Why did trackballs disappear?












19















For a desktop computer, a mouse is a great pointing device. For a laptop if you don't want an extra device to keep track of, you need an alternative. The options I'm aware of:




  1. Nub. Low-tech, cheap, compact and reliable, but miserably imprecise. Did they ever fix that? Is it even theoretically fixable or is it a limit on the precision of the human finger?

  2. Touchscreen. Looks great when an actor is using it for ten seconds in a movie, kills your shoulder when you try to do it all day in real life.

  3. Touchpad. It took a while to get the technology to work properly and even then it's awkward to use and takes up a lot of keyboard space. Modern laptops seem to have settled on it anyway, perhaps because it's thin?

  4. Trackball. Fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive.


Seems to me the trackball is the best option. Why didn't it become more widely used? I suppose it would have disappeared eventually because of increasingly strong manufacturer preference for thinness, but why wasn't it more widely used before that?










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    Nubs need periodic calibration for drift, but all modern ones do that whenever you take your finger off them for a moment. Other than that, I wouldn't describe them as imprecise. They're still in demand on business laptops. But further discussion's probably best saved for a separate question.

    – Kaz
    15 hours ago






  • 5





    Seems to me the trackball is the best option note that a nub can be installed so that it can be moved with your hands firmly placed in home row and your wrists on the palm rest. A trackball, less so.

    – Tobia Tesan
    11 hours ago






  • 2





    Modern user interfaces take advantage of track pads to provide more gestures than a trackball can easily provide. The same applies to mice too, of course.

    – JeremyP
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if I were to agree with you that trackballs are fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive, I would assume that for those properties to hold, the ball would have to be a certain size. I don't see how you'd fit that ball in my ~2.5cm 2010 macbook pro, let alone the more modern wafer size laptop. Besides, a trackball is just an upside down ball mouse right? So routinely you'll have to open it to clean the gunk off the rollers? Then you'd need a convenient way to pop the ball out of the body. A trackpad is not only thinner, but also screw/solder and forget without moving parts.

    – aktivb
    6 hours ago






  • 5





    If your main focus is on laptops, that should probably be in the title.

    – JPhi1618
    5 hours ago
















19















For a desktop computer, a mouse is a great pointing device. For a laptop if you don't want an extra device to keep track of, you need an alternative. The options I'm aware of:




  1. Nub. Low-tech, cheap, compact and reliable, but miserably imprecise. Did they ever fix that? Is it even theoretically fixable or is it a limit on the precision of the human finger?

  2. Touchscreen. Looks great when an actor is using it for ten seconds in a movie, kills your shoulder when you try to do it all day in real life.

  3. Touchpad. It took a while to get the technology to work properly and even then it's awkward to use and takes up a lot of keyboard space. Modern laptops seem to have settled on it anyway, perhaps because it's thin?

  4. Trackball. Fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive.


Seems to me the trackball is the best option. Why didn't it become more widely used? I suppose it would have disappeared eventually because of increasingly strong manufacturer preference for thinness, but why wasn't it more widely used before that?










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    Nubs need periodic calibration for drift, but all modern ones do that whenever you take your finger off them for a moment. Other than that, I wouldn't describe them as imprecise. They're still in demand on business laptops. But further discussion's probably best saved for a separate question.

    – Kaz
    15 hours ago






  • 5





    Seems to me the trackball is the best option note that a nub can be installed so that it can be moved with your hands firmly placed in home row and your wrists on the palm rest. A trackball, less so.

    – Tobia Tesan
    11 hours ago






  • 2





    Modern user interfaces take advantage of track pads to provide more gestures than a trackball can easily provide. The same applies to mice too, of course.

    – JeremyP
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if I were to agree with you that trackballs are fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive, I would assume that for those properties to hold, the ball would have to be a certain size. I don't see how you'd fit that ball in my ~2.5cm 2010 macbook pro, let alone the more modern wafer size laptop. Besides, a trackball is just an upside down ball mouse right? So routinely you'll have to open it to clean the gunk off the rollers? Then you'd need a convenient way to pop the ball out of the body. A trackpad is not only thinner, but also screw/solder and forget without moving parts.

    – aktivb
    6 hours ago






  • 5





    If your main focus is on laptops, that should probably be in the title.

    – JPhi1618
    5 hours ago














19












19








19


1






For a desktop computer, a mouse is a great pointing device. For a laptop if you don't want an extra device to keep track of, you need an alternative. The options I'm aware of:




  1. Nub. Low-tech, cheap, compact and reliable, but miserably imprecise. Did they ever fix that? Is it even theoretically fixable or is it a limit on the precision of the human finger?

  2. Touchscreen. Looks great when an actor is using it for ten seconds in a movie, kills your shoulder when you try to do it all day in real life.

  3. Touchpad. It took a while to get the technology to work properly and even then it's awkward to use and takes up a lot of keyboard space. Modern laptops seem to have settled on it anyway, perhaps because it's thin?

  4. Trackball. Fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive.


Seems to me the trackball is the best option. Why didn't it become more widely used? I suppose it would have disappeared eventually because of increasingly strong manufacturer preference for thinness, but why wasn't it more widely used before that?










share|improve this question
















For a desktop computer, a mouse is a great pointing device. For a laptop if you don't want an extra device to keep track of, you need an alternative. The options I'm aware of:




  1. Nub. Low-tech, cheap, compact and reliable, but miserably imprecise. Did they ever fix that? Is it even theoretically fixable or is it a limit on the precision of the human finger?

  2. Touchscreen. Looks great when an actor is using it for ten seconds in a movie, kills your shoulder when you try to do it all day in real life.

  3. Touchpad. It took a while to get the technology to work properly and even then it's awkward to use and takes up a lot of keyboard space. Modern laptops seem to have settled on it anyway, perhaps because it's thin?

  4. Trackball. Fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive.


Seems to me the trackball is the best option. Why didn't it become more widely used? I suppose it would have disappeared eventually because of increasingly strong manufacturer preference for thinness, but why wasn't it more widely used before that?







history hardware touchpad input-devices laptop






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









Michael Shopsin

968323




968323










asked 16 hours ago









rwallacerwallace

8,309341118




8,309341118








  • 4





    Nubs need periodic calibration for drift, but all modern ones do that whenever you take your finger off them for a moment. Other than that, I wouldn't describe them as imprecise. They're still in demand on business laptops. But further discussion's probably best saved for a separate question.

    – Kaz
    15 hours ago






  • 5





    Seems to me the trackball is the best option note that a nub can be installed so that it can be moved with your hands firmly placed in home row and your wrists on the palm rest. A trackball, less so.

    – Tobia Tesan
    11 hours ago






  • 2





    Modern user interfaces take advantage of track pads to provide more gestures than a trackball can easily provide. The same applies to mice too, of course.

    – JeremyP
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if I were to agree with you that trackballs are fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive, I would assume that for those properties to hold, the ball would have to be a certain size. I don't see how you'd fit that ball in my ~2.5cm 2010 macbook pro, let alone the more modern wafer size laptop. Besides, a trackball is just an upside down ball mouse right? So routinely you'll have to open it to clean the gunk off the rollers? Then you'd need a convenient way to pop the ball out of the body. A trackpad is not only thinner, but also screw/solder and forget without moving parts.

    – aktivb
    6 hours ago






  • 5





    If your main focus is on laptops, that should probably be in the title.

    – JPhi1618
    5 hours ago














  • 4





    Nubs need periodic calibration for drift, but all modern ones do that whenever you take your finger off them for a moment. Other than that, I wouldn't describe them as imprecise. They're still in demand on business laptops. But further discussion's probably best saved for a separate question.

    – Kaz
    15 hours ago






  • 5





    Seems to me the trackball is the best option note that a nub can be installed so that it can be moved with your hands firmly placed in home row and your wrists on the palm rest. A trackball, less so.

    – Tobia Tesan
    11 hours ago






  • 2





    Modern user interfaces take advantage of track pads to provide more gestures than a trackball can easily provide. The same applies to mice too, of course.

    – JeremyP
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if I were to agree with you that trackballs are fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive, I would assume that for those properties to hold, the ball would have to be a certain size. I don't see how you'd fit that ball in my ~2.5cm 2010 macbook pro, let alone the more modern wafer size laptop. Besides, a trackball is just an upside down ball mouse right? So routinely you'll have to open it to clean the gunk off the rollers? Then you'd need a convenient way to pop the ball out of the body. A trackpad is not only thinner, but also screw/solder and forget without moving parts.

    – aktivb
    6 hours ago






  • 5





    If your main focus is on laptops, that should probably be in the title.

    – JPhi1618
    5 hours ago








4




4





Nubs need periodic calibration for drift, but all modern ones do that whenever you take your finger off them for a moment. Other than that, I wouldn't describe them as imprecise. They're still in demand on business laptops. But further discussion's probably best saved for a separate question.

– Kaz
15 hours ago





Nubs need periodic calibration for drift, but all modern ones do that whenever you take your finger off them for a moment. Other than that, I wouldn't describe them as imprecise. They're still in demand on business laptops. But further discussion's probably best saved for a separate question.

– Kaz
15 hours ago




5




5





Seems to me the trackball is the best option note that a nub can be installed so that it can be moved with your hands firmly placed in home row and your wrists on the palm rest. A trackball, less so.

– Tobia Tesan
11 hours ago





Seems to me the trackball is the best option note that a nub can be installed so that it can be moved with your hands firmly placed in home row and your wrists on the palm rest. A trackball, less so.

– Tobia Tesan
11 hours ago




2




2





Modern user interfaces take advantage of track pads to provide more gestures than a trackball can easily provide. The same applies to mice too, of course.

– JeremyP
11 hours ago





Modern user interfaces take advantage of track pads to provide more gestures than a trackball can easily provide. The same applies to mice too, of course.

– JeremyP
11 hours ago




1




1





Even if I were to agree with you that trackballs are fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive, I would assume that for those properties to hold, the ball would have to be a certain size. I don't see how you'd fit that ball in my ~2.5cm 2010 macbook pro, let alone the more modern wafer size laptop. Besides, a trackball is just an upside down ball mouse right? So routinely you'll have to open it to clean the gunk off the rollers? Then you'd need a convenient way to pop the ball out of the body. A trackpad is not only thinner, but also screw/solder and forget without moving parts.

– aktivb
6 hours ago





Even if I were to agree with you that trackballs are fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive, I would assume that for those properties to hold, the ball would have to be a certain size. I don't see how you'd fit that ball in my ~2.5cm 2010 macbook pro, let alone the more modern wafer size laptop. Besides, a trackball is just an upside down ball mouse right? So routinely you'll have to open it to clean the gunk off the rollers? Then you'd need a convenient way to pop the ball out of the body. A trackpad is not only thinner, but also screw/solder and forget without moving parts.

– aktivb
6 hours ago




5




5





If your main focus is on laptops, that should probably be in the title.

– JPhi1618
5 hours ago





If your main focus is on laptops, that should probably be in the title.

– JPhi1618
5 hours ago










8 Answers
8






active

oldest

votes


















17















Why did trackballs disappear?




To start with, they didn't. They are still around and can be bought in many variations. Only their time attempting to work as a general pointing device is gone.




Nub. Low-tech, cheap, compact and reliable, but miserably imprecise. Did they ever fix that? Is it even theoretically fixable or is it a limit on the precision of the human finger?




The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed) so various driver profiles have been developed offering non-linear movement - this in turn is something not everyone can get along with - especially not at first.




Touchscreen. Looks great when an actor is using it for ten seconds in a movie, kills your shoulder when you try to do it all day in real life.




In fact, I really like it. Back in my Newton days I was constantly hitting the CRT to acknowledge some message box - until I spent a lot of money on an early touchscreen.




