Features impacting individual predictions after training a classification model
$begingroup$
I know my question might look odd but I just wanted to get some insights. Every prediction model will give us predictions for validation data set and it also can give/rank features based on their weight on predictions. I am looking for one step after that. Lets say we are dealing with employee resignation and we know the most important features are pay, latest promotion, job satisfaction and external job opportunities around that employees residence. Now, is there any way that we can say which of these features is the most important feature for an individual prediction? May be for one employee, Job satisfaction is the reason behind the leave but based on our feature importance, we need to focus on pay first. I just wanted to know if there is anyway that we can do some post processing on each individual predictions?
Thanks
classification feature-selection
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know my question might look odd but I just wanted to get some insights. Every prediction model will give us predictions for validation data set and it also can give/rank features based on their weight on predictions. I am looking for one step after that. Lets say we are dealing with employee resignation and we know the most important features are pay, latest promotion, job satisfaction and external job opportunities around that employees residence. Now, is there any way that we can say which of these features is the most important feature for an individual prediction? May be for one employee, Job satisfaction is the reason behind the leave but based on our feature importance, we need to focus on pay first. I just wanted to know if there is anyway that we can do some post processing on each individual predictions?
Thanks
classification feature-selection
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know my question might look odd but I just wanted to get some insights. Every prediction model will give us predictions for validation data set and it also can give/rank features based on their weight on predictions. I am looking for one step after that. Lets say we are dealing with employee resignation and we know the most important features are pay, latest promotion, job satisfaction and external job opportunities around that employees residence. Now, is there any way that we can say which of these features is the most important feature for an individual prediction? May be for one employee, Job satisfaction is the reason behind the leave but based on our feature importance, we need to focus on pay first. I just wanted to know if there is anyway that we can do some post processing on each individual predictions?
Thanks
classification feature-selection
New contributor
$endgroup$
I know my question might look odd but I just wanted to get some insights. Every prediction model will give us predictions for validation data set and it also can give/rank features based on their weight on predictions. I am looking for one step after that. Lets say we are dealing with employee resignation and we know the most important features are pay, latest promotion, job satisfaction and external job opportunities around that employees residence. Now, is there any way that we can say which of these features is the most important feature for an individual prediction? May be for one employee, Job satisfaction is the reason behind the leave but based on our feature importance, we need to focus on pay first. I just wanted to know if there is anyway that we can do some post processing on each individual predictions?
Thanks
classification feature-selection
classification feature-selection
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked yesterday
FatimaFatima
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Depending on what model you are using, the way things are multiplied and added together at prediction time slightly varies, but in principal it's all the same. You train a model that tries to learn the relationship of the feature vectors you give it to the associated targets. At prediction time, the same mathematical operations are being applied to every input you are trying to make a prediction for. So, the weights you learned during the training phase represent the feature importance across the entire training set, in which you hope generalizes to unseen "test" data. If you suspect that there are other reasons behind why an employee decided to resign outside of what the model weights are telling you, this would indicate that your model does not have enough features to separate the two classes of "not resign" vs. "resign". Essentially, during testing time, the feature importance is static and the exact same across any input you give. If feature1 is the most important for input 1, its the most important for every input. This is what the model learned.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation. That was my understanding so far and wanted to make sure that is all we can use.
$endgroup$
– Fatima
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Fatima is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46036%2ffeatures-impacting-individual-predictions-after-training-a-classification-model%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Depending on what model you are using, the way things are multiplied and added together at prediction time slightly varies, but in principal it's all the same. You train a model that tries to learn the relationship of the feature vectors you give it to the associated targets. At prediction time, the same mathematical operations are being applied to every input you are trying to make a prediction for. So, the weights you learned during the training phase represent the feature importance across the entire training set, in which you hope generalizes to unseen "test" data. If you suspect that there are other reasons behind why an employee decided to resign outside of what the model weights are telling you, this would indicate that your model does not have enough features to separate the two classes of "not resign" vs. "resign". Essentially, during testing time, the feature importance is static and the exact same across any input you give. If feature1 is the most important for input 1, its the most important for every input. This is what the model learned.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation. That was my understanding so far and wanted to make sure that is all we can use.
$endgroup$
– Fatima
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depending on what model you are using, the way things are multiplied and added together at prediction time slightly varies, but in principal it's all the same. You train a model that tries to learn the relationship of the feature vectors you give it to the associated targets. At prediction time, the same mathematical operations are being applied to every input you are trying to make a prediction for. So, the weights you learned during the training phase represent the feature importance across the entire training set, in which you hope generalizes to unseen "test" data. If you suspect that there are other reasons behind why an employee decided to resign outside of what the model weights are telling you, this would indicate that your model does not have enough features to separate the two classes of "not resign" vs. "resign". Essentially, during testing time, the feature importance is static and the exact same across any input you give. If feature1 is the most important for input 1, its the most important for every input. This is what the model learned.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation. That was my understanding so far and wanted to make sure that is all we can use.
$endgroup$
– Fatima
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depending on what model you are using, the way things are multiplied and added together at prediction time slightly varies, but in principal it's all the same. You train a model that tries to learn the relationship of the feature vectors you give it to the associated targets. At prediction time, the same mathematical operations are being applied to every input you are trying to make a prediction for. So, the weights you learned during the training phase represent the feature importance across the entire training set, in which you hope generalizes to unseen "test" data. If you suspect that there are other reasons behind why an employee decided to resign outside of what the model weights are telling you, this would indicate that your model does not have enough features to separate the two classes of "not resign" vs. "resign". Essentially, during testing time, the feature importance is static and the exact same across any input you give. If feature1 is the most important for input 1, its the most important for every input. This is what the model learned.
$endgroup$
Depending on what model you are using, the way things are multiplied and added together at prediction time slightly varies, but in principal it's all the same. You train a model that tries to learn the relationship of the feature vectors you give it to the associated targets. At prediction time, the same mathematical operations are being applied to every input you are trying to make a prediction for. So, the weights you learned during the training phase represent the feature importance across the entire training set, in which you hope generalizes to unseen "test" data. If you suspect that there are other reasons behind why an employee decided to resign outside of what the model weights are telling you, this would indicate that your model does not have enough features to separate the two classes of "not resign" vs. "resign". Essentially, during testing time, the feature importance is static and the exact same across any input you give. If feature1 is the most important for input 1, its the most important for every input. This is what the model learned.
answered yesterday
kylec123kylec123
65
65
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation. That was my understanding so far and wanted to make sure that is all we can use.
$endgroup$
– Fatima
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation. That was my understanding so far and wanted to make sure that is all we can use.
$endgroup$
– Fatima
yesterday
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation. That was my understanding so far and wanted to make sure that is all we can use.
$endgroup$
– Fatima
yesterday
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation. That was my understanding so far and wanted to make sure that is all we can use.
$endgroup$
– Fatima
yesterday
add a comment |
Fatima is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Fatima is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Fatima is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Fatima is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46036%2ffeatures-impacting-individual-predictions-after-training-a-classification-model%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown