, a gifted Legilimens, seems to know whether students, specifically Harry, (again, particularly easy to “read” so to speak) have done something they shouldn’t have, regardless of whether he has evidence.

                  – Mary
                  Dec 27 '17 at 4:27











                • If you need to add to your answer or change something you can click the edit button below the post or in the link to the left to touch-up your answer.

                  – Edlothiad
                  Dec 27 '17 at 4:42








                3




                3





                Also, I meant to mention, the word Legilimens implies not specifically mind-reading, but knowing the truth. I suspect more complicated or “deep” Legilimency involves actually seeing memories and more subtle Legilimency can simply sense whether a person is being truthful or not. This also explains why Snape, a gifted Legilimens, seems to know whether students, specifically Harry, (again, particularly easy to “read” so to speak) have done something they shouldn’t have, regardless of whether he has evidence.

                – Mary
                Dec 27 '17 at 4:27





                Also, I meant to mention, the word Legilimens implies not specifically mind-reading, but knowing the truth. I suspect more complicated or “deep” Legilimency involves actually seeing memories and more subtle Legilimency can simply sense whether a person is being truthful or not. This also explains why Snape, a gifted Legilimens, seems to know whether students, specifically Harry, (again, particularly easy to “read” so to speak) have done something they shouldn’t have, regardless of whether he has evidence.

                – Mary
                Dec 27 '17 at 4:27













                If you need to add to your answer or change something you can click the edit button below the post or in the link to the left to touch-up your answer.

                – Edlothiad
                Dec 27 '17 at 4:42





                If you need to add to your answer or change something you can click the edit button below the post or in the link to the left to touch-up your answer.

                – Edlothiad
                Dec 27 '17 at 4:42











                3














                No.



                Harry would know if legilimency was being used on him, as when Snape used legilimency on Harry (all emphasis added):




                “Liar,” said Snape. Harry’s throat went dry. He knew what Snape was going to do and he had never been able to prevent it. …



                The bathroom seemed to shimmer before his eyes; he struggled to block out all thought, but try as he might, the Half-Blood Prince's copy of Advanced Potion-Making swam hazily to the forefront of his mind.



                And then he was staring at Snape again, in the midst of this wrecked, soaked bathroom. He stared into Snape's black eyes, hoping against hope that Snape had not seen what he feared, but –




                Here, what Snape was trying to see "swam [...] to the forefront of his [Harry's] mind", so Harry was an observer as well as Snape.



                This did not happen when Dumbledore gave Harry a piercing look; I guess he was just looking sharply at Harry.



                Remember, Dumbledore was extremely smart and had a lot of information that Harry didn't. Chances are that he could guess anything he was a bit uncertain about simply by observing Harry closely and his reactions to what Dumbledore was saying.






                share|improve this answer





















                • 3





                  That's far from conclusive; Dumbledore could be better than Snape and be able to perform it more subtly, or Dumbledore could be not going as deep (detecting just whether Harry was lying, rather than looking for specific details), etc.

                  – Acccumulation
                  Jan 4 '18 at 17:08
















                3














                No.



                Harry would know if legilimency was being used on him, as when Snape used legilimency on Harry (all emphasis added):




                “Liar,” said Snape. Harry’s throat went dry. He knew what Snape was going to do and he had never been able to prevent it. …



                The bathroom seemed to shimmer before his eyes; he struggled to block out all thought, but try as he might, the Half-Blood Prince's copy of Advanced Potion-Making swam hazily to the forefront of his mind.



                And then he was staring at Snape again, in the midst of this wrecked, soaked bathroom. He stared into Snape's black eyes, hoping against hope that Snape had not seen what he feared, but –




                Here, what Snape was trying to see "swam [...] to the forefront of his [Harry's] mind", so Harry was an observer as well as Snape.



                This did not happen when Dumbledore gave Harry a piercing look; I guess he was just looking sharply at Harry.



                Remember, Dumbledore was extremely smart and had a lot of information that Harry didn't. Chances are that he could guess anything he was a bit uncertain about simply by observing Harry closely and his reactions to what Dumbledore was saying.






                share|improve this answer





















                • 3





                  That's far from conclusive; Dumbledore could be better than Snape and be able to perform it more subtly, or Dumbledore could be not going as deep (detecting just whether Harry was lying, rather than looking for specific details), etc.

                  – Acccumulation
                  Jan 4 '18 at 17:08














                3












                3








                3







                No.



                Harry would know if legilimency was being used on him, as when Snape used legilimency on Harry (all emphasis added):




                “Liar,” said Snape. Harry’s throat went dry. He knew what Snape was going to do and he had never been able to prevent it. …



                The bathroom seemed to shimmer before his eyes; he struggled to block out all thought, but try as he might, the Half-Blood Prince's copy of Advanced Potion-Making swam hazily to the forefront of his mind.



