What is the best way to organize the datasets for my task?
$begingroup$
I am working on a task — geolocation estimation of Twitter users by using tweets only. I collected tweets (and users) from more than 6000 people in Twitter. Each user is associated with a city.
In the dataset, number of samples (or users) for each city depends on the city size. (i.e. If the city A is more populous than the city B, the city A has more users in the dataset.) This seems fair, but it creates an unbalanced dataset.
Right now, I am planing to collect another dataset; a dataset that is more balanced (i.e. there will be the almost the same amount of users for each city although there will still be more users in big cities). Doing this makes sense or should I continue with the unbalanced dataset? What approach would it be good for that task?
dataset
New contributor
Mert Metin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am working on a task — geolocation estimation of Twitter users by using tweets only. I collected tweets (and users) from more than 6000 people in Twitter. Each user is associated with a city.
In the dataset, number of samples (or users) for each city depends on the city size. (i.e. If the city A is more populous than the city B, the city A has more users in the dataset.) This seems fair, but it creates an unbalanced dataset.
Right now, I am planing to collect another dataset; a dataset that is more balanced (i.e. there will be the almost the same amount of users for each city although there will still be more users in big cities). Doing this makes sense or should I continue with the unbalanced dataset? What approach would it be good for that task?
dataset
New contributor
Mert Metin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am working on a task — geolocation estimation of Twitter users by using tweets only. I collected tweets (and users) from more than 6000 people in Twitter. Each user is associated with a city.
In the dataset, number of samples (or users) for each city depends on the city size. (i.e. If the city A is more populous than the city B, the city A has more users in the dataset.) This seems fair, but it creates an unbalanced dataset.
Right now, I am planing to collect another dataset; a dataset that is more balanced (i.e. there will be the almost the same amount of users for each city although there will still be more users in big cities). Doing this makes sense or should I continue with the unbalanced dataset? What approach would it be good for that task?
dataset
New contributor
Mert Metin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I am working on a task — geolocation estimation of Twitter users by using tweets only. I collected tweets (and users) from more than 6000 people in Twitter. Each user is associated with a city.
In the dataset, number of samples (or users) for each city depends on the city size. (i.e. If the city A is more populous than the city B, the city A has more users in the dataset.) This seems fair, but it creates an unbalanced dataset.
Right now, I am planing to collect another dataset; a dataset that is more balanced (i.e. there will be the almost the same amount of users for each city although there will still be more users in big cities). Doing this makes sense or should I continue with the unbalanced dataset? What approach would it be good for that task?
dataset
dataset
New contributor
Mert Metin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Mert Metin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Mert Metin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Mert MetinMert Metin
111
111
New contributor
Mert Metin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Mert Metin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Mert Metin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When you uniformly take samples from a society, definitely chance of selecting from cities is directly related to their population. Therefore, more users will be selected from more populous cities and it's one of the most important characters of the problem you trying to solve. I think if you want to balance the data-set, you ignore one this important character of your data and also your problem.
I strongly recommend to continue with the unbalanced data-set and handle it by choosing an appropriate loss function and evaluation method.
Disclaimer:
If you use python, PyCM module can help you to find out these metrics.
Here is a simple code to get the recommended parameters from this module:
>>> from pycm import *
>>> cm = ConfusionMatrix(matrix={"Class1": {"Class1": 1, "Class2":2}, "Class2": {"Class1": 0, "Class2": 5}})
>>> print(cm.recommended_list)
["Kappa", "SOA1(Landis & Koch)", "SOA2(Fleiss)", "SOA3(Altman)", "SOA4(Cicchetti)", "CEN", "MCEN", "MCC", "J", "Overall J", "Overall MCC", "Overall CEN", "Overall MCEN", "AUC", "AUCI", "G", "DP", "DPI", "GI"]
After that, each of these parameters you want to use as the loss function can be used as follows:
>>> y_pred = model.predict #the prediction of the implemented model
>>> y_actu = data.target #data labels
>>> cm = ConfusionMatrix(y_actu, y_pred)
>>> loss = cm.Kappa #or any other parameter (Example: cm.SOA1)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Mert Metin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47356%2fwhat-is-the-best-way-to-organize-the-datasets-for-my-task%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When you uniformly take samples from a society, definitely chance of selecting from cities is directly related to their population. Therefore, more users will be selected from more populous cities and it's one of the most important characters of the problem you trying to solve. I think if you want to balance the data-set, you ignore one this important character of your data and also your problem.
I strongly recommend to continue with the unbalanced data-set and handle it by choosing an appropriate loss function and evaluation method.
Disclaimer:
If you use python, PyCM module can help you to find out these metrics.
Here is a simple code to get the recommended parameters from this module:
>>> from pycm import *
>>> cm = ConfusionMatrix(matrix={"Class1": {"Class1": 1, "Class2":2}, "Class2": {"Class1": 0, "Class2": 5}})
>>> print(cm.recommended_list)
["Kappa", "SOA1(Landis & Koch)", "SOA2(Fleiss)", "SOA3(Altman)", "SOA4(Cicchetti)", "CEN", "MCEN", "MCC", "J", "Overall J", "Overall MCC", "Overall CEN", "Overall MCEN", "AUC", "AUCI", "G", "DP", "DPI", "GI"]
After that, each of these parameters you want to use as the loss function can be used as follows:
>>> y_pred = model.predict #the prediction of the implemented model
>>> y_actu = data.target #data labels
>>> cm = ConfusionMatrix(y_actu, y_pred)
>>> loss = cm.Kappa #or any other parameter (Example: cm.SOA1)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you uniformly take samples from a society, definitely chance of selecting from cities is directly related to their population. Therefore, more users will be selected from more populous cities and it's one of the most important characters of the problem you trying to solve. I think if you want to balance the data-set, you ignore one this important character of your data and also your problem.
I strongly recommend to continue with the unbalanced data-set and handle it by choosing an appropriate loss function and evaluation method.
Disclaimer:
If you use python, PyCM module can help you to find out these metrics.
Here is a simple code to get the recommended parameters from this module:
>>> from pycm import *
>>> cm = ConfusionMatrix(matrix={"Class1": {"Class1": 1, "Class2":2}, "Class2": {"Class1": 0, "Class2": 5}})
>>> print(cm.recommended_list)
["Kappa", "SOA1(Landis & Koch)", "SOA2(Fleiss)", "SOA3(Altman)", "SOA4(Cicchetti)", "CEN", "MCEN", "MCC", "J", "Overall J", "Overall MCC", "Overall CEN", "Overall MCEN", "AUC", "AUCI", "G", "DP", "DPI", "GI"]
After that, each of these parameters you want to use as the loss function can be used as follows:
>>> y_pred = model.predict #the prediction of the implemented model
>>> y_actu = data.target #data labels
>>> cm = ConfusionMatrix(y_actu, y_pred)
>>> loss = cm.Kappa #or any other parameter (Example: cm.SOA1)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you uniformly take samples from a society, definitely chance of selecting from cities is directly related to their population. Therefore, more users will be selected from more populous cities and it's one of the most important characters of the problem you trying to solve. I think if you want to balance the data-set, you ignore one this important character of your data and also your problem.
I strongly recommend to continue with the unbalanced data-set and handle it by choosing an appropriate loss function and evaluation method.
Disclaimer:
If you use python, PyCM module can help you to find out these metrics.
Here is a simple code to get the recommended parameters from this module:
>>> from pycm import *
>>> cm = ConfusionMatrix(matrix={"Class1": {"Class1": 1, "Class2":2}, "Class2": {"Class1": 0, "Class2": 5}})
>>> print(cm.recommended_list)
["Kappa", "SOA1(Landis & Koch)", "SOA2(Fleiss)", "SOA3(Altman)", "SOA4(Cicchetti)", "CEN", "MCEN", "MCC", "J", "Overall J", "Overall MCC", "Overall CEN", "Overall MCEN", "AUC", "AUCI", "G", "DP", "DPI", "GI"]
After that, each of these parameters you want to use as the loss function can be used as follows:
>>> y_pred = model.predict #the prediction of the implemented model
>>> y_actu = data.target #data labels
>>> cm = ConfusionMatrix(y_actu, y_pred)
>>> loss = cm.Kappa #or any other parameter (Example: cm.SOA1)
$endgroup$
When you uniformly take samples from a society, definitely chance of selecting from cities is directly related to their population. Therefore, more users will be selected from more populous cities and it's one of the most important characters of the problem you trying to solve. I think if you want to balance the data-set, you ignore one this important character of your data and also your problem.
I strongly recommend to continue with the unbalanced data-set and handle it by choosing an appropriate loss function and evaluation method.
Disclaimer:
If you use python, PyCM module can help you to find out these metrics.
Here is a simple code to get the recommended parameters from this module:
>>> from pycm import *
>>> cm = ConfusionMatrix(matrix={"Class1": {"Class1": 1, "Class2":2}, "Class2": {"Class1": 0, "Class2": 5}})
>>> print(cm.recommended_list)
["Kappa", "SOA1(Landis & Koch)", "SOA2(Fleiss)", "SOA3(Altman)", "SOA4(Cicchetti)", "CEN", "MCEN", "MCC", "J", "Overall J", "Overall MCC", "Overall CEN", "Overall MCEN", "AUC", "AUCI", "G", "DP", "DPI", "GI"]
After that, each of these parameters you want to use as the loss function can be used as follows:
>>> y_pred = model.predict #the prediction of the implemented model
>>> y_actu = data.target #data labels
>>> cm = ConfusionMatrix(y_actu, y_pred)
>>> loss = cm.Kappa #or any other parameter (Example: cm.SOA1)
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Alireza ZolanvariAlireza Zolanvari
19114
19114
add a comment |
add a comment |
Mert Metin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mert Metin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mert Metin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mert Metin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47356%2fwhat-is-the-best-way-to-organize-the-datasets-for-my-task%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown