Optimising a list searching algorithm
$begingroup$
I've created the following code to try and find the optimum "diet" from a game called Eco. The maximum amount of calories you can have is 3000, as shown with MAXCALORIES.
Is there any way to make this code faster, since the time predicted for this code to compute 3000 calories is well over a few hundred years.
Note: I am trying to find the highest SP (skill points) you get from a diet, the optimum diet. To find this, I must go through every combination of diets and check how many skill points you receive through using it. The order of food does not matter, and I feel this is something that is slowing this program down.
import itertools
import sys
import time
sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)
#["Name/Carbs/Protein/Fat/Vitamins/Calories"]
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
global AllSP, AllNames
AllSP =
AllNames =
def findcombs(totalNames, totalCarbs, totalProtein, totalFat, totalVitamins, totalNutrients, totalCalories, MAXCALORIES):
doneit = False
for each in available:
each = each.split("/")
name = each[0]
carbs = float(each[1])
protein = float(each[2])
fat = float(each[3])
vitamins = float(each[4])
nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins
calories = float(each[5])
# print(totalNames, totalCalories, calories, each)
if sum(totalCalories)+calories <= MAXCALORIES:
doneit = True
totalNames2 = totalNames[::]
totalCarbs2 = totalCarbs[::]
totalProtein2 = totalProtein[::]
totalFat2 = totalFat[::]
totalVitamins2 = totalVitamins[::]
totalCalories2 = totalCalories[::]
totalNutrients2 = totalNutrients[::]
totalNames2.append(name)
totalCarbs2.append(carbs)
totalProtein2.append(protein)
totalFat2.append(fat)
totalVitamins2.append(vitamins)
totalCalories2.append(calories)
totalNutrients2.append(nutrients)
# print(" ", totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2)
findcombs(totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2, MAXCALORIES)
else:
#find SP
try:
carbs = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalCarbs)]) / sum(totalCalories)
protein = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalProtein)]) / sum(totalCalories)
fat = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalFat)]) / sum(totalCalories)
vitamins = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalVitamins)]) / sum(totalCalories)
balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max([carbs,protein,fat,vitamins]))
thisSP = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalNutrients)]) / sum(totalCalories) * balance + 12
except:
thisSP = 0
#add SP and names to two lists
AllSP.append(thisSP)
AllNames.append(totalNames)
def main(MAXCALORIES):
findcombs(, , , , , , , MAXCALORIES)
index = AllSP.index(max(AllSP))
print()
print(AllSP[index], " ", AllNames[index])
for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
main(i)
print("Calories:", i, ">>> Time:", time.time()-start)
Edit: On request, here is the formula for calculating the SP
Carbs = (amount1*calories1*carbs1 + ...) / (amount1*calories1 + ...)
(N1*C1) + (N2*C2)
SP = ---------------- x Balance + Base Gain
C1+C2
^^ Where N is the nutrients of the food (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins), and C is the calories of the food
Base Gain = 12 (Always 12)
Balance = Sum Nutrients / (2 * highest nutrition)
python performance python-3.x
New contributor
$endgroup$
|
show 10 more comments
$begingroup$
I've created the following code to try and find the optimum "diet" from a game called Eco. The maximum amount of calories you can have is 3000, as shown with MAXCALORIES.
Is there any way to make this code faster, since the time predicted for this code to compute 3000 calories is well over a few hundred years.
Note: I am trying to find the highest SP (skill points) you get from a diet, the optimum diet. To find this, I must go through every combination of diets and check how many skill points you receive through using it. The order of food does not matter, and I feel this is something that is slowing this program down.
