Why don't electromagnetic waves interact with each other?












5












$begingroup$


My exact question is that what refers to this phenomenon? I saw also Richards Feynman's video in that he talks about light and says that if we look at something those light waves that come from that thing are not disturbed from any other electromagnetic waves and explains this kind of way that if I can see things clearly, in front of me, although if someone stand in the right of me, can also clearly see any thing in the left of me, our light waves cross each other but the are not disturbed by each other. This is a kinda cool explanation but I don't understand that exactly, because I am not convinced that if those two electromagnetic waves would interact then I couldn't see the thing in front of me clearly






electromagnetic-radiation







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Imagine light beams of flashlights were water jets. When you cross two of them, they scatter on each other (interact), so you don't see anything clearly.
    $endgroup$
    – safesphere
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please provide a link of the video.
    $endgroup$
    – SRS
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Link: youtu.be/P1ww1IXRfTA?t=2372
    $endgroup$
    – isarandi
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    I suppose one could say that they do interact in the sense that the electromagnetic field at each point in time and space reachable by both waves is the result of both waves. But due to the underlying principles of field propagation it just so happens that after all the messy interference both waves emerge "unperturbed" as if the interference never had happened ;-). (These principles are discussed in G. Smith's answer.)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter A. Schneider
    4 mins ago


















5












$begingroup$


My exact question is that what refers to this phenomenon? I saw also Richards Feynman's video in that he talks about light and says that if we look at something those light waves that come from that thing are not disturbed from any other electromagnetic waves and explains this kind of way that if I can see things clearly, in front of me, although if someone stand in the right of me, can also clearly see any thing in the left of me, our light waves cross each other but the are not disturbed by each other. This is a kinda cool explanation but I don't understand that exactly, because I am not convinced that if those two electromagnetic waves would interact then I couldn't see the thing in front of me clearly






electromagnetic-radiation







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Imagine light beams of flashlights were water jets. When you cross two of them, they scatter on each other (interact), so you don't see anything clearly.
    $endgroup$
    – safesphere
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please provide a link of the video.
    $endgroup$
    – SRS
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Link: youtu.be/P1ww1IXRfTA?t=2372
    $endgroup$
    – isarandi
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    I suppose one could say that they do interact in the sense that the electromagnetic field at each point in time and space reachable by both waves is the result of both waves. But due to the underlying principles of field propagation it just so happens that after all the messy interference both waves emerge "unperturbed" as if the interference never had happened ;-). (These principles are discussed in G. Smith's answer.)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter A. Schneider
    4 mins ago
















5












5








5


3



$begingroup$


My exact question is that what refers to this phenomenon? I saw also Richards Feynman's video in that he talks about light and says that if we look at something those light waves that come from that thing are not disturbed from any other electromagnetic waves and explains this kind of way that if I can see things clearly, in front of me, although if someone stand in the right of me, can also clearly see any thing in the left of me, our light waves cross each other but the are not disturbed by each other. This is a kinda cool explanation but I don't understand that exactly, because I am not convinced that if those two electromagnetic waves would interact then I couldn't see the thing in front of me clearly






electromagnetic-radiation







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




My exact question is that what refers to this phenomenon? I saw also Richards Feynman's video in that he talks about light and says that if we look at something those light waves that come from that thing are not disturbed from any other electromagnetic waves and explains this kind of way that if I can see things clearly, in front of me, although if someone stand in the right of me, can also clearly see any thing in the left of me, our light waves cross each other but the are not disturbed by each other. This is a kinda cool explanation but I don't understand that exactly, because I am not convinced that if those two electromagnetic waves would interact then I couldn't see the thing in front of me clearly






electromagnetic-radiation




electromagnetic-radiation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









SRS

6,731434125




6,731434125










asked 17 hours ago









Bálint TataiBálint Tatai

25727




25727












  • $begingroup$
    Imagine light beams of flashlights were water jets. When you cross two of them, they scatter on each other (interact), so you don't see anything clearly.
    $endgroup$
    – safesphere
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please provide a link of the video.
    $endgroup$
    – SRS
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Link: youtu.be/P1ww1IXRfTA?t=2372
    $endgroup$
    – isarandi
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    I suppose one could say that they do interact in the sense that the electromagnetic field at each point in time and space reachable by both waves is the result of both waves. But due to the underlying principles of field propagation it just so happens that after all the messy interference both waves emerge "unperturbed" as if the interference never had happened ;-). (These principles are discussed in G. Smith's answer.)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter A. Schneider
    4 mins ago




















  • $begingroup$
    Imagine light beams of flashlights were water jets. When you cross two of them, they scatter on each other (interact), so you don't see anything clearly.
    $endgroup$
    – safesphere
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please provide a link of the video.
    $endgroup$
    – SRS
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Link: youtu.be/P1ww1IXRfTA?t=2372
    $endgroup$
    – isarandi
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    I suppose one could say that they do interact in the sense that the electromagnetic field at each point in time and space reachable by both waves is the result of both waves. But due to the underlying principles of field propagation it just so happens that after all the messy interference both waves emerge "unperturbed" as if the interference never had happened ;-). (These principles are discussed in G. Smith's answer.)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter A. Schneider
    4 mins ago


















$begingroup$
Imagine light beams of flashlights were water jets. When you cross two of them, they scatter on each other (interact), so you don't see anything clearly.
$endgroup$
– safesphere
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Imagine light beams of flashlights were water jets. When you cross two of them, they scatter on each other (interact), so you don't see anything clearly.
$endgroup$
– safesphere
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
Please provide a link of the video.
$endgroup$
– SRS
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Please provide a link of the video.
$endgroup$
– SRS
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Link: youtu.be/P1ww1IXRfTA?t=2372
$endgroup$
– isarandi
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
Link: youtu.be/P1ww1IXRfTA?t=2372
$endgroup$
– isarandi
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
I suppose one could say that they do interact in the sense that the electromagnetic field at each point in time and space reachable by both waves is the result of both waves. But due to the underlying principles of field propagation it just so happens that after all the messy interference both waves emerge "unperturbed" as if the interference never had happened ;-). (These principles are discussed in G. Smith's answer.)
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
4 mins ago






$begingroup$
I suppose one could say that they do interact in the sense that the electromagnetic field at each point in time and space reachable by both waves is the result of both waves. But due to the underlying principles of field propagation it just so happens that after all the messy interference both waves emerge "unperturbed" as if the interference never had happened ;-). (These principles are discussed in G. Smith's answer.)
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
4 mins ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















16












$begingroup$

Here are three explanations of how to understand “why” electromagnetic waves don’t directly interact electromagnetically with each other, which are all equivalent to each other:




  1. Maxwell’s equations are linear in the electric and magnetic fields, and in their sources, so the superposition of two solutions is also a solution. (For example, in Coulomb’s Law you can just add up the fields of multiple charges.)


  2. Photons do not carry any electric charge and do not have their own electromagnetic field. (Note: By contrast, gluons do carry color charge and do interact with each other.)


  3. The gauge group for electromagnetism is an abelian (i.e., commutative) group. (Gauge groups are something you learn about in more advanced physics courses.)



Notice that I said photons don’t directly interact with each other. They do indirectly interact via virtual electrons and positrons (or other charged particle-antiparticle pairs). Until you get to extremely intense electric and magnetic fields, this is a very tiny effect and was only recently measured.



An even tinier effect, which we will probably never be able to detect, is the gravitational interaction of electromagnetic waves or photons. Physicists believe there would be a gravitational interaction because electromagnetic waves and photons carry energy and momentum, even though photons are massless.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Isn't that "photons are massless at rest"?
    $endgroup$
    – CJ Dennis
    10 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @CJDennis Photons can't be at rest.
    $endgroup$
    – SRS
    8 hours ago












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471007%2fwhy-dont-electromagnetic-waves-interact-with-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









16












$begingroup$

Here are three explanations of how to understand “why” electromagnetic waves don’t directly interact electromagnetically with each other, which are all equivalent to each other:




  1. Maxwell’s equations are linear in the electric and magnetic fields, and in their sources, so the superposition of two solutions is also a solution. (For example, in Coulomb’s Law you can just add up the fields of multiple charges.)


  2. Photons do not carry any electric charge and do not have their own electromagnetic field. (Note: By contrast, gluons do carry color charge and do interact with each other.)


  3. The gauge group for electromagnetism is an abelian (i.e., commutative) group. (Gauge groups are something you learn about in more advanced physics courses.)



Notice that I said photons don’t directly interact with each other. They do indirectly interact via virtual electrons and positrons (or other charged particle-antiparticle pairs). Until you get to extremely intense electric and magnetic fields, this is a very tiny effect and was only recently measured.



An even tinier effect, which we will probably never be able to detect, is the gravitational interaction of electromagnetic waves or photons. Physicists believe there would be a gravitational interaction because electromagnetic waves and photons carry energy and momentum, even though photons are massless.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Isn't that "photons are massless at rest"?
    $endgroup$
    – CJ Dennis
    10 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @CJDennis Photons can't be at rest.
    $endgroup$
    – SRS
    8 hours ago
















16












$begingroup$

Here are three explanations of how to understand “why” electromagnetic waves don’t directly interact electromagnetically with each other, which are all equivalent to each other:




  1. Maxwell’s equations are linear in the electric and magnetic fields, and in their sources, so the superposition of two solutions is also a solution. (For example, in Coulomb’s Law you can just add up the fields of multiple charges.)


  2. Photons do not carry any electric charge and do not have their own electromagnetic field. (Note: By contrast, gluons do carry color charge and do interact with each other.)


  3. The gauge group for electromagnetism is an abelian (i.e., commutative) group. (Gauge groups are something you learn about in more advanced physics courses.)



Notice that I said photons don’t directly interact with each other. They do indirectly interact via virtual electrons and positrons (or other charged particle-antiparticle pairs). Until you get to extremely intense electric and magnetic fields, this is a very tiny effect and was only recently measured.



An even tinier effect, which we will probably never be able to detect, is the gravitational interaction of electromagnetic waves or photons. Physicists believe there would be a gravitational interaction because electromagnetic waves and photons carry energy and momentum, even though photons are massless.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Isn't that "photons are massless at rest"?
    $endgroup$
    – CJ Dennis
    10 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @CJDennis Photons can't be at rest.
    $endgroup$
    – SRS
    8 hours ago














16












16








16





$begingroup$

Here are three explanations of how to understand “why” electromagnetic waves don’t directly interact electromagnetically with each other, which are all equivalent to each other:




  1. Maxwell’s equations are linear in the electric and magnetic fields, and in their sources, so the superposition of two solutions is also a solution. (For example, in Coulomb’s Law you can just add up the fields of multiple charges.)


  2. Photons do not carry any electric charge and do not have their own electromagnetic field. (Note: By contrast, gluons do carry color charge and do interact with each other.)


  3. The gauge group for electromagnetism is an abelian (i.e., commutative) group. (Gauge groups are something you learn about in more advanced physics courses.)



Notice that I said photons don’t directly interact with each other. They do indirectly interact via virtual electrons and positrons (or other charged particle-antiparticle pairs). Until you get to extremely intense electric and magnetic fields, this is a very tiny effect and was only recently measured.



An even tinier effect, which we will probably never be able to detect, is the gravitational interaction of electromagnetic waves or photons. Physicists believe there would be a gravitational interaction because electromagnetic waves and photons carry energy and momentum, even though photons are massless.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Here are three explanations of how to understand “why” electromagnetic waves don’t directly interact electromagnetically with each other, which are all equivalent to each other:




  1. Maxwell’s equations are linear in the electric and magnetic fields, and in their sources, so the superposition of two solutions is also a solution. (For example, in Coulomb’s Law you can just add up the fields of multiple charges.)


  2. Photons do not carry any electric charge and do not have their own electromagnetic field. (Note: By contrast, gluons do carry color charge and do interact with each other.)


  3. The gauge group for electromagnetism is an abelian (i.e., commutative) group. (Gauge groups are something you learn about in more advanced physics courses.)



Notice that I said photons don’t directly interact with each other. They do indirectly interact via virtual electrons and positrons (or other charged particle-antiparticle pairs). Until you get to extremely intense electric and magnetic fields, this is a very tiny effect and was only recently measured.



An even tinier effect, which we will probably never be able to detect, is the gravitational interaction of electromagnetic waves or photons. Physicists believe there would be a gravitational interaction because electromagnetic waves and photons carry energy and momentum, even though photons are massless.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 16 hours ago

























answered 16 hours ago









G. SmithG. Smith

10.7k11431




10.7k11431












  • $begingroup$
    Isn't that "photons are massless at rest"?
    $endgroup$
    – CJ Dennis
    10 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @CJDennis Photons can't be at rest.
    $endgroup$
    – SRS
    8 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Isn't that "photons are massless at rest"?
    $endgroup$
    – CJ Dennis
    10 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @CJDennis Photons can't be at rest.
    $endgroup$
    – SRS
    8 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Isn't that "photons are massless at rest"?
$endgroup$
– CJ Dennis
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
Isn't that "photons are massless at rest"?
$endgroup$
– CJ Dennis
10 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
@CJDennis Photons can't be at rest.
$endgroup$
– SRS
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@CJDennis Photons can't be at rest.
$endgroup$
– SRS
8 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471007%2fwhy-dont-electromagnetic-waves-interact-with-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How to label and detect the document text images

Image
1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
Read more

Vallis Paradisi

Image
Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
Read more

Tabula Rosettana

Image
Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
Read more