Is there a defined priority for pattern matching?












3












$begingroup$


If you define a function g, like so:



g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"    

g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"


why will Mathematica always return g[2] == "Even", even though NumberQ[2] == True?



More specifically, is there a defined order in which Mathematica will try to match function cases? Does it evaluate the most specific match first?






pattern-matching expression-test







share|improve this question









New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That's right---fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – wgoodall01
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    31 mins ago
















3












$begingroup$


If you define a function g, like so:



g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"    

g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"


why will Mathematica always return g[2] == "Even", even though NumberQ[2] == True?



More specifically, is there a defined order in which Mathematica will try to match function cases? Does it evaluate the most specific match first?






pattern-matching expression-test







share|improve this question









New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That's right---fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – wgoodall01
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    31 mins ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


If you define a function g, like so:



g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"    

g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"


why will Mathematica always return g[2] == "Even", even though NumberQ[2] == True?



More specifically, is there a defined order in which Mathematica will try to match function cases? Does it evaluate the most specific match first?






pattern-matching expression-test







share|improve this question









New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




If you define a function g, like so:



g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"    

g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"


why will Mathematica always return g[2] == "Even", even though NumberQ[2] == True?



More specifically, is there a defined order in which Mathematica will try to match function cases? Does it evaluate the most specific match first?






pattern-matching expression-test




pattern-matching expression-test






share|improve this question









New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







wgoodall01













New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









wgoodall01wgoodall01

1185




1185




New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That's right---fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – wgoodall01
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    31 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That's right---fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – wgoodall01
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    31 mins ago
















$begingroup$
g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
$endgroup$
– J. M. is computer-less♦
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
$endgroup$
– J. M. is computer-less♦
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
That's right---fixed.
$endgroup$
– wgoodall01
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
That's right---fixed.
$endgroup$
– wgoodall01
1 hour ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is computer-less♦
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is computer-less♦
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Roman
31 mins ago




$begingroup$
Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Roman
31 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

TheOrderingOfDefinitions




  • ... The Wolfram System follows the principle of trying to put more general definitions after more specific ones. This means that special cases of rules are typically tried before more general cases.

  • Although in many practical cases, the Wolfram System can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated /; conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, the Wolfram System stores rules in the order you give them.




ClearAll[g]

g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"

g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"

g /@ {1, 2}



{"number", "even"}




ClearAll[h]

h[x_?NumberQ] := "number"

h[x_?EvenQ] := "even"

h /@ {1, 2}



{"number", "number"}







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    wgoodall01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192278%2fis-there-a-defined-priority-for-pattern-matching%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    TheOrderingOfDefinitions




    • ... The Wolfram System follows the principle of trying to put more general definitions after more specific ones. This means that special cases of rules are typically tried before more general cases.

    • Although in many practical cases, the Wolfram System can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated /; conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, the Wolfram System stores rules in the order you give them.




    ClearAll[g]
    
g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
    
g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
    
g /@ {1, 2}



    {"number", "even"}




    ClearAll[h]
    
h[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
    
h[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
    
h /@ {1, 2}



    {"number", "number"}







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      TheOrderingOfDefinitions




      • ... The Wolfram System follows the principle of trying to put more general definitions after more specific ones. This means that special cases of rules are typically tried before more general cases.

      • Although in many practical cases, the Wolfram System can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated /; conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, the Wolfram System stores rules in the order you give them.




      ClearAll[g]
      
g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
      
g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
      
g /@ {1, 2}



      {"number", "even"}




      ClearAll[h]
      
h[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
      
h[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
      
h /@ {1, 2}



      {"number", "number"}







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        TheOrderingOfDefinitions




        • ... The Wolfram System follows the principle of trying to put more general definitions after more specific ones. This means that special cases of rules are typically tried before more general cases.

        • Although in many practical cases, the Wolfram System can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated /; conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, the Wolfram System stores rules in the order you give them.




        ClearAll[g]
        
g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
        
g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
        
g /@ {1, 2}



        {"number", "even"}




        ClearAll[h]
        
h[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
        
h[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
        
h /@ {1, 2}



        {"number", "number"}







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        TheOrderingOfDefinitions




        • ... The Wolfram System follows the principle of trying to put more general definitions after more specific ones. This means that special cases of rules are typically tried before more general cases.

        • Although in many practical cases, the Wolfram System can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated /; conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, the Wolfram System stores rules in the order you give them.




        ClearAll[g]
        
g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
        
g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
        
g /@ {1, 2}



        {"number", "even"}




        ClearAll[h]
        
h[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
        
h[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
        
h /@ {1, 2}



        {"number", "number"}








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        kglrkglr

        186k10202421




        186k10202421






















            wgoodall01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            wgoodall01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            wgoodall01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            wgoodall01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192278%2fis-there-a-defined-priority-for-pattern-matching%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to label and detect the document text images

            Image
            1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
            Read more

            Vallis Paradisi

            Image
            Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
            Read more

            Tabula Rosettana

            Image
            Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
            Read more