Touchpad. It took a while to get the technology to work properly and even then it's awkward to use and takes up a lot of keyboard space. Modern laptops seem to have settled on it anyway, perhaps because it's thin?




In part, but also because it's more natural (see below).




Trackball. Fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive.




If it's supposed to be fast and precise, it's anything but inexpensive.




Seems to me the trackball is the best option.




If you can handle it, then yes. For most people it doesn't work. At least not from the start. Computers have been optimized (or evolved) to provide a satisfying first-time user experience over an efficient long-time usage. Basically the same process that (almost) eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool, despite being in most situations faster and more exact than any pointing device.



It's all about the learning curve.



Humans pointing somewhere don't use their fingertip to waggle around, but the whole arm and hand, while the index finger is just, well, the tip. That's the way we are trained to do since being a toddler.



Reducing this to just forearm and hand, with the finger giving the affirmation is as well trained into our Motor Cortex. That's why most people get along with a mouse without much training. It also adds that the mouse is 'glued' to the hand, so no active control for repositioning needed.



A touchpad comes next, as it's still pointing with the finger, but a restriction of movement needs to be learned, as well as a way to handle repositioning, as there is no haptic feedback for this.



Even the Nub comes before the trackball, as it works by applying force in the direction one wants to move the cursor. As intuitive as a joystick, just a bit more delicate.



While the Trackball is an awesome device, once learned to use it, the learning curve is way steeper than with any of the others, as its handling goes against our natural movement.



So from a motoric point of view of an untrained person (beginner) the trackball comes last. This may be quite different, once time has been invested to learn to handle a trackball on an intuitive level. But that's not how everyday interfaces have been optimized. So track balls are, nowadays, back in the realm of experienced professionals.






share|improve this answer





















  • 8





    "... eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool" - it hasn't been eliminated, just renamed and redesigned as a "multi-button gaming mouse." :)

    – alephzero
    10 hours ago








  • 7





    Upvote for comparing first time usage with long term usage. Consumer acceptance is more about ease of learning than ease of use.

    – Walter Mitty
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    _"The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed)" - What do you mean with "no sense for urgency (speed)"? Do you mean they are binary on/off devices, offering no nuance between "cursor moving" and "cursor not moving"?

    – marcelm
    7 hours ago






  • 4





    In that case I completely disagree that this is generally the case. I have occasionally used those nubs on some 20-year old Toshiba laptops (something like a 470CDT), and they were definitely analog; without much practice I was able to crawl the cursor pixel by pixel by pushing gently, as well as move the cursor very quickly by pushing hard. In fact, although the nub took a little getting used to, I found them surprisingly controllable.

    – marcelm
    6 hours ago






  • 4





    @Raffzahn "A single manufacturers example doesn't make all work that way", this is a true statement, but I don't think the implication (that marcelm's example is an outlier) reflects reality. From Wikipedia (Pointing stick): "The velocity of the pointer depends on the applied force so increasing pressure causes faster movement." Anecdotally, every nub I have used accepts variable input. In fact, I doubt you could find many examples of nubs that wouldn't accept variable input. Unwieldy? Certainly to some people. Binary? It seems that analog input is an intrinsic property of the technology.

    – Tashus
    6 hours ago



















14














Trackballs are Alive and Well



I have a Logitech M570 for my desktop computer. I have another one for my laptop. I got another one for my daughter. Every few years they break and I replace them.



I find that trackballs are superior to mice in many ways and recommend them to plenty of people. But the average user just gets a mouse, IMHO simply because they don't realize there are better options.



Except BUILT IN on Laptops



There are, however, two specific reasons that they are no longer found (and were relatively rarely found in the past) built in to laptops:




  • Cost - I don't know the specifics, but a trackball has moving parts. Moving parts cost money. A touchpad has no moving parts - it is a sealed sensor package. In fact, many touchpads are indistinguishable from the rest of the laptop bezel - just some markings printed around it to indicate that it is there. For the same reason that laptop keyboards (and bundled desktop keyboards too!) keep getting thinner - less plastic and other parts = lower cost. Trackballs do cost more as separate items too - typically much more than mice - but there it is a user choice. With a built-in pointing device, the manufacturer has to cover the cost for all users whether they consider it an advantage worth paying for or not. In the competitive commodity world of 15.4" 5 lb. laptops, every penny counts.


  • Size - Thin is in! As laptops get thinner and thinner, a few millimeters of extra height for a trackball becomes a problem. If you make the trackball too small then it loses its advantage in usability over other input devices. These are the same laptops where the extra cost would not be as big a factor - but the trackball still loses.



So why aren't trackballs more common? Because of the mouse on desktop computers. On desktop computers, the mouse caught on better than trackballs. Maybe a more "natural" motion, maybe price, maybe competition, maybe simply because Apple made mice popular with the Mac and Microsoft copied them. So when it came to laptops, the manufacturers struggled with coming up with a substitute since a mouse doesn't work in a small fixed space. The little pointer nub was quite popular for a while - and some people still like them, though I never got the hang of it. There were trackballs in some early laptops. But once the technology was perfected for touchpads, they won the race - no moving parts to break (or ball to pop out or clean), conceptually closer to use of a mouse, which had become popular on the desktop and while laptops were (and continue) getting thinner, screen sizes were getting bigger (and therefore the width & depth of the typical laptop was getting bigger rather than smaller, and the base section has to match the screen section), so there was this handy wrist-rest section in front of the keyboard that conveniently fit a touchpad. People got used to it - end of story.



For those people who want to get a separate pointing device, especially for a laptop that will be used in a confined space (as opposed to a desktop where you have plenty of mouse-moving area on the desk), I highly recommend trackballs. There is a learning curve (for those who didn't grow up playing Missile Command), but I find that people look at it funny the first time and when I show them how to use it, most (but not all) manage to learn how to use a trackball quite well within a few minutes.






share|improve this answer


























  • The cost of moving parts is an interesting question. I wonder if that affects not so much manufacturing cost as TCO? Moving parts get clogged with dust, and need to be fixed.

    – rwallace
    15 hours ago






  • 1





    Manufacturing cost. Why do you think Dell kept making their keyboards smaller and smaller - keys the same size (until they went to chiclets! Bad for PCjr but people got used to them with laptops and now desktops come with them...) but kept decreasing the border/bezel size - $1 saved in manufacturing x 1,000,000 keyboards = $1,000,000 on the bottom line. Same thing with a few extra parts to make a trackball in a laptop. Modern (and many years now) trackballs are super easy to clean - and that's not the manufacturer's problem anyway.

    – manassehkatz
    14 hours ago






  • 2





    As trackballs are spherical, if you want the ball to be an inch wide for easy handling, that means your laptop will also have to be at least an inch thick.

    – Kaz
    14 hours ago






  • 3





    @Kaz - 1" is close to the size of a Logitech M570. Actually, you can have - and I have seen in laptops - much smaller trackballs. But once you get under 1/2" it just isn't as usable. The first generations of laptops could handle 1/2" (or even a little larger) without affecting overall system thickness. But the times they have changed...

    – manassehkatz
    14 hours ago






  • 2





    I feel there has to be more to the laptop thing than described here. Neither of the given reasons holds true for expensive high performance laptops (for which the price difference isn't all that significant and which are thick enough anyway) and these don't seem to have them anymore either...

    – Jasper
    8 hours ago



















3














Dirt is another issue.



In a mouse, the hole where the ball is exposed is pointed down and stuff naturally falls out. On a trackball it naturally falls in. Goop, especially skin oils, gets stuck to the tracker wheels in either case, but general dirt, crumbs and fuzz is a bigger problem on trackballs.



Arcade machines had the advantage that they sort of floated in the case so the area under the ball was open and the crap just fell into the chassis. In the case of desktop trackballs, where the case was wrapped tightly, it was a bigger issue.



A friend who did DTP for a living (remember those days?) had cleaning her trackball down to an art, flipping, opening, shaking and then back together in a single fluid motion.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    It used to be a problem. But on the M570 (which I've used for a few years, and before that the red-ball wired version (ball is actually physically compatible - same exact size, and case is basically the same size, just edges a little more curved, plus no cord on the M570), you just flip it over, push out the ball with any pen/pencil sized object (blunt end, not the tip) and then wipe out (finger, pencil eraser or whatever) the dirt from 3 spots. Pop the ball back in and done. Takes less time to clean than to write this comment.

    – manassehkatz
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    But still, you have to do it at all. Mice no longer have a ball, or even a hole. Nor do any of the other devices being mentioned. The ball, though, it has a ball - although I could imagine solutions that fake the movement.

    – Maury Markowitz
    5 hours ago











  • All true. But on the other hand, while mice no longer have a ball, when they DID have a ball they had the same cleaning issue (often worse) as trackballs. And I find that many newer mice will have trouble on various surfaces (varies by type/brand/model of mouse, but often glass or slick surfaces). A trackball works on any surface because it doesn't actually use the surface.

    – manassehkatz
    5 hours ago



















2














Gaming



I can't play FPS or flight simulators with a trackball because I cannot intuitively self-center them. The only games they're good for are bowling and Missile Command - because those are played on an arcade cabinet with you standing in front of it.



It's a lot easier to stop a mouse on-target, then it is to stop a trackball - with a finger still on it, or having removed it. And if you freak out, all of a sudden you're looking at the sky.



If I didn't game I'd still be using my trackball.



Fatigue



I had two different trackballs. One was the size of a pool ball, the other was ping-pong sized, placed beside your thumb.



Pool ball: there's no where to rest your palm. And the buttons are your pinky and your thumb. Kinda wack.



Thumb size: well, if you've ever used a gaming controller with thumbsticks for hours on end, I don't need to explain how that begins to suck.



Switching to my middle or ring finger while using a standard mouse, instead of my fatigued index finger, isn't really an option on a 'pool ball' - and it's definitely not an option on an "ergonomically" hand shaped trackball mouse.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    That just isn't true, it's perfectly possible to play games with a trackball.

    – deepy
    9 hours ago











  • Not Freelancer. And I would totally suck at CoD if you made me use a trackball, even though I grew up using one.

    – Mazura
    9 hours ago













  • I love using trackballs for FPS. How else can you do 360 rotations sprawing people with bullets!

    – TafT
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    When I saw the word 'gaming', my first thought was "hey wait, the trackball was great for... Oh, you mentioned missile command" :)

    – rwallace
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    For gaming it depends a lot on the game and how (pointing) device handling is turned into game action. if it's about exact movement to certain screen areas, like pushing buttons or clicking items, a mouse may be best. But if the game works on continuous movement, as well as various movement speed and coverage of large area with linear movement. a trackball will give true advantage.

    – Raffzahn
    5 hours ago



















2














I'm using a trackball myself right now. I saw about 12 of them on sale at Best Buy last week. Three of my coworkers use them. I"m not sure where you get that they 'went away' but they haven't. I think it's great for desk space, for precision (I love to game with it over a mouse, which I have to pick up and move back all the time) and to reduce hand fatigue.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




MarkTO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    I think his main point is that they went away in laptops as an integrated pointing device.

    – JPhi1618
    5 hours ago



















2














As other have noted trackballs aren't dead ("disappeared").
But compared to other input methods trackballs are indeed much less popular or widespread as they once were.



Cost, scale, competing products, path dependencies and consumer psychology are the reasons for this development



Trackballs are great. They added a cool, effective, efficient way to move a pointer on screen. So did the mouse. Which is 'better'? That's largely opinion. I have one.



Both devices cost money to buy. The trackball is in use since 1946 the computer mouse is much younger.



The point is: a trackball needs training to use it effectively and efficiently.
But so does a mouse. It also 'needs training' for real first timers (remember intro-screens, handbooks explaining how it works; like 'point', 'click', 'hold' and 'drag'? Later even intro-videos, now still around for trackpad gestures etc). So this is really the cheap mouse being 'good enough' and training a user for the "wrong" kind of device.



