How unreachable are Jupiter's moons from Mars with the technology developed for going to Mars?












6












$begingroup$


Jupiter's moons in their closest point to Mars (when Jupiter is closest to the sun) are like 7 times the distance between Earth and Mars, and in a return journey they will farther away. Is there any chance to reach them in the following decades? I would like to know how far the technology for going there is in a one shot journey, once humans are able to go to Mars, how much will they have to improve (in other topic someone mentioned that something that consumes fuel is the proximity to the sun pulling and decelerating the spaceship, besides from Mars escaping the planet will consume less fuel) to reach Jupiter from Mars, and also, how about if it's possible to set a permanent base in Ceres, Pallas or Vesta, for at least a partial resupply, could that help or be feasible at all?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    6












    $begingroup$


    Jupiter's moons in their closest point to Mars (when Jupiter is closest to the sun) are like 7 times the distance between Earth and Mars, and in a return journey they will farther away. Is there any chance to reach them in the following decades? I would like to know how far the technology for going there is in a one shot journey, once humans are able to go to Mars, how much will they have to improve (in other topic someone mentioned that something that consumes fuel is the proximity to the sun pulling and decelerating the spaceship, besides from Mars escaping the planet will consume less fuel) to reach Jupiter from Mars, and also, how about if it's possible to set a permanent base in Ceres, Pallas or Vesta, for at least a partial resupply, could that help or be feasible at all?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      6












      6








      6


      1



      $begingroup$


      Jupiter's moons in their closest point to Mars (when Jupiter is closest to the sun) are like 7 times the distance between Earth and Mars, and in a return journey they will farther away. Is there any chance to reach them in the following decades? I would like to know how far the technology for going there is in a one shot journey, once humans are able to go to Mars, how much will they have to improve (in other topic someone mentioned that something that consumes fuel is the proximity to the sun pulling and decelerating the spaceship, besides from Mars escaping the planet will consume less fuel) to reach Jupiter from Mars, and also, how about if it's possible to set a permanent base in Ceres, Pallas or Vesta, for at least a partial resupply, could that help or be feasible at all?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Jupiter's moons in their closest point to Mars (when Jupiter is closest to the sun) are like 7 times the distance between Earth and Mars, and in a return journey they will farther away. Is there any chance to reach them in the following decades? I would like to know how far the technology for going there is in a one shot journey, once humans are able to go to Mars, how much will they have to improve (in other topic someone mentioned that something that consumes fuel is the proximity to the sun pulling and decelerating the spaceship, besides from Mars escaping the planet will consume less fuel) to reach Jupiter from Mars, and also, how about if it's possible to set a permanent base in Ceres, Pallas or Vesta, for at least a partial resupply, could that help or be feasible at all?







      mars jupiter europa ceres spaceport






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 14 hours ago









      PabloPablo

      21616




      21616




      New contributor




      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$

          Let's go back our old friend the Pork chop plotter. Earth to Jupiter using minimum fuel takes around 2 years and you get one opportunity per year, more or less, to get there. You can shorten the journey to perhaps 20 months with minimal extra fuel. The delta-V required at Earth (over and above escape velocity) is about 9.3 km/s (you can in theory aerobrake at Jupiter, although the velocities involved, and the radiation environment might make this a bit exciting).



          enter image description here



          Mars to Jupiter with minimal fuel takes longer. Intuitively I think this is because Mars' orbital velocity around the Sun is lower. Journey times are around 30 months, but the delta-V needed (again over and above Mars escape) is only about 6 km/s.



          A fully-fueled SpaceX Starship is expected to have about 9 km/s delta-V capability (with a very small payload) so it could reach Jupiter if refuelled in high elliptical Earth orbit, or possibly directly from the surface of Mars. Refueling in Low Mars orbit would certainly be enough.



          enter image description here



          Bases on asteroids seem unlikely to help much. Matching orbit with them is too hard and you probably still have to get the fuel there. If you could make fuel on Ceres that would be quite appealing in terms of delta-V and payload mass, although the mission would get still slower.



          TLDR: If you can make fuel on Mars, or on Ceres, it will help you move more payload to Jupiter without needing to launch insane amounts of fuel from Earth, but such missions are generally longer in duration than direct missions.