                And then he was staring at Snape again, in the midst of this wrecked, soaked bathroom. He stared into Snape's black eyes, hoping against hope that Snape had not seen what he feared, but –




                Here, what Snape was trying to see "swam [...] to the forefront of his [Harry's] mind", so Harry was an observer as well as Snape.



                This did not happen when Dumbledore gave Harry a piercing look; I guess he was just looking sharply at Harry.



                Remember, Dumbledore was extremely smart and had a lot of information that Harry didn't. Chances are that he could guess anything he was a bit uncertain about simply by observing Harry closely and his reactions to what Dumbledore was saying.






                share|improve this answer















                No.



                Harry would know if legilimency was being used on him, as when Snape used legilimency on Harry (all emphasis added):




                “Liar,” said Snape. Harry’s throat went dry. He knew what Snape was going to do and he had never been able to prevent it. …



                The bathroom seemed to shimmer before his eyes; he struggled to block out all thought, but try as he might, the Half-Blood Prince's copy of Advanced Potion-Making swam hazily to the forefront of his mind.



                And then he was staring at Snape again, in the midst of this wrecked, soaked bathroom. He stared into Snape's black eyes, hoping against hope that Snape had not seen what he feared, but –




                Here, what Snape was trying to see "swam [...] to the forefront of his [Harry's] mind", so Harry was an observer as well as Snape.



                This did not happen when Dumbledore gave Harry a piercing look; I guess he was just looking sharply at Harry.



                Remember, Dumbledore was extremely smart and had a lot of information that Harry didn't. Chances are that he could guess anything he was a bit uncertain about simply by observing Harry closely and his reactions to what Dumbledore was saying.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited May 27 '16 at 8:42

























                answered May 26 '16 at 21:39







                user32390















                • 3





                  That's far from conclusive; Dumbledore could be better than Snape and be able to perform it more subtly, or Dumbledore could be not going as deep (detecting just whether Harry was lying, rather than looking for specific details), etc.

                  – Acccumulation
                  Jan 4 '18 at 17:08














                • 3





                  That's far from conclusive; Dumbledore could be better than Snape and be able to perform it more subtly, or Dumbledore could be not going as deep (detecting just whether Harry was lying, rather than looking for specific details), etc.

                  – Acccumulation
                  Jan 4 '18 at 17:08








                3




                3





                That's far from conclusive; Dumbledore could be better than Snape and be able to perform it more subtly, or Dumbledore could be not going as deep (detecting just whether Harry was lying, rather than looking for specific details), etc.

                – Acccumulation
                Jan 4 '18 at 17:08





                That's far from conclusive; Dumbledore could be better than Snape and be able to perform it more subtly, or Dumbledore could be not going as deep (detecting just whether Harry was lying, rather than looking for specific details), etc.

                – Acccumulation
                Jan 4 '18 at 17:08











                1














                I doubt it.



                If Dumbledore wouldn't use Legilimency on Slughorn to learn what he had told Riddle all those years ago, instead relying on Slughorn being honest, why would he read Harry's mind instead of just asking him? What ZenLogic said about Harry's free will is extremely important.



                You have to remember that Dumbledore had taught literally hundreds of students, so Dumbledore's "piercing look" would have been something he had used for decades. I believe it is simply reading the non-verbal cues of a child that is not yet in control of their emotions.






                share|improve this answer




























                  1














                  I doubt it.



                  If Dumbledore wouldn't use Legilimency on Slughorn to learn what he had told Riddle all those years ago, instead relying on Slughorn being honest, why would he read Harry's mind instead of just asking him? What ZenLogic said about Harry's free will is extremely important.



                  You have to remember that Dumbledore had taught literally hundreds of students, so Dumbledore's "piercing look" would have been something he had used for decades. I believe it is simply reading the non-verbal cues of a child that is not yet in control of their emotions.






                  share|improve this answer


























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    I doubt it.



                    If Dumbledore wouldn't use Legilimency on Slughorn to learn what he had told Riddle all those years ago, instead relying on Slughorn being honest, why would he read Harry's mind instead of just asking him? What ZenLogic said about Harry's free will is extremely important.



                    You have to remember that Dumbledore had taught literally hundreds of students, so Dumbledore's "piercing look" would have been something he had used for decades. I believe it is simply reading the non-verbal cues of a child that is not yet in control of their emotions.






                    share|improve this answer













                    I doubt it.



                    If Dumbledore wouldn't use Legilimency on Slughorn to learn what he had told Riddle all those years ago, instead relying on Slughorn being honest, why would he read Harry's mind instead of just asking him? What ZenLogic said about Harry's free will is extremely important.



                    You have to remember that Dumbledore had taught literally hundreds of students, so Dumbledore's "piercing look" would have been something he had used for decades. I believe it is simply reading the non-verbal cues of a child that is not yet in control of their emotions.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 4 '18 at 17:32









                    scottscott

                    84649




                    84649























                        0














                        YES.



                        Then how did Dumbledore and Snape know Harry was there under the invisibility cloak? Dumbledore saw him and knew he was there in Hagrid's house. How could he not be like Queenie? Throughout all movies he suggests he knows what people are thinking before they say it, esp. Obvious with Leta Lestrange.






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Danie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                        • Some more evidence might be a nice addition to that answer (you can edit it in). After all, it's not that hard to guess Harry is where trouble is, is it? :) And Dumbledore is very perceptive even without Legilimency.

                          – Jenayah
                          19 hours ago
















                        0














                        YES.



                        Then how did Dumbledore and Snape know Harry was there under the invisibility cloak? Dumbledore saw him and knew he was there in Hagrid's house. How could he not be like Queenie? Throughout all movies he suggests he knows what people are thinking before they say it, esp. Obvious with Leta Lestrange.






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Danie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                        • Some more evidence might be a nice addition to that answer (you can edit it in). After all, it's not that hard to guess Harry is where trouble is, is it? :) And Dumbledore is very perceptive even without Legilimency.

                          – Jenayah
                          19 hours ago














                        0












                        0








                        0







                        YES.



                        Then how did Dumbledore and Snape know Harry was there under the invisibility cloak? Dumbledore saw him and knew he was there in Hagrid's house. How could he not be like Queenie? Throughout all movies he suggests he knows what people are thinking before they say it, esp. Obvious with Leta Lestrange.






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Danie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.










                        YES.



                        Then how did Dumbledore and Snape know Harry was there under the invisibility cloak? Dumbledore saw him and knew he was there in Hagrid's house. How could he not be like Queenie? Throughout all movies he suggests he knows what people are thinking before they say it, esp. Obvious with Leta Lestrange.







                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Danie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer






                        New contributor




                        Danie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                        answered 23 hours ago









                        DanieDanie

                        1




                        1




                        New contributor




                        Danie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





                        New contributor





                        Danie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                        Danie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.













                        • Some more evidence might be a nice addition to that answer (you can edit it in). After all, it's not that hard to guess Harry is where trouble is, is it? :) And Dumbledore is very perceptive even without Legilimency.

                          – Jenayah
                          19 hours ago



















                        • Some more evidence might be a nice addition to that answer (you can edit it in). After all, it's not that hard to guess Harry is where trouble is, is it? :) And Dumbledore is very perceptive even without Legilimency.

                          – Jenayah
                          19 hours ago

















                        Some more evidence might be a nice addition to that answer (you can edit it in). After all, it's not that hard to guess Harry is where trouble is, is it? :) And Dumbledore is very perceptive even without Legilimency.

                        – Jenayah
                        19 hours ago





                        Some more evidence might be a nice addition to that answer (you can edit it in). After all, it's not that hard to guess Harry is where trouble is, is it? :) And Dumbledore is very perceptive even without Legilimency.

                        – Jenayah
                        19 hours ago











                        -1














                        My opinion is that if Albus Dumbledore as headmaster made it forbidden to use veritaserum (truth potion), Order of the Phoenix, then why would he allow the use of legilimency? (of course only when it was really needed, in Half Blood Prince).



                        He trusted Harry well enough with all his secrets and more importantly, he once said that truth is a good and terrible thing.



                        He also said that curiosity should be treated with caution and I believe he wouldn't break his own values.






                        share|improve this answer






























                          -1














                          My opinion is that if Albus Dumbledore as headmaster made it forbidden to use veritaserum (truth potion), Order of the Phoenix, then why would he allow the use of legilimency? (of course only when it was really needed, in Half Blood Prince).



                          He trusted Harry well enough with all his secrets and more importantly, he once said that truth is a good and terrible thing.



                          He also said that curiosity should be treated with caution and I believe he wouldn't break his own values.






                          share|improve this answer




























                            -1












                            -1








                            -1







                            My opinion is that if Albus Dumbledore as headmaster made it forbidden to use veritaserum (truth potion), Order of the Phoenix, then why would he allow the use of legilimency? (of course only when it was really needed, in Half Blood Prince).



                            He trusted Harry well enough with all his secrets and more importantly, he once said that truth is a good and terrible thing.



                            He also said that curiosity should be treated with caution and I believe he wouldn't break his own values.






                            share|improve this answer















                            My opinion is that if Albus Dumbledore as headmaster made it forbidden to use veritaserum (truth potion), Order of the Phoenix, then why would he allow the use of legilimency? (of course only when it was really needed, in Half Blood Prince).



                            He trusted Harry well enough with all his secrets and more importantly, he once said that truth is a good and terrible thing.



                            He also said that curiosity should be treated with caution and I believe he wouldn't break his own values.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Jan 4 '18 at 16:55









                            RDFozz

                            5,94411552




                            5,94411552










                            answered May 26 '16 at 19:33









                            everwriteloveeverwritelove

                            1




                            1






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64315%2fis-dumbledore-using-legilimency-when-he-gives-harry-a-piercing-look%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How to label and detect the document text images

                                Vallis Paradisi

                                Tabula Rosettana