Tikz picture of two mathematical functions












1















I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}

begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]

addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));

addplot[red,  ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);

end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?






tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    7 hours ago
















1















I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}

begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]

addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));

addplot[red,  ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);

end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?






tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    7 hours ago














1












1








1


0






I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}

begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]

addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));

addplot[red,  ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);

end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?






tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica







share|improve this question














I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}

begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]

addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));

addplot[red,  ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);

end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?






tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica




tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 7 hours ago









MarkMark

20216




20216








  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    7 hours ago














  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    7 hours ago








1




1





Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

– marmot
7 hours ago





Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

– marmot
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6














The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage{pgfplots}

pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

 begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},

 ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]

  addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

 end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    6 hours ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479823%2ftikz-picture-of-two-mathematical-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage{pgfplots}

pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

 begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},

 ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]

  addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

 end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    6 hours ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago
















6














The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage{pgfplots}

pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

 begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},

 ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]

  addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

 end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    6 hours ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago














6












6








6







The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage{pgfplots}

pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

 begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},

 ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]

  addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

 end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage{pgfplots}

pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

 begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},

 ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]

  addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

 end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago

























answered 7 hours ago









marmotmarmot

109k5133252




109k5133252













  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    6 hours ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago



















  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    6 hours ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago

















Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

– Mark
6 hours ago





Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

– Mark
6 hours ago













@Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

– marmot
3 hours ago





@Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

– marmot
3 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479823%2ftikz-picture-of-two-mathematical-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How to label and detect the document text images

Image
1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
Read more

Vallis Paradisi

Image
Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
Read more

Tabula Rosettana

Image
Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
Read more