The learning curve for a trackball is probably not much steeper, if any, than for a mouse for a novice.



This is much like people reluctant to switch from QWERTZ to Dvorak or Neo keyboard layouts. Fast 4-finger typists are equally reluctant to really learn 10-finger blind typing, as they are initially even slowed by the new method.



Once companies like Apple delivered their computers with a mouse to a public not used to anything else but keyboards or awkward joysticks, this set a path to lower the cost for manufacturing mice and training users to use a mouse. Switching 'back' (to the conceptually older and at least equally efficient device) was from then on only for the really dedicated.



You witness the same process now by each and everyone adding 'touch' to devices that do not benefit from it (TouchBar anyone?). This devolution towards the lowest common denominator is great for perfect neophytes. A two-year-old now handles tablets with ease. That this doesn't foster intelligent development and hampers efficient methods of inputting in the future is a cost we seem to enjoy paying.






share|improve this answer

































    1














    As the other answer said, trackballs are live and well. I use a track ball on my PC as well as Mac. I found a fantastic brand whose trackball lets it connect with 2 different computers.



    I will add that I find trackballs hard to use for games like fornight where you need to move your player fast. For this, I prefer a mouse.



    Other than that I will take a trackball over mouse every chance I have. I prefer the trackball because I get less cramping in my hand with extensive use, over most mice.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




























      0














      One disadvantage is that they are hard to use for users that prefer using a mouse at high acceleration and with the wrist resting - of course using it with a fingertip like a mouse wheel is possible, but rather awkward (especially when the trackball is not made very precisely and tends to seize and jam a bit)....






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "648"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8787%2fwhy-did-trackballs-disappear%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        8 Answers
        8






        active

        oldest

        votes








        8 Answers
        8






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        17















        Why did trackballs disappear?




        To start with, they didn't. They are still around and can be bought in many variations. Only their time attempting to work as a general pointing device is gone.




        Nub. Low-tech, cheap, compact and reliable, but miserably imprecise. Did they ever fix that? Is it even theoretically fixable or is it a limit on the precision of the human finger?




        The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed) so various driver profiles have been developed offering non-linear movement - this in turn is something not everyone can get along with - especially not at first.




        Touchscreen. Looks great when an actor is using it for ten seconds in a movie, kills your shoulder when you try to do it all day in real life.




        In fact, I really like it. Back in my Newton days I was constantly hitting the CRT to acknowledge some message box - until I spent a lot of money on an early touchscreen.




        Touchpad. It took a while to get the technology to work properly and even then it's awkward to use and takes up a lot of keyboard space. Modern laptops seem to have settled on it anyway, perhaps because it's thin?




        In part, but also because it's more natural (see below).




        Trackball. Fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive.




        If it's supposed to be fast and precise, it's anything but inexpensive.




        Seems to me the trackball is the best option.




        If you can handle it, then yes. For most people it doesn't work. At least not from the start. Computers have been optimized (or evolved) to provide a satisfying first-time user experience over an efficient long-time usage. Basically the same process that (almost) eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool, despite being in most situations faster and more exact than any pointing device.



        It's all about the learning curve.



        Humans pointing somewhere don't use their fingertip to waggle around, but the whole arm and hand, while the index finger is just, well, the tip. That's the way we are trained to do since being a toddler.



        Reducing this to just forearm and hand, with the finger giving the affirmation is as well trained into our Motor Cortex. That's why most people get along with a mouse without much training. It also adds that the mouse is 'glued' to the hand, so no active control for repositioning needed.



        A touchpad comes next, as it's still pointing with the finger, but a restriction of movement needs to be learned, as well as a way to handle repositioning, as there is no haptic feedback for this.



        Even the Nub comes before the trackball, as it works by applying force in the direction one wants to move the cursor. As intuitive as a joystick, just a bit more delicate.



        While the Trackball is an awesome device, once learned to use it, the learning curve is way steeper than with any of the others, as its handling goes against our natural movement.



        So from a motoric point of view of an untrained person (beginner) the trackball comes last. This may be quite different, once time has been invested to learn to handle a trackball on an intuitive level. But that's not how everyday interfaces have been optimized. So track balls are, nowadays, back in the realm of experienced professionals.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 8





          "... eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool" - it hasn't been eliminated, just renamed and redesigned as a "multi-button gaming mouse." :)

          – alephzero
          10 hours ago








        • 7





          Upvote for comparing first time usage with long term usage. Consumer acceptance is more about ease of learning than ease of use.

          – Walter Mitty
          7 hours ago






        • 2





          _"The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed)" - What do you mean with "no sense for urgency (speed)"? Do you mean they are binary on/off devices, offering no nuance between "cursor moving" and "cursor not moving"?

          – marcelm
          7 hours ago






        • 4





          In that case I completely disagree that this is generally the case. I have occasionally used those nubs on some 20-year old Toshiba laptops (something like a 470CDT), and they were definitely analog; without much practice I was able to crawl the cursor pixel by pixel by pushing gently, as well as move the cursor very quickly by pushing hard. In fact, although the nub took a little getting used to, I found them surprisingly controllable.

          – marcelm
          6 hours ago






        • 4





          @Raffzahn "A single manufacturers example doesn't make all work that way", this is a true statement, but I don't think the implication (that marcelm's example is an outlier) reflects reality. From Wikipedia (Pointing stick): "The velocity of the pointer depends on the applied force so increasing pressure causes faster movement." Anecdotally, every nub I have used accepts variable input. In fact, I doubt you could find many examples of nubs that wouldn't accept variable input. Unwieldy? Certainly to some people. Binary? It seems that analog input is an intrinsic property of the technology.

          – Tashus
          6 hours ago
















        17















        Why did trackballs disappear?




        To start with, they didn't. They are still around and can be bought in many variations. Only their time attempting to work as a general pointing device is gone.




        Nub. Low-tech, cheap, compact and reliable, but miserably imprecise. Did they ever fix that? Is it even theoretically fixable or is it a limit on the precision of the human finger?




        The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed) so various driver profiles have been developed offering non-linear movement - this in turn is something not everyone can get along with - especially not at first.




        Touchscreen. Looks great when an actor is using it for ten seconds in a movie, kills your shoulder when you try to do it all day in real life.




        In fact, I really like it. Back in my Newton days I was constantly hitting the CRT to acknowledge some message box - until I spent a lot of money on an early touchscreen.




        Touchpad. It took a while to get the technology to work properly and even then it's awkward to use and takes up a lot of keyboard space. Modern laptops seem to have settled on it anyway, perhaps because it's thin?




        In part, but also because it's more natural (see below).




        Trackball. Fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive.




        If it's supposed to be fast and precise, it's anything but inexpensive.




        Seems to me the trackball is the best option.




        If you can handle it, then yes. For most people it doesn't work. At least not from the start. Computers have been optimized (or evolved) to provide a satisfying first-time user experience over an efficient long-time usage. Basically the same process that (almost) eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool, despite being in most situations faster and more exact than any pointing device.



        It's all about the learning curve.



        Humans pointing somewhere don't use their fingertip to waggle around, but the whole arm and hand, while the index finger is just, well, the tip. That's the way we are trained to do since being a toddler.



        Reducing this to just forearm and hand, with the finger giving the affirmation is as well trained into our Motor Cortex. That's why most people get along with a mouse without much training. It also adds that the mouse is 'glued' to the hand, so no active control for repositioning needed.



        A touchpad comes next, as it's still pointing with the finger, but a restriction of movement needs to be learned, as well as a way to handle repositioning, as there is no haptic feedback for this.



        Even the Nub comes before the trackball, as it works by applying force in the direction one wants to move the cursor. As intuitive as a joystick, just a bit more delicate.



        While the Trackball is an awesome device, once learned to use it, the learning curve is way steeper than with any of the others, as its handling goes against our natural movement.



        So from a motoric point of view of an untrained person (beginner) the trackball comes last. This may be quite different, once time has been invested to learn to handle a trackball on an intuitive level. But that's not how everyday interfaces have been optimized. So track balls are, nowadays, back in the realm of experienced professionals.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 8





          "... eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool" - it hasn't been eliminated, just renamed and redesigned as a "multi-button gaming mouse." :)

          – alephzero
          10 hours ago








        • 7





          Upvote for comparing first time usage with long term usage. Consumer acceptance is more about ease of learning than ease of use.

          – Walter Mitty
          7 hours ago






        • 2





          _"The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed)" - What do you mean with "no sense for urgency (speed)"? Do you mean they are binary on/off devices, offering no nuance between "cursor moving" and "cursor not moving"?

          – marcelm
          7 hours ago






        • 4





          In that case I completely disagree that this is generally the case. I have occasionally used those nubs on some 20-year old Toshiba laptops (something like a 470CDT), and they were definitely analog; without much practice I was able to crawl the cursor pixel by pixel by pushing gently, as well as move the cursor very quickly by pushing hard. In fact, although the nub took a little getting used to, I found them surprisingly controllable.

          – marcelm
          6 hours ago






        • 4





          @Raffzahn "A single manufacturers example doesn't make all work that way", this is a true statement, but I don't think the implication (that marcelm's example is an outlier) reflects reality. From Wikipedia (Pointing stick): "The velocity of the pointer depends on the applied force so increasing pressure causes faster movement." Anecdotally, every nub I have used accepts variable input. In fact, I doubt you could find many examples of nubs that wouldn't accept variable input. Unwieldy? Certainly to some people. Binary? It seems that analog input is an intrinsic property of the technology.

          – Tashus
          6 hours ago














        17












        17








        17








        Why did trackballs disappear?




        To start with, they didn't. They are still around and can be bought in many variations. Only their time attempting to work as a general pointing device is gone.




        Nub. Low-tech, cheap, compact and reliable, but miserably imprecise. Did they ever fix that? Is it even theoretically fixable or is it a limit on the precision of the human finger?




        The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed) so various driver profiles have been developed offering non-linear movement - this in turn is something not everyone can get along with - especially not at first.




        Touchscreen. Looks great when an actor is using it for ten seconds in a movie, kills your shoulder when you try to do it all day in real life.




        In fact, I really like it. Back in my Newton days I was constantly hitting the CRT to acknowledge some message box - until I spent a lot of money on an early touchscreen.




        Touchpad. It took a while to get the technology to work properly and even then it's awkward to use and takes up a lot of keyboard space. Modern laptops seem to have settled on it anyway, perhaps because it's thin?




        In part, but also because it's more natural (see below).




        Trackball. Fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive.




        If it's supposed to be fast and precise, it's anything but inexpensive.




        Seems to me the trackball is the best option.




        If you can handle it, then yes. For most people it doesn't work. At least not from the start. Computers have been optimized (or evolved) to provide a satisfying first-time user experience over an efficient long-time usage. Basically the same process that (almost) eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool, despite being in most situations faster and more exact than any pointing device.



        It's all about the learning curve.



        Humans pointing somewhere don't use their fingertip to waggle around, but the whole arm and hand, while the index finger is just, well, the tip. That's the way we are trained to do since being a toddler.



        Reducing this to just forearm and hand, with the finger giving the affirmation is as well trained into our Motor Cortex. That's why most people get along with a mouse without much training. It also adds that the mouse is 'glued' to the hand, so no active control for repositioning needed.



        A touchpad comes next, as it's still pointing with the finger, but a restriction of movement needs to be learned, as well as a way to handle repositioning, as there is no haptic feedback for this.



        Even the Nub comes before the trackball, as it works by applying force in the direction one wants to move the cursor. As intuitive as a joystick, just a bit more delicate.



        While the Trackball is an awesome device, once learned to use it, the learning curve is way steeper than with any of the others, as its handling goes against our natural movement.



