Is it good in general to subtract background from a sequence of images for learning?












0












$begingroup$


Context:



I have a sequence of satellite images, indexed by time, so basically it's a video. Images were taken on top of a mountain, to capture a main cause that affects solar rays. (GHI in other words).



I thought, subtracting background (most shared features) will only keep clouds, which is the real variable.



Original Images
enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here



Masked Images
enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here



This would probably help the network, along side original images.



Technically, I used OpenCV following this method



The generation (or lets say image data augmentation) in this case, didn't give higher score, but barely equal or a little lower.



The reason could be, that the codec I used generated images of lower quality. But also, the first images in the sequence, logically were not augmented well, as the algorithm knows the background after some iterations.



Is it good practice to omit background ?



Waiting for some hints, I am actively trying to improve data augmentation, and re-test again, doing my exercise!










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Context:



    I have a sequence of satellite images, indexed by time, so basically it's a video. Images were taken on top of a mountain, to capture a main cause that affects solar rays. (GHI in other words).



    I thought, subtracting background (most shared features) will only keep clouds, which is the real variable.



    Original Images
    enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here



    Masked Images
    enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here



    This would probably help the network, along side original images.



    Technically, I used OpenCV following this method



    The generation (or lets say image data augmentation) in this case, didn't give higher score, but barely equal or a little lower.



    The reason could be, that the codec I used generated images of lower quality. But also, the first images in the sequence, logically were not augmented well, as the algorithm knows the background after some iterations.



    Is it good practice to omit background ?



    Waiting for some hints, I am actively trying to improve data augmentation, and re-test again, doing my exercise!










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Context:



      I have a sequence of satellite images, indexed by time, so basically it's a video. Images were taken on top of a mountain, to capture a main cause that affects solar rays. (GHI in other words).



      I thought, subtracting background (most shared features) will only keep clouds, which is the real variable.



      Original Images
      enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here



      Masked Images
      enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here



      This would probably help the network, along side original images.



      Technically, I used OpenCV following this method



      The generation (or lets say image data augmentation) in this case, didn't give higher score, but barely equal or a little lower.



      The reason could be, that the codec I used generated images of lower quality. But also, the first images in the sequence, logically were not augmented well, as the algorithm knows the background after some iterations.



      Is it good practice to omit background ?



      Waiting for some hints, I am actively trying to improve data augmentation, and re-test again, doing my exercise!










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Context:



      I have a sequence of satellite images, indexed by time, so basically it's a video. Images were taken on top of a mountain, to capture a main cause that affects solar rays. (GHI in other words).



      I thought, subtracting background (most shared features) will only keep clouds, which is the real variable.



      Original Images
      enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here



      Masked Images
      enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here



      This would probably help the network, along side original images.



      Technically, I used OpenCV following this method



      The generation (or lets say image data augmentation) in this case, didn't give higher score, but barely equal or a little lower.



      The reason could be, that the codec I used generated images of lower quality. But also, the first images in the sequence, logically were not augmented well, as the algorithm knows the background after some iterations.



      Is it good practice to omit background ?



      Waiting for some hints, I am actively trying to improve data augmentation, and re-test again, doing my exercise!







      cnn data-augmentation image-preprocessing






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday







      bacloud14

















      asked yesterday









      bacloud14bacloud14

      579




      579






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46034%2fis-it-good-in-general-to-subtract-background-from-a-sequence-of-images-for-learn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46034%2fis-it-good-in-general-to-subtract-background-from-a-sequence-of-images-for-learn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to label and detect the document text images

          Vallis Paradisi

          Tabula Rosettana