Distribution of Maximum Likelihood Estimator












1












$begingroup$


Why is the Maximum Likelihood Estimator Normally distributed? I can't figure out why it is true for large n in general. My attempt (for single parameter)



Let $L(theta)$ be the maximum likelihood function for the distribution $f(x;theta)$



Then after taking sample of size n



$$L(theta)=f(x_1;theta)cdot f(x_2theta)...f(x_n;theta)$$



And we want to find $theta_{max}$ such that $L(theta)$ is maximized and $theta_{max}$ is our estimate (once a sample has actually been selected)



Since $theta_{max}$ maximizes $L(theta)$ it also maximizes $ln(L(theta))$



where



$$ln(L(theta))=ln(f(x_1;theta))+ln(f(x_2;theta))...+ln(f(x_n;theta))$$



Taking the derivative with respect to $theta$



$$frac{f'(x_1;theta)}{f(x_1;theta)}+frac{f'(x_2;theta)}{f(x_2;theta)}...+frac{f'(x_n;theta)}{f(x_n;theta)}$$



$theta_{max}$ would be the solution of the above when set to 0 (after selecting values for all $x_1,x_2...x_n$) but why is it normally distributed and how do I show that it's true for large n?






probability distributions normal-distribution estimation sampling







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Colin Hicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Why is the Maximum Likelihood Estimator Normally distributed? I can't figure out why it is true for large n in general. My attempt (for single parameter)



    Let $L(theta)$ be the maximum likelihood function for the distribution $f(x;theta)$



    Then after taking sample of size n



    $$L(theta)=f(x_1;theta)cdot f(x_2theta)...f(x_n;theta)$$



    And we want to find $theta_{max}$ such that $L(theta)$ is maximized and $theta_{max}$ is our estimate (once a sample has actually been selected)



    Since $theta_{max}$ maximizes $L(theta)$ it also maximizes $ln(L(theta))$



    where



    $$ln(L(theta))=ln(f(x_1;theta))+ln(f(x_2;theta))...+ln(f(x_n;theta))$$



    Taking the derivative with respect to $theta$



    $$frac{f'(x_1;theta)}{f(x_1;theta)}+frac{f'(x_2;theta)}{f(x_2;theta)}...+frac{f'(x_n;theta)}{f(x_n;theta)}$$



    $theta_{max}$ would be the solution of the above when set to 0 (after selecting values for all $x_1,x_2...x_n$) but why is it normally distributed and how do I show that it's true for large n?






    probability distributions normal-distribution estimation sampling







    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    Colin Hicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Why is the Maximum Likelihood Estimator Normally distributed? I can't figure out why it is true for large n in general. My attempt (for single parameter)



      Let $L(theta)$ be the maximum likelihood function for the distribution $f(x;theta)$



      Then after taking sample of size n



      $$L(theta)=f(x_1;theta)cdot f(x_2theta)...f(x_n;theta)$$



      And we want to find $theta_{max}$ such that $L(theta)$ is maximized and $theta_{max}$ is our estimate (once a sample has actually been selected)



      Since $theta_{max}$ maximizes $L(theta)$ it also maximizes $ln(L(theta))$



      where



      $$ln(L(theta))=ln(f(x_1;theta))+ln(f(x_2;theta))...+ln(f(x_n;theta))$$



      Taking the derivative with respect to $theta$



      $$frac{f'(x_1;theta)}{f(x_1;theta)}+frac{f'(x_2;theta)}{f(x_2;theta)}...+frac{f'(x_n;theta)}{f(x_n;theta)}$$



      $theta_{max}$ would be the solution of the above when set to 0 (after selecting values for all $x_1,x_2...x_n$) but why is it normally distributed and how do I show that it's true for large n?






      probability distributions normal-distribution estimation sampling







      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Colin Hicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Why is the Maximum Likelihood Estimator Normally distributed? I can't figure out why it is true for large n in general. My attempt (for single parameter)



      Let $L(theta)$ be the maximum likelihood function for the distribution $f(x;theta)$



      Then after taking sample of size n



      $$L(theta)=f(x_1;theta)cdot f(x_2theta)...f(x_n;theta)$$



      And we want to find $theta_{max}$ such that $L(theta)$ is maximized and $theta_{max}$ is our estimate (once a sample has actually been selected)



      Since $theta_{max}$ maximizes $L(theta)$ it also maximizes $ln(L(theta))$



      where



      $$ln(L(theta))=ln(f(x_1;theta))+ln(f(x_2;theta))...+ln(f(x_n;theta))$$



      Taking the derivative with respect to $theta$



      $$frac{f'(x_1;theta)}{f(x_1;theta)}+frac{f'(x_2;theta)}{f(x_2;theta)}...+frac{f'(x_n;theta)}{f(x_n;theta)}$$