        So from a motoric point of view of an untrained person (beginner) the trackball comes last. This may be quite different, once time has been invested to learn to handle a trackball on an intuitive level. But that's not how everyday interfaces have been optimized. So track balls are, nowadays, back in the realm of experienced professionals.






        share|improve this answer
















        Why did trackballs disappear?




        To start with, they didn't. They are still around and can be bought in many variations. Only their time attempting to work as a general pointing device is gone.




        Nub. Low-tech, cheap, compact and reliable, but miserably imprecise. Did they ever fix that? Is it even theoretically fixable or is it a limit on the precision of the human finger?




        The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed) so various driver profiles have been developed offering non-linear movement - this in turn is something not everyone can get along with - especially not at first.




        Touchscreen. Looks great when an actor is using it for ten seconds in a movie, kills your shoulder when you try to do it all day in real life.




        In fact, I really like it. Back in my Newton days I was constantly hitting the CRT to acknowledge some message box - until I spent a lot of money on an early touchscreen.




        Touchpad. It took a while to get the technology to work properly and even then it's awkward to use and takes up a lot of keyboard space. Modern laptops seem to have settled on it anyway, perhaps because it's thin?




        In part, but also because it's more natural (see below).




        Trackball. Fast, precise, easy to use, not even expensive.




        If it's supposed to be fast and precise, it's anything but inexpensive.




        Seems to me the trackball is the best option.




        If you can handle it, then yes. For most people it doesn't work. At least not from the start. Computers have been optimized (or evolved) to provide a satisfying first-time user experience over an efficient long-time usage. Basically the same process that (almost) eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool, despite being in most situations faster and more exact than any pointing device.



        It's all about the learning curve.



        Humans pointing somewhere don't use their fingertip to waggle around, but the whole arm and hand, while the index finger is just, well, the tip. That's the way we are trained to do since being a toddler.



        Reducing this to just forearm and hand, with the finger giving the affirmation is as well trained into our Motor Cortex. That's why most people get along with a mouse without much training. It also adds that the mouse is 'glued' to the hand, so no active control for repositioning needed.



        A touchpad comes next, as it's still pointing with the finger, but a restriction of movement needs to be learned, as well as a way to handle repositioning, as there is no haptic feedback for this.



        Even the Nub comes before the trackball, as it works by applying force in the direction one wants to move the cursor. As intuitive as a joystick, just a bit more delicate.



        While the Trackball is an awesome device, once learned to use it, the learning curve is way steeper than with any of the others, as its handling goes against our natural movement.



        So from a motoric point of view of an untrained person (beginner) the trackball comes last. This may be quite different, once time has been invested to learn to handle a trackball on an intuitive level. But that's not how everyday interfaces have been optimized. So track balls are, nowadays, back in the realm of experienced professionals.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 5 hours ago









        manassehkatz

        2,144419




        2,144419










        answered 12 hours ago









        RaffzahnRaffzahn

        47.2k5104192




        47.2k5104192








        • 8





          "... eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool" - it hasn't been eliminated, just renamed and redesigned as a "multi-button gaming mouse." :)

          – alephzero
          10 hours ago








        • 7





          Upvote for comparing first time usage with long term usage. Consumer acceptance is more about ease of learning than ease of use.

          – Walter Mitty
          7 hours ago






        • 2





          _"The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed)" - What do you mean with "no sense for urgency (speed)"? Do you mean they are binary on/off devices, offering no nuance between "cursor moving" and "cursor not moving"?

          – marcelm
          7 hours ago






        • 4





          In that case I completely disagree that this is generally the case. I have occasionally used those nubs on some 20-year old Toshiba laptops (something like a 470CDT), and they were definitely analog; without much practice I was able to crawl the cursor pixel by pixel by pushing gently, as well as move the cursor very quickly by pushing hard. In fact, although the nub took a little getting used to, I found them surprisingly controllable.

          – marcelm
          6 hours ago






        • 4





          @Raffzahn "A single manufacturers example doesn't make all work that way", this is a true statement, but I don't think the implication (that marcelm's example is an outlier) reflects reality. From Wikipedia (Pointing stick): "The velocity of the pointer depends on the applied force so increasing pressure causes faster movement." Anecdotally, every nub I have used accepts variable input. In fact, I doubt you could find many examples of nubs that wouldn't accept variable input. Unwieldy? Certainly to some people. Binary? It seems that analog input is an intrinsic property of the technology.

          – Tashus
          6 hours ago














        • 8





          "... eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool" - it hasn't been eliminated, just renamed and redesigned as a "multi-button gaming mouse." :)

          – alephzero
          10 hours ago








        • 7





          Upvote for comparing first time usage with long term usage. Consumer acceptance is more about ease of learning than ease of use.

          – Walter Mitty
          7 hours ago






        • 2





          _"The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed)" - What do you mean with "no sense for urgency (speed)"? Do you mean they are binary on/off devices, offering no nuance between "cursor moving" and "cursor not moving"?

          – marcelm
          7 hours ago






        • 4





          In that case I completely disagree that this is generally the case. I have occasionally used those nubs on some 20-year old Toshiba laptops (something like a 470CDT), and they were definitely analog; without much practice I was able to crawl the cursor pixel by pixel by pushing gently, as well as move the cursor very quickly by pushing hard. In fact, although the nub took a little getting used to, I found them surprisingly controllable.

          – marcelm
          6 hours ago






        • 4





          @Raffzahn "A single manufacturers example doesn't make all work that way", this is a true statement, but I don't think the implication (that marcelm's example is an outlier) reflects reality. From Wikipedia (Pointing stick): "The velocity of the pointer depends on the applied force so increasing pressure causes faster movement." Anecdotally, every nub I have used accepts variable input. In fact, I doubt you could find many examples of nubs that wouldn't accept variable input. Unwieldy? Certainly to some people. Binary? It seems that analog input is an intrinsic property of the technology.

          – Tashus
          6 hours ago








        8




        8





        "... eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool" - it hasn't been eliminated, just renamed and redesigned as a "multi-button gaming mouse." :)

        – alephzero
        10 hours ago







        "... eliminated the keyboard as #1 interactive tool" - it hasn't been eliminated, just renamed and redesigned as a "multi-button gaming mouse." :)

        – alephzero
        10 hours ago






        7




        7





        Upvote for comparing first time usage with long term usage. Consumer acceptance is more about ease of learning than ease of use.

        – Walter Mitty
        7 hours ago





        Upvote for comparing first time usage with long term usage. Consumer acceptance is more about ease of learning than ease of use.

        – Walter Mitty
        7 hours ago




        2




        2





        _"The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed)" - What do you mean with "no sense for urgency (speed)"? Do you mean they are binary on/off devices, offering no nuance between "cursor moving" and "cursor not moving"?

        – marcelm
        7 hours ago





        _"The Nub itself isn't imprecise at all. At basic it's a joystick with no sense for urgency (speed)" - What do you mean with "no sense for urgency (speed)"? Do you mean they are binary on/off devices, offering no nuance between "cursor moving" and "cursor not moving"?

        – marcelm
        7 hours ago




        4




        4





        In that case I completely disagree that this is generally the case. I have occasionally used those nubs on some 20-year old Toshiba laptops (something like a 470CDT), and they were definitely analog; without much practice I was able to crawl the cursor pixel by pixel by pushing gently, as well as move the cursor very quickly by pushing hard. In fact, although the nub took a little getting used to, I found them surprisingly controllable.

        – marcelm
        6 hours ago





        In that case I completely disagree that this is generally the case. I have occasionally used those nubs on some 20-year old Toshiba laptops (something like a 470CDT), and they were definitely analog; without much practice I was able to crawl the cursor pixel by pixel by pushing gently, as well as move the cursor very quickly by pushing hard. In fact, although the nub took a little getting used to, I found them surprisingly controllable.

        – marcelm
        6 hours ago




        4




        4





        @Raffzahn "A single manufacturers example doesn't make all work that way", this is a true statement, but I don't think the implication (that marcelm's example is an outlier) reflects reality. From Wikipedia (Pointing stick): "The velocity of the pointer depends on the applied force so increasing pressure causes faster movement." Anecdotally, every nub I have used accepts variable input. In fact, I doubt you could find many examples of nubs that wouldn't accept variable input. Unwieldy? Certainly to some people. Binary? It seems that analog input is an intrinsic property of the technology.

        – Tashus
        6 hours ago





        @Raffzahn "A single manufacturers example doesn't make all work that way", this is a true statement, but I don't think the implication (that marcelm's example is an outlier) reflects reality. From Wikipedia (Pointing stick): "The velocity of the pointer depends on the applied force so increasing pressure causes faster movement." Anecdotally, every nub I have used accepts variable input. In fact, I doubt you could find many examples of nubs that wouldn't accept variable input. Unwieldy? Certainly to some people. Binary? It seems that analog input is an intrinsic property of the technology.

        – Tashus
        6 hours ago











        14














        Trackballs are Alive and Well



        I have a Logitech M570 for my desktop computer. I have another one for my laptop. I got another one for my daughter. Every few years they break and I replace them.



        I find that trackballs are superior to mice in many ways and recommend them to plenty of people. But the average user just gets a mouse, IMHO simply because they don't realize there are better options.



        Except BUILT IN on Laptops



        There are, however, two specific reasons that they are no longer found (and were relatively rarely found in the past) built in to laptops:




        • Cost - I don't know the specifics, but a trackball has moving parts. Moving parts cost money. A touchpad has no moving parts - it is a sealed sensor package. In fact, many touchpads are indistinguishable from the rest of the laptop bezel - just some markings printed around it to indicate that it is there. For the same reason that laptop keyboards (and bundled desktop keyboards too!) keep getting thinner - less plastic and other parts = lower cost. Trackballs do cost more as separate items too - typically much more than mice - but there it is a user choice. With a built-in pointing device, the manufacturer has to cover the cost for all users whether they consider it an advantage worth paying for or not. In the competitive commodity world of 15.4" 5 lb. laptops, every penny counts.


        • Size - Thin is in! As laptops get thinner and thinner, a few millimeters of extra height for a trackball becomes a problem. If you make the trackball too small then it loses its advantage in usability over other input devices. These are the same laptops where the extra cost would not be as big a factor - but the trackball still loses.



        So why aren't trackballs more common? Because of the mouse on desktop computers. On desktop computers, the mouse caught on better than trackballs. Maybe a more "natural" motion, maybe price, maybe competition, maybe simply because Apple made mice popular with the Mac and Microsoft copied them. So when it came to laptops, the manufacturers struggled with coming up with a substitute since a mouse doesn't work in a small fixed space. The little pointer nub was quite popular for a while - and some people still like them, though I never got the hang of it. There were trackballs in some early laptops. But once the technology was perfected for touchpads, they won the race - no moving parts to break (or ball to pop out or clean), conceptually closer to use of a mouse, which had become popular on the desktop and while laptops were (and continue) getting thinner, screen sizes were getting bigger (and therefore the width & depth of the typical laptop was getting bigger rather than smaller, and the base section has to match the screen section), so there was this handy wrist-rest section in front of the keyboard that conveniently fit a touchpad. People got used to it - end of story.



        For those people who want to get a separate pointing device, especially for a laptop that will be used in a confined space (as opposed to a desktop where you have plenty of mouse-moving area on the desk), I highly recommend trackballs. There is a learning curve (for those who didn't grow up playing Missile Command), but I find that people look at it funny the first time and when I show them how to use it, most (but not all) manage to learn how to use a trackball quite well within a few minutes.






        share|improve this answer


























        • The cost of moving parts is an interesting question. I wonder if that affects not so much manufacturing cost as TCO? Moving parts get clogged with dust, and need to be fixed.

          – rwallace
          15 hours ago






        • 1





          Manufacturing cost. Why do you think Dell kept making their keyboards smaller and smaller - keys the same size (until they went to chiclets! Bad for PCjr but people got used to them with laptops and now desktops come with them...) but kept decreasing the border/bezel size - $1 saved in manufacturing x 1,000,000 keyboards = $1,000,000 on the bottom line. Same thing with a few extra parts to make a trackball in a laptop. Modern (and many years now) trackballs are super easy to clean - and that's not the manufacturer's problem anyway.

          – manassehkatz
          14 hours ago






        • 2





          As trackballs are spherical, if you want the ball to be an inch wide for easy handling, that means your laptop will also have to be at least an inch thick.

          – Kaz
          14 hours ago






        • 3





          @Kaz - 1" is close to the size of a Logitech M570. Actually, you can have - and I have seen in laptops - much smaller trackballs. But once you get under 1/2" it just isn't as usable. The first generations of laptops could handle 1/2" (or even a little larger) without affecting overall system thickness. But the times they have changed...

          – manassehkatz
          14 hours ago






        • 2





          I feel there has to be more to the laptop thing than described here. Neither of the given reasons holds true for expensive high performance laptops (for which the price difference isn't all that significant and which are thick enough anyway) and these don't seem to have them anymore either...

          – Jasper
          8 hours ago
















        14














        Trackballs are Alive and Well



        I have a Logitech M570 for my desktop computer. I have another one for my laptop. I got another one for my daughter. Every few years they break and I replace them.



        I find that trackballs are superior to mice in many ways and recommend them to plenty of people. But the average user just gets a mouse, IMHO simply because they don't realize there are better options.



        Except BUILT IN on Laptops



        There are, however, two specific reasons that they are no longer found (and were relatively rarely found in the past) built in to laptops:




        • Cost - I don't know the specifics, but a trackball has moving parts. Moving parts cost money. A touchpad has no moving parts - it is a sealed sensor package. In fact, many touchpads are indistinguishable from the rest of the laptop bezel - just some markings printed around it to indicate that it is there. For the same reason that laptop keyboards (and bundled desktop keyboards too!) keep getting thinner - less plastic and other parts = lower cost. Trackballs do cost more as separate items too - typically much more than mice - but there it is a user choice. With a built-in pointing device, the manufacturer has to cover the cost for all users whether they consider it an advantage worth paying for or not. In the competitive commodity world of 15.4" 5 lb. laptops, every penny counts.


        • Size - Thin is in! As laptops get thinner and thinner, a few millimeters of extra height for a trackball becomes a problem. If you make the trackball too small then it loses its advantage in usability over other input devices. These are the same laptops where the extra cost would not be as big a factor - but the trackball still loses.



        So why aren't trackballs more common? Because of the mouse on desktop computers. On desktop computers, the mouse caught on better than trackballs. Maybe a more "natural" motion, maybe price, maybe competition, maybe simply because Apple made mice popular with the Mac and Microsoft copied them. So when it came to laptops, the manufacturers struggled with coming up with a substitute since a mouse doesn't work in a small fixed space. The little pointer nub was quite popular for a while - and some people still like them, though I never got the hang of it. There were trackballs in some early laptops. But once the technology was perfected for touchpads, they won the race - no moving parts to break (or ball to pop out or clean), conceptually closer to use of a mouse, which had become popular on the desktop and while laptops were (and continue) getting thinner, screen sizes were getting bigger (and therefore the width & depth of the typical laptop was getting bigger rather than smaller, and the base section has to match the screen section), so there was this handy wrist-rest section in front of the keyboard that conveniently fit a touchpad. People got used to it - end of story.



        For those people who want to get a separate pointing device, especially for a laptop that will be used in a confined space (as opposed to a desktop where you have plenty of mouse-moving area on the desk), I highly recommend trackballs. There is a learning curve (for those who didn't grow up playing Missile Command), but I find that people look at it funny the first time and when I show them how to use it, most (but not all) manage to learn how to use a trackball quite well within a few minutes.






        share|improve this answer


























        • The cost of moving parts is an interesting question. I wonder if that affects not so much manufacturing cost as TCO? Moving parts get clogged with dust, and need to be fixed.

          – rwallace
          15 hours ago






        • 1





          Manufacturing cost. Why do you think Dell kept making their keyboards smaller and smaller - keys the same size (until they went to chiclets! Bad for PCjr but people got used to them with laptops and now desktops come with them...) but kept decreasing the border/bezel size - $1 saved in manufacturing x 1,000,000 keyboards = $1,000,000 on the bottom line. Same thing with a few extra parts to make a trackball in a laptop. Modern (and many years now) trackballs are super easy to clean - and that's not the manufacturer's problem anyway.

          – manassehkatz
          14 hours ago






        • 2





          As trackballs are spherical, if you want the ball to be an inch wide for easy handling, that means your laptop will also have to be at least an inch thick.

          – Kaz
          14 hours ago






        • 3





          @Kaz - 1" is close to the size of a Logitech M570. Actually, you can have - and I have seen in laptops - much smaller trackballs. But once you get under 1/2" it just isn't as usable. The first generations of laptops could handle 1/2" (or even a little larger) without affecting overall system thickness. But the times they have changed...

          – manassehkatz
          14 hours ago






        • 2





          I feel there has to be more to the laptop thing than described here. Neither of the given reasons holds true for expensive high performance laptops (for which the price difference isn't all that significant and which are thick enough anyway) and these don't seem to have them anymore either...

          – Jasper
          8 hours ago














        14












        14








        14







        Trackballs are Alive and Well



        I have a Logitech M570 for my desktop computer. I have another one for my laptop. I got another one for my daughter. Every few years they break and I replace them.



        I find that trackballs are superior to mice in many ways and recommend them to plenty of people. But the average user just gets a mouse, IMHO simply because they don't realize there are better options.



        Except BUILT IN on Laptops



        There are, however, two specific reasons that they are no longer found (and were relatively rarely found in the past) built in to laptops:




        • Cost - I don't know the specifics, but a trackball has moving parts. Moving parts cost money. A touchpad has no moving parts - it is a sealed sensor package. In fact, many touchpads are indistinguishable from the rest of the laptop bezel - just some markings printed around it to indicate that it is there. For the same reason that laptop keyboards (and bundled desktop keyboards too!) keep getting thinner - less plastic and other parts = lower cost. Trackballs do cost more as separate items too - typically much more than mice - but there it is a user choice. With a built-in pointing device, the manufacturer has to cover the cost for all users whether they consider it an advantage worth paying for or not. In the competitive commodity world of 15.4" 5 lb. laptops, every penny counts.


        • Size - Thin is in! As laptops get thinner and thinner, a few millimeters of extra height for a trackball becomes a problem. If you make the trackball too small then it loses its advantage in usability over other input devices. These are the same laptops where the extra cost would not be as big a factor - but the trackball still loses.



        So why aren't trackballs more common? Because of the mouse on desktop computers. On desktop computers, the mouse caught on better than trackballs. Maybe a more "natural" motion, maybe price, maybe competition, maybe simply because Apple made mice popular with the Mac and Microsoft copied them. So when it came to laptops, the manufacturers struggled with coming up with a substitute since a mouse doesn't work in a small fixed space. The little pointer nub was quite popular for a while - and some people still like them, though I never got the hang of it. There were trackballs in some early laptops. But once the technology was perfected for touchpads, they won the race - no moving parts to break (or ball to pop out or clean), conceptually closer to use of a mouse, which had become popular on the desktop and while laptops were (and continue) getting thinner, screen sizes were getting bigger (and therefore the width & depth of the typical laptop was getting bigger rather than smaller, and the base section has to match the screen section), so there was this handy wrist-rest section in front of the keyboard that conveniently fit a touchpad. People got used to it - end of story.



        For those people who want to get a separate pointing device, especially for a laptop that will be used in a confined space (as opposed to a desktop where you have plenty of mouse-moving area on the desk), I highly recommend trackballs. There is a learning curve (for those who didn't grow up playing Missile Command), but I find that people look at it funny the first time and when I show them how to use it, most (but not all) manage to learn how to use a trackball quite well within a few minutes.






        share|improve this answer















        Trackballs are Alive and Well



        I have a Logitech M570 for my desktop computer. I have another one for my laptop. I got another one for my daughter. Every few years they break and I replace them.



        I find that trackballs are superior to mice in many ways and recommend them to plenty of people. But the average user just gets a mouse, IMHO simply because they don't realize there are better options.



        Except BUILT IN on Laptops



        There are, however, two specific reasons that they are no longer found (and were relatively rarely found in the past) built in to laptops:




        • Cost - I don't know the specifics, but a trackball has moving parts. Moving parts cost money. A touchpad has no moving parts - it is a sealed sensor package. In fact, many touchpads are indistinguishable from the rest of the laptop bezel - just some markings printed around it to indicate that it is there. For the same reason that laptop keyboards (and bundled desktop keyboards too!) keep getting thinner - less plastic and other parts = lower cost. Trackballs do cost more as separate items too - typically much more than mice - but there it is a user choice. With a built-in pointing device, the manufacturer has to cover the cost for all users whether they consider it an advantage worth paying for or not. In the competitive commodity world of 15.4" 5 lb. laptops, every penny counts.


        • Size - Thin is in! As laptops get thinner and thinner, a few millimeters of extra height for a trackball becomes a problem. If you make the trackball too small then it loses its advantage in usability over other input devices. These are the same laptops where the extra cost would not be as big a factor - but the trackball still loses.



        So why aren't trackballs more common? Because of the mouse on desktop computers. On desktop computers, the mouse caught on better than trackballs. Maybe a more "natural" motion, maybe price, maybe competition, maybe simply because Apple made mice popular with the Mac and Microsoft copied them. So when it came to laptops, the manufacturers struggled with coming up with a substitute since a mouse doesn't work in a small fixed space. The little pointer nub was quite popular for a while - and some people still like them, though I never got the hang of it. There were trackballs in some early laptops. But once the technology was perfected for touchpads, they won the race - no moving parts to break (or ball to pop out or clean), conceptually closer to use of a mouse, which had become popular on the desktop and while laptops were (and continue) getting thinner, screen sizes were getting bigger (and therefore the width & depth of the typical laptop was getting bigger rather than smaller, and the base section has to match the screen section), so there was this handy wrist-rest section in front of the keyboard that conveniently fit a touchpad. People got used to it - end of story.



        For those people who want to get a separate pointing device, especially for a laptop that will be used in a confined space (as opposed to a desktop where you have plenty of mouse-moving area on the desk), I highly recommend trackballs. There is a learning curve (for those who didn't grow up playing Missile Command), but I find that people look at it funny the first time and when I show them how to use it, most (but not all) manage to learn how to use a trackball quite well within a few minutes.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 5 hours ago

























        answered 15 hours ago









        manassehkatzmanassehkatz

        2,144419




        2,144419













        • The cost of moving parts is an interesting question. I wonder if that affects not so much manufacturing cost as TCO? Moving parts get clogged with dust, and need to be fixed.

          – rwallace
          15 hours ago






        • 1





          Manufacturing cost. Why do you think Dell kept making their keyboards smaller and smaller - keys the same size (until they went to chiclets! Bad for PCjr but people got used to them with laptops and now desktops come with them...) but kept decreasing the border/bezel size - $1 saved in manufacturing x 1,000,000 keyboards = $1,000,000 on the bottom line. Same thing with a few extra parts to make a trackball in a laptop. Modern (and many years now) trackballs are super easy to clean - and that's not the manufacturer's problem anyway.

          – manassehkatz
          14 hours ago






        • 2





          As trackballs are spherical, if you want the ball to be an inch wide for easy handling, that means your laptop will also have to be at least an inch thick.

          – Kaz
          14 hours ago






        • 3





          @Kaz - 1" is close to the size of a Logitech M570. Actually, you can have - and I have seen in laptops - much smaller trackballs. But once you get under 1/2" it just isn't as usable. The first generations of laptops could handle 1/2" (or even a little larger) without affecting overall system thickness. But the times they have changed...

          – manassehkatz
          14 hours ago






        • 2





          I feel there has to be more to the laptop thing than described here. Neither of the given reasons holds true for expensive high performance laptops (for which the price difference isn't all that significant and which are thick enough anyway) and these don't seem to have them anymore either...

          – Jasper
          8 hours ago



















        • The cost of moving parts is an interesting question. I wonder if that affects not so much manufacturing cost as TCO? Moving parts get clogged with dust, and need to be fixed.

          – rwallace
          15 hours ago






        • 1





          Manufacturing cost. Why do you think Dell kept making their keyboards smaller and smaller - keys the same size (until they went to chiclets! Bad for PCjr but people got used to them with laptops and now desktops come with them...) but kept decreasing the border/bezel size - $1 saved in manufacturing x 1,000,000 keyboards = $1,000,000 on the bottom line. Same thing with a few extra parts to make a trackball in a laptop. Modern (and many years now) trackballs are super easy to clean - and that's not the manufacturer's problem anyway.

          – manassehkatz
          14 hours ago






        • 2





          As trackballs are spherical, if you want the ball to be an inch wide for easy handling, that means your laptop will also have to be at least an inch thick.

          – Kaz
          14 hours ago






        • 3





          @Kaz - 1" is close to the size of a Logitech M570. Actually, you can have - and I have seen in laptops - much smaller trackballs. But once you get under 1/2" it just isn't as usable. The first generations of laptops could handle 1/2" (or even a little larger) without affecting overall system thickness. But the times they have changed...

          – manassehkatz
          14 hours ago






        • 2





          I feel there has to be more to the laptop thing than described here. Neither of the given reasons holds true for expensive high performance laptops (for which the price difference isn't all that significant and which are thick enough anyway) and these don't seem to have them anymore either...

          – Jasper
          8 hours ago

















        The cost of moving parts is an interesting question. I wonder if that affects not so much manufacturing cost as TCO? Moving parts get clogged with dust, and need to be fixed.

        – rwallace
        15 hours ago





        The cost of moving parts is an interesting question. I wonder if that affects not so much manufacturing cost as TCO? Moving parts get clogged with dust, and need to be fixed.

        – rwallace
        15 hours ago




        1




        1





        Manufacturing cost. Why do you think Dell kept making their keyboards smaller and smaller - keys the same size (until they went to chiclets! Bad for PCjr but people got used to them with laptops and now desktops come with them...) but kept decreasing the border/bezel size - $1 saved in manufacturing x 1,000,000 keyboards = $1,000,000 on the bottom line. Same thing with a few extra parts to make a trackball in a laptop. Modern (and many years now) trackballs are super easy to clean - and that's not the manufacturer's problem anyway.

        – manassehkatz
        14 hours ago





        Manufacturing cost. Why do you think Dell kept making their keyboards smaller and smaller - keys the same size (until they went to chiclets! Bad for PCjr but people got used to them with laptops and now desktops come with them...) but kept decreasing the border/bezel size - $1 saved in manufacturing x 1,000,000 keyboards = $1,000,000 on the bottom line. Same thing with a few extra parts to make a trackball in a laptop. Modern (and many years now) trackballs are super easy to clean - and that's not the manufacturer's problem anyway.

        – manassehkatz
        14 hours ago




        2




        2





        As trackballs are spherical, if you want the ball to be an inch wide for easy handling, that means your laptop will also have to be at least an inch thick.

        – Kaz
        14 hours ago





        As trackballs are spherical, if you want the ball to be an inch wide for easy handling, that means your laptop will also have to be at least an inch thick.

        – Kaz
        14 hours ago




        3




        3





        @Kaz - 1" is close to the size of a Logitech M570. Actually, you can have - and I have seen in laptops - much smaller trackballs. But once you get under 1/2" it just isn't as usable. The first generations of laptops could handle 1/2" (or even a little larger) without affecting overall system thickness. But the times they have changed...

        – manassehkatz
        14 hours ago





        @Kaz - 1" is close to the size of a Logitech M570. Actually, you can have - and I have seen in laptops - much smaller trackballs. But once you get under 1/2" it just isn't as usable. The first generations of laptops could handle 1/2" (or even a little larger) without affecting overall system thickness. But the times they have changed...

        – manassehkatz
        14 hours ago




        2




        2





        I feel there has to be more to the laptop thing than described here. Neither of the given reasons holds true for expensive high performance laptops (for which the price difference isn't all that significant and which are thick enough anyway) and these don't seem to have them anymore either...

        – Jasper
        8 hours ago





        I feel there has to be more to the laptop thing than described here. Neither of the given reasons holds true for expensive high performance laptops (for which the price difference isn't all that significant and which are thick enough anyway) and these don't seem to have them anymore either...

        – Jasper
        8 hours ago











        3














        Dirt is another issue.



        In a mouse, the hole where the ball is exposed is pointed down and stuff naturally falls out. On a trackball it naturally falls in. Goop, especially skin oils, gets stuck to the tracker wheels in either case, but general dirt, crumbs and fuzz is a bigger problem on trackballs.



        Arcade machines had the advantage that they sort of floated in the case so the area under the ball was open and the crap just fell into the chassis. In the case of desktop trackballs, where the case was wrapped tightly, it was a bigger issue.



        A friend who did DTP for a living (remember those days?) had cleaning her trackball down to an art, flipping, opening, shaking and then back together in a single fluid motion.






        share|improve this answer



















        • 1





          It used to be a problem. But on the M570 (which I've used for a few years, and before that the red-ball wired version (ball is actually physically compatible - same exact size, and case is basically the same size, just edges a little more curved, plus no cord on the M570), you just flip it over, push out the ball with any pen/pencil sized object (blunt end, not the tip) and then wipe out (finger, pencil eraser or whatever) the dirt from 3 spots. Pop the ball back in and done. Takes less time to clean than to write this comment.

          – manassehkatz
          5 hours ago






        • 1





          But still, you have to do it at all. Mice no longer have a ball, or even a hole. Nor do any of the other devices being mentioned. The ball, though, it has a ball - although I could imagine solutions that fake the movement.

          – Maury Markowitz
          5 hours ago











        • All true. But on the other hand, while mice no longer have a ball, when they DID have a ball they had the same cleaning issue (often worse) as trackballs. And I find that many newer mice will have trouble on various surfaces (varies by type/brand/model of mouse, but often glass or slick surfaces). A trackball works on any surface because it doesn't actually use the surface.

          – manassehkatz
          5 hours ago
















        3














        Dirt is another issue.



        In a mouse, the hole where the ball is exposed is pointed down and stuff naturally falls out. On a trackball it naturally falls in. Goop, especially skin oils, gets stuck to the tracker wheels in either case, but general dirt, crumbs and fuzz is a bigger problem on trackballs.



        Arcade machines had the advantage that they sort of floated in the case so the area under the ball was open and the crap just fell into the chassis. In the case of desktop trackballs, where the case was wrapped tightly, it was a bigger issue.



        A friend who did DTP for a living (remember those days?) had cleaning her trackball down to an art, flipping, opening, shaking and then back together in a single fluid motion.






        share|improve this answer



















        • 1





          It used to be a problem. But on the M570 (which I've used for a few years, and before that the red-ball wired version (ball is actually physically compatible - same exact size, and case is basically the same size, just edges a little more curved, plus no cord on the M570), you just flip it over, push out the ball with any pen/pencil sized object (blunt end, not the tip) and then wipe out (finger, pencil eraser or whatever) the dirt from 3 spots. Pop the ball back in and done. Takes less time to clean than to write this comment.

          – manassehkatz
          5 hours ago






        • 1





          But still, you have to do it at all. Mice no longer have a ball, or even a hole. Nor do any of the other devices being mentioned. The ball, though, it has a ball - although I could imagine solutions that fake the movement.

          – Maury Markowitz
          5 hours ago











        • All true. But on the other hand, while mice no longer have a ball, when they DID have a ball they had the same cleaning issue (often worse) as trackballs. And I find that many newer mice will have trouble on various surfaces (varies by type/brand/model of mouse, but often glass or slick surfaces). A trackball works on any surface because it doesn't actually use the surface.

          – manassehkatz
          5 hours ago














        3












        3








        3







        Dirt is another issue.



        In a mouse, the hole where the ball is exposed is pointed down and stuff naturally falls out. On a trackball it naturally falls in. Goop, especially skin oils, gets stuck to the tracker wheels in either case, but general dirt, crumbs and fuzz is a bigger problem on trackballs.



        Arcade machines had the advantage that they sort of floated in the case so the area under the ball was open and the crap just fell into the chassis. In the case of desktop trackballs, where the case was wrapped tightly, it was a bigger issue.



        A friend who did DTP for a living (remember those days?) had cleaning her trackball down to an art, flipping, opening, shaking and then back together in a single fluid motion.






        share|improve this answer













        Dirt is another issue.



        In a mouse, the hole where the ball is exposed is pointed down and stuff naturally falls out. On a trackball it naturally falls in. Goop, especially skin oils, gets stuck to the tracker wheels in either case, but general dirt, crumbs and fuzz is a bigger problem on trackballs.



        Arcade machines had the advantage that they sort of floated in the case so the area under the ball was open and the crap just fell into the chassis. In the case of desktop trackballs, where the case was wrapped tightly, it was a bigger issue.



        A friend who did DTP for a living (remember those days?) had cleaning her trackball down to an art, flipping, opening, shaking and then back together in a single fluid motion.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 5 hours ago









        Maury MarkowitzMaury Markowitz

        2,316524




        2,316524








        • 1





          It used to be a problem. But on the M570 (which I've used for a few years, and before that the red-ball wired version (ball is actually physically compatible - same exact size, and case is basically the same size, just edges a little more curved, plus no cord on the M570), you just flip it over, push out the ball with any pen/pencil sized object (blunt end, not the tip) and then wipe out (finger, pencil eraser or whatever) the dirt from 3 spots. Pop the ball back in and done. Takes less time to clean than to write this comment.

          – manassehkatz
          5 hours ago






        • 1





          But still, you have to do it at all. Mice no longer have a ball, or even a hole. Nor do any of the other devices being mentioned. The ball, though, it has a ball - although I could imagine solutions that fake the movement.

          – Maury Markowitz
          5 hours ago











        • All true. But on the other hand, while mice no longer have a ball, when they DID have a ball they had the same cleaning issue (often worse) as trackballs. And I find that many newer mice will have trouble on various surfaces (varies by type/brand/model of mouse, but often glass or slick surfaces). A trackball works on any surface because it doesn't actually use the surface.

          – manassehkatz
          5 hours ago














        • 1





          It used to be a problem. But on the M570 (which I've used for a few years, and before that the red-ball wired version (ball is actually physically compatible - same exact size, and case is basically the same size, just edges a little more curved, plus no cord on the M570), you just flip it over, push out the ball with any pen/pencil sized object (blunt end, not the tip) and then wipe out (finger, pencil eraser or whatever) the dirt from 3 spots. Pop the ball back in and done. Takes less time to clean than to write this comment.

          – manassehkatz
          5 hours ago






        • 1





          But still, you have to do it at all. Mice no longer have a ball, or even a hole. Nor do any of the other devices being mentioned. The ball, though, it has a ball - although I could imagine solutions that fake the movement.

          – Maury Markowitz
          5 hours ago











        • All true. But on the other hand, while mice no longer have a ball, when they DID have a ball they had the same cleaning issue (often worse) as trackballs. And I find that many newer mice will have trouble on various surfaces (varies by type/brand/model of mouse, but often glass or slick surfaces). A trackball works on any surface because it doesn't actually use the surface.

          – manassehkatz
          5 hours ago








        1




        1





        It used to be a problem. But on the M570 (which I've used for a few years, and before that the red-ball wired version (ball is actually physically compatible - same exact size, and case is basically the same size, just edges a little more curved, plus no cord on the M570), you just flip it over, push out the ball with any pen/pencil sized object (blunt end, not the tip) and then wipe out (finger, pencil eraser or whatever) the dirt from 3 spots. Pop the ball back in and done. Takes less time to clean than to write this comment.

        – manassehkatz
        5 hours ago





        It used to be a problem. But on the M570 (which I've used for a few years, and before that the red-ball wired version (ball is actually physically compatible - same exact size, and case is basically the same size, just edges a little more curved, plus no cord on the M570), you just flip it over, push out the ball with any pen/pencil sized object (blunt end, not the tip) and then wipe out (finger, pencil eraser or whatever) the dirt from 3 spots. Pop the ball back in and done. Takes less time to clean than to write this comment.

        – manassehkatz
        5 hours ago




        1




        1





        But still, you have to do it at all. Mice no longer have a ball, or even a hole. Nor do any of the other devices being mentioned. The ball, though, it has a ball - although I could imagine solutions that fake the movement.

        – Maury Markowitz
        5 hours ago





        But still, you have to do it at all. Mice no longer have a ball, or even a hole. Nor do any of the other devices being mentioned. The ball, though, it has a ball - although I could imagine solutions that fake the movement.

        – Maury Markowitz
        5 hours ago













        All true. But on the other hand, while mice no longer have a ball, when they DID have a ball they had the same cleaning issue (often worse) as trackballs. And I find that many newer mice will have trouble on various surfaces (varies by type/brand/model of mouse, but often glass or slick surfaces). A trackball works on any surface because it doesn't actually use the surface.

        – manassehkatz
        5 hours ago





        All true. But on the other hand, while mice no longer have a ball, when they DID have a ball they had the same cleaning issue (often worse) as trackballs. And I find that many newer mice will have trouble on various surfaces (varies by type/brand/model of mouse, but often glass or slick surfaces). A trackball works on any surface because it doesn't actually use the surface.

        – manassehkatz
        5 hours ago











        2














        Gaming



        I can't play FPS or flight simulators with a trackball because I cannot intuitively self-center them. The only games they're good for are bowling and Missile Command - because those are played on an arcade cabinet with you standing in front of it.



        It's a lot easier to stop a mouse on-target, then it is to stop a trackball - with a finger still on it, or having removed it. And if you freak out, all of a sudden you're looking at the sky.



        If I didn't game I'd still be using my trackball.



        Fatigue



        I had two different trackballs. One was the size of a pool ball, the other was ping-pong sized, placed beside your thumb.



        Pool ball: there's no where to rest your palm. And the buttons are your pinky and your thumb. Kinda wack.



        Thumb size: well, if you've ever used a gaming controller with thumbsticks for hours on end, I don't need to explain how that begins to suck.



        Switching to my middle or ring finger while using a standard mouse, instead of my fatigued index finger, isn't really an option on a 'pool ball' - and it's definitely not an option on an "ergonomically" hand shaped trackball mouse.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          That just isn't true, it's perfectly possible to play games with a trackball.

          – deepy
          9 hours ago











        • Not Freelancer. And I would totally suck at CoD if you made me use a trackball, even though I grew up using one.

          – Mazura
          9 hours ago













        • I love using trackballs for FPS. How else can you do 360 rotations sprawing people with bullets!

          – TafT
          8 hours ago






        • 2





          When I saw the word 'gaming', my first thought was "hey wait, the trackball was great for... Oh, you mentioned missile command" :)

          – rwallace
          7 hours ago






        • 1





          For gaming it depends a lot on the game and how (pointing) device handling is turned into game action. if it's about exact movement to certain screen areas, like pushing buttons or clicking items, a mouse may be best. But if the game works on continuous movement, as well as various movement speed and coverage of large area with linear movement. a trackball will give true advantage.

          – Raffzahn
          5 hours ago
















        2














        Gaming



        I can't play FPS or flight simulators with a trackball because I cannot intuitively self-center them. The only games they're good for are bowling and Missile Command - because those are played on an arcade cabinet with you standing in front of it.



        It's a lot easier to stop a mouse on-target, then it is to stop a trackball - with a finger still on it, or having removed it. And if you freak out, all of a sudden you're looking at the sky.



        If I didn't game I'd still be using my trackball.



        Fatigue



        I had two different trackballs. One was the size of a pool ball, the other was ping-pong sized, placed beside your thumb.



        Pool ball: there's no where to rest your palm. And the buttons are your pinky and your thumb. Kinda wack.



        Thumb size: well, if you've ever used a gaming controller with thumbsticks for hours on end, I don't need to explain how that begins to suck.



        Switching to my middle or ring finger while using a standard mouse, instead of my fatigued index finger, isn't really an option on a 'pool ball' - and it's definitely not an option on an "ergonomically" hand shaped trackball mouse.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          That just isn't true, it's perfectly possible to play games with a trackball.

          – deepy
          9 hours ago











        • Not Freelancer. And I would totally suck at CoD if you made me use a trackball, even though I grew up using one.

          – Mazura
          9 hours ago













        • I love using trackballs for FPS. How else can you do 360 rotations sprawing people with bullets!

          – TafT
          8 hours ago






        • 2





          When I saw the word 'gaming', my first thought was "hey wait, the trackball was great for... Oh, you mentioned missile command" :)

          – rwallace
          7 hours ago






        • 1





          For gaming it depends a lot on the game and how (pointing) device handling is turned into game action. if it's about exact movement to certain screen areas, like pushing buttons or clicking items, a mouse may be best. But if the game works on continuous movement, as well as various movement speed and coverage of large area with linear movement. a trackball will give true advantage.

          – Raffzahn
          5 hours ago














        2












        2








        2







        Gaming



        I can't play FPS or flight simulators with a trackball because I cannot intuitively self-center them. The only games they're good for are bowling and Missile Command - because those are played on an arcade cabinet with you standing in front of it.



        It's a lot easier to stop a mouse on-target, then it is to stop a trackball - with a finger still on it, or having removed it. And if you freak out, all of a sudden you're looking at the sky.



        If I didn't game I'd still be using my trackball.



        Fatigue



        I had two different trackballs. One was the size of a pool ball, the other was ping-pong sized, placed beside your thumb.



        Pool ball: there's no where to rest your palm. And the buttons are your pinky and your thumb. Kinda wack.



        Thumb size: well, if you've ever used a gaming controller with thumbsticks for hours on end, I don't need to explain how that begins to suck.



        Switching to my middle or ring finger while using a standard mouse, instead of my fatigued index finger, isn't really an option on a 'pool ball' - and it's definitely not an option on an "ergonomically" hand shaped trackball mouse.






        share|improve this answer















        Gaming



        I can't play FPS or flight simulators with a trackball because I cannot intuitively self-center them. The only games they're good for are bowling and Missile Command - because those are played on an arcade cabinet with you standing in front of it.



        It's a lot easier to stop a mouse on-target, then it is to stop a trackball - with a finger still on it, or having removed it. And if you freak out, all of a sudden you're looking at the sky.



        If I didn't game I'd still be using my trackball.



        Fatigue



        I had two different trackballs. One was the size of a pool ball, the other was ping-pong sized, placed beside your thumb.



        Pool ball: there's no where to rest your palm. And the buttons are your pinky and your thumb. Kinda wack.



        Thumb size: well, if you've ever used a gaming controller with thumbsticks for hours on end, I don't need to explain how that begins to suck.



        Switching to my middle or ring finger while using a standard mouse, instead of my fatigued index finger, isn't really an option on a 'pool ball' - and it's definitely not an option on an "ergonomically" hand shaped trackball mouse.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago

























        answered 10 hours ago









        MazuraMazura

        20716




        20716








        • 1





          That just isn't true, it's perfectly possible to play games with a trackball.

          – deepy
          9 hours ago











        • Not Freelancer. And I would totally suck at CoD if you made me use a trackball, even though I grew up using one.

          – Mazura
          9 hours ago













        • I love using trackballs for FPS. How else can you do 360 rotations sprawing people with bullets!

          – TafT
          8 hours ago






        • 2





          When I saw the word 'gaming', my first thought was "hey wait, the trackball was great for... Oh, you mentioned missile command" :)

          – rwallace
          7 hours ago






        • 1





          For gaming it depends a lot on the game and how (pointing) device handling is turned into game action. if it's about exact movement to certain screen areas, like pushing buttons or clicking items, a mouse may be best. But if the game works on continuous movement, as well as various movement speed and coverage of large area with linear movement. a trackball will give true advantage.

          – Raffzahn
          5 hours ago














        • 1





          That just isn't true, it's perfectly possible to play games with a trackball.

          – deepy
          9 hours ago











        • Not Freelancer. And I would totally suck at CoD if you made me use a trackball, even though I grew up using one.

          – Mazura
          9 hours ago













        • I love using trackballs for FPS. How else can you do 360 rotations sprawing people with bullets!

          – TafT
          8 hours ago






        • 2





          When I saw the word 'gaming', my first thought was "hey wait, the trackball was great for... Oh, you mentioned missile command" :)

          – rwallace
          7 hours ago






        • 1





          For gaming it depends a lot on the game and how (pointing) device handling is turned into game action. if it's about exact movement to certain screen areas, like pushing buttons or clicking items, a mouse may be best. But if the game works on continuous movement, as well as various movement speed and coverage of large area with linear movement. a trackball will give true advantage.

          – Raffzahn
          5 hours ago








        1




        1





        That just isn't true, it's perfectly possible to play games with a trackball.

        – deepy
        9 hours ago





        That just isn't true, it's perfectly possible to play games with a trackball.

        – deepy
        9 hours ago













        Not Freelancer. And I would totally suck at CoD if you made me use a trackball, even though I grew up using one.

        – Mazura
        9 hours ago







        Not Freelancer. And I would totally suck at CoD if you made me use a trackball, even though I grew up using one.

        – Mazura
        9 hours ago















        I love using trackballs for FPS. How else can you do 360 rotations sprawing people with bullets!

        – TafT
        8 hours ago





        I love using trackballs for FPS. How else can you do 360 rotations sprawing people with bullets!

        – TafT
        8 hours ago




        2




        2





        When I saw the word 'gaming', my first thought was "hey wait, the trackball was great for... Oh, you mentioned missile command" :)

        – rwallace
        7 hours ago





        When I saw the word 'gaming', my first thought was "hey wait, the trackball was great for... Oh, you mentioned missile command" :)

        – rwallace
        7 hours ago




        1




        1





        For gaming it depends a lot on the game and how (pointing) device handling is turned into game action. if it's about exact movement to certain screen areas, like pushing buttons or clicking items, a mouse may be best. But if the game works on continuous movement, as well as various movement speed and coverage of large area with linear movement. a trackball will give true advantage.

        – Raffzahn
        5 hours ago





        For gaming it depends a lot on the game and how (pointing) device handling is turned into game action. if it's about exact movement to certain screen areas, like pushing buttons or clicking items, a mouse may be best. But if the game works on continuous movement, as well as various movement speed and coverage of large area with linear movement. a trackball will give true advantage.

        – Raffzahn
        5 hours ago











        2














        I'm using a trackball myself right now. I saw about 12 of them on sale at Best Buy last week. Three of my coworkers use them. I"m not sure where you get that they 'went away' but they haven't. I think it's great for desk space, for precision (I love to game with it over a mouse, which I have to pick up and move back all the time) and to reduce hand fatigue.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        MarkTO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.
















        • 1





          I think his main point is that they went away in laptops as an integrated pointing device.

          – JPhi1618
          5 hours ago
















        2














        I'm using a trackball myself right now. I saw about 12 of them on sale at Best Buy last week. Three of my coworkers use them. I"m not sure where you get that they 'went away' but they haven't. I think it's great for desk space, for precision (I love to game with it over a mouse, which I have to pick up and move back all the time) and to reduce hand fatigue.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        MarkTO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.
















        • 1





          I think his main point is that they went away in laptops as an integrated pointing device.

          – JPhi1618
          5 hours ago














        2












        2








        2







        I'm using a trackball myself right now. I saw about 12 of them on sale at Best Buy last week. Three of my coworkers use them. I"m not sure where you get that they 'went away' but they haven't. I think it's great for desk space, for precision (I love to game with it over a mouse, which I have to pick up and move back all the time) and to reduce hand fatigue.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        MarkTO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        I'm using a trackball myself right now. I saw about 12 of them on sale at Best Buy last week. Three of my coworkers use them. I"m not sure where you get that they 'went away' but they haven't. I think it's great for desk space, for precision (I love to game with it over a mouse, which I have to pick up and move back all the time) and to reduce hand fatigue.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        MarkTO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        MarkTO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 6 hours ago









        MarkTOMarkTO

        1212




        1212




        New contributor




        MarkTO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        MarkTO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        MarkTO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        • 1





          I think his main point is that they went away in laptops as an integrated pointing device.

          – JPhi1618
          5 hours ago














        • 1





          I think his main point is that they went away in laptops as an integrated pointing device.

          – JPhi1618
          5 hours ago








        1




        1





        I think his main point is that they went away in laptops as an integrated pointing device.

        – JPhi1618
        5 hours ago





        I think his main point is that they went away in laptops as an integrated pointing device.

        – JPhi1618
        5 hours ago











        2














        As other have noted trackballs aren't dead ("disappeared").
        But compared to other input methods trackballs are indeed much less popular or widespread as they once were.



        Cost, scale, competing products, path dependencies and consumer psychology are the reasons for this development



        Trackballs are great. They added a cool, effective, efficient way to move a pointer on screen. So did the mouse. Which is 'better'? That's largely opinion. I have one.



        Both devices cost money to buy. The trackball is in use since 1946 the computer mouse is much younger.



        The point is: a trackball needs training to use it effectively and efficiently.
        But so does a mouse. It also 'needs training' for real first timers (remember intro-screens, handbooks explaining how it works; like 'point', 'click', 'hold' and 'drag'? Later even intro-videos, now still around for trackpad gestures etc). So this is really the cheap mouse being 'good enough' and training a user for the "wrong" kind of device.



        The learning curve for a trackball is probably not much steeper, if any, than for a mouse for a novice.



        This is much like people reluctant to switch from QWERTZ to Dvorak or Neo keyboard layouts. Fast 4-finger typists are equally reluctant to really learn 10-finger blind typing, as they are initially even slowed by the new method.



        Once companies like Apple delivered their computers with a mouse to a public not used to anything else but keyboards or awkward joysticks, this set a path to lower the cost for manufacturing mice and training users to use a mouse. Switching 'back' (to the conceptually older and at least equally efficient device) was from then on only for the really dedicated.



        You witness the same process now by each and everyone adding 'touch' to devices that do not benefit from it (TouchBar anyone?). This devolution towards the lowest common denominator is great for perfect neophytes. A two-year-old now handles tablets with ease. That this doesn't foster intelligent development and hampers efficient methods of inputting in the future is a cost we seem to enjoy paying.






        share|improve this answer






























          2














          As other have noted trackballs aren't dead ("disappeared").
          But compared to other input methods trackballs are indeed much less popular or widespread as they once were.



          Cost, scale, competing products, path dependencies and consumer psychology are the reasons for this development



          Trackballs are great. They added a cool, effective, efficient way to move a pointer on screen. So did the mouse. Which is 'better'? That's largely opinion. I have one.



          Both devices cost money to buy. The trackball is in use since 1946 the computer mouse is much younger.



          The point is: a trackball needs training to use it effectively and efficiently.
          But so does a mouse. It also 'needs training' for real first timers (remember intro-screens, handbooks explaining how it works; like 'point', 'click', 'hold' and 'drag'? Later even intro-videos, now still around for trackpad gestures etc). So this is really the cheap mouse being 'good enough' and training a user for the "wrong" kind of device.



          The learning curve for a trackball is probably not much steeper, if any, than for a mouse for a novice.



          This is much like people reluctant to switch from QWERTZ to Dvorak or Neo keyboard layouts. Fast 4-finger typists are equally reluctant to really learn 10-finger blind typing, as they are initially even slowed by the new method.



          Once companies like Apple delivered their computers with a mouse to a public not used to anything else but keyboards or awkward joysticks, this set a path to lower the cost for manufacturing mice and training users to use a mouse. Switching 'back' (to the conceptually older and at least equally efficient device) was from then on only for the really dedicated.



          You witness the same process now by each and everyone adding 'touch' to devices that do not benefit from it (TouchBar anyone?). This devolution towards the lowest common denominator is great for perfect neophytes. A two-year-old now handles tablets with ease. That this doesn't foster intelligent development and hampers efficient methods of inputting in the future is a cost we seem to enjoy paying.






          share|improve this answer




























            2












            2








            2







            As other have noted trackballs aren't dead ("disappeared").
            But compared to other input methods trackballs are indeed much less popular or widespread as they once were.



            Cost, scale, competing products, path dependencies and consumer psychology are the reasons for this development



            Trackballs are great. They added a cool, effective, efficient way to move a pointer on screen. So did the mouse. Which is 'better'? That's largely opinion. I have one.



            Both devices cost money to buy. The trackball is in use since 1946 the computer mouse is much younger.



            The point is: a trackball needs training to use it effectively and efficiently.
            But so does a mouse. It also 'needs training' for real first timers (remember intro-screens, handbooks explaining how it works; like 'point', 'click', 'hold' and 'drag'? Later even intro-videos, now still around for trackpad gestures etc). So this is really the cheap mouse being 'good enough' and training a user for the "wrong" kind of device.



            The learning curve for a trackball is probably not much steeper, if any, than for a mouse for a novice.



            This is much like people reluctant to switch from QWERTZ to Dvorak or Neo keyboard layouts. Fast 4-finger typists are equally reluctant to really learn 10-finger blind typing, as they are initially even slowed by the new method.



            Once companies like Apple delivered their computers with a mouse to a public not used to anything else but keyboards or awkward joysticks, this set a path to lower the cost for manufacturing mice and training users to use a mouse. Switching 'back' (to the conceptually older and at least equally efficient device) was from then on only for the really dedicated.



            You witness the same process now by each and everyone adding 'touch' to devices that do not benefit from it (TouchBar anyone?). This devolution towards the lowest common denominator is great for perfect neophytes. A two-year-old now handles tablets with ease. That this doesn't foster intelligent development and hampers efficient methods of inputting in the future is a cost we seem to enjoy paying.






            share|improve this answer















            As other have noted trackballs aren't dead ("disappeared").
            But compared to other input methods trackballs are indeed much less popular or widespread as they once were.



            Cost, scale, competing products, path dependencies and consumer psychology are the reasons for this development



            Trackballs are great. They added a cool, effective, efficient way to move a pointer on screen. So did the mouse. Which is 'better'? That's largely opinion. I have one.



            Both devices cost money to buy. The trackball is in use since 1946 the computer mouse is much younger.



            The point is: a trackball needs training to use it effectively and efficiently.
            But so does a mouse. It also 'needs training' for real first timers (remember intro-screens, handbooks explaining how it works; like 'point', 'click', 'hold' and 'drag'? Later even intro-videos, now still around for trackpad gestures etc). So this is really the cheap mouse being 'good enough' and training a user for the "wrong" kind of device.



            The learning curve for a trackball is probably not much steeper, if any, than for a mouse for a novice.



            This is much like people reluctant to switch from QWERTZ to Dvorak or Neo keyboard layouts. Fast 4-finger typists are equally reluctant to really learn 10-finger blind typing, as they are initially even slowed by the new method.



            Once companies like Apple delivered their computers with a mouse to a public not used to anything else but keyboards or awkward joysticks, this set a path to lower the cost for manufacturing mice and training users to use a mouse. Switching 'back' (to the conceptually older and at least equally efficient device) was from then on only for the really dedicated.



            You witness the same process now by each and everyone adding 'touch' to devices that do not benefit from it (TouchBar anyone?). This devolution towards the lowest common denominator is great for perfect neophytes. A two-year-old now handles tablets with ease. That this doesn't foster intelligent development and hampers efficient methods of inputting in the future is a cost we seem to enjoy paying.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 4 hours ago

























            answered 5 hours ago









            LangLangCLangLangC

            4461211




            4461211























                1














                As the other answer said, trackballs are live and well. I use a track ball on my PC as well as Mac. I found a fantastic brand whose trackball lets it connect with 2 different computers.



                I will add that I find trackballs hard to use for games like fornight where you need to move your player fast. For this, I prefer a mouse.



                Other than that I will take a trackball over mouse every chance I have. I prefer the trackball because I get less cramping in my hand with extensive use, over most mice.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                  1














                  As the other answer said, trackballs are live and well. I use a track ball on my PC as well as Mac. I found a fantastic brand whose trackball lets it connect with 2 different computers.



                  I will add that I find trackballs hard to use for games like fornight where you need to move your player fast. For this, I prefer a mouse.



                  Other than that I will take a trackball over mouse every chance I have. I prefer the trackball because I get less cramping in my hand with extensive use, over most mice.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    As the other answer said, trackballs are live and well. I use a track ball on my PC as well as Mac. I found a fantastic brand whose trackball lets it connect with 2 different computers.



                    I will add that I find trackballs hard to use for games like fornight where you need to move your player fast. For this, I prefer a mouse.



                    Other than that I will take a trackball over mouse every chance I have. I prefer the trackball because I get less cramping in my hand with extensive use, over most mice.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.










                    As the other answer said, trackballs are live and well. I use a track ball on my PC as well as Mac. I found a fantastic brand whose trackball lets it connect with 2 different computers.



                    I will add that I find trackballs hard to use for games like fornight where you need to move your player fast. For this, I prefer a mouse.



                    Other than that I will take a trackball over mouse every chance I have. I prefer the trackball because I get less cramping in my hand with extensive use, over most mice.







                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer






                    New contributor




                    matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered 7 hours ago









                    mattmatt

                    212




                    212




                    New contributor




                    matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.























                        0














                        One disadvantage is that they are hard to use for users that prefer using a mouse at high acceleration and with the wrist resting - of course using it with a fingertip like a mouse wheel is possible, but rather awkward (especially when the trackball is not made very precisely and tends to seize and jam a bit)....






                        share|improve this answer




























                          0














                          One disadvantage is that they are hard to use for users that prefer using a mouse at high acceleration and with the wrist resting - of course using it with a fingertip like a mouse wheel is possible, but rather awkward (especially when the trackball is not made very precisely and tends to seize and jam a bit)....






                          share|improve this answer


























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            One disadvantage is that they are hard to use for users that prefer using a mouse at high acceleration and with the wrist resting - of course using it with a fingertip like a mouse wheel is possible, but rather awkward (especially when the trackball is not made very precisely and tends to seize and jam a bit)....






                            share|improve this answer













                            One disadvantage is that they are hard to use for users that prefer using a mouse at high acceleration and with the wrist resting - of course using it with a fingertip like a mouse wheel is possible, but rather awkward (especially when the trackball is not made very precisely and tends to seize and jam a bit)....







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 38 mins ago









                            rackandbonemanrackandboneman

                            3,547815




                            3,547815






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8787%2fwhy-did-trackballs-disappear%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Callistus I

                                Tabula Rosettana

                                How to label and detect the document text images