import itertools
import sys
import time
sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)
#["Name/Carbs/Protein/Fat/Vitamins/Calories"]
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
global AllSP, AllNames
AllSP =
AllNames =
def findcombs(totalNames, totalCarbs, totalProtein, totalFat, totalVitamins, totalNutrients, totalCalories, MAXCALORIES):
doneit = False
for each in available:
each = each.split("/")
name = each[0]
carbs = float(each[1])
protein = float(each[2])
fat = float(each[3])
vitamins = float(each[4])
nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins
calories = float(each[5])
# print(totalNames, totalCalories, calories, each)
if sum(totalCalories)+calories <= MAXCALORIES:
doneit = True
totalNames2 = totalNames[::]
totalCarbs2 = totalCarbs[::]
totalProtein2 = totalProtein[::]
totalFat2 = totalFat[::]
totalVitamins2 = totalVitamins[::]
totalCalories2 = totalCalories[::]
totalNutrients2 = totalNutrients[::]
totalNames2.append(name)
totalCarbs2.append(carbs)
totalProtein2.append(protein)
totalFat2.append(fat)
totalVitamins2.append(vitamins)
totalCalories2.append(calories)
totalNutrients2.append(nutrients)
# print(" ", totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2)
findcombs(totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2, MAXCALORIES)
else:
#find SP
try:
carbs = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalCarbs)]) / sum(totalCalories)
protein = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalProtein)]) / sum(totalCalories)
fat = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalFat)]) / sum(totalCalories)
vitamins = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalVitamins)]) / sum(totalCalories)
balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max([carbs,protein,fat,vitamins]))
thisSP = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalNutrients)]) / sum(totalCalories) * balance + 12
except:
thisSP = 0
#add SP and names to two lists
AllSP.append(thisSP)
AllNames.append(totalNames)
def main(MAXCALORIES):
findcombs(, , , , , , , MAXCALORIES)
index = AllSP.index(max(AllSP))
print()
print(AllSP[index], " ", AllNames[index])
for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
main(i)
print("Calories:", i, ">>> Time:", time.time()-start)
Edit: On request, here is the formula for calculating the SP
Carbs = (amount1*calories1*carbs1 + ...) / (amount1*calories1 + ...)
(N1*C1) + (N2*C2)
SP = ---------------- x Balance + Base Gain
C1+C2
^^ Where N is the nutrients of the food (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins), and C is the calories of the food
Base Gain = 12 (Always 12)
Balance = Sum Nutrients / (2 * highest nutrition)
python performance python-3.x
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
$endgroup$
– Peilonrayz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-initertools.combinations
.
$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can you edit your question to describe the exact mathematical relationship between a set of foods and their computedthisSP
value?
$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
|
show 10 more comments
$begingroup$
I've created the following code to try and find the optimum "diet" from a game called Eco. The maximum amount of calories you can have is 3000, as shown with MAXCALORIES.
Is there any way to make this code faster, since the time predicted for this code to compute 3000 calories is well over a few hundred years.
Note: I am trying to find the highest SP (skill points) you get from a diet, the optimum diet. To find this, I must go through every combination of diets and check how many skill points you receive through using it. The order of food does not matter, and I feel this is something that is slowing this program down.
import itertools
import sys
import time
sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)
#["Name/Carbs/Protein/Fat/Vitamins/Calories"]
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
global AllSP, AllNames
AllSP =
AllNames =
def findcombs(totalNames, totalCarbs, totalProtein, totalFat, totalVitamins, totalNutrients, totalCalories, MAXCALORIES):
doneit = False
for each in available:
each = each.split("/")
name = each[0]
carbs = float(each[1])
protein = float(each[2])
fat = float(each[3])
vitamins = float(each[4])
nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins
calories = float(each[5])
# print(totalNames, totalCalories, calories, each)
if sum(totalCalories)+calories <= MAXCALORIES:
doneit = True
totalNames2 = totalNames[::]
totalCarbs2 = totalCarbs[::]
totalProtein2 = totalProtein[::]
totalFat2 = totalFat[::]
totalVitamins2 = totalVitamins[::]
totalCalories2 = totalCalories[::]
totalNutrients2 = totalNutrients[::]
totalNames2.append(name)
totalCarbs2.append(carbs)
totalProtein2.append(protein)
totalFat2.append(fat)
totalVitamins2.append(vitamins)
totalCalories2.append(calories)
totalNutrients2.append(nutrients)
# print(" ", totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2)
findcombs(totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2, MAXCALORIES)
else:
#find SP
try:
carbs = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalCarbs)]) / sum(totalCalories)
protein = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalProtein)]) / sum(totalCalories)
fat = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalFat)]) / sum(totalCalories)
vitamins = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalVitamins)]) / sum(totalCalories)
balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max([carbs,protein,fat,vitamins]))
thisSP = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalNutrients)]) / sum(totalCalories) * balance + 12
except:
thisSP = 0
#add SP and names to two lists
AllSP.append(thisSP)
AllNames.append(totalNames)
def main(MAXCALORIES):
findcombs(, , , , , , , MAXCALORIES)
index = AllSP.index(max(AllSP))
print()
print(AllSP[index], " ", AllNames[index])
for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
main(i)
print("Calories:", i, ">>> Time:", time.time()-start)
Edit: On request, here is the formula for calculating the SP
Carbs = (amount1*calories1*carbs1 + ...) / (amount1*calories1 + ...)
(N1*C1) + (N2*C2)
SP = ---------------- x Balance + Base Gain
C1+C2
^^ Where N is the nutrients of the food (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins), and C is the calories of the food
Base Gain = 12 (Always 12)
Balance = Sum Nutrients / (2 * highest nutrition)
python performance python-3.x
New contributor
$endgroup$
I've created the following code to try and find the optimum "diet" from a game called Eco. The maximum amount of calories you can have is 3000, as shown with MAXCALORIES.
Is there any way to make this code faster, since the time predicted for this code to compute 3000 calories is well over a few hundred years.
Note: I am trying to find the highest SP (skill points) you get from a diet, the optimum diet. To find this, I must go through every combination of diets and check how many skill points you receive through using it. The order of food does not matter, and I feel this is something that is slowing this program down.
import itertools
import sys
import time
sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)
#["Name/Carbs/Protein/Fat/Vitamins/Calories"]
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
global AllSP, AllNames
AllSP =
AllNames =
def findcombs(totalNames, totalCarbs, totalProtein, totalFat, totalVitamins, totalNutrients, totalCalories, MAXCALORIES):
doneit = False
for each in available:
each = each.split("/")
name = each[0]
carbs = float(each[1])
protein = float(each[2])
fat = float(each[3])
vitamins = float(each[4])
nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins
calories = float(each[5])
# print(totalNames, totalCalories, calories, each)
if sum(totalCalories)+calories <= MAXCALORIES:
doneit = True
totalNames2 = totalNames[::]
totalCarbs2 = totalCarbs[::]
totalProtein2 = totalProtein[::]
totalFat2 = totalFat[::]
totalVitamins2 = totalVitamins[::]
totalCalories2 = totalCalories[::]
totalNutrients2 = totalNutrients[::]
totalNames2.append(name)
totalCarbs2.append(carbs)
totalProtein2.append(protein)
totalFat2.append(fat)
totalVitamins2.append(vitamins)
totalCalories2.append(calories)
totalNutrients2.append(nutrients)
# print(" ", totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2)
findcombs(totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2, MAXCALORIES)
else:
#find SP
try:
carbs = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalCarbs)]) / sum(totalCalories)
protein = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalProtein)]) / sum(totalCalories)
fat = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalFat)]) / sum(totalCalories)
vitamins = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalVitamins)]) / sum(totalCalories)
balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max([carbs,protein,fat,vitamins]))
thisSP = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalNutrients)]) / sum(totalCalories) * balance + 12
except:
thisSP = 0
#add SP and names to two lists
AllSP.append(thisSP)
AllNames.append(totalNames)
def main(MAXCALORIES):
findcombs(, , , , , , , MAXCALORIES)
index = AllSP.index(max(AllSP))
print()
print(AllSP[index], " ", AllNames[index])
for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
main(i)
print("Calories:", i, ">>> Time:", time.time()-start)
Edit: On request, here is the formula for calculating the SP
Carbs = (amount1*calories1*carbs1 + ...) / (amount1*calories1 + ...)
(N1*C1) + (N2*C2)
SP = ---------------- x Balance + Base Gain
C1+C2
^^ Where N is the nutrients of the food (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins), and C is the calories of the food
Base Gain = 12 (Always 12)
Balance = Sum Nutrients / (2 * highest nutrition)
python performance python-3.x
python performance python-3.x
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
Ruler Of The World
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
Ruler Of The WorldRuler Of The World
1116
1116
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
$endgroup$
– Peilonrayz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-initertools.combinations
.
$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can you edit your question to describe the exact mathematical relationship between a set of foods and their computedthisSP
value?
$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
|
show 10 more comments
$begingroup$
I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
$endgroup$
– Peilonrayz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-initertools.combinations
.
$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can you edit your question to describe the exact mathematical relationship between a set of foods and their computedthisSP
value?
$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
$endgroup$
– Peilonrayz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
$endgroup$
– Peilonrayz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-in
itertools.combinations
.$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-in
itertools.combinations
.$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can you edit your question to describe the exact mathematical relationship between a set of foods and their computed
thisSP
value?$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can you edit your question to describe the exact mathematical relationship between a set of foods and their computed
thisSP
value?$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
|
show 10 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Global variables are bad. Don't use them. I have to spend a long while looking at your code to tell what uses them and when. When your code becomes hundreds of lines long this is tedious and unmaintainable.
If you need to use recursion and add to something not in the recursive function use a closure.
You should load
available
into an object, rather than extract the information from it each and every time you use it.- Using the above you can simplify all your
totalNames
,totalCarbs
into one list. - Rather than using
AllSP
andAllNames
you can add a tuple to one list. - You should put all your code into a
main
so that you reduce the amount of variables in the global scope. This goes hand in hand with (1). - Rather than copying and pasting the same line multiple times you can create a function.
All this gets the following. Which should be easier for you to increase the performance from:
import itertools
import sys
import time
import collections
sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)
_Food = collections.namedtuple('Food', 'name carbs protein fat vitamins calories')
class Food(_Food):
@property
def nutrients(self):
return sum(self[1:5])
def read_foods(foods):
for food in foods:
name, *other = food.split('/')
yield Food(name, *[float(v) for v in other])
def tot_avg(food, attr):
return (
sum(f.calories * getattr(f, attr) for f in food)
/ sum(f.calories for f in food)
)
def find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES):
all_combinations =
def inner(total):
for food in available:
total_calories = [f.calories for f in total]
if sum(total_calories) + food.calories <= MAXCALORIES:
inner(total[:] + [food], MAXCALORIES)
else:
nutrients = [
tot_avg(total, 'carbs'),
tot_avg(total, 'protein'),
tot_avg(total, 'fat'),
tot_avg(total, 'vitamins')
]
balance = sum(nutrients) / 2 / max(nutrients)
sp = tot_avg(total, 'nutrients') * balance + 12
all_combinations.append((sp, total))
inner()
return all_combinations
def main(available):
for MAXCALORIES in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
all_ = findcombs(available, MAXCALORIES)
amount, foods = max(all_, key=lambda i: i[0])
print(amount, ' ', [f.name for f in foods])
print('Calories:', i, '>>> Time:', time.time()-start)
if __name__ == '__main__':
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
main(list(read_foods(available)))
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
59 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Data representation
Your choice of data representation is curious. It's a middle ground between a fully-serialized text format and a fully-deserialized in-memory format (such as nested tuples or dictionaries). I'd offer that it's not as good as either of the above. If you're going for micro-optimization, you need to do "pre-deserialized" literal variable initialization that doesn't require parsing at all. The best option would probably be named tuples or even plain tuples, i.e.
available = (
('Fiddleheads', 3, 1, 0, 3, 80),
# ...
)
But this won't yield any noticeable benefit, and it's not as maintainable as the alternative: just write a CSV file.
main isn't main
You've written a main
function that isn't actually top-level code. This is not advisable. Rename it to something else, and put your top-level code in an actual main function, called from global scope with a standard if __name__ == '__main__'
check.
list duplication
This:
totalNames[::]
should simply be
list(totalNames)
snake_case
Your names should follow the format total_names
, rather than totalNames
.
Also, variables in global scope (i.e. AllSP
) should be all-caps; and you shouldn't need to declare them global
.
I'm going to do some reading and see what you're doing in terms of algorithm and submit a second answer to suggest a saner one.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Ruler Of The World is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215626%2foptimising-a-list-searching-algorithm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Global variables are bad. Don't use them. I have to spend a long while looking at your code to tell what uses them and when. When your code becomes hundreds of lines long this is tedious and unmaintainable.
If you need to use recursion and add to something not in the recursive function use a closure.
You should load
available
into an object, rather than extract the information from it each and every time you use it.- Using the above you can simplify all your
totalNames
,totalCarbs
into one list. - Rather than using
AllSP
andAllNames
you can add a tuple to one list. - You should put all your code into a
main
so that you reduce the amount of variables in the global scope. This goes hand in hand with (1). - Rather than copying and pasting the same line multiple times you can create a function.
All this gets the following. Which should be easier for you to increase the performance from:
import itertools
import sys
import time
import collections
sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)
_Food = collections.namedtuple('Food', 'name carbs protein fat vitamins calories')
class Food(_Food):
@property
def nutrients(self):
return sum(self[1:5])
def read_foods(foods):
for food in foods:
name, *other = food.split('/')
yield Food(name, *[float(v) for v in other])
def tot_avg(food, attr):
return (
sum(f.calories * getattr(f, attr) for f in food)
/ sum(f.calories for f in food)
)
def find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES):
all_combinations =
def inner(total):
for food in available:
total_calories = [f.calories for f in total]
if sum(total_calories) + food.calories <= MAXCALORIES:
inner(total[:] + [food], MAXCALORIES)
else:
nutrients = [
tot_avg(total, 'carbs'),
tot_avg(total, 'protein'),
tot_avg(total, 'fat'),
tot_avg(total, 'vitamins')
]
balance = sum(nutrients) / 2 / max(nutrients)
sp = tot_avg(total, 'nutrients') * balance + 12
all_combinations.append((sp, total))
inner()
return all_combinations
def main(available):
for MAXCALORIES in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
all_ = findcombs(available, MAXCALORIES)
amount, foods = max(all_, key=lambda i: i[0])
print(amount, ' ', [f.name for f in foods])
print('Calories:', i, '>>> Time:', time.time()-start)
if __name__ == '__main__':
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
main(list(read_foods(available)))
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
59 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Global variables are bad. Don't use them. I have to spend a long while looking at your code to tell what uses them and when. When your code becomes hundreds of lines long this is tedious and unmaintainable.
If you need to use recursion and add to something not in the recursive function use a closure.
You should load
available
into an object, rather than extract the information from it each and every time you use it.- Using the above you can simplify all your
totalNames
,totalCarbs
into one list. - Rather than using
AllSP
andAllNames
you can add a tuple to one list. - You should put all your code into a
main
so that you reduce the amount of variables in the global scope. This goes hand in hand with (1). - Rather than copying and pasting the same line multiple times you can create a function.
All this gets the following. Which should be easier for you to increase the performance from:
import itertools
import sys
import time
import collections
sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)
_Food = collections.namedtuple('Food', 'name carbs protein fat vitamins calories')
class Food(_Food):
@property
def nutrients(self):
return sum(self[1:5])
def read_foods(foods):
for food in foods:
name, *other = food.split('/')
yield Food(name, *[float(v) for v in other])
def tot_avg(food, attr):
return (
sum(f.calories * getattr(f, attr) for f in food)
/ sum(f.calories for f in food)
)
def find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES):
all_combinations =
def inner(total):
for food in available:
total_calories = [f.calories for f in total]
if sum(total_calories) + food.calories <= MAXCALORIES:
inner(total[:] + [food], MAXCALORIES)
else:
nutrients = [
tot_avg(total, 'carbs'),
tot_avg(total, 'protein'),
tot_avg(total, 'fat'),
tot_avg(total, 'vitamins')
]
balance = sum(nutrients) / 2 / max(nutrients)
sp = tot_avg(total, 'nutrients') * balance + 12
all_combinations.append((sp, total))
inner()
return all_combinations
def main(available):
for MAXCALORIES in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
all_ = findcombs(available, MAXCALORIES)
amount, foods = max(all_, key=lambda i: i[0])
print(amount, ' ', [f.name for f in foods])
print('Calories:', i, '>>> Time:', time.time()-start)
if __name__ == '__main__':
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
main(list(read_foods(available)))
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
59 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Global variables are bad. Don't use them. I have to spend a long while looking at your code to tell what uses them and when. When your code becomes hundreds of lines long this is tedious and unmaintainable.
If you need to use recursion and add to something not in the recursive function use a closure.
You should load
available
into an object, rather than extract the information from it each and every time you use it.- Using the above you can simplify all your
totalNames
,totalCarbs
into one list. - Rather than using
AllSP
andAllNames
you can add a tuple to one list. - You should put all your code into a
main
so that you reduce the amount of variables in the global scope. This goes hand in hand with (1). - Rather than copying and pasting the same line multiple times you can create a function.
All this gets the following. Which should be easier for you to increase the performance from:
import itertools
import sys
import time
import collections
sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)
_Food = collections.namedtuple('Food', 'name carbs protein fat vitamins calories')
class Food(_Food):
@property
def nutrients(self):
return sum(self[1:5])
def read_foods(foods):
for food in foods:
name, *other = food.split('/')
yield Food(name, *[float(v) for v in other])
def tot_avg(food, attr):
return (
sum(f.calories * getattr(f, attr) for f in food)
/ sum(f.calories for f in food)
)
def find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES):
all_combinations =
def inner(total):
for food in available:
total_calories = [f.calories for f in total]
if sum(total_calories) + food.calories <= MAXCALORIES:
inner(total[:] + [food], MAXCALORIES)
else:
nutrients = [
tot_avg(total, 'carbs'),
tot_avg(total, 'protein'),
tot_avg(total, 'fat'),
tot_avg(total, 'vitamins')
]
balance = sum(nutrients) / 2 / max(nutrients)
sp = tot_avg(total, 'nutrients') * balance + 12
all_combinations.append((sp, total))
inner()
return all_combinations
def main(available):
for MAXCALORIES in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
all_ = findcombs(available, MAXCALORIES)
amount, foods = max(all_, key=lambda i: i[0])
print(amount, ' ', [f.name for f in foods])
print('Calories:', i, '>>> Time:', time.time()-start)
if __name__ == '__main__':
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
main(list(read_foods(available)))
$endgroup$
Global variables are bad. Don't use them. I have to spend a long while looking at your code to tell what uses them and when. When your code becomes hundreds of lines long this is tedious and unmaintainable.
If you need to use recursion and add to something not in the recursive function use a closure.
You should load
available
into an object, rather than extract the information from it each and every time you use it.- Using the above you can simplify all your
totalNames
,totalCarbs
into one list. - Rather than using
AllSP
andAllNames
you can add a tuple to one list. - You should put all your code into a
main
so that you reduce the amount of variables in the global scope. This goes hand in hand with (1). - Rather than copying and pasting the same line multiple times you can create a function.
All this gets the following. Which should be easier for you to increase the performance from:
import itertools
import sys
import time
import collections
sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)
_Food = collections.namedtuple('Food', 'name carbs protein fat vitamins calories')
class Food(_Food):
@property
def nutrients(self):
return sum(self[1:5])
def read_foods(foods):
for food in foods:
name, *other = food.split('/')
yield Food(name, *[float(v) for v in other])
def tot_avg(food, attr):
return (
sum(f.calories * getattr(f, attr) for f in food)
/ sum(f.calories for f in food)
)
def find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES):
all_combinations =
def inner(total):
for food in available:
total_calories = [f.calories for f in total]
if sum(total_calories) + food.calories <= MAXCALORIES:
inner(total[:] + [food], MAXCALORIES)
else:
nutrients = [
tot_avg(total, 'carbs'),
tot_avg(total, 'protein'),
tot_avg(total, 'fat'),
tot_avg(total, 'vitamins')
]
balance = sum(nutrients) / 2 / max(nutrients)
sp = tot_avg(total, 'nutrients') * balance + 12
all_combinations.append((sp, total))
inner()
return all_combinations
def main(available):
for MAXCALORIES in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
all_ = findcombs(available, MAXCALORIES)
amount, foods = max(all_, key=lambda i: i[0])
print(amount, ' ', [f.name for f in foods])
print('Calories:', i, '>>> Time:', time.time()-start)
if __name__ == '__main__':
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
main(list(read_foods(available)))
answered 40 mins ago
PeilonrayzPeilonrayz
25.9k338109
25.9k338109
$begingroup$
I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
59 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
59 secs ago
$begingroup$
I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
59 secs ago
$begingroup$
I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
59 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Data representation
Your choice of data representation is curious. It's a middle ground between a fully-serialized text format and a fully-deserialized in-memory format (such as nested tuples or dictionaries). I'd offer that it's not as good as either of the above. If you're going for micro-optimization, you need to do "pre-deserialized" literal variable initialization that doesn't require parsing at all. The best option would probably be named tuples or even plain tuples, i.e.
available = (
('Fiddleheads', 3, 1, 0, 3, 80),
# ...
)
But this won't yield any noticeable benefit, and it's not as maintainable as the alternative: just write a CSV file.
main isn't main
You've written a main
function that isn't actually top-level code. This is not advisable. Rename it to something else, and put your top-level code in an actual main function, called from global scope with a standard if __name__ == '__main__'
check.
list duplication
This:
totalNames[::]
should simply be
list(totalNames)
snake_case
Your names should follow the format total_names
, rather than totalNames
.
Also, variables in global scope (i.e. AllSP
) should be all-caps; and you shouldn't need to declare them global
.
I'm going to do some reading and see what you're doing in terms of algorithm and submit a second answer to suggest a saner one.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Data representation
Your choice of data representation is curious. It's a middle ground between a fully-serialized text format and a fully-deserialized in-memory format (such as nested tuples or dictionaries). I'd offer that it's not as good as either of the above. If you're going for micro-optimization, you need to do "pre-deserialized" literal variable initialization that doesn't require parsing at all. The best option would probably be named tuples or even plain tuples, i.e.
available = (
('Fiddleheads', 3, 1, 0, 3, 80),
# ...
)
But this won't yield any noticeable benefit, and it's not as maintainable as the alternative: just write a CSV file.
main isn't main
You've written a main
function that isn't actually top-level code. This is not advisable. Rename it to something else, and put your top-level code in an actual main function, called from global scope with a standard if __name__ == '__main__'
check.
list duplication
This:
totalNames[::]
should simply be
list(totalNames)
snake_case
Your names should follow the format total_names
, rather than totalNames
.
Also, variables in global scope (i.e. AllSP
) should be all-caps; and you shouldn't need to declare them global
.
I'm going to do some reading and see what you're doing in terms of algorithm and submit a second answer to suggest a saner one.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Data representation
Your choice of data representation is curious. It's a middle ground between a fully-serialized text format and a fully-deserialized in-memory format (such as nested tuples or dictionaries). I'd offer that it's not as good as either of the above. If you're going for micro-optimization, you need to do "pre-deserialized" literal variable initialization that doesn't require parsing at all. The best option would probably be named tuples or even plain tuples, i.e.
available = (
('Fiddleheads', 3, 1, 0, 3, 80),
# ...
)
But this won't yield any noticeable benefit, and it's not as maintainable as the alternative: just write a CSV file.
main isn't main
You've written a main
function that isn't actually top-level code. This is not advisable. Rename it to something else, and put your top-level code in an actual main function, called from global scope with a standard if __name__ == '__main__'
check.
list duplication
This:
totalNames[::]
should simply be
list(totalNames)
snake_case
Your names should follow the format total_names
, rather than totalNames
.
Also, variables in global scope (i.e. AllSP
) should be all-caps; and you shouldn't need to declare them global
.
I'm going to do some reading and see what you're doing in terms of algorithm and submit a second answer to suggest a saner one.
$endgroup$
Data representation
Your choice of data representation is curious. It's a middle ground between a fully-serialized text format and a fully-deserialized in-memory format (such as nested tuples or dictionaries). I'd offer that it's not as good as either of the above. If you're going for micro-optimization, you need to do "pre-deserialized" literal variable initialization that doesn't require parsing at all. The best option would probably be named tuples or even plain tuples, i.e.
available = (
('Fiddleheads', 3, 1, 0, 3, 80),
# ...
)
But this won't yield any noticeable benefit, and it's not as maintainable as the alternative: just write a CSV file.
main isn't main
You've written a main
function that isn't actually top-level code. This is not advisable. Rename it to something else, and put your top-level code in an actual main function, called from global scope with a standard if __name__ == '__main__'
check.
list duplication
This:
totalNames[::]
should simply be
list(totalNames)
snake_case
Your names should follow the format total_names
, rather than totalNames
.
Also, variables in global scope (i.e. AllSP
) should be all-caps; and you shouldn't need to declare them global
.
I'm going to do some reading and see what you're doing in terms of algorithm and submit a second answer to suggest a saner one.
answered 3 hours ago
ReinderienReinderien
4,250822
4,250822
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
$endgroup$
– greybeard
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Ruler Of The World is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ruler Of The World is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ruler Of The World is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ruler Of The World is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215626%2foptimising-a-list-searching-algorithm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
$endgroup$
– Peilonrayz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-in
itertools.combinations
.$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can you edit your question to describe the exact mathematical relationship between a set of foods and their computed
thisSP
value?$endgroup$
– Reinderien
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
2 hours ago