          To expand in response to @Pablo's comment. The plotter page says:




          The present application provides an extremely efficient (although approximate) solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem (LTP) to produce launch and arrival v-infinity pork-chop plots between solar system targets selected by the user. The solution method is based on the works:



          Approximate Analytical Solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem. Claudio Bombardelli, Juan Luis Gonzalo, Javier Roa. In Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics (submitted). 2017.



          Approximate Analytical Solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem. Claudio Bombardelli, Javier Roa, Juan Luis Gonzalo. Paper AAS 16-212 in 26th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Napa, CA, USA, 14-18 February 2016.




          The equations/algorithms will be found in those papers, I assume.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Does the plotter shows somewhere which equations and variables are used to design the plot?
            $endgroup$
            – Pablo
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            It is misleading to compare the journey times that use minimal fuel, because the minimal fuel for Mars-Jupiter is significantly less than the minimal fuel for Earth-Jupiter. If instead you compare the journey times for a delta-V of (say) 10 km/s, then if I am reading the graphs correctly the Earth-Jupiter journey time is about 520 days, whereas the Mars-Jupiter journey time is only about 430 days.
            $endgroup$
            – TonyK
            1 hour ago





















          6












          $begingroup$

          I whomped up a spreadsheet to compare scenarios like this: Hohmann.xls.



          Typing Earth into departure planet cell and Mars into destination planet I get

          Launch windows open each 2.14 years (synodic period)

          Trip time .71 years

          Delta V Low Earth Orbit to Low Mars Orbit: 5.7 km/s



          Earth to Mars numbers



          Typing Mars into departure planet and Jupiter into destination:

          Launch window: Each 2.23 years
          Trip time 3.1 years

          Delta V Low Mars Orbit to Jupiter Capture orbit: 4.4 km/s



          enter image description here



          Jupiter capture orbit has periapsis 300 km above Jupiter's cloud tops and apoapsis about 4.8 million kilometers.



          Matching orbit with a moon would take more. Altitude of Jupiter's larger moons can be found in cells J27 to J30. For example setting Jupiter's destination orbit at Europa's altitude boosts delta V to more than 10 km/s. This doesn't take into account Europa's gravity.



          Due to Jupiter's strong magnetic field Jupiter's moons suffer from a very harsh radiation environment.



          Caveat: My spreadsheet assumes circular, coplanar orbits. So accuracy is only ballpark.



          TL;DR Going from Mars to Jupiter's moons is a lot harder than going from Earth to Mars.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Strange they have some expectations to find life in Europa, how could it be? Very deep underwater?
            $endgroup$
            – Pablo
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Pablo yes. Under a thick layer of ice and then a lot of water.
            $endgroup$
            – Steve Linton
            2 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "508"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Pablo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34401%2fhow-unreachable-are-jupiters-moons-from-mars-with-the-technology-developed-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7












          $begingroup$

          Let's go back our old friend the Pork chop plotter. Earth to Jupiter using minimum fuel takes around 2 years and you get one opportunity per year, more or less, to get there. You can shorten the journey to perhaps 20 months with minimal extra fuel. The delta-V required at Earth (over and above escape velocity) is about 9.3 km/s (you can in theory aerobrake at Jupiter, although the velocities involved, and the radiation environment might make this a bit exciting).



          enter image description here



          Mars to Jupiter with minimal fuel takes longer. Intuitively I think this is because Mars' orbital velocity around the Sun is lower. Journey times are around 30 months, but the delta-V needed (again over and above Mars escape) is only about 6 km/s.



          A fully-fueled SpaceX Starship is expected to have about 9 km/s delta-V capability (with a very small payload) so it could reach Jupiter if refuelled in high elliptical Earth orbit, or possibly directly from the surface of Mars. Refueling in Low Mars orbit would certainly be enough.



          enter image description here



          Bases on asteroids seem unlikely to help much. Matching orbit with them is too hard and you probably still have to get the fuel there. If you could make fuel on Ceres that would be quite appealing in terms of delta-V and payload mass, although the mission would get still slower.



          TLDR: If you can make fuel on Mars, or on Ceres, it will help you move more payload to Jupiter without needing to launch insane amounts of fuel from Earth, but such missions are generally longer in duration than direct missions.



          To expand in response to @Pablo's comment. The plotter page says:




          The present application provides an extremely efficient (although approximate) solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem (LTP) to produce launch and arrival v-infinity pork-chop plots between solar system targets selected by the user. The solution method is based on the works:



          Approximate Analytical Solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem. Claudio Bombardelli, Juan Luis Gonzalo, Javier Roa. In Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics (submitted). 2017.



          Approximate Analytical Solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem. Claudio Bombardelli, Javier Roa, Juan Luis Gonzalo. Paper AAS 16-212 in 26th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Napa, CA, USA, 14-18 February 2016.




          The equations/algorithms will be found in those papers, I assume.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Does the plotter shows somewhere which equations and variables are used to design the plot?
            $endgroup$
            – Pablo
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            It is misleading to compare the journey times that use minimal fuel, because the minimal fuel for Mars-Jupiter is significantly less than the minimal fuel for Earth-Jupiter. If instead you compare the journey times for a delta-V of (say) 10 km/s, then if I am reading the graphs correctly the Earth-Jupiter journey time is about 520 days, whereas the Mars-Jupiter journey time is only about 430 days.
            $endgroup$
            – TonyK
            1 hour ago


















          7












          $begingroup$

          Let's go back our old friend the Pork chop plotter. Earth to Jupiter using minimum fuel takes around 2 years and you get one opportunity per year, more or less, to get there. You can shorten the journey to perhaps 20 months with minimal extra fuel. The delta-V required at Earth (over and above escape velocity) is about 9.3 km/s (you can in theory aerobrake at Jupiter, although the velocities involved, and the radiation environment might make this a bit exciting).



          enter image description here



          Mars to Jupiter with minimal fuel takes longer. Intuitively I think this is because Mars' orbital velocity around the Sun is lower. Journey times are around 30 months, but the delta-V needed (again over and above Mars escape) is only about 6 km/s.



          A fully-fueled SpaceX Starship is expected to have about 9 km/s delta-V capability (with a very small payload) so it could reach Jupiter if refuelled in high elliptical Earth orbit, or possibly directly from the surface of Mars. Refueling in Low Mars orbit would certainly be enough.



          enter image description here



          Bases on asteroids seem unlikely to help much. Matching orbit with them is too hard and you probably still have to get the fuel there. If you could make fuel on Ceres that would be quite appealing in terms of delta-V and payload mass, although the mission would get still slower.



          TLDR: If you can make fuel on Mars, or on Ceres, it will help you move more payload to Jupiter without needing to launch insane amounts of fuel from Earth, but such missions are generally longer in duration than direct missions.



          To expand in response to @Pablo's comment. The plotter page says:




          The present application provides an extremely efficient (although approximate) solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem (LTP) to produce launch and arrival v-infinity pork-chop plots between solar system targets selected by the user. The solution method is based on the works:



          Approximate Analytical Solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem. Claudio Bombardelli, Juan Luis Gonzalo, Javier Roa. In Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics (submitted). 2017.



          Approximate Analytical Solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem. Claudio Bombardelli, Javier Roa, Juan Luis Gonzalo. Paper AAS 16-212 in 26th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Napa, CA, USA, 14-18 February 2016.




          The equations/algorithms will be found in those papers, I assume.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Does the plotter shows somewhere which equations and variables are used to design the plot?
            $endgroup$
            – Pablo
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            It is misleading to compare the journey times that use minimal fuel, because the minimal fuel for Mars-Jupiter is significantly less than the minimal fuel for Earth-Jupiter. If instead you compare the journey times for a delta-V of (say) 10 km/s, then if I am reading the graphs correctly the Earth-Jupiter journey time is about 520 days, whereas the Mars-Jupiter journey time is only about 430 days.
            $endgroup$
            – TonyK
            1 hour ago
















          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          Let's go back our old friend the Pork chop plotter. Earth to Jupiter using minimum fuel takes around 2 years and you get one opportunity per year, more or less, to get there. You can shorten the journey to perhaps 20 months with minimal extra fuel. The delta-V required at Earth (over and above escape velocity) is about 9.3 km/s (you can in theory aerobrake at Jupiter, although the velocities involved, and the radiation environment might make this a bit exciting).



          enter image description here



          Mars to Jupiter with minimal fuel takes longer. Intuitively I think this is because Mars' orbital velocity around the Sun is lower. Journey times are around 30 months, but the delta-V needed (again over and above Mars escape) is only about 6 km/s.



          A fully-fueled SpaceX Starship is expected to have about 9 km/s delta-V capability (with a very small payload) so it could reach Jupiter if refuelled in high elliptical Earth orbit, or possibly directly from the surface of Mars. Refueling in Low Mars orbit would certainly be enough.



          enter image description here



          Bases on asteroids seem unlikely to help much. Matching orbit with them is too hard and you probably still have to get the fuel there. If you could make fuel on Ceres that would be quite appealing in terms of delta-V and payload mass, although the mission would get still slower.



          TLDR: If you can make fuel on Mars, or on Ceres, it will help you move more payload to Jupiter without needing to launch insane amounts of fuel from Earth, but such missions are generally longer in duration than direct missions.



          To expand in response to @Pablo's comment. The plotter page says:




          The present application provides an extremely efficient (although approximate) solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem (LTP) to produce launch and arrival v-infinity pork-chop plots between solar system targets selected by the user. The solution method is based on the works:



          Approximate Analytical Solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem. Claudio Bombardelli, Juan Luis Gonzalo, Javier Roa. In Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics (submitted). 2017.



          Approximate Analytical Solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem. Claudio Bombardelli, Javier Roa, Juan Luis Gonzalo. Paper AAS 16-212 in 26th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Napa, CA, USA, 14-18 February 2016.




          The equations/algorithms will be found in those papers, I assume.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Let's go back our old friend the Pork chop plotter. Earth to Jupiter using minimum fuel takes around 2 years and you get one opportunity per year, more or less, to get there. You can shorten the journey to perhaps 20 months with minimal extra fuel. The delta-V required at Earth (over and above escape velocity) is about 9.3 km/s (you can in theory aerobrake at Jupiter, although the velocities involved, and the radiation environment might make this a bit exciting).



          enter image description here



          Mars to Jupiter with minimal fuel takes longer. Intuitively I think this is because Mars' orbital velocity around the Sun is lower. Journey times are around 30 months, but the delta-V needed (again over and above Mars escape) is only about 6 km/s.



          A fully-fueled SpaceX Starship is expected to have about 9 km/s delta-V capability (with a very small payload) so it could reach Jupiter if refuelled in high elliptical Earth orbit, or possibly directly from the surface of Mars. Refueling in Low Mars orbit would certainly be enough.



          enter image description here



          Bases on asteroids seem unlikely to help much. Matching orbit with them is too hard and you probably still have to get the fuel there. If you could make fuel on Ceres that would be quite appealing in terms of delta-V and payload mass, although the mission would get still slower.



          TLDR: If you can make fuel on Mars, or on Ceres, it will help you move more payload to Jupiter without needing to launch insane amounts of fuel from Earth, but such missions are generally longer in duration than direct missions.



          To expand in response to @Pablo's comment. The plotter page says:




          The present application provides an extremely efficient (although approximate) solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem (LTP) to produce launch and arrival v-infinity pork-chop plots between solar system targets selected by the user. The solution method is based on the works:



          Approximate Analytical Solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem. Claudio Bombardelli, Juan Luis Gonzalo, Javier Roa. In Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics (submitted). 2017.



          Approximate Analytical Solution of the Lambert's Targeting Problem. Claudio Bombardelli, Javier Roa, Juan Luis Gonzalo. Paper AAS 16-212 in 26th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Napa, CA, USA, 14-18 February 2016.




          The equations/algorithms will be found in those papers, I assume.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago

























          answered 9 hours ago









          Steve LintonSteve Linton

          7,91012144




          7,91012144








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Does the plotter shows somewhere which equations and variables are used to design the plot?
            $endgroup$
            – Pablo
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            It is misleading to compare the journey times that use minimal fuel, because the minimal fuel for Mars-Jupiter is significantly less than the minimal fuel for Earth-Jupiter. If instead you compare the journey times for a delta-V of (say) 10 km/s, then if I am reading the graphs correctly the Earth-Jupiter journey time is about 520 days, whereas the Mars-Jupiter journey time is only about 430 days.
            $endgroup$
            – TonyK
            1 hour ago
















          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Does the plotter shows somewhere which equations and variables are used to design the plot?
            $endgroup$
            – Pablo
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            It is misleading to compare the journey times that use minimal fuel, because the minimal fuel for Mars-Jupiter is significantly less than the minimal fuel for Earth-Jupiter. If instead you compare the journey times for a delta-V of (say) 10 km/s, then if I am reading the graphs correctly the Earth-Jupiter journey time is about 520 days, whereas the Mars-Jupiter journey time is only about 430 days.
            $endgroup$
            – TonyK
            1 hour ago










          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Does the plotter shows somewhere which equations and variables are used to design the plot?
          $endgroup$
          – Pablo
          4 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Does the plotter shows somewhere which equations and variables are used to design the plot?
          $endgroup$
          – Pablo
          4 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          It is misleading to compare the journey times that use minimal fuel, because the minimal fuel for Mars-Jupiter is significantly less than the minimal fuel for Earth-Jupiter. If instead you compare the journey times for a delta-V of (say) 10 km/s, then if I am reading the graphs correctly the Earth-Jupiter journey time is about 520 days, whereas the Mars-Jupiter journey time is only about 430 days.
          $endgroup$
          – TonyK
          1 hour ago






          $begingroup$
          It is misleading to compare the journey times that use minimal fuel, because the minimal fuel for Mars-Jupiter is significantly less than the minimal fuel for Earth-Jupiter. If instead you compare the journey times for a delta-V of (say) 10 km/s, then if I am reading the graphs correctly the Earth-Jupiter journey time is about 520 days, whereas the Mars-Jupiter journey time is only about 430 days.
          $endgroup$
          – TonyK
          1 hour ago













          6












          $begingroup$

          I whomped up a spreadsheet to compare scenarios like this: Hohmann.xls.



          Typing Earth into departure planet cell and Mars into destination planet I get

          Launch windows open each 2.14 years (synodic period)

          Trip time .71 years

          Delta V Low Earth Orbit to Low Mars Orbit: 5.7 km/s



          Earth to Mars numbers



          Typing Mars into departure planet and Jupiter into destination:

          Launch window: Each 2.23 years
          Trip time 3.1 years

          Delta V Low Mars Orbit to Jupiter Capture orbit: 4.4 km/s



          enter image description here



          Jupiter capture orbit has periapsis 300 km above Jupiter's cloud tops and apoapsis about 4.8 million kilometers.



          Matching orbit with a moon would take more. Altitude of Jupiter's larger moons can be found in cells J27 to J30. For example setting Jupiter's destination orbit at Europa's altitude boosts delta V to more than 10 km/s. This doesn't take into account Europa's gravity.



          Due to Jupiter's strong magnetic field Jupiter's moons suffer from a very harsh radiation environment.



          Caveat: My spreadsheet assumes circular, coplanar orbits. So accuracy is only ballpark.



          TL;DR Going from Mars to Jupiter's moons is a lot harder than going from Earth to Mars.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Strange they have some expectations to find life in Europa, how could it be? Very deep underwater?
            $endgroup$
            – Pablo
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Pablo yes. Under a thick layer of ice and then a lot of water.
            $endgroup$
            – Steve Linton
            2 hours ago
















          6












          $begingroup$

          I whomped up a spreadsheet to compare scenarios like this: Hohmann.xls.



          Typing Earth into departure planet cell and Mars into destination planet I get

          Launch windows open each 2.14 years (synodic period)

          Trip time .71 years

          Delta V Low Earth Orbit to Low Mars Orbit: 5.7 km/s



          Earth to Mars numbers



          Typing Mars into departure planet and Jupiter into destination:

          Launch window: Each 2.23 years
          Trip time 3.1 years

          Delta V Low Mars Orbit to Jupiter Capture orbit: 4.4 km/s



          enter image description here



          Jupiter capture orbit has periapsis 300 km above Jupiter's cloud tops and apoapsis about 4.8 million kilometers.



          Matching orbit with a moon would take more. Altitude of Jupiter's larger moons can be found in cells J27 to J30. For example setting Jupiter's destination orbit at Europa's altitude boosts delta V to more than 10 km/s. This doesn't take into account Europa's gravity.



          Due to Jupiter's strong magnetic field Jupiter's moons suffer from a very harsh radiation environment.



          Caveat: My spreadsheet assumes circular, coplanar orbits. So accuracy is only ballpark.



          TL;DR Going from Mars to Jupiter's moons is a lot harder than going from Earth to Mars.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Strange they have some expectations to find life in Europa, how could it be? Very deep underwater?
            $endgroup$
            – Pablo
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Pablo yes. Under a thick layer of ice and then a lot of water.
            $endgroup$
            – Steve Linton
            2 hours ago














          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          I whomped up a spreadsheet to compare scenarios like this: Hohmann.xls.



          Typing Earth into departure planet cell and Mars into destination planet I get

          Launch windows open each 2.14 years (synodic period)

          Trip time .71 years

          Delta V Low Earth Orbit to Low Mars Orbit: 5.7 km/s



          Earth to Mars numbers



          Typing Mars into departure planet and Jupiter into destination:

          Launch window: Each 2.23 years
          Trip time 3.1 years

          Delta V Low Mars Orbit to Jupiter Capture orbit: 4.4 km/s



          enter image description here



          Jupiter capture orbit has periapsis 300 km above Jupiter's cloud tops and apoapsis about 4.8 million kilometers.



          Matching orbit with a moon would take more. Altitude of Jupiter's larger moons can be found in cells J27 to J30. For example setting Jupiter's destination orbit at Europa's altitude boosts delta V to more than 10 km/s. This doesn't take into account Europa's gravity.



          Due to Jupiter's strong magnetic field Jupiter's moons suffer from a very harsh radiation environment.



          Caveat: My spreadsheet assumes circular, coplanar orbits. So accuracy is only ballpark.



          TL;DR Going from Mars to Jupiter's moons is a lot harder than going from Earth to Mars.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I whomped up a spreadsheet to compare scenarios like this: Hohmann.xls.



          Typing Earth into departure planet cell and Mars into destination planet I get

          Launch windows open each 2.14 years (synodic period)

          Trip time .71 years

          Delta V Low Earth Orbit to Low Mars Orbit: 5.7 km/s



          Earth to Mars numbers



          Typing Mars into departure planet and Jupiter into destination:

          Launch window: Each 2.23 years
          Trip time 3.1 years

          Delta V Low Mars Orbit to Jupiter Capture orbit: 4.4 km/s



          enter image description here



          Jupiter capture orbit has periapsis 300 km above Jupiter's cloud tops and apoapsis about 4.8 million kilometers.



          Matching orbit with a moon would take more. Altitude of Jupiter's larger moons can be found in cells J27 to J30. For example setting Jupiter's destination orbit at Europa's altitude boosts delta V to more than 10 km/s. This doesn't take into account Europa's gravity.



          Due to Jupiter's strong magnetic field Jupiter's moons suffer from a very harsh radiation environment.



          Caveat: My spreadsheet assumes circular, coplanar orbits. So accuracy is only ballpark.



          TL;DR Going from Mars to Jupiter's moons is a lot harder than going from Earth to Mars.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          HopDavidHopDavid

          11.9k2560




          11.9k2560












          • $begingroup$
            Strange they have some expectations to find life in Europa, how could it be? Very deep underwater?
            $endgroup$
            – Pablo
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Pablo yes. Under a thick layer of ice and then a lot of water.
            $endgroup$
            – Steve Linton
            2 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            Strange they have some expectations to find life in Europa, how could it be? Very deep underwater?
            $endgroup$
            – Pablo
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Pablo yes. Under a thick layer of ice and then a lot of water.
            $endgroup$
            – Steve Linton
            2 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          Strange they have some expectations to find life in Europa, how could it be? Very deep underwater?
          $endgroup$
          – Pablo
          4 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Strange they have some expectations to find life in Europa, how could it be? Very deep underwater?
          $endgroup$
          – Pablo
          4 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @Pablo yes. Under a thick layer of ice and then a lot of water.
          $endgroup$
          – Steve Linton
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Pablo yes. Under a thick layer of ice and then a lot of water.
          $endgroup$
          – Steve Linton
          2 hours ago










          Pablo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Pablo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Pablo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Pablo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34401%2fhow-unreachable-are-jupiters-moons-from-mars-with-the-technology-developed-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to label and detect the document text images

          Vallis Paradisi

          Tabula Rosettana