      $theta_{max}$ would be the solution of the above when set to 0 (after selecting values for all $x_1,x_2...x_n$) but why is it normally distributed and how do I show that it's true for large n?






      probability distributions normal-distribution estimation sampling




      probability distributions normal-distribution estimation sampling






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Colin Hicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Colin Hicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      Colin Hicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 5 hours ago









      Colin HicksColin Hicks

      1353




      1353




      New contributor




      Colin Hicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Colin Hicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Colin Hicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          MLE requires $$frac{partial ln L(theta)}{partial theta} = sum_{i=1}^n frac{ f'(x_i;theta)}{f(x_i;theta)},$$
          where $f'(x_i;theta)$ could denote a gradient (allowing for the multivariate case, but still sticking to your notation). Define a new function $g(x;theta)=frac{ f'(x;theta)}{f(x;theta)}.$ Then ${g(x_i;theta)}_{i=1}^n$ is a new iid sequence of random variables, with $Eg(x_1;theta)=0$. If $Eg(x_1;theta)g(x_1;theta)'<infty$, CLT implies,
          $$sqrt{n}(bar{g}_n(theta)-Eg(x_1;theta))=sqrt{n}bar{g}_n(theta) rightarrow_D N(0,E(g(x;theta)g(x;theta)'),$$
          where $bar{g}_n(theta)=frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n g(x_i;theta).$ The ML estimator solves the equation
          $$bar{g}_n(theta)=0.$$
          It follows that the ML estimator is given by
          $$hat{theta}=bar{g}_n^{-1}(0).$$
          So long as the set of discontinuity points of $bar{g}_n^{-1}(z)$, i.e. the set of all values of $z$ such that $bar{g}_n^{-1}(z)$ is not continuous, occur with probability zero, the continuous mapping theorem gives us asymptotic normality of $theta$.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            $frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$ is just another function of x so central limit theorem applies thank you for that
            $endgroup$
            – Colin Hicks
            5 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            You're welcome :)
            $endgroup$
            – dlnB
            5 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "65"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Colin Hicks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397619%2fdistribution-of-maximum-likelihood-estimator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          MLE requires $$frac{partial ln L(theta)}{partial theta} = sum_{i=1}^n frac{ f'(x_i;theta)}{f(x_i;theta)},$$
          where $f'(x_i;theta)$ could denote a gradient (allowing for the multivariate case, but still sticking to your notation). Define a new function $g(x;theta)=frac{ f'(x;theta)}{f(x;theta)}.$ Then ${g(x_i;theta)}_{i=1}^n$ is a new iid sequence of random variables, with $Eg(x_1;theta)=0$. If $Eg(x_1;theta)g(x_1;theta)'<infty$, CLT implies,
          $$sqrt{n}(bar{g}_n(theta)-Eg(x_1;theta))=sqrt{n}bar{g}_n(theta) rightarrow_D N(0,E(g(x;theta)g(x;theta)'),$$
          where $bar{g}_n(theta)=frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n g(x_i;theta).$ The ML estimator solves the equation
          $$bar{g}_n(theta)=0.$$
          It follows that the ML estimator is given by
          $$hat{theta}=bar{g}_n^{-1}(0).$$
          So long as the set of discontinuity points of $bar{g}_n^{-1}(z)$, i.e. the set of all values of $z$ such that $bar{g}_n^{-1}(z)$ is not continuous, occur with probability zero, the continuous mapping theorem gives us asymptotic normality of $theta$.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            $frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$ is just another function of x so central limit theorem applies thank you for that
            $endgroup$
            – Colin Hicks
            5 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            You're welcome :)
            $endgroup$
            – dlnB
            5 hours ago
















          3












          $begingroup$

          MLE requires $$frac{partial ln L(theta)}{partial theta} = sum_{i=1}^n frac{ f'(x_i;theta)}{f(x_i;theta)},$$
          where $f'(x_i;theta)$ could denote a gradient (allowing for the multivariate case, but still sticking to your notation). Define a new function $g(x;theta)=frac{ f'(x;theta)}{f(x;theta)}.$ Then ${g(x_i;theta)}_{i=1}^n$ is a new iid sequence of random variables, with $Eg(x_1;theta)=0$. If $Eg(x_1;theta)g(x_1;theta)'<infty$, CLT implies,
          $$sqrt{n}(bar{g}_n(theta)-Eg(x_1;theta))=sqrt{n}bar{g}_n(theta) rightarrow_D N(0,E(g(x;theta)g(x;theta)'),$$
          where $bar{g}_n(theta)=frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n g(x_i;theta).$ The ML estimator solves the equation
          $$bar{g}_n(theta)=0.$$
          It follows that the ML estimator is given by
          $$hat{theta}=bar{g}_n^{-1}(0).$$
          So long as the set of discontinuity points of $bar{g}_n^{-1}(z)$, i.e. the set of all values of $z$ such that $bar{g}_n^{-1}(z)$ is not continuous, occur with probability zero, the continuous mapping theorem gives us asymptotic normality of $theta$.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            $frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$ is just another function of x so central limit theorem applies thank you for that
            $endgroup$
            – Colin Hicks
            5 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            You're welcome :)
            $endgroup$
            – dlnB
            5 hours ago














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          MLE requires $$frac{partial ln L(theta)}{partial theta} = sum_{i=1}^n frac{ f'(x_i;theta)}{f(x_i;theta)},$$
          where $f'(x_i;theta)$ could denote a gradient (allowing for the multivariate case, but still sticking to your notation). Define a new function $g(x;theta)=frac{ f'(x;theta)}{f(x;theta)}.$ Then ${g(x_i;theta)}_{i=1}^n$ is a new iid sequence of random variables, with $Eg(x_1;theta)=0$. If $Eg(x_1;theta)g(x_1;theta)'<infty$, CLT implies,
          $$sqrt{n}(bar{g}_n(theta)-Eg(x_1;theta))=sqrt{n}bar{g}_n(theta) rightarrow_D N(0,E(g(x;theta)g(x;theta)'),$$
          where $bar{g}_n(theta)=frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n g(x_i;theta).$ The ML estimator solves the equation
          $$bar{g}_n(theta)=0.$$
          It follows that the ML estimator is given by
          $$hat{theta}=bar{g}_n^{-1}(0).$$
          So long as the set of discontinuity points of $bar{g}_n^{-1}(z)$, i.e. the set of all values of $z$ such that $bar{g}_n^{-1}(z)$ is not continuous, occur with probability zero, the continuous mapping theorem gives us asymptotic normality of $theta$.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$



          MLE requires $$frac{partial ln L(theta)}{partial theta} = sum_{i=1}^n frac{ f'(x_i;theta)}{f(x_i;theta)},$$
          where $f'(x_i;theta)$ could denote a gradient (allowing for the multivariate case, but still sticking to your notation). Define a new function $g(x;theta)=frac{ f'(x;theta)}{f(x;theta)}.$ Then ${g(x_i;theta)}_{i=1}^n$ is a new iid sequence of random variables, with $Eg(x_1;theta)=0$. If $Eg(x_1;theta)g(x_1;theta)'<infty$, CLT implies,
          $$sqrt{n}(bar{g}_n(theta)-Eg(x_1;theta))=sqrt{n}bar{g}_n(theta) rightarrow_D N(0,E(g(x;theta)g(x;theta)'),$$
          where $bar{g}_n(theta)=frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n g(x_i;theta).$ The ML estimator solves the equation
          $$bar{g}_n(theta)=0.$$
          It follows that the ML estimator is given by
          $$hat{theta}=bar{g}_n^{-1}(0).$$
          So long as the set of discontinuity points of $bar{g}_n^{-1}(z)$, i.e. the set of all values of $z$ such that $bar{g}_n^{-1}(z)$ is not continuous, occur with probability zero, the continuous mapping theorem gives us asymptotic normality of $theta$.







          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 4 hours ago





















          New contributor




          dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 5 hours ago









          dlnBdlnB

          3917




          3917




          New contributor




          dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.












          • $begingroup$
            $frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$ is just another function of x so central limit theorem applies thank you for that
            $endgroup$
            – Colin Hicks
            5 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            You're welcome :)
            $endgroup$
            – dlnB
            5 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            $frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$ is just another function of x so central limit theorem applies thank you for that
            $endgroup$
            – Colin Hicks
            5 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            You're welcome :)
            $endgroup$
            – dlnB
            5 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          $frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$ is just another function of x so central limit theorem applies thank you for that
          $endgroup$
          – Colin Hicks
          5 hours ago






          $begingroup$
          $frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$ is just another function of x so central limit theorem applies thank you for that
          $endgroup$
          – Colin Hicks
          5 hours ago














          $begingroup$
          You're welcome :)
          $endgroup$
          – dlnB
          5 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          You're welcome :)
          $endgroup$
          – dlnB
          5 hours ago










          Colin Hicks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Colin Hicks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Colin Hicks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Colin Hicks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397619%2fdistribution-of-maximum-likelihood-estimator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to label and detect the document text images

          Image
          1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
          Read more

          Vallis Paradisi

          Image
          Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
          Read more

          Tabula Rosettana

          Image
          Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
          Read more